Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Le téléchargement de votre SlideShare est en cours. ×

Ppt on remediation 32212101 pdf.pdf

Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Prochain SlideShare
Ppt on remediation .pptx
Ppt on remediation .pptx
Chargement dans…3
×

Consultez-les par la suite

1 sur 20 Publicité

Plus De Contenu Connexe

Similaire à Ppt on remediation 32212101 pdf.pdf (20)

Plus récents (20)

Publicité

Ppt on remediation 32212101 pdf.pdf

  1. 1. DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING 1
  2. 2. LAND RECLAMATION (REMEDIATION TECHNIQUES) PRESENTED BY: HILAL BASHIR M TECH 1ST YEAR 32212101 2
  3. 3. contents  Introduction  Identifying Contamination  Risk assessment  Remediation methods for contaminated sites  Conclusive remarks  References 3
  4. 4. Introduction  Approximately 90.00% of the world’s population depends directly or indirectly on land.  The degradation of land or simply land degradation is one of the foremost challenging issues most of which is a consequence of man’s continuous or incessant exploration.  The Department of the Environment (UK) has described contaminated land as ‘land which represents an actual or potential hazard to health or the environment as a result of current or previous use’. 4
  5. 5. Identifying contamination.  Contamination can create a range of hazards, depending on its composition and nature. It may be present in solid, liquid or gas phases, and may be physical, chemical or biological.so we need to identify the contamination first.  As Contamination may be hazards to: • People • Water resources • Flora and fauna • Foundations and structures  The process of assessing whether the existence of contamination matters is termed as risk assessment. This is discussed more fully in the next section. 5
  6. 6. Risk assessment.  The process of risk assessment can be defined as simply ‘an evaluation of the probability of harm and, in the context of contaminated land, is concerned with gathering and interpreting information on the characteristics of sources, pathways and receptors at a specific site and understanding the uncertainties inherent to ensuring assessment of risk.  The process of risk assessment can be viewed as consisting of four key stages: • hazard identification • exposure assessment (what are the key environmental pathways and exposure routes by which the toxic substances can reach the receptors) • dose—response assessment (how potent are the toxic substances that can reach the receptor). • risk characterization (what level of risk can be assigned to each source—pathway— receptor linkage). 6
  7. 7. Remediation methods for contaminated sites.  Soil remediation is the application of proven technologies to mitigate and manage risks from contaminated soils that could be harmful to human health and the environment.  In Remediation techniques, either the land is fully recovered from contamination or the contamination is minimized to make the land useful for different purposes.  Soil remediation falls into three primary categories: In-situ, ex-situ and other treatment. Under each category is a range of specialized technology and methods that may be required for any given project. 7
  8. 8. Different methods of soil remediation. 1. Physical and chemical remediation. • Solidification and stabilization. • Removal to landfill. • Washing and sorting treatments. • Chemical oxidation 2. Thermal soil remediation. • Steam Enhanced Extraction (SEE). • Electrical Resistance Heating (ERH). • Thermal Conduction Heating (TCH). 3. Bio Remediation. • Intrinsic Bioremediation. • Projected Bioremediation. 8
  9. 9. Bio Remediation:  Bioremediation is the process by which living beings such as plants, algae and microorganisms are used to remediate, reduce or remove contamination from the environment.  Bioremediation of soil uses living organisms to degrade the soil. In essence, the biological activity removes or immobilizes soil pollutants.  Most bioremediation projects require months or even years to complete the treatment process.  Costs related to biological remediation are generally lower than other techniques. 9
  10. 10. A). In situ Bioremediation: ✓ Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRBs): • A permanent or semi-permanent reactive barrier composed mainly of iron immersed in the contaminated groundwater stream. • Remediate groundwater contaminated by many types of pollutants such as chlorinated hydrocarbons and heavy metals. 10
