Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Le téléchargement de votre SlideShare est en cours. ×

Airborne LiDAR – Traditional Nadir Versus Oblique Perspectives

Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Chargement dans…3
×

Consultez-les par la suite

1 sur 35 Publicité

Airborne LiDAR – Traditional Nadir Versus Oblique Perspectives

Télécharger pour lire hors ligne

Airborne topographic LiDAR started out 25+ years ago with the most commonly known approach of scanning a laser perpendicular to flight direction but with that scan pattern generally pointed straight down. This nadir orientation is still widely used but the airborne LiDAR mapping industry has grown to include a variety of oblique laser perspectives for some applications. Each approach has strengths for some applications and weaknesses for others. LiDAR sidelap should also be grouped into this application-approach discussion. This presentation will review the benefits of each scanning perspective and show data examples highlighting the strengths of each approach.

Airborne topographic LiDAR started out 25+ years ago with the most commonly known approach of scanning a laser perpendicular to flight direction but with that scan pattern generally pointed straight down. This nadir orientation is still widely used but the airborne LiDAR mapping industry has grown to include a variety of oblique laser perspectives for some applications. Each approach has strengths for some applications and weaknesses for others. LiDAR sidelap should also be grouped into this application-approach discussion. This presentation will review the benefits of each scanning perspective and show data examples highlighting the strengths of each approach.

Publicité
Publicité

Plus De Contenu Connexe

Similaire à Airborne LiDAR – Traditional Nadir Versus Oblique Perspectives (20)

Publicité

Plus récents (20)

Airborne LiDAR – Traditional Nadir Versus Oblique Perspectives

  1. 1. www.merrick.com Traditional Nadir Versus Oblique Perspectives Presented to: AGIC Presented on: August 31, 2022 Presented by: Matt Bethel, GISP Director of Operations and Technology with Merrick & Company Airborne LiDAR www.merrick.com
  2. 2. Historical Nadir Lidar Perspective Exaggerated along track to show scan pattern
  3. 3. Advancements In LiDAR Scanning Dual Sensors Single Sensor, Dual Scanners Single Sensor, Dual Output Laser, Single Scanner Goals: • Higher usable pulse rate • Better point distribution
  4. 4. Advancements In LiDAR Scanning Intentionally not to scale to show scan pattern
  5. 5. Advancements In LiDAR Scanning Intentionally not to scale to show scan pattern
  6. 6. 6 If nadir airborne LiDAR scanning works well, why consider oblique oriented collection?
  7. 7. Nadir Collection Perspective
  8. 8. Forward Facing Oblique Collection Perspective
  9. 9. Rear Facing Oblique Collection Perspective
  10. 10. Forward and Rear Facing Oblique Collections Perspective
  11. 11. Nadir and Oblique LiDAR Scanner Types Content courtesy of Riegl USA 2022
  12. 12. Latest Generation Survey Grade Airborne LiDAR Scanner Types Sensor Manufacturer Single Nadir Scanner Palmer Scanner Multiple Oblique Scanners Fixed Wing Aircraft Teledyne Optech Galaxy T2000 CZMIL SupeNova Galaxy G2 Riegl VQ-780 II-S VQ-580 II VQ-480 II VQ-880-G II VQ-1560 II-S Leica Geosystems TerrainMapper-2 Leica SPL-100 Chiroptera-5 VeriDaaS / L3Harris Geiger Model LiDAR / IntelliEarth Helicopter and / or Unmanned Aircraft Teledyne Optech CL-90 CL-360 Riegl VUX-1LR VUX-1UAV miniVUX-1LR miniVUX-3UAV VUX-240 miniVUX-1DL VQ-840-G VUX-120
  13. 13. Palmer Conical LiDAR Scanner Video courtesy of L3Harris Corporation - Geiger-mode LiDAR Tech Talk ILMF 2015
  14. 14. Project Boundary Project Boundary 1 2 1 2 1 2 4 2 4 2 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 1 2 4 6 4 6 4 6 4 2 Single Coverage Flight Plan Double Coverage Flight Plan (>50% sidelap) LiDAR Sidelap Options N D
  15. 15. Foliage Penetration From a Dual Oblique, 55% Sidelap, Fixed Wing LiDAR Flight
  16. 16. Point Density Comparisons Content courtesy of Riegl USA 2022 Graphic courtesy of Leica Geosystem
  17. 17. Data examples from a site flown with all three types of LiDAR scanners • Single nadir scanner • Palmer conical scanner flown with double pass configuration (>50% sidelap) • Dual oblique flown with double pass configuration (>50% sidelap) Single and dual oblique scanners will be shown for comparison
  18. 18. Single Nadir LiDAR
  19. 19. Palmer Conical LiDAR
  20. 20. Single Oblique LiDAR
  21. 21. Dual Oblique LiDAR
  22. 22. Single Nadir LiDAR Shadowing
  23. 23. Palmer Conical LiDAR Shadowing
  24. 24. Single Oblique LiDAR Shadowing
  25. 25. Dual Oblique Single Pass LiDAR Shadowing
  26. 26. Dual Oblique Double Pass LiDAR Shadowing
  27. 27. Nadir LiDAR Above Ground Feature Modelling
  28. 28. Palmer Conical LiDAR Above Ground Feature Modelling
  29. 29. Dual Oblique LiDAR Above Ground Feature Modelling
  30. 30. Power Line and Tower Modelling Nadir LiDAR Palmer Scanner LiDAR Dual Oblique LiDAR
  31. 31. Nadir LiDAR Above Ground Feature Modelling
  32. 32. Palmer Conical LiDAR Above Ground Feature Modelling
  33. 33. Dual Oblique LiDAR Above Ground Feature Modelling
  34. 34. Scanner Type Summary Nadir airborne scanning lidar Cross hatched, semi-oblique airborne scanning lidar Palmer scanning oblique airborne lidar Great for Not ideal for Great for Not ideal for Great for Not ideal for Open ground modelling Modelling the sides of above ground features Open ground modelling Bathymetric applications Open ground modelling Ground modelling in narrow urban canyons Foliage penetration Bathymetric applications Modelling the sides of above ground features Modelling the sides of above ground features Foliage penetration (depends on tree type) Ground modelling in narrow urban canyons Ground modelling in narrow urban canyons Bathymetric applications Dense foliage penetration Foliage penetration (depends on tree type) Increasing point density with two laser and/or detectors
  35. 35. Thank You • Matt Bethel • Director of Operations and Technology • Merrick & Company • http://www.merrick.com/Geospatial • matt.bethel@merrick.com

×