Essay On Tragedy And The Common Man

Essay On Tragedy And The Common Man
Aristotle – a Greek dramatist – claimed that only those of noble birth could truly be tragic, as their downfall would be perceived as more catastrophic
than that of the common man. Therefore, the common man cannot actually understand tragedy, as his demise would not be as powerful or tragic as
those from noble realms. In Arthur Miller's essay Tragedy and the Common Man, he opposes Aristotle's theory by saying that – actually – it is the
common man who is best fit for tragedy. Miller's statement on how the components in a tragedy that would shake us derive "from the underlying fear
of being misplaced" and "the disaster inherent in being torn away from our chosen image" proves this. Noble and royal individuals know their place in
this world;...show more content...
The reason for the superiority of this statement above others is that it covers the concept of the common man's tragedy far better than any other
statement. The biblical figure, Job, was a respectable and prosperous family man who was plagued with terrible misfortunes that took away all that he
holds dear, including his offspring, his health and his property. He then struggles to comprehend his situation and commences a search for the answers
to his difficulties. It can be suggested that Job was a common man – not born into a noble or kingly family. However, as common as he was, was his
demise not tragic? He could have faced God in rage and demanded he return to his place. This very example defies Aristotle's theory entirely. Miller's
use of this illustration is extravagant as it completely proves his point through one sentence. He also says that the "commonest of men may take on that
stature to the extent of his willingness to throw all he has into the contest, the battle to secure his rightful place in his world". To summarize, he is
saying that even the ordinary and the extraordinary will sacrifice everything they have to ensure their place in this world, whether it kills them or
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay on Tragedy of Deforestation
Human activity can negatively impact on the environment in different ways, which can lead to consequences which are not only bad for the
environmental area affected, but humans too. Activities such as causing radiation leaks with nuclear meltdowns and dumping waste are just some
examples of how humans can worsen their own environment.
One environment damaging human activity in particular is deforestation. It is a significant problem in many parts of the world, with over four fifths of
the worlds forest wiped out according to the World Resources Institute. So what are the main consequences which are caused by deforestation, and why
does it happen?
A major result on the environment is the habitat destruction and endangerment of animals....show more content...
This problem certainly isn't central to Australia, with deforestation most commonly occurring in Latin America, Southeast Asia and Africa, however
Australia like the rest of the world is affected by the consequences nonetheless. It's a well–known fact that rainforests have the ability to absorb
immense amounts of carbon dioxide and release oxygen by photosynthesis. Not only do we lose a source of oxygen and CO2 recycling, but when
trees are burned or cut down, they actually release CO2 because 50 percent of trees is CO2. According to the Global Canopy Program (organisation of
chief rainforest scientists) "If we lose the forests, we lose the fight against climate change".
Deforestation will continue for a long time, due to financial gain and people needing more space for agriculture or clearing out forest due to
urbanisation and similar developments. Agriculture is the main cause, as farmers need large spaces for planting crops and keeping animals; however
they can do a lot damage to forests at the same time. Forests are obviously abundant in vegetation; however tropical rainforests are often on soil which
contains low levels of nutrients in thin layers. The bulk of rock beneath is prone to erosion from the rain and high temperatures of the tropics.
Substantial amounts of nutrients which are vital for animal communities are contained

