Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Le téléchargement de votre SlideShare est en cours. ×
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Prochain SlideShare
Neurological levels
Neurological levels
Chargement dans…3
×

Consultez-les par la suite

1 sur 13 Publicité

Plus De Contenu Connexe

Diaporamas pour vous (20)

Similaire à Creating a high five team (20)

Publicité

Plus par LineView Academy (was OFX Academy) (20)

Plus récents (20)

Publicité

Creating a high five team

  1. 1. Teamwork – Creating a high five team www.optimumfx.com
  2. 2. Intent & Why • To highlight 4 key ingredients for developing winning teams • Discuss how you could apply these elements to existing teams • Why create winning teams? – ...
  3. 3. High-five Teams 1. Provide purpose, vision, shared goals and values 2. Unleash and develop skills 3. Create “Team Power” 4. Keep the focus on the positive! • High Five! – You can’t high-five yourself! – You know/feel when it ‘clicks’ – Same is true of winning teams
  4. 4. 1. Provide purpose • Provide purpose, shared values and goals – The compelling purpose for being (worthwhile work) • A good enough reason to get people fired up and wanting to head in the same direction – the holy grail – Without this, you don’t have a team – just a crowd • Reinforce with Team Charter/covenant • Great examples: – Medical teams – saving lives – Sports teams – silverware, rivalries, bragging rights • Q: What tools could you apply to create this with your teams?
  5. 5. 2. Develop High Skills • Unleash capabilities, encourage individuals to use them • Start with individual skills and get everyone committed to constant improvement – cross-train • As leaders, you need to be able to measure and compare – and provide feedback • Set individual goals • Q: What tools could you employ here?
  6. 6. 3. Create Team Power • Collective power of the group outshines individual performance • Shifts focus from looking good to ensuring the team looks good • Synergetic harmony – None of us is as smart as all of us – 1+1=3 – Individuals can never have ‘team skills’
  7. 7. 4. Keep the focus on the positive • Reinforces the first three – people repeat performance that garners reward • Accentuate the positive - Repeated reward and recognition • Catch people doing the right things – and recognise it (no negative feedback) • Catch them aligned – to purpose, skills development – and heap on the recognition/rewards • Q: Tools for this? – Recognition is often its own reward
  8. 8. 4 Key Ingredients for high-five teams 1. Create a sense of purpose, plus shared values and goal – Good enough reason to get people fired up - without this you don’t have a team – Create team charter or covenant to reinforce this 2. Develop high skills – Unleash capabilities, encourage individuals to use them – Start with individual skills and get everyone committed to constant improvement – Need to be able to measure and compare – and provide feedback – Set individual goals (SMART) 3. Create Team Power - None of us is as smart as all of us – Collective power of the group outshines individual performance – Not focused on looking good – focus on the team looking good – Synergetic harmony 4. Repeated reward and recognition – accentuate the positive – Reinforces the first three - People repeat performance that garners reward (Killer whale) – Catch people doing the right things – and recognise it (no negative feedback) – Catch them aligned (to purpose, skills development, synergy) and heap on the recognition/rewards – Recognition is often its own reward – think about Most Valuable Player award/man of the match – instant feedback, immediate accountability
  9. 9. P.U.C.K. 4 Key Ingredients for Successful Teams
  10. 10. One of us is smarter than all of us - A quick reframe • Ants get smarter while we get dumber • The wisdom of crowds comes not from the consensus, but the aggregation of ideas/thoughts/decisions of each individual • The best collective decisions are the product of disagreement and contest not consensus or compromise • Diversity increases the quality of the aggregated wisdom of the group – Different paradigms/MOWs – positive deviance "Paradoxically, the best way for a group to be smart is for each person in it to think and act as independently as possible.“
  11. 11. How to make it happen • Ask rather than tell - evoke an exploratory ‘let’s see what happens’ frame of mind • The three R's - respect recognition and reassurance - need to be in place. Without these most people will simply not take the risk of engaging in exploring with you (Old school-anchors of being made to look silly can kick in) • Eliminate the right-answer attitude – NLP Principles of "the map is not the territory" and "respect the other person's model of the world" (although, can be deeply ingrained from school days) • No surprises – let people know what to expect. When people come to your coaching session, team or management meeting, tell them in advance that things are going to be different. • Allow silence – People need time to digest what you have asked before they answer or come up with ideas and suggestions
  12. 12. Recap 1. Provide a clear sense of purpose with values and goals, reinforced with a charter or a covenant that gives the team members a reason to trade self for selflessness – Get them fired up 2. Unleash and develop skills continuously, building individual skills that in turn bolster collective skills – Continuously improve skills to achieve purpose 3. Create team power – none of us is smarter than all of us – Ensure aligned - synergetic harmony 4. Keep the accent on the positive – people repeat performance for which they get praised
  13. 13. Questions to ask yourselves • Does your team have agreed-upon goals they created as a team? • Do the players openly encourage and support one another? • Do they have open communication with one another? • Does each player know what their role on the team is? • Is there mutual respect among the members? • Do players use statements such as "we" when referring to the team, or is it an "every man for himself" mentality? • Have they created a positive team image for themselves? • Is the team as a whole committed to improving performance? • Does each member consider themselves as a "team player?"

×