Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Le téléchargement de votre SlideShare est en cours. ×

Greg Sterling — Why Listings Management Still Matters | 5 Hours of Local SEO

Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Chargement dans…3
×

Consultez-les par la suite

1 sur 28 Publicité

Plus De Contenu Connexe

Diaporamas pour vous (20)

Similaire à Greg Sterling — Why Listings Management Still Matters | 5 Hours of Local SEO (20)

Publicité

Plus par Semrush (20)

Plus récents (20)

Publicité

Greg Sterling — Why Listings Management Still Matters | 5 Hours of Local SEO

  1. 1. Why Listings Management Still Matters 2021
  2. 2. 2 100% SaaS B2B 170+ resellers 7 Offices (DE, UK, FR, NL, US, CA) 1,350,000+ customer locations 2013 founded 1,500+ enterprise clients 300 employees 125+ platforms and directories Uberall directly and indirectly manages data and/or reviews for 1,350,000+ business locations Uberall at a glance
  3. 3. • Analyst, blogger, researcher • Tracking evolution of local digital marketing since 1999 • Former contributing editor, Search Engine Land • Now: Uberall Greg Sterling VP, Market Insights Uberall About Me
  4. 4. 4 ● Citations: Third party mentions of a business (often NAP info) ● Business listings: Key local business data (NAP++). Citations and listings often used interchangeably ● Listings management: Active management and syndication of business data across the web ● NAP consistency: Business listings on directories and apps are accurate and consistent with one another Definitions, briefly
  5. 5. The (old) ‘Local Search Ecosystem’ Circa 2005 - 2014 Source: Moz
  6. 6. LM: foundational local SEO Managing business listings across a broad network of local directories has been a foundational local SEO tactic. NAP consistency was relied upon by Google to verify the existence and legitimacy of local businesses. Sometimes described as “backlinks for local.” Listings management was therefore very important.
  7. 7. Uniform customer experience When consumers land on important consumer sites, directories and apps, you want business information to be accurate and complete. Also: If you weren’t actively managing your business data, you could be sure that it was being managed for you by aggregators and other third parties.
  8. 8. Citations/NAP [is] the number one issue affecting local businesses. The majority of businesses have NAP consistency issues on some level, ranging from cripplingly bad to very minor, and this issue will remain a thorn in our side for some years to come. -- BrightLocal 2014
  9. 9. Initially, I was surprised to see authority and consistency of citations rated so highly for localized organic results. But then I thought to myself, "if Google is increasingly looking for brand signals, then why shouldn't citations help in the organic algorithm as well?" And while the quantity of structured citations still rated highly for pack and carousel results, consistent citations from quality sources continue to carry the day across both major result types.
  10. 10. ● Google increasingly emphasized direct data collection from businesses through GMB ● Many directories declined in consumer traffic (e.g., Citysearch, Mapquest, internet yellow pages) In the interim, a couple of things happened
  11. 11. Capturing local SEO consensus 2020 Local Ranking Factors survey
  12. 12. Citations: 7% Citations: 6% Decline in citation importance In roughly 6 or 7 years, the perceived importance of citations has declined from No. 1 to 6th position
  13. 13. Ranking factors: changes over time
  14. 14. Miriam Ellis, Moz It’s my personal belief that the citations that matter most for your business are the ones that rank highest for your business by geographic market. Andrew Shotland, LocalSEOGuide Regardless of whether or not [citations] help with Google rankings, we still unfortunately see Google ingest and trust the data from these services all too often. The more locations you manage, the more likely you are to see Google change the phone number, address, category or even business name based on sketchy third-party data. Darren Shaw, Whitespark Citations used to be the key tactic to drive local search rankings. Local search has evolved and they are definitely less important now, but I am not ready to completely throw them out of my toolkit. Joy Hawkins, Sterling Sky I often find that people are surprised to hear that my agency doesn’t focus much on citation building or “maintaining” as a strategy. We’ve found that time is better spent on other high-impact tactics. Mike Blumenthal, GatherUp If a business has their data correct on their website and can get their data straightened away at Google, Facebook and maybe Yelp, there is no need for a citation campaign and certainly no need for a recurring cost to do so. Then what function or role do citations continue to play?
