A discussion of freeze/thaw physics, consideration for why appropriate levels of thermal processing is critical to desired results
http://pharmequipment.com/products/#BLAST_AND_CONTROLLED
2. Presentation Goals
Compared to Storage Freezers and ULT
freezers, how do ‘Rate’ chambers differ
1st pass physics- key on the physics we can
manipulate for a desired result
Example: product load and location
independence applied to a specified/target
solid phase freeze rate
Q/A
3. Storage vs. Rate Freezer
Storage freezer
Tamb
Q'product
Tcntl
insulation
Product
Q' wall = (Tamb - Tpcm)/ Rwall
(ideal package)
Refrig system
1st Law Applied to control volume of the storage chamber enclosure
Energy In to product - Energy Out of package = Energy Stored
E'in - E'out = E'stored
Q'wall - Q'refr = E'stored
Q'wall = Q'refr (with a little margin for door openings)
4. Storage vs. Rate Freezer
Storage Performance Interests
Control temperature
Temperature uniformity
Recovery from a door opening or reserve
capacity
5. Storage vs. Rate Freezer
Storage Performance non-interests
Changing the temperature of the product
(especially not a phase change)
Dynamics of how energy exchanges
between product and ambient
Thawing rates i.e. increasing the
temperature of the product
6. Storage vs. Rate Freezer
Rate Chamber
Q'blower
Q'wall
This area is for
the machine section
Apply 1st law to the enclosure
Energy in - Energy out = Energy Stored
(Q'wall + Q'blower) - Q'refr = (- Q'product )
Q' refr = Q'product + Q'wall + Q'blower
BI wheel
motor
door
Refrigeration machine
section
Q'refr
Product
Q'product
7. Storage vs Rate Freezer
Rate interests
Product temperature
Rate of product temperature change in both
cooling and warming
8. Storage vs Rate Freezer
Rate Application interests :
Temp and uniformity as previous
Add:
Product temperature, Tproduct, and dTprod/dt
as affected by
Energy exchange at product/medium interface i.e. the
heat transfer at the product
Thermal conductivity between the medium (air, water,
or refrigerant)
ΔT = Tmedium – T product
Thermal resistance between medium and product
9. Summary ‘Storage’ vs ‘Rate’
Ambient or ‘storage space’ temp vs ‘Product Temperature’
Storage applications typically address static conditions of the ambient
surrounding the product. Rate applications address rate of change of the
product temp (dynamic by nature)
Product energy is typically the dominant load in a Rate application.
A storage chamber application using air as the medium (walk-in or ULT
freezer) will have an air flow rate typically measured in 0.5 to 1.5
exchanges per minute. A ‘Rate’ chamber exchange air at 1 exchange per
second.
Interior volume of a storage chamber will be large compared to the
volume of the conditioning equipment. A rate application will have
conditioning equipment approximately the same size as the interior
volume.
14. Package Evaluation : Analytical
Tamb
convective resistance @ outer surface
conduction resistance of bag 2
conductive resistance of air 2
conductive resistance of bag1
conductive resistance of air1
conductive resistance of product dish
Tamb
Tproduct
Face path
Perimeterpath
18. Package Evaluation: Experimental
Unique feature of the time constant
approach … reaches 63% final result
in one time constant.
Example: Product originally at a uniform
temperature of 60oC enters a controlled
space at 10oC. At t= 1.0 Ƭ, the product
temperature will have changed 31.5oC
(0.63 x 50oC).
19. Package Evaluation: Experimental
A couple of cautions regarding the use of the time
constant approach
Lumped heat capacitance model
Can’t span a phase change
Does not provide detail of the dominant resistance, only the
overall thermal resistance
Positive aspects of using the time constant approach
Good for package-to-package comparison
Works particularly on single use bags
20. Application: Example
Targets
30L bag with 16L fill
From -5oC to -35oC 0.13 to 0.94oC/min
Goals:
Determine simple profile to achieve target
Evaluate location and load variance
26. Application: Example : Test 3
8 bag test
Input and output profile
Cooling rate (table)
27. Application: Example: Test 4
8 bag test (increase rate)
Input and output profile
Cooling rate (table)
28. Application: Example: take-away
This example showed load
independence using only step changes
in freeze mode only
The Bio-Process paper goes on to show
location independence and similar
approach for the thawing process. Link
on web site.
29. Q&A
Margaret Stava mstava@pharmequipment.com mobile 909-784-8993
Sylvain Riendeau sriendeau@farrarscientific.com mobile 740-350-8269
Scott Farrar sfarrar@farrarscientific.com mobile 740-706-1252
37. Chamber Rate performance: thaw profile
130802 Rate Chamber
4 ASI 16L Bags in Plastic Compression Rack Thaw Profile
Product Temps
-50.00
-40.00
-30.00
-20.00
-10.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Time "Minutes"
Temperature"°C"
Cabinet Air
Top Bag
Top Mid Bag
Bot Mid Bag
Bot Bag
47. Summary: Freeze/Thaw Profiles ULT vs Rate Chamber
Freeze and Thaw Rate comparison- ULT vs. Rate Chamber w/ Plastic container
No. Bags ULT Freezer Rate Chamber
Frz time Thaw time Frz time Thaw time
1 940 1300 625 545
4 1414 793 614
7 851 741
9 890 709
Test conditions notes:
1. ASI 30 l. tufted bag with 16l fill of water
2. Frz time = 25o
C to core temp of -30o
C (minutes)
3. Thaw time = -40o
C to core temp of 5o
C (minutes)
4. ULT thaw in open ambient- static
48. Summary: Freeze/Thaw Profiles ULT vs Rate Chamber
Freeze and Thaw Rate comparison- ULT vs. Rate Chamber w/Enhanced container
No. Bags ULT Freezer Rate Chamber
Frz time Thaw time Frz time Thaw time
1 560 568 253 267
4 1226 350 265
7 468 413
Test conditions notes:
1. ASI 30 l. tufted bag with 16l fill of water
2. Frz time = 25o
C to core temp of -30o
C (minutes)
3. Thaw time = -40o
C to core temp of 5o
C (minutes)
4. ULT thaw in open ambient- static
49. Fundamental differences between
storage freezers and rate chambers
Flow rate
Product vs ambient temperature
Dynamic vs static (often looking for a 1st
derivative response)
…..