Schuichi Iwata_The challenge of governance as reagards nanotechnology

The challenge of governance as
regards nanotechnology

-nanotechnology through nuclear issues-

Ne3LS@Montreal
2012.11.2
Shuichi IWATA

Friday, November 2, 12

Question

• Q1:In the context of regulatory uncertainty
regarding nanotechnologies, what are the
responsibilities of the various actors?

• Q2:In the context of globalization, how can we
harmonize the different approaches toward
governance in different countries? Should this
harmonization be done at an international level?

• Q3:How can we better link research and
innovation in nanotechnology with the needs of
society?

• Q4:What do you see in your crystal ball for the
future of nanotechnology?

Question/Answer tentative
• Q1:Responsibilities/collective responsibility linked with
individual care(fundamental human right from to know &
knowing to decision) . The consuming public has been well
trained and prudent enough for producers/companies to
become sensitive for for their own sustainability. Traceability
has been endorsed by leading edge sciences as well as Japanese
intrinsic culture in general. Brand based on PL is essential.

• Q2:Harmonization/collective knowledge based on open and
shared data prepared by experts with organized traceability.

• Q3:Linkage of nanotechnology and societal needs/battle royal
with changing rules of game, if possible after their conﬁrmation
co-ordinated by government.

• Q4:Future of nanotechnology/a challenge beyond “statistics”
and “abstract” to “tailored only for you”, which requires design.

How to deal with risks due to
complexity and uncertainties

natural disaster
human-made disaster
social disaster
and their couplings


部分)国立科学博物館蔵


It is not easy for a landscape designer to predict cedar
pollen allergy before.


Prepared
by
M.
Yarime
Network of Citations among Articles from 29,391 papers
(1970-2006, connected component = 9,973 papers)
on Sustainability
#6 Business
#4 Forestry 450 papers, 5.5 ages
competitive advantage, environmental performance
(Agroforestry) South Africa, Brazil, USA
614 papers, 6.3 ages
nutrient, soil, nitrogen-fixation
India, Brazil, Germany #14 Soil
fertile soil, organic matter, cultivation
#1 Agriculture Australia, USA, Brazil
1,584 papers, 7.1 ages
soil, crop, biodiversity #3 Ecological Economics
USA, Netherlands, Australia 1,135 papers, 5.5 ages
natural capital accounting, ecological
footprint
#2 Fisheries USA, Netherlands, Australia
1,419 papers, 5.5 ages
fish catch, marine, ecosystem #5 Forestry
USA, Sweden, Canada (Tropical Rain Forest)
tropical forest, timber, harvest
USA, England, Spain
#9 Forestry #12 Energy
(Biodiversity) 229 papers, 4.9 ages
353 papers, 5.4 ages hydrogen, biomass, photovoltaic
ecosystem management England, Netherlands, USA
Canada, USA, France

#11 Rural Sociology
#13 Health 271 papers, 6.6 ages
221 papers, 5.8 ages developing country, rural development, local knowledge
health program, community USA, New Zealand, England
USA, Canada, Australia
#10 Urban Planning
#15 Wild Life
161 papers, 5.9 ages #7 Tourism sustainable city, landscape planning, regulation
England, USA, Scotland
wildlife, hunting, forest mammals
England, USA, Sweden eco-tourism, coastal management
#8 Water
England, USA, Scotland 361 papers, 5.5 ages # Rank, Cluster name
water resource, waste water, water cycle Cluster size, Average years after publication
China, Switzerland, Germany Keywords in the cluster
Kajikawa, et al. (2007) Country focusing the cluster


--patchworks of knowledge chunks based on
culture but no theory to promote mainly
thanks to capacity building through
education; governance is behind them-

Maintenance of ecology of sciences,
technologies, standards, regulations and
governances of stakeholders-keeping
diversities of sciences and cultures for
creativity and productivity

How to visualize the ecology tacit knowledge

How to solve
complexity and uncertainty issues

TQC of well-structured data to
go beyond
mere collections of
papers and data


Culculated
density:
D


How to solve
complexity and uncertainty issues

However almost all data
are ill-structured

Nano* s are the case also!

Reliability on
Radioactive Dose Data
--too much confusion


We do not know about our Earth and ....

• Earth

• Plate

• Fault AD 869
• Earthquake

• Tsunami

• Artifacts

• Climate Change

• Society

16 WNFM 38th AM-2011(Seville)


March 11, 2011(Fri)14:46 – Earthquake, Tsunami
By Tatsujiro Suzuki (The 3/11 Fukushima Nuclear Accident: What Happened and Lessons learned (so far)) May 2-4, 2011

➢ Occurred 14:46 March 11, 2011
➢ Magnitude : 9.0 Mw
➢ Epicenter location : 38°6’’N and
142°51’’E, and 24km in depth
➢ Victims : 15,202 Dead
8,718 Missing
(as of May 25, 2011)

18

UrEDAS : Urgent Earthquake Detection and Alarm System

Just several seconds!


