SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  26
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Crisis Standards of Care: A Toolkit for Indicators and Triggers
                     Committee Meeting


           Dr. Randy D. Kearns
                      DHA MSA CEM
      Program Director, Burn Surge Disaster Program
              Department of Surgery
      Administrator, EMSPIC
               Department of Emergency Medicine
                      January 15, 2013
• US Department of Health and Human
  Services
  – Office of the Assistant Secretary for
    Preparedness and Response
  – Through the Hospital Preparedness Program
• US Department of Homeland Security
  – Federal Emergency Management Agency
  – Fire Prevention and Public Education
• Foundation and Other Organizations
  – North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center
    Foundation
  – The Duke Endowment
• Burn – is a time sensitive injury/illness
• Small – but manageable patient population
• Data quality – small, easier troubleshoot,
  better to understand gaps and anomalies
• Scalability – lessons learned have applicability
  in other specialties
• Limited Supply of Critical Facilities
Verified Burn
Center, Co-
Located with a
Trauma Center

Verified Burn
Center, No
Trauma Center

Self Designated
Burn Center
• Type III Burn Disaster:
   – Isolated burn disaster such as the Station Night Club Fire
   – Burn Care System Impact
• Type II Burn Disaster:
   – Multiple aspect disaster, such as an explosion with significant
     numbers of traumatic as well as burn injured patients such as the
     05 London or 04 Madrid Bombings
   – Healthcare System Impact
• Type I Burn Disaster:
   – Catastrophic/wide spread event, multi-state such as 9/11 attacks
     or Earthquakes such as Northridge or Loma Prieta
   – Infrastructure Impact
Disaster plans should reflect an extension of daily
  activities.
Planning from the burn center perspective should
   reflect (minimally) three levels;
• Local:
   – Intrafacility (your hospital/system)
• State:
   – Interfacility/instrastate (burn and trauma centers)
     (state ESF-8)
• Regional:
   – Interstate (burn and trauma centers) NDMS or EMAC
     through state ESF-8
Planning from the governmental perspective should
   reflect:

Local:      First Responder (EMS system)
            First Receiver(s) (local hospital[s])
State:      Mutual Aid EMS, Intrastate regional
            response teams, burn and trauma
            centers
Regional:   Interstate Burn Centers, Regional or
            Federal Response Teams through
            EMAC or NDMS
Immediate: best you can with what you have
    and know who to call for what you need
    (also referred to as a No-notice Event)
6-120 hrs: leaning forward with response
     teams, transport agencies, and push packs
     of equipment (staff, space, stuff)
>72-120 hrs: high census but normal operation
• Entry - Activation
  – “Back of a Napkin”
     • Data and Assumptions
     • Involves SME’s and Lunch
• Activity within the Plan
  – Modeling
  – Test: Exercise Table Top, Functional and Full Scale
  – Use it
• Plan Fatigue/Failure
  – Plan vs. Framework
• The Value of Modeling:
  – Test multiple hypotheses
  – Inject variability
  – Increased frequency of exercise
• Three Types of Simulation
  – Discrete Event
  – Continuous

• Plan Fatigue/Failure
  – Plan vs. Framework
• Descriptive analysis
     – Self designated and self reported bed capacity
     – Burn Center Surge capacity (50% above stated capacity)
     – Trauma Center static capacity (temporary)
• Monte Carlo Simulation (North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center 2009-
    10 to determine a distribution curve)
     – Reported Staffed Capacity – Avg. Daily Census
        = Bed Availability
     – Randomly perform 10,000 iterations using @Risk
Kearns RD. Burn surge capacity in the south what is the capacity of burn centers within the
American Burn Association southern region to absorb significant numbers of burn injured
patients during a medical disaster? Medical University of South Carolina: ProQuest
Dissertations and Theses; 2011.
• Computational algorithms
    – Rely on repeated random sampling to yield results
         • Census and Admissions
    – Define possible inputs
         • Frequency distribution (Normal Distribution, determined by the
           NCJBC Data)
    – Deterministic computation
         • Probabilistic values for bed availability
    – Aggregate results
         • Compounding variable, number of hospitals