Essay On The Tragedy Of King Lear
Up until the mid–point of his career, Shakespeare divided his plays between the three major genres: Comedy, Tragedy, and History. The tragic genre is
perhaps the oldest genre in literature, dating back to the ancient Greeks. It started with the ancient Greek celebrations of Dionysus, the god of wine and
fertility. The very simple plot of atragedy involves a protagonist who desires something which could be a lover, power, wealth, authority, and obstacles
come in his way as he reaches its fulfillment. However, After undergoing a series of challenges, the protagonist does not overcome the obstacles, which
eventually lead to his downfall and destroy him. That is apparent in the Shakespearean Tragedy as tragedy does not only mean death or calamity,...show
more content...
The full title of the play itself The Tragedy of King Lear puts the play in the tragic genre. As with all tragedies, there exists atragic hero, one who
possesses a fatal flaw that initiates the tragedy and all the sufferings that follow. King Lear, king of England, would be the tragic hero because he
held the highest position in the social chain at the very beginning of the play. His social position gave him pride as he remarked himself as
"Jupiter" and "Apollo". Moreover, according to the definition of a tragic hero, one must be born into nobility, endowed with a tragic flaw, fail to
judge, fall from great heights, being aware that they have made an inevitable mistake, and faces and accepts death with honor. King Lear meets all
of these qualities. King Lear was a tragic hero that was born into nobility, endowed with a tragic flaw and fails as he makes a serious mistake in
judgement. "He owned vast amounts of land and ruled over many people. Give me the map there. know that we have divided In three our Kingdom."
The plot is driven by the power and consequence of losses, more specifically, the losses of King Lear. Throughout the play, because of his flaws,
King Lear loses his authority as a king, his identity as a father, and his sanity as a man. One loss becomes related to one another. Moreover, his
greatest loss, and what

Tragedy In Drama Essay
Tragedy and Drama
In a range of dramatic works from Agamemnon to Hamlet, one sees the range of development of the tragic form, from the earliest Greek to the later
Shakespearean tragedies. There are two basic concepts of tragedy: the concept introduced by Aristotle in his Poetics, and the concept developed by
Frederick Nietzsche in his "The Birth of Tragedy." Many dramas can be reviewed to reveal the contrast between these two concepts of
tragedy, and demonstrate the development of the tragic form over time.
The idea of Greek tragedy stems from Aristotle's definition of a tragic hero. In Aristotle's definition, the tragic hero must be a person of high standing
so their fall from glory will be all the more horrible. The hero's...show more content...
Again, we have a person of high standing in Oedipus, who is neither entirely good nor entirely bad. However, it is Oedipus' pride that pervades as
his tragic flaw throughout the play. It is pride that causes Oedipus to believe the rumor of his questionable parentage and further, to go to the oracle.
It is again pride that causes him to leave Corinth in attempt to defy the prophecy of the oracle. And pride arguably causes Oedipus to murder the man
he quarrels with on the road, who is actually his father, thus fulfilling the very prophesy he had tried to defy. Oedipus Rex demonstrates the belief in
fate, that what is ordained shall be, regardless of man's attempt to resist his fate. Oedipus falls victim to having poor judgement and letting his pride
make his decisions for him, and this ends up becoming his demise.
Another of the Greek tragedies is Medea, which is one of the few with a female as the title hero character. Medea demonstrates the changing attitude in
Greek drama, and introduces a more human aspect to the hero's behavior. In the earlier dramas, the heroes were influenced heavily by fate, and the
tragic flaw and eventual downfall often had something to do with fate. However, in the case of Medea, we see the hero as falling outside the realm of
divine intervention. Though Medea is wronged by Jason, there is no sense of support from the gods in exacting her

Tragedy Essay
Kenny Fleming
Mr. Blocker– Period 2
Due: 4/2/12
Tragedy From Afar
Catharsis, the dramatic event that describes the "emotional cleansing" of the general audience, prevails in many tragedies. It provides an extreme
change in emotion, as the result of experiencing strong feelings. It has been described as "purification" or a "purging" of emotions (Aristotle 22).
Shakespeare's Macbeth represented a tragedy, because of the loss and destruction of lives. More specifically, the large–scale destruction and loss that
resulted was Macbeth's rise to power, ruling, and downfall. Arthur Miller's The Crucible illustrates a tragedy due to intense emotional suffering brought
on by the accusations of former friends, manipulation, infidelity,...show more content...
A widely publicized real life tragedy revolved around a New York mom who had at least 10 drinks and smoked marijuana before driving five children
the wrong way down a highway and crashing head on into an SUV. She was killed instantly and also took the lives of her 2–year–old daughter and
three nieces, also in her van, as well as three men who were in the SUV. Her 5–year–old son was the lone survivor of the crash. "Schuler had a blood
alcohol content of .19, more than double the legal limit, and was also impaired by marijuana, which just further exacerbated the problem", according to
state attorney Janet Difiore. At one point her 8–year–old niece called her father to say her aunt was behaving strangely. Unfortunately, while the family
attempted to monitor Schuler and the children's location, they were unsuccessful. An event, which results in the untimely death of young children,
always evokes tremendous emotion. This event, well popularized and viewed by many, serves as a key reminder in helping us deal with suffering we
may experience on our own. By reading about this story, we feel these emotions from a safe distance to better prepare ourselves. This is why a topic
/event with tragedy like this draws a large amount of attention.
Tragedies in all of these examples are similar due to the effect they have on the audience. In each of these books and real life events, there are common
elements causing an emotional effect on the audience. For the most part, these