  11. 11. ✓ Bio slurping: • Remediation of groundwater and soil by indirect O2 supply and improve pollutant degradation. • Bio slurping is unsuitable to treat low permeable soils. 11
  12. 12. ✓ Bioventing: • Bioventing involves controlled stimulation of the air flow, providing oxygen to increase microbial activity and, consequently, enhance bioremediation. • This technique has been used successfully in the remediation of soils polluted by oil products. 12
  13. 13. ✓ Biosparging: • In bio sparging, air is introduced into the soil to promote the degradation capacity of microorganisms. In contrast to bioventing, air is introduced inside the saturated area, causing the upward movement of volatile pollutants. 13
  14. 14. ✓ Phytoremediation: • Phytoremediation refers to the use of plants in polluted sites to promote biological, biochemical, physical, microbiological and chemical interactions to attenuate the toxicity of contaminants. • Elemental contaminants like heavy metals or radioactive elements are mainly extracted, transformed and sequestered, while organic contaminants are eliminated mainly through rhizodegradation, biodegradation, vaporization or stabilization. 14
  15. 15. B). Ex situ bioremediation:  The polluted material is removed and degraded in special facilities outside the incident site.  The selection of an ex-situ bioremediation technique is usually made on the basis of the following aspects: • Operating costs • Extent and depth of contamination • Type of contaminant • Location and geological features of the contaminated site. 15
  16. 16. Ex situ techniques:  Bioreactors: Contaminants are kept in a containment container where, using various types of devices to mix the sludge, a mixture (solid, liquid, gas) is obtained. The biofilm formed stimulates the biodegradation of pollutants and increase the biomass level.  Bio piles: Bioremediation through bio piles consists in the piling of contaminated soil and subsequent aeration to promote biodegradation mainly by improving microbial activity.  Compositing: Composting is an ex-situ aerobic process by which organic waste is decomposed by thermophilic biological agents to obtain a humic amendment known as composit, which is used as soil fertilizer. 16
  17. 17. C). Surface enhanced soil bioremediation:  The use of surfactants and bio surfactants may be an efficient option to assist soil treatment. ✓ Synthetic surfactants: Synthetic surfactants include ionic and non-ionic surfactants. Both have been used successfully to remove different types of toxic organic compounds as well as heavy metals contaminating the soil. ✓ Biosurfactants: Biological counterpart of synthetic surfactants 17
  18. 18. Conclusive Remarks:  The primary aims of remediation of a contaminated site are either the reduction of actual or potential environmental threat, or the reduction of potential risks that are unacceptable to levels that are acceptable.  Identifying the most appropriate remediation method is of prime importance to reduce or remove the threat associated with the contaminants. 18
  19. 19. References:  L. D. Hooper, F. W. Oehme and G. R. Krieger, in Hazardous Materials Toxicology, ed. J. B. Sullivan, Jr., and G. R. Kreiger, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1992  Department of the Environment (DoE), A Framework for Assessing the Impact of Contaminated Land on Groundwater and Surface Water, CLR1, DoE, London, 1994, vols. 1 and 2.  S. J. T. Pollard, D. O. Harrop, P. Crowcroft, S. H. Mallett, S. R. Jeffries and P. J. Young, J. Chart. Inst. Water Environ. Manage., 1995.  Martin and P. Bardos, A Review of Full Scale Treatment Technologies for the Remediation of Contaminated Soil, BPP Publications, Richmond, 1996.  Davis, E.L., 1997. How Heat Can Accelerate In-situ Soil and Aquifer Remediation: Important Chemical Properties and Guidance on Choosing the Appropriate Technique. US EPA Issue Paper, EPA/540/S-97/502.  Derby (2009). "In Situ Chemical Oxidation for Groundwater Remediation." SERDP/ESTCP Environmental Remediation Technology (2011). Environment. Groundwater and Environmental Services, Inc., Web.  Banerjee, A.; Roy, A.; Dutta, S.; Mondal, S. Bioremediation of hydrocarbon—A review. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2016.  Saxena, G.; Bharagava, R.N. Bioremediation of Industrial Waste for Environmental Safety: Volume I: Industrial Waste and Its Management; Saxena, G., Bharagava, R.N., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020. 19
  20. 20. THANK YOU 20

×