VIP Model Call Girls Bhosari ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to ...
ย
Phosphorus Export
1. Phosphorus Export from
Artificially Drained Fields across
the Eastern Corn Belt
Lindsay Pease1, Kevin King1, Emily Duncan1, Mark Williams2, and Norm Fausey2
USDA Agricultural Research Service
1. Soil Drainage Research Unit, Columbus, Ohio
2. National Soil Erosion Lab, West Lafayette, Indiana
72nd SWCS International Annual Conference
Madison, Wisconsin
July 31, 2017
4. Credit: NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab (2009)
Photo credit: NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab (2009)
SOIL DRAINAGE RESEARCH UNIT
5. Photo credit: NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab (2009)
SOIL DRAINAGE RESEARCH UNIT
6. โ400,000 in Ohio without drinking waterโ
-Chicago Tribune, 8/3/14
Credit: Joshua Lott/Reuters (2014)
Volunteers unload bottled water
from a truck outside Waite High
School in Toledo, Ohio
SOIL DRAINAGE RESEARCH UNIT
10. Columbus
Cleveland
Toledo
Percent of county with
subsurface drainage
0-5
5-15
15-30
30-50
50-80
Lake Erie
Major city
USDA-ARS edge-of-field site
Cincinnati
Dayton
Williams et al. 2016. J. Soil Water Conserv. 71:9-12
SOIL DRAINAGE RESEARCH UNIT
EDGE-OF-FIELD RESEARCH
11. Baseline Phase: 2011 to 2016
Treatment Phase: Starting in 2017
SOIL DRAINAGE RESEARCH UNIT
EDGE-OF-FIELD RESEARCH
13. Baseline: Characterize surface and subsurface losses
SOIL DRAINAGE RESEARCH UNIT
Are fields meeting recommended loading targets?
14. SOIL DRAINAGE RESEARCH UNIT
DRP Concentration: Surface > SubsurfaceDRPConcentration(mgL-1
)
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
A
B
TPConcentration(mgL-1
)
0.01
0.1
1
D
0.001
0.01
March to July Annual
B
2.0
2.5
3.0
Subsurface
Surface
Target Load
ad(kgha-1
)
A
Target Conc.
0.05 0.05
0.09 0.21 0.08
0.27
15. DRPConcentration(mgL-1
)
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
A
B
SOIL DRAINAGE RESEARCH UNIT
TPConcentration(mgL-1
)
0.01
0.1
1
0.001
March to July Annual
B
TP Concentration: Surface > Subsurface
2.0
2.5
1.5
3.0
Subsurface
Surface
Target Load
oad(kgha-1
)
A
Target Conc.
0.23 0.23
0.20
0.46
0.19
0.56
16. SOIL DRAINAGE RESEARCH UNIT
0.5
1.0
2.0
2.5
3.5
4.0
0.0
1.5
3.0
0.5
0.0
March to July Annual
TPLoad(kgha-1
)
B
DRP Load: Surface < Subsurface
4.0
0.5
1.0
2.0
2.5
0.0
1.5
3.0
Subsurface
Surface
Target Load
DRPLoad(kgha-1
)
A
B
0.11
0.29
0.13
0.03
0.22
0.06
17. TP Load: Surface < Subsurface
SOIL DRAINAGE RESEARCH UNIT
0.5
1.0
2.0
2.5
3.5
4.0
0.0
1.5
3.0
0.5
0.0
March to July Annual
TPLoad(kgha-1
)
B
4.0
0.5
1.0
2.0
2.5
0.0
1.5
3.0
Subsurface
Surface
Target Load
DRPLoad(kgha-1
)
A
B
3.5
4.0
0.5
1.0
2.0
2.5
0.0
1.5
3.0
Subsurface
Surface
Target Load
DRPLoad(kgha-1
)
A
B
0.50
1.24
0.090.30
0.56 0.13
18. DRPloading(kg/ha/yr)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5 Annex 4 threshold
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
3.0
3.5
WY 2013
WY 2014
WY 2015
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5 Mean annualkg/ha/yr)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Subsurface
Surface
Annex 4 threshold
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
WY 2012
WY 2013
43% of Site-Years Meet Annual DRP Loading Target
SOIL DRAINAGE RESEARCH UNIT
28%: March to July DRP Load
20. Treatment Practices
๏ Gypsum as a surface amendment
๏ Fall vs spring application
๏ Organic vs inorganic P source
๏ Rate (full vs half rate)
๏ DWM
๏ Multiple vs single application
๏ Drawdown โ alfalfa
๏ Conventional vs no-till/reduced till
๏ Organic vs inorganic