Von Neumann, Ulam, Metropolis
1940’s at Los Alamos
working on nuclear weapons
• Distribution Curve (normal)
   – Data from NCJBC
• Coefficient of variation
   – Average Daily Census/Standard Deviation
• X = Simulations (X1-X10)
  – X1-X5 Real events, assumes all burn injured need burn beds
  – X6-X10 Theoretical Patient Inputs
• Y = Hospitals/States/Balance of the Region
  – Hospitals (Intrastate) Y1, Y2
  – States (Interstate) Y3, Y4, Y5
  – Balance of the Region Y6
• Determine number of beds needed (expressed as X) input parameter
• Test with historical data
• Compare X to available beds at UNC Hospitals (expressed as Y1)
    – X < Y1 then stop, if X > Y1 then add in WFUBMC Y2
    – If (Y1+Y2) > X then stop, if X > (Y1+Y2) then proceed

    Simulations          ESF-8 Approach, Hospitals/State Burn Center Resources
                         ESF-

X1 – 54 patients         Y1 Home hospital – NC Jaycee Burn Center at UNC Hospitals
X2 – 130 patients
X3 – 38 patients         Y2 Intrastate resources – WFUBMC, Wake Forest Baptist Health
X4 – 215 patients        Y3 Virginia state resources – 4 Burn Centers
X5 – 243 patients
X6 – 500 patients        Y4 Georgia state resources – 2 Burn Centers
X7 – 1,000 patients      Y5 Tennessee state resources – 2 Burn Centers
X8 – 2,500 patients
X9 – 5,000 patients      Y6 Remainder of Southern Regional Burn Centers
X10 – 10,000 patients
•   Confirmed Trigger points for planning tools
•   Activation points for transportation assets/resources
•   Better understanding of capacities and capabilities
•   6:5:6 Trigger to activate Plan
•   20-60 patients = Intrastate Plan Failure
• 425-450 patients = Interstate Plan Failure (Regional)
Surge Capacity (and Capability) includes the
  – Staff
  – Space
  – Stuff (Supplies, Pharmaceuticals & Equipment)
required to meet the needs of the patients.

  The most important contributing factor outside
  of S3 is medical transportation resources.
• Probability is inversely proportional to
  Capacity Demand (Y axis)

• Severity is a product of Capacity Demand +
  Deployment Time (X axis)

• In economic terms, you would say the
  American Healthcare Model is based on
  Static Equilibrium
  – Intersection point of supply/demand
99.99%


                 Day to Day Capacity
   Probability
   Probability




                 Conventional Surge Capacity

                 Contingency Surge Capacity

                 Crisis Surge Capacity
0.01%                                               Greater >
   < Lessor                              Severity
• Goal
 –Take all steps necessary to avoid or end
  Crisis Surge Capacity as soon as possible

 –Crisis Surge ends when…
•   Staff                                                  • Patients
•   Space                         Disaster                   – Ongoing Care

•   Stuff
                                                           • Patients
•   Transport                                                – Discharged
                                                             – Transferred
                                                             – Expire

Surge Equilibrium: all competing influences are balanced
99.99%
   Probability
   Probability




                   Goal: Return to
                 Day to Day Capacity

0.01%                                        Greater >
   < Lessor                       Severity
Kearns R, Holmes 4th J, Cairns B. Burn disaster preparedness and the southern
region of the United States. South Med J. Jan 2013;106(1):69-73.
Kearns RD, Holmes 4th JH, Alson RL, Cairns BA. Disaster Planning: The Concepts and
Principles of Burn Surge outside the Burn Center. Journal Burn Care Research
Accepted for publication JBCR: 2013.
Modeling helps us predict:
    Trigger points
    Sufficient Resources
         to the scene to care for and move patients to
         appropriate destinations
    Upstream notification
         Receiving hospitals
         Mutual aid ground/air ambulances
    Capacity, Capability, Transportation
Kearns RD, Hubble, MW, Holmes 4th JH, Cairns BA. Disaster Planning: Transportation
Resources and Considerations for Managing a Burn Disaster. Journal Burn Care Research
Accepted for publication JBCR: 2013.
• Plans – Relationships
   – Local, State, Regional
• Who to call and what can you
  bring?
   – Staff, Space, Stuff – Transport
     resources
• Plans – Scalability, Trigger
  Points, Activity, Failure
• All disasters are local, so are all
  solutions
• Education = Comfort
Randy D. Kearns, DHA
Randy_kearns@med.unc.edu

