Projet d'appui de l'OCDE pour la gestion des risques au Maroc - 3-4 Avril 2017. Info : www.oecd.org/fr/gov/risques/projet-appui-ocde-gestion-risques-maroc-atelier-avril-2017.htm

1. OECD SUPPORT PROJECT FOR RISK
MANAGEMENT IN MOROCCO
Workshop on Knowledge and Risk Assessment
3-4 April 2017, Rabat
NATIONAL RISK ATLAS
The Mexican Experience

2. Mexico,
a diverse
country

5. Mexico, a country with multiple risks

7. Eartquakes

8. Volcanoes

9. Hurricanes

10. Landslides

11. Drought index

12. Wild Fire

13. Climate Change (Extreme phenomena)

14. Risk Agenda

15. Phenomena
established in the
General Law of Civil
Protection

16. Regulatory framework

17. Article 19. The executive coordination of the National System will fall to the secretariat through
the National Coordination, which has the following powers in matters of civil protection:
XXII To supervise, through CENAPRED, that the national atlas of risks be carried out and
kept up to date, as well as those corresponding to the federative entities, municipalities
and delegations; (9)
1.General Law of Civil Protection
(05/12/2000)
Article 12. The executive coordination of
the National System will fall to the
Ministry of the Interior, which has the
following powers in matters of civil
protection:
XVII. Develop and update the National
Risk Atlas; (1)
2. General Law on Civil Protection
(06/06/2012)
Article 2. National Risk Atlas: Comprehensive
information system on disturbing agents and
expected damages resulting from a spatial and
temporal analysis of the interaction between
hazards, vulnerability and the degree of
exposure of affected agents;

18. Chapter XVII Of the Analysis of Risks
Article 110. Risk analysis is an orderly and
systematic method for identifying and
evaluating damages that may result from
natural and anthropogenic hazards and
hazards, as well as vulnerabilities of
buildings, buildings, infrastructure or
human settlements within the site under
study , In the near environment and in its
basin.
Regulation to the General Law of Civil Protection
(05/13/2014)
Chapter XVIII Risk Atlas
I. Information system
II. Hazard Maps
III. Susceptibility map for
landslides
IV. Inventory of exposed goods.
V. Vulnerability Inventory
VI. Risk Maps
VII.Scenarios of Risk

19. Article 113. The elaboration of the National
Atlas of Risks can be carried out in a
permanent way and by progressive stages.
Each of these stages will develop or improve
one or more of the components listed in the
previous article. Updates of the National Risk
Atlas will reduce the uncertainty of the
information, increase the resolution or
improve the capabilities of the National Civil
Protection System.
The National Risk Atlas must comply with the
guidelines and terminology, based on the
provisions of the guidelines established for
that purpose by the National Center for
disaster prevention.
Article 114. The supervision for the
elaboration and updating of the National
Atlas of Risks and of the State and
Municipal Atlas of Risks referred to in
article 19, section XXII of the Law, shall be
of an eminently preventive nature.

20. I. General provisions
II. Disturbing phenomena
III. Components of a risk atlas
IV. Geological phenomena
V. Hydrometeorological phenomena
VI. Chemical-technological phenomena
VII. Sanitary-ecological phenomena
VIII. Socio-organizational phenomena
IX. Attachment references
Minimum content guide for the elaboration of the
National Risk Atlas

21. System Design

23. Information and communication technologies

25. Diagram 1.- CENAPRED Network
LAN and WAN connections
Switch Layer 2 / Layer3
Switch Layer 2
Optical fiber single-mode 12-wire
Optical fiber multimode 12 wires 62.5 m
UTP (twisted pair) cat.6
Private network
CISCO ASA Firewall
REDUNAM
Anthropological Site
CENAPRED network
Storage 24 TB Raw
Oracle VM
Virtualization
High availability
2 virtual machines
4 cores
16 GB RAM
1 virtual machine
8 cores
32 GB RAM

26. ANR
National Risk Atlas
Risk Information System
Metadata Catalog

27. Inter-institutional coordination

29. Federal Public
Administation
Federative Entities
Municipalities
Perimeters of urban
consolidation
Flood hazard
Seismic hazard, landslide
Order of the Territory
Urban Development
BASE INFORMATION
Single Housung Registration
PROCESSES PRODUCTS
Autonomous
agencies
Social sector
Private sector

30. The National Risk Atlas

44. Systems integrated in the National Atlas of Risks
Level of complexity
Number
of Layers
(dynamic)
Number
of visits,
Monthly
average
ANR
Database More than 40,000 records
276 1,601 3,675
80030030,000
Portal
Public
ANR
system
Restricted
ANR
system

45. Examples of use

46. Other tools in Mexico

48. Recommendations
• Facilitate linkages across risk atlases at
all levels, and develop synergies
between
SAVER and R-FONDEN.
• Harmonise federal support for the
development of risk atlases at sub-
national levels.
• Strengthen financial and technical
support of municipal risk atlases.
• Take stronger account of potential
tsunamis in risk atlases.
• Develop the National Atlas on Climate
Change Impacts and Vulnerability.
• Reinforce engagement of the private
sector in risk assessment processes at all
levels.

49. 10 keys for risk assesment
1. Use standards (OGC)
2. Only one geographic framework (projection, datum)
3. Make metadata
4. Make the risk analysis public, be more useful and can be verified
5. Uses formal information sources, it does not matter if they are not
updated
6. The integration of information for different levels of analysis requires
harmonization

50. 10 keys for risk assesment
7. Make clear the importance of risk assessment, which is useful to
convince users and other information providers.
8. There must be a leading institution that integrates and publishes the
information on the same site.
9. Define one methodologies and procedures for risk assessment, you must
update them in a constant manner whit the participation of all related
institutions.
10. It integrates communicators and specialists in design and usability, the
systems will be more used.

51. What have we learned?
• Risk assessment is a difficult and long-term task.
• There must be an institution with technical capacity to coordinate
and integrate the information generated for all instances.
• It is necessary to generate indicators that allow to evaluate the use
of the systems and their impact in the decision making.
• National risk information systems are the frame of reference for the
generation of public policies for disaster risk management