Tragedy : A Great Topic
Tragedy: A Great Topic
(In Discussion: The Construction of Poetry)
"Of all the Causes which conspire to blind man's erring judgement, and misguide the mind, what the weak head with strongest bias rules, is pride, the
never–failing vice of fools. Whatever Nature has in worth denied, she gives in large recruits of needful Pride: for as in bodies, thus in souls, we find
what wants in blood and spirit, swelled with wind: Pride, where Wit fails, steps in to our defence, and fills up all the mighty Void of sense." (Page 702
Lines 1–10). This is a quote from Alexander Pope's An Essay on Criticism. Alexander Pope wrotepoetry. His favorite topic was informative. In this
poem the first fourteen lines are about pride, stanza two is about the lack of learning. He also talks about wit, judging a book by the cover, how hard
it is to please, being partial to groups the critic favors, being influenced by others, and more. Aristotle loved to write on tragedy. According to Richard
Sorabji, "Aristotle groups together thought, perception and walking as activities of which we are conscious, and does not follow Descartes in
protesting that we are not immediately conscious of corporeal walking. Thought, perception and walking are grouped together again, on the grounds
that they all belong to humans, none to plants." Aristotle does not agree with Descartes in what is conscious and what isn't. Aristotle wrote an essay
entitled Tragedy and the Emotions of Pity and Fear. Aristotle and Alexander

Macbeth
According to the classical view, tragedy should arouse feelings of pity and fear in the audience. Does Macbeth do this?
Tragedy has most definitely influenced the viewer's thoughts on Macbeth within this play. In Shakespeare's Macbeth, the audience sees a gradual
breakdown in the character of Macbeth himself, due to the tragic events that unfold during the play. This has a direct effect on the audience's views and
thoughts of Macbeth, thus creating pity and fear within the audience. Macbeth, being a man and a human being himself, is in–clined to some forms of
temptation, to which man himself has quite often succumbed. The guilt that Mac–beth experiences after the death of his beloved King Duncan also
experienced in every human's life,...show more content...
The events in which took place after this increase our pity of Macbeth. The audience sees a grown, noble and mighty officer degraded into a pool of
immense guilt.
Macbeth was, shortly after the murdering incident, driven insane by the immense guilt produced by his withered conscience. The dagger that was
used in the killing of King Duncan haunted him before the murder took place. This tragedy in the play gives us both fear of where the sword came
from and pity for Macbeth's character that had degraded to such a point that he has become paranoid.
"Is this a dagger which I see before me, The handle toward my hand? Come, let me clutch thee. I have thee not, and yet I see thee still. Art thou
not, fatal vision, sensible To feeling as to sight? Or art thou but A dagger of mind, a false creation, Proceeding from the heat–oppressed brain? ..."
[II.i.33–39]
The events before the murder of Duncan, which include Macbeth's fear of killing Duncan, the timing at–which it will take place; all of which these
things made the audience fearful. Macbeth seemed nervous in a way, for he loved his king and would do anything in his strength to protect him and his
family:
"The service and loyalty...your throne and state, children and servants, Which do but what they should by doing everything Safe toward your love
and hon–our..."
Macbeth [I.iv.22–27]

Macbeth knew that Duncan was a kind man, and Duncan thought that others were like him (as noble and

