Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Nous utilisons votre profil LinkedIn et vos données d’activité pour vous proposer des publicités personnalisées et pertinentes. Vous pouvez changer vos préférences de publicités à tout moment.
Social Impact Measurement: why and for
whom?
The view of the European Economic and Social
Committee
OECD Forum on Partners...
 Treaty based advisory body to EU Institutions
 Gathers organised civil society perspectives
 Opinions, hearings, studi...
 Nothing new for social enterprises…
 Europe is changing  unprecedented crisis and societal challenges 
more needs & l...
 EU Policy Perspective
 Single Market Act II and SBI  methods needed for EuSEF and EaSI
 GECES sub-group report
 EESC...
 Welcome the debate on social impact measurements
 EESC description: social outcomes and impact created by specific acti...
Further to Consider
 Remember why!  to support of social enterprise growth and
development
 Must be social enterprises ...
 Co-design pilots with social enterprises  local, regional and national
levels
 CEGES report and EESC opinion basis for...
Thank you!
Follow EESC work on Social Enterprise:
http://www.eesc.europa.eu/?i=portal.en.social-entrepreneurship-make-it-h...
Prochain SlideShare
Chargement dans…5
×

Wd ariane rodert - Social Impact Measurement: why and for whom?

945 vues

Publié le

  • Soyez le premier à commenter

  • Soyez le premier à aimer ceci

Wd ariane rodert - Social Impact Measurement: why and for whom?

  1. 1. Social Impact Measurement: why and for whom? The view of the European Economic and Social Committee OECD Forum on Partnership and Local Development Stockholm 2014-04-24
  2. 2.  Treaty based advisory body to EU Institutions  Gathers organised civil society perspectives  Opinions, hearings, studies, reports and projects  Specific social economy and enterprise expertise  Key player in the EU social enterprise policy agenda  SBI, Strasbourg, project…  EESC Observer in GECES (Groupe d'Experts de la Commission sur l'Entrepreneuriat Social) The European Economic and Social Committee
  3. 3.  Nothing new for social enterprises…  Europe is changing  unprecedented crisis and societal challenges  more needs & less funding  Social enterprise recognised key in exit strategy and to re-build  primary purpose is social impact  Most recently: Strasbourg Declaration calls for: “In this new Europe, all players need to look at growth and value creation from a wider perspective, by including social indicators and demonstrating positive social impact when reporting social and economic progress”. Social Impact – Why?
  4. 4.  EU Policy Perspective  Single Market Act II and SBI  methods needed for EuSEF and EaSI  GECES sub-group report  EESC opinion  adopted December 2013  Recognise that motives vary by stakeholders:  Public authorities  policy outcome relative policy objectives  Social enterprise  realisation of social mission  Investors  realisation of funding objective  User  results relative expectations Social Impact – for Whom?
  5. 5.  Welcome the debate on social impact measurements  EESC description: social outcomes and impact created by specific activities (and models) of the social enterprise – not the enterprise itself  Tread carefully, do not rush  may counteract purpose of supporting social enterprises  Core purpose of enterprise and already an integral part  Input  Output  Outcome  Impact  Methods exist  are bottom-up and both qualitative and quantitative  Risk of incorrect/over-application in MS  stifle social innovation and sector development  Pilot, review and adjust  limit to EuSEF and EaSI Social Impact – How? The EESC Opinion
  6. 6. Further to Consider  Remember why!  to support of social enterprise growth and development  Must be social enterprises centred and supportive of mission  Recognise diversity of sector  risk loosing new and small…  Ensure proportionality  must fit specific models and logic, resources…  Separate EuSEF and EaSI  don’t mix financial and political effects…  Accredit and promote using existing methods  Awareness raising and training programmes for MS
  7. 7.  Co-design pilots with social enterprises  local, regional and national levels  CEGES report and EESC opinion basis for EU policy work  need a clear policy dimension  consultation?  Connection to G8 central  include context of European welfare models  EESC will continue to discuss and monitor The Way Forward…
  8. 8. Thank you! Follow EESC work on Social Enterprise: http://www.eesc.europa.eu/?i=portal.en.social-entrepreneurship-make-it-happen

×