The document discusses three case studies that used visual methodologies in participatory research involving information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D). In the case studies, participatory photography, interviews, and focus groups helped bridge communication gaps between researchers and participants and empowered participants to engage critically with ICT. However, researchers needed to renegotiate their own cultural identities and assumptions about ICT. While visual methods helped participants reflect on ICT, changing practices requires long-term support. The studies intended to facilitate structural changes through ICT design and use, with varying levels of success. Overall, the document argues that visual methodologies provide a starting point for understanding inequalities related to ICT, and critical engagement with ICT must address
4. Purpose:
Analysis & Reflection about research methodologies
motivations, processes, & outcomes
Considerations in light of the literature (ICT4D; visual
methodologies) & our research outcomes
5. paper methodology
• 3 researchers, 3 case studies
Analysis & Reflection about research methodologies
motivations, processes, & outcomes
• Considerations in light of the literature (ICT4D;
visual methodologies) & our research outcomes
6. Bridge differences and communication gaps between researcher and
participants
[Bignante 2010; Collier, 1967; Young and Barrett 2001]
Help communicating factors that are hard to verbalize
[Gomez & Vannini 2016]
Empowering participants to take part in the research conversation
[Vannini et al., 2015]
Enable participants’ critical engagement with ICT
apply reflexive ICT practices, develop a situational awareness of the role of
ICT in context, gain greater power and control over use & design of ICT
visual methodologies
in the literature
7. Bridge differences and communication gaps between
researcher and participants
[Bignante 2010; Collier 1967; Young and Barrett 2001]
Help communicating factors that are hard to verbalize
[Collier 1967; Gomez & Vannini 2016]
Empowering participants to take part in the research
conversation
[Bignante 2010; Vannini et al. 2015]
Enable participants’ critical engagement with ICT
[Gomez & Vannini 2016; Nemer 2013]
visual methodologies
in the literature
8. Bridge differences and communication gaps between
researcher and participants
[Bignante 2010; Collier 1967; Young and Barrett 2001]
Help communicating factors that are hard to verbalize
[Collier 1967; Gomez & Vannini 2016]
Empowering participants to take part in the research
conversation
[Bignante 2010; Vannini et al. 2015]
Enable participants’ critical engagement with ICT
[Gomez & Vannini 2016; Nemer 2013]
visual methodologies
in the literature
cultural identity lens/emphasis
9. Bridge differences and communication gaps between
researcher and participants
[Bignante 2010; Collier 1967; Young and Barrett 2001]
Help communicating factors that are hard to verbalize
[Collier 1967; Gomez & Vannini 2016]
Empowering participants to take part in the research
conversation
[Bignante 2010; Vannini et al. 2015]
Enable participants’ critical engagement with ICT
[Gomez & Vannini 2016; Nemer 2013]
visual methodologies
in the literature
10. Bridge differences and communication gaps between
researcher and participants
[Bignante 2010; Collier 1967; Young and Barrett 2001]
Help communicating factors that are hard to verbalize
[Collier 1967; Gomez & Vannini 2016]
Empowering participants to take part in the research
conversation
[Bignante 2010; Vannini et al. 2015]
Enable participants’ critical engagement with ICT
[Gomez & Vannini 2016; Nemer 2013]
visual methodologies
in the literature
11. Bridge differences and communication gaps between
researcher and participants
[Bignante 2010; Collier 1967; Young and Barrett 2001]
Help communicating factors that are hard to verbalize
[Collier 1967; Gomez & Vannini 2016]
Empowering participants to take part in the research
conversation
[Bignante 2010; Vannini et al. 2015]
Enable participants’ critical engagement with ICT
[Gomez & Vannini 2016; Nemer 2013]
visual methodologies
in the literature
12. Bridge differences and communication gaps between
researcher and participants
[Bignante 2010; Collier 1967; Young and Barrett 2001]
Help communicating factors that are hard to verbalize
[Collier 1967; Gomez & Vannini 2016]
Empowering participants to take part in the research
conversation
[Bignante 2010; Vannini et al. 2015]
Enable participants’ critical engagement with ICT
[Gomez & Vannini 2016; Nemer 2013]
visual methodologies
in the literature
13. Critical engagement with ICT:
• Reflect on their own ICT use (reflexive ICT practices)
• Understand and reflect on the role of ICT in context
(situational awareness)
• Gain greater power and control over the use and design of
ICT within their lives
14. paper methodology
• 3 researchers, 3 case studies
Analysis & Reflections about research methodologies
motivations, processes, & outcomes
• Considerations in light of the literature (ICT4D;
visual methodologies) & our research outcomes
15. 15 Sub-Saharan African countries (mainly South Africa,
Mozambique and Swaziland)
Investigate learning approaches, reporting, and ICT practices
across donors and different offices of the organization
16. 15 Sub-Saharan African countries (mainly South Africa,
Mozambique and Swaziland)
Investigate learning approaches, reporting, and ICT practices
across donors and different offices of the organization
Two interview types: (“rich pictures” and follow-up interviews)
21. paper methodology
• 3 researchers, 3 case studies
Analysis & Reflections about research methodologies
motivations, processes, & outcomes
• Considerations in light of the literature (ICT4D;
visual methodologies) & our research outcomes
22. Pictures were beneficial for sparking
discussion and gathering
interpretations
Meanings researchers and participants attached to
ICT were sometimes different than pre-supposed.