Bruce A. Cairns, MD
Distinguished Professor of Surgery and Immunology, Director North Carolina Jaycee
Burn Center, University of North Carolina- School of Medicine
Bruce_cairns@med.unc.edu

James H Holmes 4th, MD
Associate Professor of Surgery, Wake Forest University, Director Wake Forest Baptist
Health Burn Center
jholmes@wakehealth.edu

Charles B. Cairns, MD
Professor and Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina –
School of Medicine
Charles_cairns@med.unc.edu

•   www.ncburndisaster.org
•   www.southernburndisaster.org

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Kearns%20 iom%20csc it%20meeting%20jan%2015

Kearns Presentation at the FDA Medical Countermeasures
Kearns Presentation at the FDA Medical CountermeasuresKearns Presentation at the FDA Medical Countermeasures
Kearns Presentation at the FDA Medical CountermeasuresRandy Kearns
 
Israel surge capacity feb 2010 (3)
Israel surge capacity feb 2010 (3)Israel surge capacity feb 2010 (3)
Israel surge capacity feb 2010 (3)hpinny
 
DISASTER MANAGEMENT Revised.pptx
DISASTER MANAGEMENT Revised.pptxDISASTER MANAGEMENT Revised.pptx
DISASTER MANAGEMENT Revised.pptxMuhammad Nasir
 
Principles of disaster management
Principles of disaster managementPrinciples of disaster management
Principles of disaster managementSCGH ED CME
 
Sshs lecture admin in disaster
Sshs lecture admin in disasterSshs lecture admin in disaster
Sshs lecture admin in disasterBrandon Williams
 
Disaster medicine at SCGH
Disaster medicine at SCGHDisaster medicine at SCGH
Disaster medicine at SCGHSCGH ED CME
 
Disaster management-TRANSPORTATION AND HOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE
Disaster management-TRANSPORTATION AND HOSPITAL EMERGENCY CAREDisaster management-TRANSPORTATION AND HOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE
Disaster management-TRANSPORTATION AND HOSPITAL EMERGENCY CAREselvaraj227
 
Establishing a Healthcare Response Coalition
Establishing a Healthcare Response CoalitionEstablishing a Healthcare Response Coalition
Establishing a Healthcare Response CoalitionAUCMed
 
Disaster medicine Enida Xhaferi
Disaster medicine Enida XhaferiDisaster medicine Enida Xhaferi
Disaster medicine Enida XhaferiEnida Xhaferi
 
Idaho Mass Casualty Incident Response
Idaho Mass Casualty Incident ResponseIdaho Mass Casualty Incident Response
Idaho Mass Casualty Incident ResponseNick Nudell
 
Surge Capacity Management
Surge Capacity ManagementSurge Capacity Management
Surge Capacity ManagementJames Muisyo
 
Emergency and Disaster Nursing.pptx
Emergency and Disaster Nursing.pptxEmergency and Disaster Nursing.pptx
Emergency and Disaster Nursing.pptxTheaIlao1
 
MLA CE305 - Disaster Health Information Sources: The Basics
MLA CE305 - Disaster Health Information Sources: The BasicsMLA CE305 - Disaster Health Information Sources: The Basics
MLA CE305 - Disaster Health Information Sources: The BasicsRobin Featherstone
 
EMS stroke systems of care in the US
EMS stroke systems of care in the USEMS stroke systems of care in the US
EMS stroke systems of care in the USRommie Duckworth
 
