Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Nous utilisons votre profil LinkedIn et vos données d’activité pour vous proposer des publicités personnalisées et pertinentes. Vous pouvez changer vos préférences de publicités à tout moment.
Chargement dans…3
×
1 sur 22

The radio shack court

0

Partager

Presentation offered to the Judicial Technology Advisory Committee of the Canadian Judicial Council

Livres associés

Gratuit avec un essai de 30 jours de Scribd

Tout voir

Livres audio associés

Gratuit avec un essai de 30 jours de Scribd

Tout voir

The radio shack court

  1. 1. The Radio Shack Courtroom<br />The Case for<br />Paperless Courtrooms<br />Dominic Jaar<br />Consulting<br />
  2. 2. Reality Check<br />2<br />
  3. 3. Reality Check<br />3<br />
  4. 4. Reality Check<br />4<br />
  5. 5. Reality Check<br />5<br />
  6. 6. Reality Check<br />6<br />
  7. 7. Reality Check<br />7<br />Normal<br />
  8. 8. Reality Check<br />8<br />Normal<br />
  9. 9. The Cost of Paper<br />Environmental<br />Space<br />Inefficiency<br />Duplication<br />Search<br />Evidence Integrity<br />Money<br />$0.25 x #Pages x #Exhibits x 4 copies<br />Archive<br />Access to justice<br />9<br />
  10. 10. Judges’ responsabilities?<br />Maintainaccess to justice<br />Reducecosts<br />Learn to judge in a paperlessenvironment<br />Require technologies to beused in the courtroom<br />10<br /><ul><li>Improveaccess to justice</li></ul>- Justice B.T.Granger, The Future isNow, CBA Annualconference, Quebec, July 23, 2008<br />
  11. 11. Lawyers’ Obligations?<br />Maintainaccess to justice<br />Reducecosts<br />Learn to practice in a paperlessenvironment<br />Learn to use technologies in the courtroom<br />11<br /><ul><li>Improveaccess to justice</li></ul>- Dominic Jaar, The Radio ShackCourtroom, Judicial Technology AdvisoryCommittee, St. John’s, August 24th, 2008<br />
  12. 12. Why Technologies<br />Reduce<br />Delays<br />Costs<br />Improve<br />Access to justice<br />Image of justice<br />Efficiency<br />Enhance persuasiveness<br />12<br />
  13. 13. Issues<br />Lawyers’ Inherent Conflict of Interest<br />Printing = profit centers<br />Billable hours<br />Efficiency<br />Education<br />Courtrooms not designed for technologies<br />Judges’<br />13<br />computer literacy<br />IT Support<br />
  14. 14. The Radio Shack Courtroom<br />14<br />Justice B.T. Granger, Taking the next step and why you should, Computer Educational Skills Training Seminar, National Judicial Institute, Halifax, December 11-13, 2007<br />
  15. 15.
  16. 16. DIY Courtroom<br />16<br />
  17. 17. DIY Courtroom<br />17<br />
  18. 18. DIY Courtroom<br />18<br />
  19. 19. Issues for lawyers<br />Whichjudge has been assigned<br />For or against technologies<br />Equipement<br />Tech savvy<br />Which court room<br />What type of case<br />Presentation vs e-evidence<br />When to be techno<br />19<br />
  20. 20. New requirements<br />Collaboration<br />Lawyers<br />Judge<br />Clerks<br />Set-up time<br />Methodology<br />Standards<br />Education<br />20<br />
  21. 21. Resources<br />ABA LTRC: Litigation and Courtroom Technology Info Center<br />Effective Use of Courtroom Technology: A Judge’s Guide to Pretrial and Trial [PDF]<br />Effective Use of Courtroom Technology: A Lawyer's Guide to Pretrial and Trial<br />Using Litigation Support Software in the Courtroom by Justice B.T.Granger [PDF]<br />ABA TECHSHOW, April 2nd and 4th, 2009<br />LegalIT, Canada’s Premier Conference on Law and IT<br />21<br />April 20 and 21st, 2009<br />Montreal<br />
  22. 22. 22<br />Questions?<br />

×