Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Le téléchargement de votre SlideShare est en cours. ×

GroupsAndTeams.ppt

Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Prochain SlideShare
Groups andteams (4)
Groups andteams (4)
Chargement dans…3
×

Consultez-les par la suite

1 sur 25 Publicité

Plus De Contenu Connexe

Similaire à GroupsAndTeams.ppt (20)

Publicité

Plus récents (20)

GroupsAndTeams.ppt

  1. 1. GROUPS and TEAMS  Roger Dhesi  Niels Bauer  Yan Huang  Derek Sullivan  Vick Mann
  2. 2. Objectives Define and discuss group dynamics:  Why are groups & teams important?  Groups – Types of groups – How do groups form – Why people join groups – Influence of Groups on Individuals  Teams – Groups vs. Teams – Turning Individuals into Team Players – Virtual Teams
  3. 3. Why Important?
  4. 4. Groups  Group – two or more individuals, interacting and interdependent, who have come together to achieve particular objectives.
  5. 5. Groups - Types  Formal Groups – Command – Task  Informal Groups – Interest – Friendship
  6. 6. Groups - Formation  Stages of Group Development – Forming – Storming – Norming – Performing – Adjourning
  7. 7. Groups – Why Join?  Why People Join Groups – Security – Status – Self-esteem – Affiliation – Power – Goal Achievement
  8. 8. Influence of Groups  The presence of others strongly influences individual behavior.  Conversely, the behavior of individuals is affected by being part of a group.  Business requires groups, therefore how groups work influences how individuals behave and work.
  9. 9. Influence of Groups  Patterns of Behavior in Groups – Social Striving – Social Loafing – Social Facilitation – De-individuation
  10. 10. Influence of Groups  Social Striving – People work harder when they are in groups, then when they are alone.
  11. 11. Influence of Groups  Social Loafing – People tend to expend less effort on group tasks then when performing the same task alone.
  12. 12. Influence of Groups  Social Facilitation – The presence of others can enhance an individual’s performance for simple or well rehearsed tasks.
  13. 13. Influence of Groups  De-individuation – This pattern happens when you have the increased desire to please management with the diffusion of responsibility from social loafing.
  14. 14. Groups vs. Teams  Group – interacts to share information and make decisions to help each group member perform his or her area of responsibility.  Team – a group whose individual efforts result in a performance that is greater than the sum of the individual inputs
  15. 15. Groups vs. Teams  Groups – Strong leader – Individual accountability – Organizational purpose – Individual work products – Efficient meetings – Delegates work – Random and varied skills  Teams – Shared leadership – Individual and mutual accountability – Specific team purpose – Collective work products – Open-ended meetings – Does real work together – Complementary skills
  16. 16. Groups vs. Teams  Swim “Team” - Is this a group or a team?
  17. 17. Team Players  Turning individuals into team players  Example: – Sacramento City College Baseball – Derek Sullivan, Assistant Coach
  18. 18. Team Players  Recruiting – Involves selling players on what the program can do for them (scholarships, professional contracts, etc). – Is an individual focus on personal development (telling players to be selfish). – Tends to de-emphasize “TEAM” and their obligations to the program (sacrifice, patience, and winning)
  19. 19. Team Players  The “Challenge” – Convincing players that their individual sacrifices are good for the program and WILL pay off individually at the end (for everyone).
  20. 20. Virtual Teams Virtual Teams: What are their Characteristics and Impact on Team Performance? Sze-Sze Wang and Richard Burton Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 6; 339-360, 2000.
  21. 21. Virtual Teams  Virtual team characterized by members: – Physically dispersed – Culturally differentiated – Organizationally differentiated  Communication must transcend: – Space – Time – Culture
  22. 22. Virtual Teams  Characteristics of virtual teams – Context = little history, novel tasks, physically distributed – Composition = heterogeneous culture and organizational backgrounds – Structure = relationships are lateral but weak
  23. 23. Virtual Teams - Findings  For teams physically distributed and engaged in novel tasks, ease of communication and “routine-ness” of tasks leas to higher performance.  For teams culturally and organization- ally diverse, clarification of roles and a common team culture lead to higher performance.
  24. 24. Virtual Teams - Findings  For teams physically distributed and performing novel tasks, lateral communication between weakly tied team members improves performance.  For teams culturally and organizationally diverse, lateral communication between weakly tied members improves performance.
  25. 25. Questions?

×