Interhospital Transportataion Dilemma
Interhospital Transportataion DilemmaInterhospital Transportataion Dilemma
Interhospital Transportataion Dilemmaguest8e029d
 
Disaster Management.pptx
Disaster Management.pptxDisaster Management.pptx
Disaster Management.pptxMostaque Ahmed
 

Similaire à Kearns%20 iom%20csc it%20meeting%20jan%2015 (20)

Kearns Presentation at the FDA Medical Countermeasures
Kearns Presentation at the FDA Medical CountermeasuresKearns Presentation at the FDA Medical Countermeasures
Kearns Presentation at the FDA Medical Countermeasures
 
Israel surge capacity feb 2010 (3)
Israel surge capacity feb 2010 (3)Israel surge capacity feb 2010 (3)
Israel surge capacity feb 2010 (3)
 
DISASTER MANAGEMENT Revised.pptx
DISASTER MANAGEMENT Revised.pptxDISASTER MANAGEMENT Revised.pptx
DISASTER MANAGEMENT Revised.pptx
 
In A Moments Notice
In A Moments NoticeIn A Moments Notice
In A Moments Notice
 
Principles of disaster management
Principles of disaster managementPrinciples of disaster management
Principles of disaster management
 
Sshs lecture admin in disaster
Sshs lecture admin in disasterSshs lecture admin in disaster
Sshs lecture admin in disaster
 
Disaster medicine at SCGH
Disaster medicine at SCGHDisaster medicine at SCGH
Disaster medicine at SCGH
 
triage.ppt
triage.ppttriage.ppt
triage.ppt
 
Disaster management-TRANSPORTATION AND HOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE
Disaster management-TRANSPORTATION AND HOSPITAL EMERGENCY CAREDisaster management-TRANSPORTATION AND HOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE
Disaster management-TRANSPORTATION AND HOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE
 
Establishing a Healthcare Response Coalition
Establishing a Healthcare Response CoalitionEstablishing a Healthcare Response Coalition
Establishing a Healthcare Response Coalition
 
Disaster management dr.venu for m g u ktm latest
Disaster management  dr.venu for m g u ktm latestDisaster management  dr.venu for m g u ktm latest
Disaster management dr.venu for m g u ktm latest
 
Disaster medicine Enida Xhaferi
Disaster medicine Enida XhaferiDisaster medicine Enida Xhaferi
Disaster medicine Enida Xhaferi
 
Idaho Mass Casualty Incident Response
Idaho Mass Casualty Incident ResponseIdaho Mass Casualty Incident Response
Idaho Mass Casualty Incident Response
 
Surge Capacity Management
Surge Capacity ManagementSurge Capacity Management
Surge Capacity Management
 
Emergency and Disaster Nursing.pptx
Emergency and Disaster Nursing.pptxEmergency and Disaster Nursing.pptx
Emergency and Disaster Nursing.pptx
 
MLA CE305 - Disaster Health Information Sources: The Basics
MLA CE305 - Disaster Health Information Sources: The BasicsMLA CE305 - Disaster Health Information Sources: The Basics
MLA CE305 - Disaster Health Information Sources: The Basics
 
Ascend Presentation
Ascend PresentationAscend Presentation
Ascend Presentation
 
EMS stroke systems of care in the US
EMS stroke systems of care in the USEMS stroke systems of care in the US
EMS stroke systems of care in the US
 
Interhospital Transportataion Dilemma
Interhospital Transportataion DilemmaInterhospital Transportataion Dilemma
Interhospital Transportataion Dilemma
 
Disaster Management.pptx
Disaster Management.pptxDisaster Management.pptx
Disaster Management.pptx
 

