Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Le téléchargement de votre SlideShare est en cours. ×

The Persil Power Fiasco (1).pptx

Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Prochain SlideShare
pricing
pricing
Chargement dans…3
×

Consultez-les par la suite

1 sur 16 Publicité

Plus De Contenu Connexe

Plus récents (20)

Publicité

The Persil Power Fiasco (1).pptx

  1. 1. The Persil Power Fiasco How Unilever failed to research about consumer behavior Presented by:- Mutahira Dar Semester III MBA , Section ‘C’ Presidency Business School
  2. 2. Company profile:-  Anglo- Dutch multinational company.  Founded in 1933.  Headquartered in London and Rotterdam.  One of the oldest multinational companies .  Its products are available in around 190 countries.  Unilever owns over 400 brands.
  3. 3. Unilever products
  4. 4. Unilever’s main competition was from P&G
  5. 5. So, what was Persil Power and why did it attract so much flak?  The detergent powder was launched in 1994 across Europe.  It was the result of a major technological breakthrough (as per Unilever).  Product development efforts spanned a period of 10 years.  Unilever spent close to 100 million pounds.  Intention was to overtake Ariel detergent.
  6. 6. What was unique about Persil power ?  Product had - manganese catalyst (accelerator ) that could clean clothes even at lower temperatures.  Breakthrough  Unilever protected its innovative efforts by • This product – result of Unilever’s research- competitive advantage • cleaned clothes without damaging fabric color • 35 patents • Test marketing in 60000 households
  7. 7. P&G springs into action- failure of Persil  After testing, P&G found that under certain conditions, Persil powder damaged the clothes.  The catalyst could damage colored clothes at high temperatures.  A big failure for Unilever.  Negative publicity by P&G. • lost the legal battle • forced to withdraw the product • lost 300 million pounds spent in development and marketing.
  8. 8. So what went wrong?  Unilever had conducted most of its tests in Dutch households  In Northern Europe, people washed their white and colored clothes separately.  In Southern Europe, clothes were washed together in hot water.  Problem:- 1. Manganese catalyst was fine at low temperatures. 2. But it reacted with certain dyes at hot temperatures.  So, it was a niche product (cold water ,white garments)
  9. 9. In an interview, Niall Fitzgerald said, “‘Communications had evolved so fast that within seconds this wasn’t a brand issue, this was a corporate issue. So even if we had wanted to ring-fence our product, we couldn’t have.’ Unilever chairman Sir Michael Perry referred to this incident as the greatest marketing setback that Unilever had ever seen.
  10. 10. Consequences  People avoided this product with a thought that it will destroy their clothes.  The product was a flop.  Most retailers quickly took the product from their shelves.  Unilever launched a crisis management program  1995 – Persil power replaced with Persil New Generation.
  11. 11.  Great organizations learn from their failures instead of carping about it or fixing accountabilities when the damage is already done.  This experience taught Unilever to promote greater cross-functional co-ordination between R&D and marketing functions.  The company institutionalized the process of setting up dedicated innovation centers instead of adopting an ethnocentric approach.  No brand is an island.  Products have to be tested under all conditions.
  12. 12. Q1.What are the aspects of consumer behavior that Unilever missed? How did it affect their business?  Unilever only focused on one segment of market that is Northern Europe where people washed clothes separately and in low temperatures. (NICHE PRODUCT) but sold product in other geographies.  Failed to test product in all conditions.  Lagged behind in research of usage norms in different geographies.  Effects on business:- • product was withdrawn • negative publicity by P&G • loss of 300 million pounds
  13. 13. Q2.Does this case study highlight the importance of understanding consumer behavior before a business decides to innovate a product?  Yes, because it helps to understand Difference in consumer behaviors in different geographies Varied expectations of consumers Reasons why consumers buy a product Likes and dislikes of consumers Impact of brand failure on corporate reputation
  14. 14. The significant risk for Unilever was… • If one product encounters a problem the image of other products could be damaged • Dent in brand reputation • Loss in customer’s trust and confidence in the brand
  15. 15. Thank you…

×