Differences on
effects
• Energy
• Air, Semiconductors, ...
• DNA/Cell/Organ/Body
• Insects....
• Soil/Lands/River/Mountains/Sea
• Humans & Societies


how to deal with Data
Individual cares medical services if necessary
tele-medicine
・・・・
---->e-health(security, privacy)
Data on humans
digital check of accessible data
・・・・ along data life cycle

Data on living things capacity building of “experts”
to get data literacies rather than
statistics just for basic sciences
Radioactivity monitoring data share and traceability
Accident management “another subject”


how to deal with Data
Individual cares medical services if necessary

s
tele-medicine
・・・・
in t
o
---->e-health(security, privacy)
Data on humans

w p
digital check of accessible data
・・・・
Vie along data life cycle

Data on living things
e rs capacity building of “experts”

U s to get data literacies rather than
statistics just for basic sciences
Radioactivity monitoring data share and traceability
Accident management “another subject”


How to deal with
ill-structured data!


Data on Fukushima
• Environmental Monitoring Data/Low Dose (Rate) Risk
Data : epidemiological survey data, animal data /Patient
Clinical Data(+stress/fear/evacuation/damage caused by
rumors)

• Engineering Data(Design, Manufacturing, Operation,
Maintenance, Failure/Accident, Decommition) with big
diversities from sketch, log data, monitoring, ........, to
simulation

• ................
To grasp the reality together &
properly by using data journal!

Case Studies under Discussions

• Observatory data “TQC by time, space, energy, structure”
• 100 Years of Geomagnetic Observations at KAKIOKA- Contributions to Centennial
Progress of Geophysics

• Health data and scientiﬁc data for health data evaluation
• food risks “Human : Well Beings”
• low dose effects on irradiation exposures

• Data of Fukushima Nuclear Reactor Accidents and
associated facts “Collective Knowledge by Openness”


e.g. Semantic Web Layer Cake, 2007

Digital FUKUSHIMA

DBpedia*

tons of log data,
image data, copied/
pasted/duplicated
data, processed
data, PDF and
EXCEL ﬁles, .......


Diffusion of tacit knowledge is slow.

Next step is to strengthen our society
by increasing rule makers rather than rule takers
based on reliable data.

Data democracy for
emergence of our society!!!


Many
Thanks
Arigatou
Gozaimasu


869
Jōgan Sanriku Earthquake (Sugawara no Michizane et.al.)
>>Curse and Shrine
1755 Lisbon earthquake
>>Kant, Adam Smith, Voltaire, Rousseau (Enlightenment Thought)

1498

1945 Hiroshima and Nagasaki
>>the Cold War between the East and the West
>>Imperative of Responsibility (1979 Hans Jonas)

1986 Chernobyl

>>гласность and Dissolution of the Soviet Union

2001 9.11 New York
>>Sustainability for Human Security/Fundamental Human Right........

2011
3.11 The 2011 off the Paciﬁc coast of Tohoku Earthquake
Fukushima Daiichi 33


Vita Nova for Robust Engineering
Observation Science - earthquake/tsunami,biodiversity, climate change
Experimental Science -strategies and tactics with less experiments,
without reliable measurements due to the station blackout ....

Theoretical Science -inverse approaches to bridge gaps of models so as
to overcome “unexpected” or “locked-in” issues

Computational Science -correctness, semantics e.g., SPEEDI, severe
core damage simulation codes...

Data Science -data quality, transfer models between different contexts,
Design Science -values, brand, trends, virtues, contexts for each individual,
group, organization, stakeholder, nation, region, .... different design windows with
physical-, engineering-, economical-, social-, cultural-, political- feasibility

Strategic & Tactical(Timely, Proper,....) Solutions
34


Global
Reduc7on
of
Natural
Energy
Resources

! !! !!! ?!
2007 2050 2092

oil gas uranium

↑ Consumption
+ –
Production ↓
years
35
Hermann
Scheer
–
Energy
is
a
driving
force
for
our
civilisa7on
–
SOLAR
ADVOCATE,
2005

Schuichi Iwata_The challenge of governance as reagards nanotechnology

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Schuichi Iwata_The challenge of governance as reagards nanotechnology

Similaire à Schuichi Iwata_The challenge of governance as reagards nanotechnology (19)

Plus de Ne3LS_Network

Plus de Ne3LS_Network (20)

Schuichi Iwata_The challenge of governance as reagards nanotechnology