๏ Banding vs broadcast
๏ Cover crop vs no cover crops
๏ Bioreactors and steel slag filters
SOIL DRAINAGE RESEARCH UNIT
21. Conclusions
Subsurface drainage: Low P concentrations โ Risk from Steady Discharge
Surface runoff: High P concentrations โ Risk from Intense Rainfall
Fewer than half of field sites currently meet pledged targets
Legacy P means balancing P budget isnโt enough to meet targets
To meet targets, need both surface and subsurface load reduction strategies
SOIL DRAINAGE RESEARCH UNIT
22. Funding Partners
USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service
โข CEAP - Conservation Effects Assessment Project
โข MRBI: Mississippi River Basin Initiative
โข 201/202 EOF activities
USDA-Agriculture Research Service
4R Research Fund (IPNI and Fertilizer Industry)
The Nature Conservancy
Becks Hybrids/Ohio State University
Ohio Agri-Businesses
Ohio Corn and Wheat Growers
CIG: 69-3A75-12-231 (OSU)
CIG: 69-3A75-13-216 (Heidelberg University)
Ohio Soybean Association
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: DW-12-92342501-0
Edge-of-Field Team
Kevin King, PhD โ Research Leader
Emily Duncan, PhD
Jed Stinner, PhD
Katie Rumora, MS
Phil Levison, MS
Sara Henderson, MS
Eric Fischer, MS
Marie Pollock, MS
Elizabeth Callow
Taylor Porter
Mark Day
SOIL DRAINAGE RESEARCH UNIT
23. Phosphorus Export from
Artificially Drained Fields across
the Eastern Corn Belt
Lindsay Pease, Kevin King, Emily Duncan, Mark Williams, and Norm Fausey
USDA Agricultural Research Service
Lindsay.Pease@ars.usda.gov
72nd SWCS International Annual Conference
Madison, Wisconsin
July 31, 2017
24. DRPloading(kg/ha/yr)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5 Annex 4 threshold
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
3.0
3.5
WY 2013
WY 2014
WY 2015
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5 Mean annualkg/ha/yr)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Subsurface
Surface
Annex 4 threshold
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
WY 2012
WY 2013
43% of site-years met Annual DRP Load Recommendations
SOIL DRAINAGE RESEARCH UNIT
28%: March to July DRP Load
65%: Annual TP Load
40%: March to July TP Load
27. SOIL DRAINAGE RESEARCH UNIT
40% Reduction in TP and DRP by 2025
Goal: reduce bloom size to 2012 levels in 9 out of 10 years
Annually and from March 1 through July 31
Pledged by Ohio, Michigan, and Ontario
For this study:
Field-scale equivalents for pledged load reduction
Annual Load: 0.29 kg/ha DRP and 1.24 kg/ha TP
March 1 - July 31 Load: 0.11 kg/ha DRP and 0.50 kg/ha TP
Editor's Notes
Good morning everyone, Iโm Lindsay Pease. For this presentation today, Iโm first going to give you a little bit of background into how I got here, and then Iโll go into my dissertation research on controlled drainage and water quality.
Blooms are an annual occurrence on Lake Erie. The size and severity of the bloom changes each year, but have caused an increasing strain on the region over the past decade
Bad for the economy of region with losses from tourism, recreational and commercial fishing, and property values
Poses a serious health risk to residents using the lake for recreation and drinking waterโฆ
โฆThe algal bloom in the summer of 2014 has proven to be the most infamous bloom yet with the city of Toledo imposing a drinking water ban leaving businesses shut down and residents without water for three days
Brought national attention to the issues we are having in Lake Erie
Already have high density of drainage
ยฝ drains to Lake Erie, some drains to Gulf of Mexicoโฆnitrogen concerns