1.
Gender
Mainstreaming
Monitoring Structure
(GMMS) -
Accountability
mechanism of the GEP

2.
Gender Mainstreaming Monitoring Structure
(GMMS) – what is it and how it was set
❖ System devoted to regular assessment of gender mainstreaming progress
at the UC
▪ Designed to be inscribed in the University’s strategic governance
❖ 2 main objectives:
▪ Monitoring the GEP (accountability mechanism)
▪ Monitoring gender equality across the institution
❖ 2 dimensions:
• Regular (biannual) monitoring of GEP implementation
• Regular assessment of the state of gender equality at UC
❖ An effective response to shortcomings identified in the baseline
assessment
• Expansion of data collection and analysis
• Mechanisms for monitoring and reporting

3.
1. Accountability mechanism of the GEP
9 strategic
objectives
56 actions 54 KPIs 21 Targets
(impact
measurements)
For each action is established:
• The accomplishement indicator(s)
• The corresponding schedule
• The units, services/divisions and areas to be
involved in its implementation
• The responsability for its accomplishement
Aligned with the 2019-2023
Strategic Plan UC

4.
GEP monitoring - example
ACTION PLAN EXECUTION, BY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
40.6 AVERAGE
OVERALL
EXECUTION RATE

5.
2. GMMS beyond the GEP
❖ Regular reporting on GE
• Model and indicators draft by the SUPERA team
• Gender disaggregated statistics available in public
reports and other institutional documents
❖ Inclusive communication
❖ UC´s commitment to Sustainable Development
Goals

6.
Gender reporting – exemples from 2020 UC
Sustainabilty Report and Management Report
Available at
https://www.uc.pt/sustentabilidade/sustreport
https://www.uc.pt/dpgd/gestao/relatorio_gest
ao_contas_UC2020.pdf

7.
Facilitating Factors
❖ Initial diagnosis revealed that UC already had a robust information
management system
wide range of indicators disaggregated by sex
solid planning and reporting institutional system
❖ Fruitful relationship with head of Planning, Management and
Development Division
❖ Monitoring instruments incorporated into routinised management
procedures
❖ Alignment with strategic governance
Goals: Gender Mainstreaming and
Sustainability

8.
Obstacles and challenges
Data Protection Gender-specific
skills and resources

9.
Structural impact and sustainability
➢ Gender Equality can be assessed for the first time at the UC
➢ Involvement of all faculties/research units and all administrative
units
➢ Fully integrated in the UC’s institutional/regular governance
➢ Integral part of institutional data collection, monitoring
and (public) reporting processes
➢ Institutionalisation of gender sensitive language in
materials
➢ Articulation of GEP with Strategic Plan
➢ Connection with Sustainable Development Goals

10.
Lessons learned and recommendations
❖ Analyse the structure of opportunities of the university:
identify opening and paths to institutional change
❖ Include a thorough analysis of the data management
system in place in the gender diagnosis, as a way to identify
strong points to build upon and clear areas that need
improvement
❖ Identify key stakeholders and potential allies
❖ Define clear objectives and targets at the GEP
❖ Anchor monitoring instruments in existing structures and
practices

11.
Thank you!
Contact: Mónica Lopes
monica@ces.uc.pt