1981: A 90.4-kW PV system was dedicated at Lovington Square Shopping Center (New Mexico) using Solar Power Corp. modules. A 97.6-kW PV system was dedicated at Beverly High School in Beverly, Massachusetts, using Solar Power Corp. modules. An 8-kW PV-powered (Mobil Solar), reverse-osmosis desalination facility was dedicated in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. 1984: The IEEE Morris N. Liebmann Award was presented to Drs. David Carlson and Christopher Wronski at the 17th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, "for crucial contributions to the use of amorphous silicon in low-cost, high-performance photovoltaic solar cells." 1991: The Solar Energy Research Institute was redesignated as the U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory by President George Bush. 1993: The National Renewable Energy Laboratory's Solar Energy Research Facility (SERF), opened in Golden, Colorado. 1996: The U.S. Department of Energy announces the National Center for Photovoltaics, headquartered in Golden, Colorado.
1. Presented by:
Makmur Saini
Sukma Abadi
Presented in ProfessionalPresented in Professional
Management ProgramManagement Program
University of CanberraUniversity of Canberra
July 12July 12ndnd
, 2007, 2007
2. SOLAR POWER
• What is solar power ?
• The history of solar power
• Types of solar power Technologies
• How does solar power generate power ?
• Where is solar power used ?
• The cost of solar PV systems
• Advantages/disadvantages of using solar power
• Environment issues
3. WHAT IS SOLAR POWER ?
• Solar power is electricity produced directly
from sunlight
• Solar thermal power refers to a process
where the sun’s energy heats a working
fluid that eventually is used to do work in
an engine or a turbine.
4. THE HISTORY OF SOLAR POWER
• Greeks used passive solar to heat Buildings (400
BC)
• Romans improved by using glass to trap heat in
the buildings and green houses (100 AD)
• 1700: Antoine LaVoisier built a solar heater
• 1839: French physicist Antoine-Cesar Becquerel
observed that shining light on an electrode
submerged in a conductive solution would create
an electric current.
• 1860: The First Solar Motor, heated water used to
drive a steam motor, Auguste Mouchout
5. • 1883: American Charles Fritts described the
first solar cells, which was made from
selenium wafers
• 1900: The photoelectric effect was discovered.
• 1904: Henry E. Willsie first use of solar
energy at night.
• 1916: Millikan provided experimental proof
of the photoelectric effect
• 1918: Polish scientist Czochralski developed a
way to grow single-crystal silicon.
THE HISTORY OF SOLAR POWER
6. • 1941: American Russell Ohl invented a silicon
solar cell
• 1954: Bell Labs researchers Pearson, Chapin,
and Fuller reported their discovery of 4.5%
efficient silicon solar cells
• 1950’s: Solar cells developed for satellites
• 1960: Hoffman Electronics achieved 14%
efficient PV cells.
• 1973: OPEC Energy Crisis causes US to re-
examine use of renewable energy sources;
federal and state tax credits result in rapid
growth for a new solar industry.
THE HISTORY OF SOLAR POWER
7. • 1981: A 90.4-kW PV system was dedicated at Lovington Square
Shopping Center (New Mexico) using Solar Power Corp. modules. A
97.6-kW PV system was dedicated at Beverly High School in
Beverly, Massachusetts, using Solar Power Corp. modules. An 8-kW
PV-powered (Mobil Solar), reverse-osmosis desalination facility was
dedicated in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
• 1984: The IEEE Morris N. Liebmann Award was presented to Drs.
David Carlson and Christopher Wronski at the 17th Photovoltaic
Specialists Conference, "for crucial contributions to the use of
amorphous silicon in low-cost, high-performance photovoltaic solar
cells."
• 1991: The Solar Energy Research Institute was redesignated as the
U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory
by President George Bush.
• 1993: The National Renewable Energy Laboratory's Solar Energy
Research Facility (SERF), opened in Golden, Colorado.
• 1996: The U.S. Department of Energy announces the National Center
for Photovoltaics, headquartered in Golden, Colorado.
THE HISTORY OF SOLAR POWER
8. TYPES OF SOLAR POWER
TECHNOLOGIES
Passive
Concentration
Photovoltaic (PV)
9. Passive
• Direct Solar Gain
– South facing large
windows
– Floors, walls, ceiling
used to trap heat. The
heat is released at night
10. • Indirect Solar Gain
– Thermal storage
materials are placed
between the interior
habitable space and the
sun
– Can use vents in wall
to help circulate hot air
through room
Passive
11. • Isolated Solar Gain:
• Uses a fluid (liquid or air)
to collect heat in a flat
plate solar collector
attached to the structure.