  15. 15. ‘Citations matter’ opinion spectrum Meaningful impact No impact Industry perception moving in this direction
  16. 16. What does Google say about ranking? ● Complete GMB profile ● Accurate business information (e.g., hours) ● Manage and respond to reviews ● Add photos (increasingly important) ● Relevance/Distance/Prominence https://support.google.com/business/answer/7091?hl=en
  17. 17. Source: Google Prominence “Prominence refers to how well known a business is. Some places are more prominent in the offline world, and search results try to reflect this in local ranking ... Prominence is also based on information that Google has about a business, from across the web, like links, articles, and directories. Google review count and review score factor into local search ranking. More reviews and positive ratings can improve your business' local ranking. Your position in web results is also a factor, so search engine optimization (SEO) best practices apply.”
  18. 18. We can all agree ● GMB ● Facebook ● Yelp ● Apple Maps ● Bing ● +Verticals: TripAdvisor, Opentable, Zillow, ZocDoc, DoorDash, HomeAdvisor, Avvo, Doctor.com, HERE, etc. ● But: aggregators and others?
  19. 19. Does the long tail matter? Do listings consistency and broad, long-tail distribution matter anymore? What is the impact (if any) on local visibility?
  20. 20. Uberall study Examined 115,000 enterprise and SMB locations in the US and Europe to determine the impact of extended directory distribution on local search and Google Maps visibility, consumer engagement (calls, clicks, directions). ● 12,158 Enterprise locations ● 102,795 SMBs ● 34,789 US locations ● ~80,000 EU locations ● All data from Jan 2019 - Oct 2020 ● Control group featured inclusion in GMB, Facebook, Apple Maps and Bing. Experimental group featured extended distribution (varied by market). ● Roughly 70 total directories included in the study across US and Europe.
  21. 21. Impact of extended listings distribution (visibility) GMB, Apple Maps, Facebook, Bing Extended network of directories Local Search Visibility ● 3,000 locations with 10+ directories ● 3,000 locations with 4 directories Date range: 9/19- 10/20
  22. 22. Impact of extended listings distribution (engagement) GMB, Apple Maps, Facebook, Bing Extended network of directories User Engagement/Actions ● 3,000 locations with 10+ directories ● 3,000 locations with 4 directories Date range: 9/19- 10/20
  23. 23. Number of sites: local search visibility SMB = 200 locations analyzed per group Enterprise = 1500 locations per group Enterprise SMB
  24. 24. Listings completeness: impact on engagement Number of locations Region Directions Phone Calls Website Clicks 80164 EU +70.51% +46.15% +84.62% 34789 US +46.53% +11.48% +69.18% Note: Profile completeness is measured by verifying that NAP + photos are present and complete. Impact of 90% (or higher) profile completeness on GMB engagement metrics (directions, calls, clicks). Data show increases in all GMB actions for both the EU and the US.
  25. 25. 25 Separate study of 30K locations (2019 - 2020) Searches [in billions] 23% increase in local search views ● Mix of enterprise and mid-market businesses in EMEA and North America ● Control group had GMB, Apple, Bing, Facebook, Bing, Foursquare, HERE, Factual ● In Q3 these listings were distributed to 30 additional publisher sites (plus original 7) ● Comparing Q1-Q2 2019 performance with Q1-Q2 2020 performance we saw:
  26. 26. Impact of data-aggregator non-renewal on single account Findings: ● Listing overwritten or impacted by other data sources: “wrong information came back.” ● No impact on ranking or traffic ● No impact on backlinks Source: SterlingSky “If you’re worried that people might see the wrong name or phone number online, it might be a good idea to stomach the annual fee… if your main goal is just ranking on Google, it’s likely you don’t need it.”
  27. 27. Conclusions & caveats ● Enterprises, retailers and franchises, with numerous locations should use a third party agency or vendor ● SMBs with multiple locations should actively manage their listings also ● VSB tougher call: very small businesses with no location/single location (comes down to a budget question)
  28. 28. Discussion time Greg Sterling VP Market Insights greg.sterling@uberall.com

×