1. Online Catalogs: Designing with Users in Mind Webinar August 13, 2009 Christie Heitkamp Manager, User Experience & Information Architecture Team, WorldCat Local & WorldCat.org Karen Calhoun Vice President, WorldCat and Metadata Services
2. Polling –What Do You Think? 1. Our staff understand what our end users want from our catalog A – True B – False C – Don’t know By pirate johnny http://www.flickr.com/photos/piratejohnny/2798872422/
3. More Polling 2. My library’s end users are satisfied with our online catalog A – True B – False C – Don’t know By: sea turtle http://www.flickr.com/photos/sea-turtle/3181321172/
4. More Polling 3. My library’s cataloging practices and priorities reflect what end users want from our catalog A – True B – False C – Don’t know
6. Agenda Introduction to user experience Usability studies conducted on WorldCat.org and WorldCat Local over the past few years Meet the “users”
7. Credits Arnold Arcolio Mike Prasse OCLC Marketing group – Joanne Cantrell WorldCat Local Pilot partners
8. Usability & User Experience User Experience (from wikipedia) User experience design, most often abbreviated UX, but sometimes UE, is a term used to describe the overarching experience a person has as a result of their interactions with a particular product or service, its delivery, and related artifacts, according to their design
22. Credits: Online Catalogs Study With thanks to Janet Hawk, Joanne Cantrell, Peggy Gallagher, OCLC Market Research Photo by allw3ndyhttp://flickr.com/photos/allw3ndy/2757149584/
23. Online Catalogs: What Users and Librarians Want End-Users expect online catalogs: to look like popular Web sites to have summaries, abstracts, tables of contents to help find needed information Librarians expect online catalogs: to serve end users’ information needs to help staff carry out work responsibilities to have accurate, structured data to exhibit classical principles of organization http://www.oclc.org/us/en/reports/onlinecatalogs/default.htm
24. Objectives of our metadata quality research Start over without assumptions about what “quality” is Identify and compare metadata expectations End users Librarians Compare expectations of types of librarians Define a new WorldCat quality program … Taking into account the perspectives of all constituencies of WorldCat End users (and subgroups of end users) Librarians (and subgroups of librarians)
25. Research methodologies and demographics Focus groups Conducted by Blue Bear, LLC Three sessions: College students, general public, scholars Pop-up survey on WorldCat.org Conducted by ForeSee Results 11,000+ responses: Students (28%), educators (22%), business professionals (19%), other; mix of ages; 44% from outside U.S. Librarian survey Conducted by Marketing Backup 1,397 responses; North America (64%) and outside North America (36%); academic, public, special libraries; staff with roles in technical and public services, ILL, directors
26. What did we learn?End-user focus group results Key observations: Delivery is as important, if not more important, than discovery. Seamless, easy flow from discovery through delivery is critical. Summaries and tables of contents are key elements of a description Improved search relevance is necessary.
27. What did we learn?End-user focus group results
28. What did we learn?End-user focus group results “End users enter a few short search statements into online IR systems. Generally, their queries bear two to four words.”—Karen Markey Twenty-five years of end user searching, Part 1: Research findings. 2007. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/56093 Other key findings of our study: Keyword searching is king, but … Advanced search (fielded searching) is useful Faceted browse is useful These help end users refine searches, navigate, browse, and manage large result sets
29. What did we learn?Pop-up survey suggestions Changes to help identify an item? End users (n=7535)
30. End-user recommendations Improve search relevance Add more links to online full text (and make linking easy) Add more summaries/abstracts: Make summaries more prominent Add more details in the search results (e.g., cover art and summaries)
33. What did we learn?Librarians’ Perceptions of What End-Users Want Recommended enhancements to WorldCat
34. What did we learn?Librarians’ Perceptions of What End-Users Want (2) Recommended enhancements to WorldCat
35. Recommendations from librarian survey Merge duplicates Make it easier to make corrections to records (fix typos; do upgrades); “social cataloging” experiment—Wikipedia More emphasis on accuracy/currency of library holdings Enrichment—TOCs, summaries, cover art—work with content suppliers, use APIs, etc. More communication about what users say they want
55. For more information about the usability studies we’ve done and a summary of results written by Arnold Arcolio, visit: http://www.oclc.org/worldcatlocal/usability
58. What Does It Mean For Aligning What My Library Does with What Users Want? By: David Wulffhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/dwulff/5357629/
59. Question 3 Revisited 3b. My library’s cataloging practices and priorities reflect what end users want from our catalog A – True B – False C – Don’t know
60. Two Starting Points Paying attention to what’s important about records Aligning librarian and staff priorities with end user priorities E-resources, books, media, unique digital collections, special collection Redesigning work practices
61. Based on our two studies, what’s important about records? Delivery information – item availability and links to content Basic bibliographic information (title, author, publication year, publisher, format, edition, language) Evaluative content like summaries Fielded indexing (to support advanced search) Faceted browse (based on controlled forms names, topics, tags, etc.) Social features (for some audiences)
62. Follow up What did you think of the format of today’s session? (Webex with polling and chat) What did you think of the content of the presentation? What did you get out of the session that you can use in your work? What do you wish we had talked about?
After we intially launched our pilot, we immediately began intensive usability studies to begin to identify the issues and the successes of the new concept site. In collaboration with the WorldCat Local pilot libraries, we identified major areas of concern that our libraries and OCLC thought were usability issues in the WorldCat Local site.
One of the major features of WorldCat Local is offering the user the ability to discover local, group, and global holdings in one search interface. Since this is probably a new concept for library patrons, we wanted to make sure that the discovery and fulfillment experience in WorldCat Local would provide an equal or better experience than what patrons currently have using their local and group systems separately. Our testing showed that academic users had a strongly favorable response to searching local, group, and global collections together. However, since public library patrons are more concerned about what is at their local “branch” which is not easily discoverable through WorldCat Local, combining local, group, and global holdings was not received as favorably. To address this, OCLC is in the process of implementing branch holdings that will be discoverable through WorldCat Local and meanwhile, WorldCat Local introduced the ‘library scoping’ dropdown next to the search box that allow users to limit the results shown to just items owned by a particular library (currently not at the branch level).Both undergraduate and graduate student test participants recognized, understood, and welcomed the basic concept of combining articles form different sources, and combining them with books. They repeatedly mentioned the inclusion of journal article content as something they valued highly. However, most participants in one test (9/14) wrongly assumed that journal article coverage includes all the licensed content available at their campus.
For more information about the results we’ve discovered in usability testing WorldCat Local, download the summary written by one of our user researchers, Arnold Arcolio at this URL. Arnold presented his findings last month at ALA and provided a great forum for discussion among librarians who are interested in WorldCat Local usability.