Intro to OER for the University System of Maryland
25 Oct 2014•0 j'aime•280 vues
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Signaler
Formation
Morning and afternoon track A for faculty presentation conducted by Kim Thanos from the Introduction to Open Educational Resources (OER) workshop held on 21 Oct 2014 for the University System of Maryland at bwtech@UMBC South campus.
Intro to OER for the University System of Maryland
1. Introduction to OER for Open Courses
lumen
lumenlearning.com
Kim Thanos, CEO, kim.thanos@lumenlearning.com
Nate Angell, Doorman, nate@lumenlearning.com
October 21, 2014
2. 2
Agenda
• Introductions
Lumen Learning
Open Education
• Keys to Open Education
Licensing
Adoption approaches
Examples
• “Designing” Open Courses
Mapping to learning outcomes
Material review
Addressing gaps and needs
• Next Steps and Support Resources
3. 3
About Lumen Learning
• Founders: David Wiley and Kim
Thanos
• Mission: Scale effective use of OER
and analytics
Improve access and quality
Impact disadvantaged learners
Fix a broken market
• Approach: Model openness
Respect and build community
Continuous improvement
Openly license
Facts:
• .com company
• partially owned by a
charitable foundation
• formed in 2012
• based in Portland, OR
• 40+ institutional
clients
4. 4
Symptoms of a Broken Market
Outcomes
Six-year
graduation
rate for
open access
institutions
33%
Cost
Costs growing
3x
inflation
$1,200
Avg. annual textbook
cost per college
student
Access
6 in 10
students go without
textbooks due to cost
take fewer
courses
due to
textbook
cost
35%
<50%
of community college
students achieve
credential goals
5. 5
How do we work with institutions?
• Goals: Ease transition. Scale and sustain impact.
• Step 1: Get programs started right
Guide institutional leaders
Guide and support faculty members
• Step 2: Ease scale
Use our work without our help (institutional cost: $0 per student)
User our work with our tools and support (institutional cost: $5 per
student)
• Step 3: Invest in continuous improvement based on learning
results
• Step 4: Support and build community.
7. Orientation to Open Education
• I’m just learning about open education
• I have a strong understanding
• I feel strong philosophical alignment
• I’m pragmatic about its applications
• I’m skeptical but listening
• I’m not sure what to do next
• I have a vision and a plan
www.lumenlearning.com
9. Ideas are Non-rivalrous
can be given without being given away
Physical Expressions of Ideas are Not
10. CC licensed photo http://www.flickr.com/photos/62693815@N03/6277209256/
13. 13
Makes It Easy to Share: 5Rs
• Make, own, and control your own copy of
the content • Use the content in its unaltered form
Retain
Reuse
• Adapt, adjust, modify, improve, or alter
the content Revise
• Combine the original or revised content
with other OER to create something new Remix
• Share your copies of the original content,
revisions, or remixes with others Redistribute
14. Creative Commons licenses provide a simple, standardized
way to grant copyright permissions to creative work.
Attribute? Commercial Permission: use? Share alike?
http://creativecommons.org
15. Attribution = literally by whom
Share Alike = publish, same license
Non-commercial = no gain
No Derivatives = no changes
A remix nightmare
A tiny bit open
16. 16
Why ?
For most authors the greatest
risk is
not piracy
but obscurity.
- Tim O’Reilly
17. 17
Why ?
And in the end
the love you take
is equal to
the love you make.
- John Lennon
18. What are Open Educational
Resources (OER)?
(1) Any kind of teaching materials – textbooks,
syllabi, lesson plans, videos, readings, exams
What are Open Educational
Resources (OER)?
(2) Are free for anyone to access, and
(3) Include free permission to engage in the 5R
activities: retain, reuse, revise, remix, redistribute
19. 19
Why Use OER?
• Eliminate textbook cost as a barrier to student success
Access
Level playing field
Time = money
• Increase faculty control of learning materials
Revise and remix for the best collection
Target to learning goals and student needs
• Community-based approach to teaching materials
20. Direct connection between cost and success
20
60%+ do not purchase textbooks at
some point due to cost
35% take fewer courses due to
textbook cost
31% choose not to register for a
course due to textbook cost
23% regularly go without textbooks
due to cost
14% have dropped a course due
to textbook cost
10% have withdrawn from a course
due to textbook cost Source: 2012 student survey by
Florida Virtual Campus
21. 21
Why NOT Use OER?
• Concerns about quality
Do high-quality resources exist in my discipline?
Where do I find them?
• Time
I don’t have time to write an open textbook or aggregate
resources.
• Sustainability
How do I know that two years from now the resources will still
exist and will be current?
• Preference for current textbook
22. 22
Faculty Approaches
BUILD ADAPT ADOPT
• Develop new materials
• Aggregate materials
from high-quality OER
• Create tools and
systems
• Create media
• Share or publish
Similar in scope to writing
a new textbook with many
collaborators.