The Tragedy Of ' Tragedy ' Essay
What is Tragedy? As defined on the Literary Devices website, tragedy in literature refers to a series of unfortunate events by which one or more of the
literary characters in the story undergo several misfortunes, which finally culminate into a disaster of "epic proportions". The website also states that
tragedy is generally built up in 5 stages: a) happy times, b) the introduction of a problem, c) the problem worsens to a crisis or dilemma, d) the
characters are unable to prevent the problem from taking over, and e) the problem results in some catastrophic, grave ending, which is the tragedy
culminated (Literary Devices, 2016). Although very similar to the aforementioned definition, I personally define or relate the word "tragedy" to a
more modern sense. This modern sense is an individual that is unsuccessful with day to day life and seems to continuously be in an uphill battle. The
individual has their goals set but could never reach their full potential to reach that goal. They get so consumed by the uncertainties in life and no
matter how hard they try to overcome adversity it still results in the set goals never being in sight and sadly never being met.
Tragic Hero For every tragic story involves "Tragic Hero". When we all think of the word hero, we conclude that the story is going to have a happy
ending, but unfortunately that is not the case in tragic literature. According to Author Miller's Tragedy and the Common Man, the one

A Summary On ' Tragedy '
Hannah Fraser
HC 223H
Goldberg
03 June 2015
As a summary of the quarter's work, write an essay that presents your answer to the question of the day, 'Is tragedy (still) possible?' Be specific in your
definitions, and illustrate your points with examples drawn from class material and anything else you may find helpful.
The Foundations of a Tragedy For centuries the only definition of tragedy available to critics was found through Aristotle's Poetics. Rarely were the
ideas of Aristotle challenged and his explanation of a tragic work established the format of tragedy. Aristotle was never questioned and thus his
explanation of tragedy stood for centuries however, as literature develops the requirements of a tragedy have begun to change. In current tragedies
not all tragic heroes suffer because of a specific tragic error, not all tragic plots contain scenes of recognition, and not all heroes are recognized
individuals. Numerous types of dramas have developed over time that do not satisfy all of Aristotle's requirements however are still considered
tragedy. Modern tragedies do not satisfy all of the requirements of tragedy as described by Aristotle. However, they allow an audience to feel pain
and closely connect to the characters. In modern times a tragic hero is no longer required to be a prestigious and elite character, but instead a
relatable and common man such as Willy Loman in Death of a Salesman. It is rare to find a chorus in a modern tragedy, however in modern cinema

A Tragic Situation Essay
Tragedy is a description of an event that evokes a sympathetic feeling of emotion by the audience. The events involve people emotionally who were not
involved in the situation physically. In the story of Antigone, Sophecles forces the audience to take pity on the poor girl's situation. This story impacts
the audience in such a way that the audience becomes emotionally enthralled in the plot of the story. All of Steiner's, "Principle constants of conflict in
the condition of man," (360) were present in the tragic tale of Antigone. The conflicts confirm a tragic sense about the story. In atragedy drama is
experienced and the characters typically suffer extremely. Consequently, this can happen because of a tragic mistake.
The first of the...show more content...
She made it very difficult for Creon to feel satisfied with her execution. Antigone told him that she does not care if she dies because she already got
what she wanted by burying her brother against Creon's wishes. Even though she knew she was going to die she would die happy. Antigone won the
battle over her uncle and the power struggle he put her through. "Enough. Give me glory! What greater glory could I win than to give my own brother
decent burial?" (375–376) Antigone told her uncle. Eteocles, Antigone's other brother, was buried a well. His burial was not illegal because was not
an enemy of Creon. Antigone tired tells him that every death deserves a proper burial no matter who they are. He was much closed–minded and
refused to listen to her. The conflict of Antigone and Creon is a battle over power between man and woman. What makes this story even more tragic
was the power Creon held over Antigone and her fate. It was the power to decide whether she should live or die. He had the chance to free her from
her doom. Although he realized this too late. When he realized this he gathered his men. He said to them, "Now– I'm on my way! Come, each of you,
take up axes, make for the high ground, over there quickly! I and my better judgment have come round to this– I shackled her, I'll set her free myself. I
am afraid...it's best to keep