Passive
12. • Focus the sun to create heat
– Boil water
– Heat liquid metals
• Use heated fluid to turn a turbine
• Generate electricity
Concentration
13. Concentration
• Power towers
– Large field of mirriors
is used to concentrate
the sunlight.
– Concentrated Sunlight
is used to heat molten
salt
14. • Trough Collectors
– Uses parabolic mirrors
to heat a fluid in an
absorbing tube.
– Hot fluid is used to
boil water to run a
steam generator.
Concentration
18. • Photoelectric effect
• PN junction directly
converts sunlight into
electricity.
• Electricity can be stored
for later useage or used on
demand.
Photovoltaic Cells (Solar Cells)
19. Photovoltaic Cells (Solar Cells)
• Multiple PN junction Cell
has multiple transparent
layers
• Top layer absorbs the high
energy light and passes
rest through
20. • Solar Cells transform light
to electricity
• Controller regulates were
the charge is directed
• Batteries store the energy
• Inverter converts from DC
to AC
Photovoltaic Cells (Solar Cells)
23. How Does Solar Power Generate Power
• A system used to transform solar radiation directly into
electricity. At the heart of a solar power system, also
known as a photovoltaic (PV) system, are solar cells,
which are interconnected to form solar modules (solar
panels) and solar arrays.
• The size and configuration of a system depend on its
intended task. Modules and arrays can be used to charge
batteries, operate motors, and to power any number of
electrical loads. With the appropriate power conversion
equipment, solar power systems can produce alternating
current (AC) compatible with any conventional appliances,
and can operate in parallel with, and interconnected to, the
utility grid.
24. How Does Solar Power Generate Power
Among the components of a complete solar power
system may be a DC-AC power inverter, a battery
bank, a system and battery controller, auxiliary
energy sources, and sometimes the specified
electrical load (appliances). In addition, an
assortment of balance of system (BOS) hardware,
including wiring, overcurrent, surge protection
and disconnect devices, and other power
processing equipment
30. Solar power is used in a
mobile home in Arizona.
The solar panels convert the
solar energy into electrical
energy.
The use of solar cells are
also supplemented by the
use of wind turbines
Where is Solar Power Used ?
44. Where is Solar Power Used ?
• In Indonesia, solar power Solar Home System
(SHS) or Hybrid Power
• Hybrid Power is the power that used Solar Power
and Diesel Power
• Hybrid Power (PLTH) have developed at 25
locations, such as Parangtritis, Yogyakarta and
Gorontalo
• Solar Home System is the power that used at rural
areas and at special areas (the area which don’t get
supply from PLN)
45. The Cost of Solar PV Systems
• Cells are the building block of PV systems
– Typically generate 1.5 - 3 watts of power
• Modules or panels are made up of multiple
cells
• Arrays are made up of multiple modules
– A typical array costs about $5–$6/watt
• Still need lots of other components to make
this work
• Typical systems cost about $8/watt
46.
47. Solar Cell Efficiencies
• Typical module efficiencies ~12%
– Screen printed multi-crystalline solar cells
• Efficiency range is 6-30%
– 6% for amorphous silicon-based PV cells
– 20% for best commercial cells
– 30% for multi-junction research cells
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cells
48. Solar Panel Efficiency
• ~1 kW/m2
reaches the ground (sunny day)
• ~20% efficiency ⇒ 200W/m2
electricity
• Daylight & weather in northern latitudes
– 100 W/m2
in winter; 250 W/m2
in summer
– Or 20 to 50 W/m2
from solar cells
• Value of electricity generated at $0.08/kWh
– $0.10 / m2
/ day OR $83,000 km2
/ day
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_panel
49. Cost Analysis
• US retail module price = ~$5.00 / W (2005)
• Installations costs = ~$3.50 / W (2005)
• Cost for a 4 kW system = ~$17,000 (2006)
– Without subsidies
– Typical payback period is ~24 years
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cells
51. • Running costs are low.
• No carbon dioxide
emissions to add to the
Greenhouse Effect
• No sulphur dioxide
emissions to cause
acid rain. Solar powered station, California
The Advantages of Solar Power
52. • Solar panels can be
quickly set up in remote
areas
• Local communities can
benefit from small scale
use of solar power.
• Can be used to charge
batteries to provide
electricity when needed.Solar cells used to charge batteries
The Advantages of Solar Power
53. • The initial cost of solar
cells can be very high.
• The output is dependent
on weather conditions
and the time of day.
