Presentation from March 2021 CCXG Forum

1. Implementing Article 6.4
Options for baseline methodological approaches
CCXG Session 3 16.03.2021
Thomas Forth
thomas.forth.extern@bmu.bund.de

2. Article 6, paragraph 4, of the Paris Agreement
Proposal by the President
Version 3 of 15 December 2019
B. Methodologies 33/34
33. Mechanism methodologies may be
developed by activity participants, host
Parties, stakeholders, or the Supervisory
Body.
34. Mechanism methodologies shall be
approved by the Supervisory Body where
they meet the requirements of these rules,
modalities and procedures and
requirements established by the
Supervisory Body.
When work on methodologies can start?
What is the role of host Parties?
How this para relates to para 33
regarding host Parties?
How this para relates to para 36? What
is the balance or the hierarchy between
CMA principles and requirements set by
the SB?

3. Article 6, paragraph 4, of the Paris Agreement
Proposal by the President
Version 3 of 15 December 2019
B. Methodologies 35/36
35. Each mechanism methodology shall
require the selection of a transparent and
conservative approach, assumptions,
parameters, data sources and key factors and
should take into account, as appropriate:
uncertainty; any leakage due to the
implementation of the Article 6, paragraph 4,
activity; relevant policy; consistency with the
NDC of the host Party, any contribution to
reducing emission levels in the host Party, any
long-term low GHG emission development
strategy of the host Party and the long-term
goal of the Paris Agreement; and should
encourage an increase in ambition over time.
36. The CMA shall adopt principles for
methodologies and baseline and additionality
approaches.
Are these references the basis of the
principles to be taken by the CMA and how
they could be operationalized as guidance to
the new body (SB)?
How to handle the references to the host
Parties?
How to handle different capacities of host
countries to provide data and information on
NDC related policies and measures, the LTS
and LTG?
Will it be sufficient to have principles as
narratives?
Or should they build a more concrete basis for
the SB requirements setting?

4. Article 6, paragraph 4, of the Paris Agreement
Proposal by the President
Version 3 of 15 December 2019
B. Methodologies 37/38
37. Standardized baselines may be developed
by the Supervisory Body at the request of the
host Party or may be developed by the host
Party and approved by the Supervisory Body.
Standardized baselines shall be established
at the highest possible level of aggregation in
the relevant sector of the host Party.
38. The Supervisory Body may waive
additionality requirements for any least
developed country or small island developing
State at the request of that Party, in
accordance with requirements developed by
the Supervisory Body.
With the before-mentioned requirements
the question comes up, what is the
purpose of standardized baselines (SBL)
under the Paris Agreement?
Will SBL be a space where host Parties
can align the use of Art. 6 with their
domestic climate policies and the LTS?
Will be there a different treatment of
similar activities under similar local
conditions, such as cookstove or
community-related activities in general?

5. General Remarks
on the Methodogies Section
 The text may serve as good basis for the proceeding of the UNFCCC negotiations
 Some aspects would benefit from supplemental clarifications and would provide a
broad understanding of roles and tasks of actors
 On paras 34/36:
More attributional elements for CMP, SB and host Parties
 On paras 35/37:
Understanding the need of capacity building, when NDCs, LTS and LTGs should
become subject to the use of Art. 6.
 On paras 33/38:
An early starting point for methodolgy development and special encouragements
should be on the wish list for Glasgow.
Definig that process and the issues to start with.

6. BAT approach
as host Parties best choice
• BAT approaches are already of high
value in many countries
• OECD activities are ongoing, actually
until 2022
• For a couple of Parties we have
reporting of regulations, experiences
and further work announced
• Examples could be find in: Brazil,
Canada, China, EU, India, New Zealand,
Russia, the US and some more
• However more work needs to be done to
provide the same opportunities for the
use of Art. 6 for all Parties
• Apparently such an approach could
create barriers for Parties for a long time
• A solution could be, that the work will
be inscribed in the concrete
requirements in the methodogies
• Certainly ressources for capacity
building would accelerate this process
• And a transitional period is unavoidable

7. BAT approach allows host Parties
to make better choices
• The BAT approach is combinable with
standardized baselines.
• Technology options for domestic
pathways to current NDC and to ambition
raising over time could be identified.
• At the same time the BAT approach
discovers the points of departure for Art. 6
activities, where the host Party needs
international cooperation
• Analytically: the margins comes visible, in
which the host country will be enabled to
set its pathway to NDC in line with LTS
• This approch facilitate the explanation and
the testing of additionality
• The BAT approach opens the technical
space for host Parties to influence
methodology application in line with
domestic circumstances on NDC and LTS
• However: The ideal type of creating a
baseline must be translated into the
proceeding under Art. 6.
It is not done with referencing!

8. Thank you!
thomas.forth.extern@bmu.bund.de