Tragedy and Comedy Essay
Theater is a natural outlet for our desire to hear and tell stories, and in some ways it is even more primal and powerful than the written word. At its
worst, theater will merely bore; while at its best it will not only entertain but move and shape its audience. Two such genres of theater, or drama, have
consistently achieved this effect. Tragedy, represented by the weeping actors' mask, usually features the title character's fall from greatness to ruin,
guided by the gods or fate. Oedipus Rex, written by Sophocles, is the epitome of classic Tragedy, as defined by Aristotle (96–101). Here, Oedipus falls
from kingship to blindness and exile. Drama's other great genre, Comedy, is represented by the laughing actors' mask. In Comedy the...show more
content...
At their core, Comedy and Tragedy are two sides of the same coin. Without characters, there would not be a story. Whether that character is a human
being or an idea, we need something or someone that can be the reflection of something real onstage. In Oedipus Rex the main character is a young
king. On the surface, one might not relate to a rich, powerful king destined to ruin by mythical gods. The Greeks, however, believed that "tragedy
could only befall the great." (Jacobus 34) Oedipus' character resonated because he was above them. If it were a plebeian who killed his father and
married his mother, it would be our equivalent of an inbred trailer–park tabloid story. His nobility is what keeps the dramatic from becoming the
melodramatic. So for the Greeks, Oedipus' story became a classic because he achieved that perfect balance of nobility and relatability. They
experienced fear when Oedipus, a man in a position just under the gods, fell and failed. But both modern man and the ancient Greek can experience
pity because we can see part of ourselves in Oedipus. When Oedipus is helpless to escape his fate, part of us shares his frustration. His humanity is
timeless. While a Comedy's main character does not require us to feel pity or fear, we still must relate, albeit in different ways. In Lysistrata, the main
character is a confident and quick–witted and although she is subject to sexist

Essay On The Paradox Of Tragedy
2. What is the Paradox of Tragedy? Generally, the paradox of tragedy discusses "how we can (not irrationally or absurdly) respond emotionally to a
work of art all, given that we do not really believe the events or charters depicted in it are real." While, in Pleasures of Tragedies, Feagin takes a more
specific approach which aims at figuring out the possible explanation of the pleasures obtained from the tragedy. According to our common sense,
tragedy can evoke unpleasant emotions, such as sadness, disappointment and pity. It is believed that people usually tend to avoid negative emotions,
however, many people seem still pursue and enjoy tragedy a lot. Therefore, a contradiction arises here, i.e. human beings by nature tend to avoid
negative...show more content...
It thereby triggers a holy spiritual experience which is only unique to human being, and helps human beings to successfully identify themselves as
human beings or as a moral creature. And such self–identification, "this discovery, or reminder, is something which, quite justly, yields satisfaction." To
further understand how could such realization of humanity or successful self–identification provoke pleasurable feelings exactly, it is reasonable to
consider about Aristotle's theory of happiness/Eudaimonia (It is pretty much sure that there are many other ways). In Aristotle's argument of happiness,
which he names as Eudaimonia, he argues that the function of man is "to be an activity or actions of the soul implying a rational principle." Although
human beings can have many functions, one distinctive function only possessed by human beings rather than other live beings is the application of
rationality by the soul. Since fulfilling one's function is crucial for human being to be truly happy as a human being, Aristotle proposes that people
can only get real happiness when they make the virtuous choice and act morally through using their rationality. Thereby, in the case of paradox of
tragedy, when people think rationally and come to the judgement that feeling pity or sympathetic for the characters in the tragedy is virtuous or
morally right, he or she will feel happy for being a rational and moral person. By contrast, when judging a piece of immoral art, people's
meta–response will be sadness if his direct response is pleasure, because such direct pleasure is in conflict with moral values of human beings. People
will feel sad due to the failure of fulfilling his function of being a rational and moral