• Many solar panels are
needed to produce that
of a power station Solar reflector used for cooking
The Disadvantages of Solar Power
54. • Large areas of land are
required for large scale
generation of
electricity
• A warm reliable biome
would be needed.
• Solar cells have
relatively low
efficiencies
The Disadvantages of Solar Power
55. References
• wikipedia
• John Hendstock, North Chadderton School, www.ase.org.uk
• http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/earth/stories/s225110.htm
• http://www.solarenergy.com/info_history.html
• http://pvpower.com/pvtechs.html
• http://www.adsdyes.com/fullerenes.html
• http://www.azsolarcenter.com/design/pas-2.htm
• http://www.eere.energy.gov/RE/solar_concentrating.html
56. References
• T. Surek, "Crystal Growth and Materials Research in
Photovoltaics: Progress and Challenges," J. Crystal
Growth 275, 292–304 (2005).
• National Renewable Energy Laboratory Perspectus,
http://www.nrel.gov/cdte/perspective.html
• http://w4.siemens.de/FuI/en/archiv/zeitschrift/heft1_99/arti
kel11/
• Chemical Science Network, www.chemsoc.org
• http://www.sandia.gov/pv/docs/PVFSCThin-
Film_Solar_Cells.htm
• Basic Research Needs for Solar Energy Utilization
Department of Energy Paper, 4.18.05
Editor's Notes
When a photon of light hits a piece of silicon, one of three things can happen. The first is that the photon can pass straight through the silicon. This (generally) happens when the energy of the photon is lower than the bandgap energy of the silicon semiconductor. The second thing that can happen is that the photon is reflected off the surface. The third thing is that it can be absorbed by the silicon. This (generally) happens if the photon energy is greater than the bandgap energy of silicon. When a photon is absorbed, its energy is given to an electron in the crystal lattice. Usually this electron is in the valence band, and is tightly bound in covalent bonds between neighboring atoms, and hence unable to move far. The energy given to it by the photon "excites" it into the conduction band, where it is free to move around within the semiconductor. The covalent bond that the electron was previously a part of now has one less electron - this is known as a hole. The presence of a missing covalent bond allows the bonded electrons of neighboring atoms to move into the "hole," leaving another hole behind, and in this way a hole can move through the lattice. Thus, it can be said that photons absorbed in the semiconductor create mobile electron-hole pairs.
A photon need only have greater energy than that of the band gap in order to excite an electron from the valence band into the conduction band. However, the solar frequency spectrum approximates a black body spectrum at ~6000 K, and as such, much of the solar radiation reaching the Earth is composed of photons with energies greater than the band gap of silicon. These higher energy photons will be absorbed by the solar cell, but the difference in energy between these photons and the silicon band gap is converted into heat (via lattice vibrations - called phonons) rather than into usable electrical energy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cells
Typical module efficiencies for commercially available screen printed multicrystalline solar cells are around 12%. However, efficiencies vary from 6% for amorphous silicon-based solar cells to 30% or higher with multiple-junction research lab cells. A solar module's energy conversion efficiency, (or just efficiency) is the ratio of the maximum output electrical power divided by the input light power under "standard" test conditions. The "standard" solar radiation (known as the "air mass 1.5 spectrum") has a power density of 1000 watts per square meter. Thus, 1 m² of typical multicrystalline solar panels in full sunlight at solar noon at the equator during either the March or September equinox will produce approximately 120 watts of peak power. A more technical description of efficiency is the maximum power, made up of the fill factor (the percentage of the panel face filled up by solar cells vs the space between cells) x the open circuit voltage x the short circuit current, divided by the input power.
Note : A typical 4 square centimeter solar cell produces electrical energy of the order of 0.4 to 0.5 volts at 6 milliamperes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cells
On a bright day, the sun delivers about 1 kW/m2 to the Earth's surface. Typical solar panels have an average efficiency of 12%, with the best commercial panels at 20%. This would result in 200 W/m2. However, not all days have bright sunlight, and therefore enough solar energy.
At middle northern latitudes, taking the daylight cycle and weather conditions into account, on average 100 W/m2 in winter and 250 W/m2 in summer reach the ground. With a conversion efficiency of about 20%, one can expect to obtain between 20 and 50 watts per square meter of solar cell. Accordingly, at the current $0.08/kWh (USD), a square meter will generate up to $0.10 per 24 hour day, and a square kilometer (250 acres) would generate up to 50 MW, or $83,000/km2/day. For reference, the unpopulated Sahara desert is over 9 million km2, with less cloud cover and better solar angle, giving closer to 83 MW/km2, or 750 TW (terawatt) total. The Earth's current electrical energy consumption is near 1.6, and total energy is around 14 TW at any given moment (including oil, gas, coal, nuclear, hydro).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_panel
Costs of photovoltaic panels seem, in 2005, to be about $1 to $2 per watt in about 400 kW quantities. As production rates increase, costs are likely to continue to go down.
