July 15 Presentation to Transition Advisroy Team on Procurement
1. PRESENTATION TO
LSU TRANSITION ADVISORY TEAM
JOINT MEETING OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES,
TECHNOLOGY, STREAMLINING TASK FORCES
Presented by Marie C Frank
LSU Office of Procurement Services
2. Agenda
1. Introduction
2. LSU System Overview
3. LSU Shared Services
4. Procurement Evolution
5. Subcommittee Recommendations:
1. Pilot Procurement Code and Structure
2. eProcurement System
3. Spend Analysis and Savings Opportunity in Procurement
6. Savings Examples
2
3. Subcommittee Members
Subcommittee members include the following:
Marie C Frank, Executive Director of
Procurement Services, LSU
James Frazier, Associate Director of
Procurement Services, LSU
Wendy Simoneaux, Assistant Vice President for
Budget & Finance, LSU System
Monica Mougeot, Director of Fiscal Operations,
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Larry Williams, Director of Purchasing, LSU
Alexandria
3
4. Subcommittee Members
Subcommittee members include the following:
Donnie Thibodeaux, Assistant to the Vice
Chancellor for Business Services, LSU Eunice
Bill Wolfe, Director of Human Resource
Management, LSU Shreveport
Jan Bernath, Director of Accounting Services,
LSU Agriculture Center
Angela Neal, Acting Director of Purchasing and
Materials Management, LSU HSC Shreveport
Rob Parker, Director of Purchasing, LSU HSC
New Orleans
4
5. Subcommittee Members
Subcommittee members include the following:
Ben Lousteau, Fiscal Analyst, LSU HSC New
Orleans
Glenn Ducote, Attorney at Law
Vic Cleveland, Manager of Contracting &
Procurement, Shell Geismar LP
Tony Calcagno, Procurement Director, CB&I
Ron Krajewski, Specialty Underwriters
5
6. LSU System Overview
6
# of
STAFF
REPORTS TO ANNUAL
SPEND
ANNUAL # OF
PURCHASE
ORDERS
# OF
SOLICITATION
S
SYSTEM
LSU BR (1) 19 VC of Finance &
Administration
$230 M 6,900 450 PRO
LSU AG (9) 2 Associate VC for
Administration
$20 M 784 152 PRO
LSUE (6) 2 VC Business
Affairs
$16.5 M 900 9 PRO
LSUA (2) 2 VC of Finance $4.5 M 1,075 35 PRO
PENNINGTON (3) 3 AED of
Operations/Chief
of Staff
$10 M 415 18 PRO
LSU LAW (8) 1 VC of
Administrative &
Finance
$3.8 M 59 10 PRO
LSU HSC NO 10 VC of
Administration &
Finance
$ 61.4 M 4,019 200 PEOPLESOFT
LSU HSC SHREV PEOPLESOFT
LSUS ** 2 VC Business
Affairs
$4.7 M 1,950 98 Integrow
Total 41 $350.9 M 16102 972
7. LSU Shared Services
7
Institution
Formal
Solicitations
Professional
Services
PRO
System Facilities
Property
Management
Financial
Accounting,
Payroll, and
Benefit
Administration
LaCarte
Card
LSU Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
LSU Alexandria N N Y N Y Y Y
LSU Eunice N N Y N Y Y Y
LSU Ag Center Y N Y Y/N Y Y Y
LSU Law Center Y N Y N Y Y Y
PBRC Y N Y N N Y Y
LSU System Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
11. #1 – Pilot Procurement Code
and Structure
Recommendation: The Pilot Procurement Code
being created for LSU should apply to all
institutions under a “Shared Services” Model.
Challenge: Currently, LSU Shreveport, LSU
HSC New Orleans and LSU HSC Shreveport do
not currently operate under LSU’s Shared
Services Model.
11
12. UPPC
Used in lieu of:
Louisiana Procurement Code for
goods and services
Laws governing professional,
personal, consulting and social
services
Laws governing equipment and
services governed by the Office of
Information Technology
12
13. #1 – Pilot Procurement Code
and Structure
Where are we now?