The Great Gatsby As A Tragedy Essay
The Great Gatsby As A Tragedy
A hurried read of F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby can generate a tragic impression. The deaths of three of the main characters and the failure of
Gatsby and Daisy's romance can be viewed as tragic.
However, a deeper analysis of the book reveals a much deeper tragedy.
The relentless struggles of Gatsby himself parallel Fitzgerald's apparent ideas of the struggles of all Americans. The American dream romanticized by
the majority of the population is really unattainable because it is, in fact, nonexistent.
Every character has an unfortunate role and could be called a tragic character. However, the main tragedy is that of the title character.
Gatsby experiences nothing but tragedy in his...show more content...
Gatsby's final tragedy is his death. Gatsby made a great effort to achieve his dreams, but in the end his efforts were futile.
Fitzgerald was obviously appalled at the general state of society in the 1920s. He appears to have been particularly saddened by the decayed social and
moral values of the well–established American aristocracies. The old wealth seen on East Egg and the people attending Gatsby's parties signify the
careless materialism of the time. Tom and Daisy are prime examples of this. They outrage Nick and by the end of the novel he decides that they are
"careless peopleГўв‚¬В¦they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money" (187). As seen through the disappointed eyes
in Dr. Eckleburg's glasses on the billboard at the Valley of the Ashes, the world itself was in a tragic state. The distinct social classes are what kept
Gatsby and Daisy apart. In the beginning, it was his lack of money that made them unable to be together. After they are reunited, it is the great division
of the old and new wealth that keeps them apart.
Gatsby could never be accepted into Daisy's social class because on
East Egg he could not have self–made wealth.
The novel ends with Gatsby's death and subsequent funeral. These are representative of the final death of the American dream. Gatsby's life work had
turned out to be for nothing. Although he has many acquaintances and doesn't "want any trouble with anybody" (48), he has
no

Essay On The Tragedy Of Macbeth
'The Tragedie of Macbeth': A True Aristotelean Tragedy?
The portrayal of the downfall of an opulent and well liked individual is often referred to as a tragedy, but is this downfall always a tragic event or
can it be justifiable? This essay will now define the Aristotelean idea of plot structure. Furthermore it will analyse and discuss if "The Tragedie of
Macbeth" applies to said plot structure.
To write and perform tragedies dates back to shortly before 500 B.C.. It took place at the annual Great Dionysia, a dramatic festival the people of
Athens organised in honour of the Greek god Dionysus. The great poets of Ancient Greece competed against each other, trying to write the most
devastating tragedy, but how does one do that?
According...show more content...
"I haue seene her rise from her bed, throw her Night–Gown vppon her, vnlocke her Closset, take foorth paper, folde it, write vpon't, read it, afterwards
Seale it, and againe returne to bed; yet all this while in a most fast sleepe" (Actus Quintus, Scena Prima). Here it is revealed that Lady Macbeth is
walking in her sleep, and as a doctor and a gentlewoman exchange information, it is also revealed that Lady Macbeth repeatedly washes her hands,
which can be seen as an act trying to rid herself of the blood on her hands, namely the blood of King Duncan, but also of Banquo and Macduffe's
family, for if it wasn't for her persuading her husband to kill the king, he would not have had to kill the threats he faced whilst on the throne. These
things haunt the Lady so much that in the end, she is driven to madness and commits suicide, earning the pity of the