Kearns%20 iom%20csc it%20meeting%20jan%2015

  • 1. Crisis Standards of Care: A Toolkit for Indicators and Triggers Committee Meeting Dr. Randy D. Kearns DHA MSA CEM Program Director, Burn Surge Disaster Program Department of Surgery Administrator, EMSPIC Department of Emergency Medicine January 15, 2013
  • 2. • US Department of Health and Human Services – Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response – Through the Hospital Preparedness Program • US Department of Homeland Security – Federal Emergency Management Agency – Fire Prevention and Public Education • Foundation and Other Organizations – North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center Foundation – The Duke Endowment
  • 3. • Burn – is a time sensitive injury/illness • Small – but manageable patient population • Data quality – small, easier troubleshoot, better to understand gaps and anomalies • Scalability – lessons learned have applicability in other specialties • Limited Supply of Critical Facilities
  • 4. Verified Burn Center, Co- Located with a Trauma Center Verified Burn Center, No Trauma Center Self Designated Burn Center
  • 5. • Type III Burn Disaster: – Isolated burn disaster such as the Station Night Club Fire – Burn Care System Impact • Type II Burn Disaster: – Multiple aspect disaster, such as an explosion with significant numbers of traumatic as well as burn injured patients such as the 05 London or 04 Madrid Bombings – Healthcare System Impact • Type I Burn Disaster: – Catastrophic/wide spread event, multi-state such as 9/11 attacks or Earthquakes such as Northridge or Loma Prieta – Infrastructure Impact
  • 6. Disaster plans should reflect an extension of daily activities. Planning from the burn center perspective should reflect (minimally) three levels; • Local: – Intrafacility (your hospital/system) • State: – Interfacility/instrastate (burn and trauma centers) (state ESF-8) • Regional: – Interstate (burn and trauma centers) NDMS or EMAC through state ESF-8
  • 7. Planning from the governmental perspective should reflect: Local: First Responder (EMS system) First Receiver(s) (local hospital[s]) State: Mutual Aid EMS, Intrastate regional response teams, burn and trauma centers Regional: Interstate Burn Centers, Regional or Federal Response Teams through EMAC or NDMS
  • 8. Immediate: best you can with what you have and know who to call for what you need (also referred to as a No-notice Event) 6-120 hrs: leaning forward with response teams, transport agencies, and push packs of equipment (staff, space, stuff) >72-120 hrs: high census but normal operation
  • 9. • Entry - Activation – “Back of a Napkin” • Data and Assumptions • Involves SME’s and Lunch • Activity within the Plan – Modeling – Test: Exercise Table Top, Functional and Full Scale – Use it • Plan Fatigue/Failure – Plan vs. Framework
  • 10. • The Value of Modeling: – Test multiple hypotheses – Inject variability – Increased frequency of exercise • Three Types of Simulation – Discrete Event – Continuous • Plan Fatigue/Failure – Plan vs. Framework
  • 11. • Descriptive analysis – Self designated and self reported bed capacity – Burn Center Surge capacity (50% above stated capacity) – Trauma Center static capacity (temporary) • Monte Carlo Simulation (North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center 2009- 10 to determine a distribution curve) – Reported Staffed Capacity – Avg. Daily Census = Bed Availability – Randomly perform 10,000 iterations using @Risk Kearns RD. Burn surge capacity in the south what is the capacity of burn centers within the American Burn Association southern region to absorb significant numbers of burn injured patients during a medical disaster? Medical University of South Carolina: ProQuest Dissertations and Theses; 2011.
  • 12. • Computational algorithms – Rely on repeated random sampling to yield results • Census and Admissions – Define possible inputs • Frequency distribution (Normal Distribution, determined by the NCJBC Data) – Deterministic computation • Probabilistic values for bed availability – Aggregate results • Compounding variable, number of hospitals Von Neumann, Ulam, Metropolis 1940’s at Los Alamos working on nuclear weapons