• Identify high-quality
course or resource
• Create significant
revision
• Remix, aggregate
• Share or publish
Similar in scope to moving
from traditional to fully
online delivery.
• Review open course
• Refine for teaching
approach
• Align with syllabus
• Assign and reference
Similar in scope to using a
new textbook or a major
new edition.
23. 23
Shifting Faculty Engagement with OER
• REUSE – This is MY content
• REVISE – This is a starting point for
improvement
• REMIX – This is the best collection of materials
for each concept or outcome
• REDISTRIBUTION – This exists in a community
of collaborators
24. 24
Maryland Open-Source Textbook (MOST) Initiative
If you are using social media today, we have
started to use a new hashtag for MOST:
#MDOpenTxts
25. 25
Institutional Approaches
Opportunistic
Kaleidoscope Pilots
Individual faculty interest
• Led by dept. chair
• Training and support each
term
• Models defined for
broader adoption
+ Faculty support
- Systemic change
Department
Salt Lake Community College
Emphasis on math adoption
• Led by dept. chair
• Training and support each
term (new FT + adjuncts)
• Models defined for
broader adoption
+ Managed change
- “We’re not like math”
Full Program
Tidewater Community College
Full AS degree in business
• Led by dept. provost
• 23 courses
• Acad/admin/student
support participation
+ Systemic change
- Dependent on strong
leadership
26. 26
College Project Results
Over $475,000 in Textbook Savings
Tidewater Community College
8%
11%
Mercy College
48%
2%
9%
60%
Drops Withdraws C or Better
Lumen Open Supported Courses Traditional Textbooks
27. 27
Cross-institutional Results
44%
Preliminary Results
80%
11%
5%
23%
65%
13% 11%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
A C or Better F Withdrawal
Kaleidoscope Traditional
What is the same about these? (Discussion)
Point: both are covered under the full protection of the law; have full protection of copyright law, anything I create has the same protection as the most expensive movie ever created, all copyright is pervasive...what is the impact of this? It impacts the way we share, the way we teach, the way we learn.
CC licensed photo http://www.flickr.com/photos/62693815@N03/6277209256/
Use copyright to enforce sharing with a Creative Commons license
At its core, open materials are 4Rs
First three are what impact teaching and learning
Bundling multiple texts is expensive:
Focused on return of investment of textbook
Revise: reduce the amount of materials
Opportunity for students to engage in materials…engaging students to revise and add to the textbook for their course
Free is awesome…but its just a part of what this is about
Open source software community has it
There are broad global uses of CC outside of education as well
(Click on hyperlink) Discuss 3 layers of licensing: Human Readable (language means I can understand it); Legal Code (legalese); Machine Readable (Google search can pick it up)
Demo Advanced Google search and looking for CC logo (generally found at the bottom of webpages)
Case against using CC NC for materials you create is removing the option to print materials for students
CC button says it gives permission
CCBY means attribute it to the original author
Creates professional network
Personal connections
Commerical Use: can someone use the material
Sharealike: revise but keep the same license
NC License hurts when printing: need to have a sustainable process; CK 12 agreement under $5 per book; extra piece; we are still living in a world where we need print materials
If Kscope is funding faculty time, materials created must be CCBY
Openly sharing materials is powerful
Recent research (conducted by the Florida Virtual Campus) quantifies the ways high textbook costs affect student persistence and success.
More than 60% of students report not having purchase textbooks at some point due to the cost
Nearly a quarter (23%) of students regularly go without textbooks due to their cost
Due to the high cost of textbooks:
35% of students report taking fewer courses
31% report not registering for a course
14% have dropped a course
10% have withdrawn from a course
Link to research source: http://www.openaccesstextbooks.org/pdf/2012_Exec_Sum_Student_Txtbk_Survey.pdf
We have absolutely no stake in the existing model, and that frees us to focus on the learner.
Over 17,000 at 21 institutions. Controlled for institution, race, and gender.
We have absolutely no stake in the existing model, and that frees us to focus on the learner.
Over 17,000 at 21 institutions. Controlled for institution, race, and gender.
We have absolutely no stake in the existing model, and that frees us to focus on the learner.
Over 17,000 at 21 institutions. Controlled for institution, race, and gender.
Many instructors begin with textbook, favored lessons, and time-honored activities rather than deriving those tools from targeted goals or standards – “backward” from conventional habits. This approach can be thought of as purposeful task-analysis.
The results are a more sharply defined teaching and learning target so that students perform better knowing their goal.
There is greater coherence among desired results, key performances, and teaching and learning experiences which leads to better students performance – the purpose of instructional design.
http://www-tc.pbs.org/teacherline/courses/inst325/docs/inst325_wiggins_mctighe.pdf