Hamlet As An Aristotelian Tragedy Essay
According to the Aristotelian view of tragedy, a tragic hero must fall through his or her own error. This is typically called the "tragic
flaw", and can be applied to any characteristic that causes the downfall the hero. Shakespeare's Hamlet, Prince of Denmark can be seen as an
Aristotelian tragedy and Hamlet as it's tragic hero. Hamlet's flaw, which in accordance with Aristotle's principles of tragedy causes his demise, is his
inability to act. This defect of Hamlet's character is displayed throughout the play.
In the opening scenes of the play, the Ghost of old Hamlet reveals the truth about his death to his son, and tells Hamlet to avenge the murder. Hamlet's
first response is one that sounds of speedy action, saying...show more content...
Further evidence of Hamlet's tragic flaw can be found in act III, scene 3. At this point, Hamlet is sure of Claudius' guilt, and has even declared that
"Now could I drink hot blood and do such bitter business as the day Would quake to look on." (p. 99 lines 406–408) He comes to find
King Claudius alone, and recognizes it as an opportunity to act, but almost immediately talks himself out of action on the bases that the King is
praying, and will therefore go to heaven. He decides yet again to delay avenging his father's murder, this time until he can kill the King while he is in
a vile condition, such as "When he is drunk asleep; or in his rage; Or in the incestuous pleasure of his bed." (p. 103 lines 89–90) Hamlet
has failed to act for so long that the Ghost soon comes back to remind him of his duty.
In the end, we see that Hamlet's inability to act indeed causes his fall, and that his failure costs him not only his life, but also his mother's. In the final
scene, Hamlet duels with Laertes, who has conspired with the King to kill Hamlet. In the King's attempt to kill Hamlet, he accidentally poisons the
Queen. Laertes delivers the fatal wound to Hamlet with a sword dipped in a deadly poison and it is only with his final life breath that Hamlet finally
kills the King. This does not mean that Hamlet has finally acted–he has only reacted to what is happening to him. If Hamlet had initially carried out his

Essay on Comedy vs. Tragedy
There is not one person in this world who has the exact same preferences as another person. Everyone has their own unique style, which creates the
need for a wider variety of genres. In the Elizabethan Ear, one of the world's greatest poets emerged. His sonnets, stories, plays were written in such
varieties that appealed to the masses, even in today's society. Of all his works, the most popular styles were comedies and tragedies. These polar
opposites appealed to many because of the way they brought the story to life. The same story written in both of these styles could have a completely
different effect on the audience based on the style used. Although completely dissimilar, the two styles did have some similarities, which kept...show
more content...
The use of insanity reoccurs in the course of the play with dire consequences. A serious tone of voice and subject matter is always present during a
tragedy. Throughout the entire course of Macbeth, the reader is under the constant weight of how the hero was slowly meeting his demise. Unfortunate
event after unfortunate event occurred, each becoming more serious and tragic. It started with the death of Duncan, then to more murders, then suicide,
and finally the dramatic downfall of Macbeth, himself. There is nothing in this long cycle of death that even remotely puts a smile on one's face. Since
the plot was riddled with death, the characters even had a somber note to them. They constantly talked of blood, death, and murder – subjects that
would never appear in a comedy in such the manner they were used. The severity of the plot in Macbeth causes the need for equally severe characters.
This serious tone provides the perfect setting for the destruction of the main character as well as irony that puts one's mind at unease, which is nicely
packaged into a style of writing known as the tragedy.
On the complete opposite side there is the comedy. As its name suggests, the genre is stuffed with buffoonery, confusion, and just all around nonsense
that makes the reader submit into fits of laughter. Shakespeare's The Twelfth Night places a great amount of emphasis on

Macbeth's Tragedy Essay
Tragedy: a play dealing with tragic events and having an unhappy ending, especially one concerning the downfall of the main character. A story or play
can achieve the title of a tragedy through fluent and consistent heartbreaking and misfortunate occurrences. For example, in William Shakespeare's
tragedy Macbeth, the main character is faced with an abundant amount of experiences that can be classified as tragic, and his tragedy is caused by one
main factor. Despite the actions made by Lady Macbeth and the three witches to persuade Macbeth's own conscience and thoughts, Macbeth himself is
responsible for his own tragedy due to his ambitious nature and lust for power which caused him to conduct actions that ultimately led to his downfall.
It may seem as though the three witches are responsible for Macbeth's tragedy; however, all events that led to Macbeth's death were caused by the
actions that Macbeth carried out himself, out of pure ambition. Macbeth has heard and believed the prophecies that were told by the witches without a
single doubt. However, they provide him with only half–truths, and for the most part, exclude major details and speak in riddle like tones. Macbeth
accepts all that the witches tell him, even though he knows they are creatures that serve evil. The witches lure him on with their...show more content...
"Hark! I laid their daggers ready/He could not miss 'em/Had he not resembled/My father as he slept, I had done't/...My husband/...I have done the deed.
Didst thou not hear a noise?"(II.II.14–18). The initial plan was for Lady Macbeth to carry out the murder but the combination of Macbeth's lust for
power and ambition caused him to disregard their plan and murder Duncan himself. After all, Macbeth was the one who murdered Duncan, not Lady
Macbeth, which is why Macbeth is at fault for the