Participants gained a sense of empowerment when
their meanings and contributions derived value for
their personal identities and community places.
23. Pictures were beneficial for sparking
discussion and gathering
interpretations
Meanings researchers and participants attached to
ICT were sometimes different than pre-supposed.
Participants gained a sense of empowerment when
their meanings and contributions derived value for
their personal identities and community places.
24.
25. “We always talk at the radio about
the importance of hygiene to
prevent the spread of diseases, they
want the CMC to be clean because
we have to set the example for the
community, and we have to do
what we predicate.”
26. “Beauty is important for
the human being…
beauty is a value that
makes human beings
what they are.”
27.
28. “I took a picture of myself working
… speaking at the radio. I like
working for the people. […] I see
that people need more information
for everything, this photo is because
people will see that working for the
people is very good.”
30. Researchers are major players in
developing reflexive ICT practice skills
• Participants’ attitudes towards ICT were pragmatic and
positively affirmative Participants were not accustomed to
examining their own ICT agency.
• Different levels of reflexive ICT practice occurring
simultaneously. Researchers needed to renegotiate their own
cultural identities and how these influenced their own
concepts and assumptions of ICT.
• It should not be assumed that participants can change their
ICT practice merely by reflecting on their power and position.
Visual methods are an important tool for researchers to
support participants to develop reflexive ICT practice skills.
31. Researchers are major players in
developing reflexive ICT practice skills
• Participants’ attitudes towards ICT were pragmatic and
positively affirmative Participants were not accustomed to
examining their own ICT agency.
• Different levels of reflexive ICT practice occurring
simultaneously. Researchers needed to renegotiate their own
cultural identities and how these influenced their own
concepts and assumptions of ICT.
• It should not be assumed that participants can change their
ICT practice merely by reflecting on their power and position.
Visual methods are an important tool for researchers to
support participants to develop reflexive ICT practice skills.
32. Researchers are major players in
developing reflexive ICT practice skills
• Participants’ attitudes towards ICT were pragmatic and
positively affirmative Participants were not accustomed to
examining their own ICT agency.
• Different levels of reflexive ICT practice occurring
simultaneously. Researchers needed to renegotiate their own
cultural identities and how these influenced their own
concepts and assumptions of ICT.
• It should not be assumed that participants can change their
ICT practice merely by reflecting on their power and position.
Visual methods are an important tool for researchers to
support participants to develop reflexive ICT practice skills.
34. Power & Control over the use and
design of ICTs
All three cases had an intention to change structures
through the design and use of ICT and related
services: different levels of structural change were
achieved in the three cases.
35.
36. Conclusions
Visual methods in participatory research are a beneficial
starting point for understanding and facilitating responses
to ubiquitous inequalities caused by ICT.
Critical engagement with ICT as the linchpin for
meaningful growth in ICT4D research
• deemphasizing the role of ICT to confront technological
deterministic views in development not viable
• ICT is increasingly intertwined and embedded in our
individual and collective identities and environments
Previously published in AI & Society 2017
Caitlin now at the Australian National University
Collaboration
Visual methods = inclusion of a photo or drawing in the research process (e.g. an interview, ethnographic research, focus groups).
1. We all had experience with the use of visual methods in participatory research in ICTD – in different ways
2. Visual methods rather unexplored in ICTD – but we found it very beneficial for our research
Our purpose was to reflect and analyze our use of the methodology, in terms of the motivations that lead us to employ visual methods, the different ways to apply it, and finally in terms of the kind of research outcomes for ICTD.
Interesting because the method is not widely used in ICTD
Not only helpful to understand each other, but also to make sure to put emphasis on the socio-cultural context, on the wider historical context
We define critical consciousness and engagement with ICT as the ability to:
3 case studies derived from our own research experiences
I am gonna spend a few more words about my case study, but outcomes are valid across all other cases.
Read the paper if you want to know more about the other cases.
3 pictures
Used in a Focus groups with the directors
The role of the researcher is major
Concrete improvement actions for the CMCs were formulated (after focus group, reflection on the method itself) – not a guarantee this lead to a long-term change in perspective, but it was an instance in which participants were able to reflect on their own power on the intervention.