Call Girls In Dhaula Kuan꧁❤ 🔝 9953056974🔝❤꧂ Escort ServiCe
SOC Changes and Other Soil Properties
1. Abdullah Alhameida, Jasdeep Singha, Ekrem Ozlua,b and Sandeep Kumara
Presenter: Jasdeep Singh
aDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture and Plant Science, SDSU
bDepartment of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison
72nd SWCS International Annual Conference, Madison
August 02, 2017
SOC Changes and Other Soil Properties
as Impacted by Crop Rotational
Diversity Under No-Till Farming in NGP
3. Soil Problems in NGP
• Land use change (grassland conversions)
• Monoculture (Corn/Soybean)
• Limited moisture
• Intensive tillage practices
–Degrade soil quality
–Increase erosion
(Clay et al., 2014; Wright and Wimberly, 2013)
3
4. • Conservation tillage
– Area of no-till in NGP has been increased tremendously (50-90% in NGP region;
Hansen et al., 2012)
• Crop Diversification (e.g., corn-beans, corn-
beans-small grains)
• Cover-Crops
• Residue retention
Improved Agricultural Practices
4
5. Study Objectives and Hypothesis
Objective; Assess the impacts of long-term tillage and
rotation on soil organic carbon and other selected
parameters that include hydrological and microbial
properties.
Hypothesis; Combination of no-till and diverse
cropping system can improve SOC, hydrological and
microbial activities.
5
6. • Southeast Research Station of the South Dakota
State University, Beresford, SD (43° 02’ 58” N, 96°
53’ 30” W)
Study Site
6
7. 420 NT Soybean 3YR
419 NT Maize 3YR
418 NT Wheat 3YR
417 CT Soybean 3YR
416 CT Maize 3YR
415 CT Wheat 3YR
414 NT Maize 4YR
413 NT Wheat 4YR
412 NT Oat 4YR
411 NT Soybean 4YR
410 CT Maize 4YR
409 CT Soybean 4YR
408 CT Wheat 4YR
407 CT Oat 4YR
401 CT Soybean 2YR
402 CT Maize 2YR
406 NT Maize 2YR
405 NT Soybean 2YR
404 ST Maize 2YR
403 ST Soybean 2YR
320 CT Wheat 3YR
319 CT Maize 3YR
318 CT Soybean 3YR
317 NT Wheat 3YR
316 NT Maize 3YR
315 NT Soybean 3YR
314 CT Soybean 2YR
313 CT Maize 2YR
312 ST Soybean 2YR
311 ST Maize 2YR
310 NT Soybean 2YR
309 NT Maize 2YR
308 CT Oat 4YR
307 CT Wheat 4YR
301 NT Maize 4YR
302 NT Wheat 4YR
306 CT Soybean 4YR
305 CT Maize 4YR
304 NT Soybean 4YR
303 NT Oat 4YR
120 CT Oat 4YR
119 CT Wheat 4YR
118 CT Soybean 4YR
117 CT Maize 4YR
116 NT Soybean 4YR
115 NT Oat 4YR
114 NT Wheat 4YR
113 NT Maize 4YR
112 CT Wheat 3YR
111 CT Maize 3YR
110 CT Soybean 3YR
109 NT Wheat 3YR
108 NT Maize 3YR
107 NT Soybean 3YR
101 NT Maize 2YR
102 NT Soybean 2YR
106 CT Soybean 2YR
105 CT Maize 2YR
104 ST Soybean 2YR
103 ST Maize 2YR
220 NT Maize 2YR
219 NT Soybean 2YR
218 ST Soybean 2YR
217 ST Maize 2YR
216 CT Maize 2YR
215 CT Soybean 2YR
214 NT Maize 4YR
213 NT Wheat 4YR
212 NT Oat 4YR
211 NT Soybean 4YR
210 CT Maize 4YR
209 CT Soybean 4YR
208 CT Wheat 4YR
207 CT Oat 4YR
201 CT Wheat 3YR
202 CT Maize 3YR
206 NT Soybean 3YR
205 NT Maize 3YR
204 NT Wheat 3YR
203 CT Soybean 3YR
EXPERIMENT PLOTS LAYOUT
• Established in 1991
• 80 plots
• RCBD
Rotation Patterns:
1. 2YR – Maize-Soybean
2. 3YR – Maize-Soybean-Oat
3. 4YR – Maize-Soybean-Oat-Wheat
Tillage System:
1. NT - No-till.
2. CT - Conventional tillage (fall chisel
plow of corn and small grain stubble
followed by field cultivator in spring all
plots).
3. ST - Strip-till with Brillion 4-row unit.
Note:
Cover Crop: Plant cover crop in 3-yr rotation after
small grain; plant cover crop in corn plots after
harvest (Rep 1 & 4 east 30’; Rep 2 & 3 west 30’)
Cover crop mix planted after small grain and rye
planted after corn.
Experimental Layout and Study
Treatments
26. β-Glucosidase Activity
26
Soybean Phase Maize Phase
2-yr 3-yr 4-yr Mean 2-yr 3-yr 4-yr Mean
---------β-Glucosidase Activity (µ mol PNG kg−1 soil h−1)----------
At Planting
NT 1640ab 1352cd 1670a 1554A 1939a 1175c 1797ab 1637A
CT 1495bc 1162e 1223ed 1293B 556d 1523abc 1355bc 1145B
Mean 1568A 1257B 1446A 1372B 1785A 1265B
At Harvest
NT 952a 594bc 668b 738A 801a 535bc 724ab 687A
CT 399cd 420bcd 277d 365B 228d 366cd 617ab 404B
Mean 675A 507AB 473B 514B 450B 671A
27. Conclusions
27
• The 4-yr (diverse cropping system) with no-till soil management
increased: SOC,TN, LFOC, LFON andWAS up to 30 cm depth.
• Soil organic carbon stock, in 0-15 cm depth, was higher under NT by
2% compared to CT system.
• The M/S/W/O rotation system increased C stock by 9% and 6.5%
compared to less complex cropping systems.
28. Conclusions
28
• Crop diversification significantly decreased soil bulk density by 3.2%
in surface and by 2.21% in sub-surface soil under MSWO as
compared to MSW and MS.
• Diverse cropping system with NT significantly increased:
– SWR and water infiltration.
• Adopting Diverse cropping system with NT significantly increased:
– MBC, MBN and soil enzymes activities.
29. Future Work
29
• Inclusion of cover crops in diverse rotation
• Economic Optimum Nutrient Range
• Soil MicrobialCommunity
• Green House Gas emissions
• Economics Returns
30. Acknowledgements
30
• Southeast Research Farm Station, Beresford for providing
the study site.
• South DakotaAgriculture Experiment Station for funding
support.
• Dr. Peter Sexton, Farm- Manager
• Dr. Shannon Osborne
• Lab team