  • 13. • Distribution Curve (normal) – Data from NCJBC • Coefficient of variation – Average Daily Census/Standard Deviation • X = Simulations (X1-X10) – X1-X5 Real events, assumes all burn injured need burn beds – X6-X10 Theoretical Patient Inputs • Y = Hospitals/States/Balance of the Region – Hospitals (Intrastate) Y1, Y2 – States (Interstate) Y3, Y4, Y5 – Balance of the Region Y6
  • 14. • Determine number of beds needed (expressed as X) input parameter • Test with historical data • Compare X to available beds at UNC Hospitals (expressed as Y1) – X < Y1 then stop, if X > Y1 then add in WFUBMC Y2 – If (Y1+Y2) > X then stop, if X > (Y1+Y2) then proceed Simulations ESF-8 Approach, Hospitals/State Burn Center Resources ESF- X1 – 54 patients Y1 Home hospital – NC Jaycee Burn Center at UNC Hospitals X2 – 130 patients X3 – 38 patients Y2 Intrastate resources – WFUBMC, Wake Forest Baptist Health X4 – 215 patients Y3 Virginia state resources – 4 Burn Centers X5 – 243 patients X6 – 500 patients Y4 Georgia state resources – 2 Burn Centers X7 – 1,000 patients Y5 Tennessee state resources – 2 Burn Centers X8 – 2,500 patients X9 – 5,000 patients Y6 Remainder of Southern Regional Burn Centers X10 – 10,000 patients
  • 15. Confirmed Trigger points for planning tools • Activation points for transportation assets/resources • Better understanding of capacities and capabilities • 6:5:6 Trigger to activate Plan • 20-60 patients = Intrastate Plan Failure • 425-450 patients = Interstate Plan Failure (Regional)
  • 16. Surge Capacity (and Capability) includes the – Staff – Space – Stuff (Supplies, Pharmaceuticals & Equipment) required to meet the needs of the patients. The most important contributing factor outside of S3 is medical transportation resources.
  • 17. • Probability is inversely proportional to Capacity Demand (Y axis) • Severity is a product of Capacity Demand + Deployment Time (X axis) • In economic terms, you would say the American Healthcare Model is based on Static Equilibrium – Intersection point of supply/demand
  • 18. 99.99% Day to Day Capacity Probability Probability Conventional Surge Capacity Contingency Surge Capacity Crisis Surge Capacity 0.01% Greater > < Lessor Severity
  • 19. • Goal –Take all steps necessary to avoid or end Crisis Surge Capacity as soon as possible –Crisis Surge ends when…
  • 20. Staff • Patients • Space Disaster – Ongoing Care • Stuff • Patients • Transport – Discharged – Transferred – Expire Surge Equilibrium: all competing influences are balanced
  • 21. 99.99% Probability Probability Goal: Return to Day to Day Capacity 0.01% Greater > < Lessor Severity
  • 22. Kearns R, Holmes 4th J, Cairns B. Burn disaster preparedness and the southern region of the United States. South Med J. Jan 2013;106(1):69-73.
  • 23. Kearns RD, Holmes 4th JH, Alson RL, Cairns BA. Disaster Planning: The Concepts and Principles of Burn Surge outside the Burn Center. Journal Burn Care Research Accepted for publication JBCR: 2013.
  • 24. Modeling helps us predict: Trigger points Sufficient Resources to the scene to care for and move patients to appropriate destinations Upstream notification Receiving hospitals Mutual aid ground/air ambulances Capacity, Capability, Transportation Kearns RD, Hubble, MW, Holmes 4th JH, Cairns BA. Disaster Planning: Transportation Resources and Considerations for Managing a Burn Disaster. Journal Burn Care Research Accepted for publication JBCR: 2013.
  • 25. • Plans – Relationships – Local, State, Regional • Who to call and what can you bring? – Staff, Space, Stuff – Transport resources • Plans – Scalability, Trigger Points, Activity, Failure • All disasters are local, so are all solutions • Education = Comfort
  • 26. Randy D. Kearns, DHA Randy_kearns@med.unc.edu Bruce A. Cairns, MD Distinguished Professor of Surgery and Immunology, Director North Carolina Jaycee Burn Center, University of North Carolina- School of Medicine Bruce_cairns@med.unc.edu James H Holmes 4th, MD Associate Professor of Surgery, Wake Forest University, Director Wake Forest Baptist Health Burn Center jholmes@wakehealth.edu Charles B. Cairns, MD Professor and Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina – School of Medicine Charles_cairns@med.unc.edu • www.ncburndisaster.org • www.southernburndisaster.org