1.
Scripted comments for Benchmarking
To deliver a topic on the derivation of the Benchmarks, we will
pass through our paper on the Scope of Glass projects by
determining the slides applicable to the Benchmarking process.
Slide 2 shows this paper's goal is to find the Agile methodology
needed to shorten the 50-year glass path we have derived.
Slide 3 The Proof of the Interior Margin Facts derived from our
last project are the starting point for Benchmarking for the
Proofs necessary for Part II where we derive the Impact Factor

2.
Slide 6 We assembled the associative facts and performed
statistical analysis.
Slide 7 We stratified the component stream and correlated the
alpha and reinvestment analysis to our new facts. In addition,
we utilized the optimal load to split out the climb and thread
rate. The climb rate is necessary to the engineering
justification.

3.
Slide 8 When we graphed the ANOVA of the STREAM TABLE, we
determined the Build Equation. We found that the Burden Rate
of the Green Wall was the geometric plain or plait derived
graphically, and we found the build equation by differentiating
the two regression equations shown. The burden rate is now
at the build level of composition within the model. It is a
cyclical function capable of being native to trigonometric
derivations.
Slide 9 This build equation will be important in the work
needed to make glass table decisions, in a streaming
continuous union for an advantageous build for the agile
development of the process. The statistical build was found to
be without the addition of a load factor, and this is important
for the compositional build. This is quite different from
benchmarking.

4.
Slide 11 We begin benchmarking on slide 11 where we compare
time and motion facts to our Events compilation and the
difference of 14.8 is a marginal figure.
Slide 12 We compose a 14.8 metric from the doubling of the ark
rate within the compositional form and we use this to subtract
from the alpha1 to derive the alpha 2.
o We benchmarked these rates by adjusting to the lower
than clock rate required for the balancing of the Final
Forward Statement. Remember that sliding decimal places
are prevalent in Number Theory, which we use.
o Notice our Thruput calculation here used to develop a
benchmark later.

5.
o Also, on slide 12 we show the importance of using the
compiled figure as opposed to a superficial calculation, as
it contains important Number Theory facts such as the
load and other derivations. These strings help to build the
portfolio.
Slide 13 We proof our benchmarked rates by reducing the
remainder to e/2 or 301 at 10 to 12 sigma, which is equivalent
to the $8.7 billion x 10^10 in assets carried on the Final
Forward.
o Note now the Econometric Benchmark of 7.11509 which is
composed next is enabling this proof. This slide prepares
us for Part II of the paper for deriving the component
chain and sprint requirement (the impact statement to do
this.)
o In setting precedents, It is likewise important to note that
the Church documents the Theological Doctrines
important to Ark Science and the precedence set in the
Scripture and the Science of the Saints for Ark Sciences

6.
Slide 17 By comparing the thruput derived and the clockkey
figure we derive the econometric benchmark that now contains
the 509 Interior margin.
o This Slide also shows the importance of Ark Science to
build Equity in comparison to the lower state of binary
which does not gain the whole composition of the Equity
nor an immediacy of justification of it. Oversight from the
Morning Star will deliver an immediate payback, line of
credit and market ready composition.
Slide 19 Our usual method of proofing our metrics before using
them in the culmination of reports and engineering

7.
computations is complete. Now we have evidence for
determining the Impact factor.
o Slide 19 shows that this is the first paper in our design
series. We discuss the way we split out the climb metric as
needed for an engineering justification for the build from
secant engineering as defined in the engineering
storyboard and used in the production; This work does not
justify thread which is engineered as a utility.
Note that in the Addendum to the paper, we show the
derivation of thread, not shown here
Please note the papers in our Learning Series which we will use
to determine an agile strategy from our waterfall method of
learning. Our papers are found on SlideShare at Marshallja.
Thank you for listening.