Received approval from the Board of Regents
Received approval from the LSU Board of
Supervisors
Received approval from the DOA as the “initial
qualifying institution” subject to approval of the
UPPC
Received approval of the UPPC from DOA
Issued a Notice of Intent to begin promulgation
of the code into the Louisiana Administrative
13
14. UPPC – What does it Do?
Adopt a procurement code that is simple –
freedom from unnecessary bureaucratic
processes
14
15.
16. UPPC – What does it Do?
Ability to use more competitive strategies –
limits, electronic processes, selection… every
method for determining low cost and best
value
EXAMPLES: Increased Thresholds, Office
Supplies, Reverse Auctions
16
17. Office Max
Analyzed spend of LSU and its Shared
Services Institutions to be $2 M per year
Sought and received approval from the DOA to
issue an RFP (best value) as opposed to an
ITB (lowest cost)
Current laws limited specifications to narrow
terms and scoring/negotiation methods
Awarded to Office Max for a signing bonus,
volume rebate and 25-55% discounts on all
items.
17
18. Reverse Auctions
Very similar to eBay auctions where the
suppliers bid for the contract
The ability for suppliers to participate is
minimal and entirely in an electronic
environment
Louisiana Procurement Code passed recent
law to allow the use of Reverse Auctions but
only to be conducted by the Division of
Administration
18
19. UPPC – What does it Do?
Ability to solicit/contract for the most cost
effective term
EXAMPLE: Bus Transit
Use effective methods for public notice
EXAMPLE: Electronic notification of solicitations
Utilize new technology – eProcurement and
employ supplier technology
EXAMPLE: Cooperative Purchasing Catalog
Enablement's
Apply commodity strategies
EXAMPLE: Scientific and IT supplies/equipment
19
20. Pilot Procurement Code
REMAINING STEPS TO
IMPLEMENT:
Approval of the Joint Legislative Committee
on the Budget (JLCB)
Development and approval of Procurement
Policies which are 60% complete
Final approval of the LSU Board of
Supervisors
Execute Change Management within LSU
20
21. #2 – eProcurement System
Recommendation: LSU electronic procurement
system (Sciquest) should be expanded and
utilized by all institutions either under the Shared
Services Model or through the use of acquired
Business Units of Sciquest.
Opportunity: The increase of electronic
methods of procurement will increase efficiency
and savings because it serves as the tool to
bridge the flexibilities of the UPPC and the other
institutions; however, the challenge is to
dedicate resources necessary to implement
21
23. eProcurement
Electronic Public Notice
Electronic Solicitation
Electronic Signatures
Reverse Auctions
Strategic Sourcing
Negotiated Hosted Catalogs
Real-time Competition at Dollar 1
23
24. #3 – Spend Analysis and
Savings Opportunities in
Procurement24
Recommendation: Identify savings
opportunities across all institutions through
spend analysis and the utilization of strategic
sourcing strategies to procure goods and
services and revenue-generating opportunities
through the optimal channels with the best
suppliers.
Challenge: The lack of tools, integration and
disparate data sources; however, the opportunity
exists for this recommendation to act as bridge
for consolidating all the data across all the
25. FY 2012 – Spend Analysis
Total Spend ≈ $252M
Breakdown by Institution:
≈ $189M – LSU Main Campus
≈ $25M – LSU Agricultural Center
≈ $12M – Pennington Biomedical Research Center
≈ $11M – LSU System Office
≈ $6M – LSU Eunice
≈ $5M – LSU Alexandria
≈ $4M – Paul M. Hebert Law Center
Data from July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2012
25
39. THANK YOU
MARIE C FRANK, MPA, CPPB
LSU OFFICE OF PROCUREMENT SERVICES
213 THOMAS BOYD HALL
BATON ROUGE, LOUSIANA 70803
(225) 578-2307
MFRANK@LSU.EDU