My Personal Story of Tragedy in the Family
It was a bright sunny day with a little of winter coldness in the air, like any other year my family and I were preparing the festivities to welcome the
New Year. Our house was filled with the cheerfulness and surprises that this holiday brings, and as the time came close, we gathered around the dinner
table to begin the countdown. When the clock stroke 12'olck, my relatives began to hug and wish each other a happy new year, and little did I know
that at three twenty–five our cheerfulness would disappear and be replaced with sorrow. That night when we retired to our bedrooms, I fell into a
profound sleep with no worries in my mind. I heard the phone ring and nothing else but a scream, a scream so powerful full of pain that my heart
ached. It all felt so real, but after a while I heard no noise or movement, and fell back to sleep. I was awakened by a cry, I rolled over to my back
and looked up, and there at the foot of my bed I saw my mother. Her voice was trembling when she spoke the words "Honey, your tita passed away
this morning". It was as if rain had fallen upon me when she had told me and all my feelings were gathered and thrown in a hurricane causing
major disaster inside of me. I hugged her and let her musty tears stream down on my shirt, I needed to stay strong although it hurt inside, but I had to
for my mom. Just when my tears were beginning to fall she got up wiped her tears away and said "Get ready for church". I did as she told me too and
while getting ready

Essay on Hamlet and Tragedy
Hamlet and Tragedy
Hamlet: A Tragedy When you think of William Shakespeare, Hamlet is the first thing most people think of, as his work. Hamlet is also a classic
example of a tragedy. In all tragedies the hero suffers, and usually dies at the end. All good pieces of literature written way back when, are usually
tragedies. The most important element is the amount of free will the character has. In every tragedy, the character must display free will. If every
action is controlled by a hero's destiny, then the hero's death can't be avoided, and in a tragedy the sad part is that it could. Hamlet's death could have
been avoided many times. Hamlet had many...show more content...
The tragic hero must possess many good traits, as well as one flaw, which eventually leads to his downfall. A tragic hero must be brave and noble.
Hamlet is the perfect example of the tragic hero. Hamlet has all the good traits needed to be a tragic hero. He is brave and daring. One example of
this is that when he went to England, he was taking a big risk and knew they were out to kill him. His loyalty to his father, was the reason he was
so angry with Claudius and his Mother. Eric Bentley said that a Tragedy is dependent on comedy. Comic relief is used in tragedies to change the
atmosphere of the reader, who is constantly focusing on the death and corruption of a tragedy. If a play were full of the death and sorrow, as in
tragedies, it would make the reader very depressed and not like the play. Some examples of this in Hamlet, are in the Gravedigger Scene, Talking to
the Skull and the Throwing of the book.
Towards the end of the play, there are two scenes in the graveyard. One is when Hamlet picks up a skull, and the gravedigger tells him that the
skull belonged to Yorick, the old king's jester. Hamlet tells Horatio that he knew Yorick, and then realizes what we all become after we die, dust. He
then plays with the idea of life and death, and describes the finality of it. The gravedigger scene is the tragic conclusion of the play. The second scene
of comedy in this scene is when the gravediggers argue whether Ophelia should be allowed to be

Essay On Tragedy And The Common Man

Essay On Tragedy And The Common Man

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Essay On Tragedy And The Common Man

Similaire à Essay On Tragedy And The Common Man(20)

Plus de Paper Writing Website Singapore

Plus de Paper Writing Website Singapore(20)

Dernier

Dernier(20)

Essay On Tragedy And The Common Man