Installed, costs seem to be in the $3-$7 per watt range.
Current retail prices in Australia for small systems are around A$12-A$15 per watt. (For example, a 10 W panel cost A$150 in December 2005, and a 20 W panel cost A$250).
_________________________
Based on manufacturer-reported power-output ratings (notoriously exaggerated), the mean US retail module price is $5.32/Wp with a 10th-percentile price of about $4.50/Wp (see SolarBuzz). Additional installation costs for a residential rooftop retrofit in California (CA) is around $3.50/Wp or more. So on the low side, installed system costs are about $7.00/Wp in CA, and probably higher in places with less experience. Federal, state, utility, and other subsidies combined can pay about half this cost depending on location. See link DSIRE (the Database of State Incentives for Renewable Energy) to determine applicable incentives for a given area.
Under net metering, one offsets regular retail utility rate which for CA PG&E residential customers is 12 cents/kWh, for tier 1 rates including tax [1]. Average customers are exposed to tier 3 rates of 22 cents/kWh. With a time of use meter, customers can offset some peak summer tier 3 rates of 40 cents. Commercial and agricultural customers are exposed to higher rates.
Knowing installed system costs, amount of sunshine, and the utility rates, one can figure out the years till payback with or without financing costs. Assuming no financing costs and a $6/Wp installed system cost (lower than current $7), one can take sunshine and utility rate information from around the globe and come up with a payback graph such as shown below. The addition of subsidies brings down the years to payback proportionately. For example, if the years to payback were 24 years at $6/Wp, and subsidies brought that down to $3/Wp, the years to payback would be 12.
When calculating the expected return on investment for Solar PV versus other investments, one might also take into account predicted increases in nominal retail electric rates. Additionally, locking in fixed rates via Solar PV provides a hedge against volatile utility rates, and this hedge has a separate monetary value. Since his home-generated electrical service might be considered a boutique electrical service, the dedicated PV enthusiast might also want to calculate his payback by comparing against boutique electric rates instead of against simply the lowest rates available to the public. SMUD suggests that boutique electricity is worth at least 10% more than non-green electricity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cells
Costs of photovoltaic panels seem, in 2005, to be about $1 to $2 per watt in about 400 kW quantities. As production rates increase, costs are likely to continue to go down.
Installed, costs seem to be in the $3-$7 per watt range.
Current retail prices in Australia for small systems are around A$12-A$15 per watt. (For example, a 10 W panel cost A$150 in December 2005, and a 20 W panel cost A$250).
_________________________
Based on manufacturer-reported power-output ratings (notoriously exaggerated), the mean US retail module price is $5.32/Wp with a 10th-percentile price of about $4.50/Wp (see SolarBuzz). Additional installation costs for a residential rooftop retrofit in California (CA) is around $3.50/Wp or more. So on the low side, installed system costs are about $7.00/Wp in CA, and probably higher in places with less experience. Federal, state, utility, and other subsidies combined can pay about half this cost depending on location. See link DSIRE (the Database of State Incentives for Renewable Energy) to determine applicable incentives for a given area.
Under net metering, one offsets regular retail utility rate which for CA PG&E residential customers is 12 cents/kWh, for tier 1 rates including tax [1]. Average customers are exposed to tier 3 rates of 22 cents/kWh. With a time of use meter, customers can offset some peak summer tier 3 rates of 40 cents. Commercial and agricultural customers are exposed to higher rates.
Knowing installed system costs, amount of sunshine, and the utility rates, one can figure out the years till payback with or without financing costs. Assuming no financing costs and a $6/Wp installed system cost (lower than current $7), one can take sunshine and utility rate information from around the globe and come up with a payback graph such as shown below. The addition of subsidies brings down the years to payback proportionately. For example, if the years to payback were 24 years at $6/Wp, and subsidies brought that down to $3/Wp, the years to payback would be 12.
When calculating the expected return on investment for Solar PV versus other investments, one might also take into account predicted increases in nominal retail electric rates. Additionally, locking in fixed rates via Solar PV provides a hedge against volatile utility rates, and this hedge has a separate monetary value. Since his home-generated electrical service might be considered a boutique electrical service, the dedicated PV enthusiast might also want to calculate his payback by comparing against boutique electric rates instead of against simply the lowest rates available to the public. SMUD suggests that boutique electricity is worth at least 10% more than non-green electricity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cells