Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Le téléchargement de votre SlideShare est en cours. ×

Leadership Consulting for Social Change UNISA 2015

Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Chargement dans…3
×

Consultez-les par la suite

1 sur 8 Publicité

Plus De Contenu Connexe

Diaporamas pour vous (19)

Publicité

Similaire à Leadership Consulting for Social Change UNISA 2015 (20)

Leadership Consulting for Social Change UNISA 2015

  1. 1. Leadership Consulting for Social Change - Dr Stanley Arumugam Consulting Psychology Conference – UNISA – 21st August 2015 ABSTRACT Consulting psychology can make a significant impact working with leaders for social change across all sectors both nationally and internationally. This work requires us as consulting psychologists acting as change partners to re-think our role from technical-specialist behavioural experts to change advocates of organisational culture and systemic social change. This session will explore issues ‘below the surface’ that show up in our leadership engagements implicitly and explicitly in the South African and African context. The session will explore what consulting psychology conversations look like with leaders as change partners on issues such as profit, poverty, corruption, corporate governance, race, gender, culture and climate change? Working with leaders for social transformation requires us to take positions as a community of practitioners. How could we do this in a professional-ethical and authentic way that brings our best selves to the work of social transformation and also brings a distinctiveness to the contribution of consulting psychology in South Africa? The 2015 Consulting Psychology Conference “From Below to Beyond” will explore Consulting within the fields of Leadership, Diversity and Wellness We aim to weave a ‘golden thread’ from the underlying dynamics (Below) of consulting psychology, through to the current best practices, and looking forward to the future possibilities (Beyond) our profession.  Below: Discussing personal and professional experiences, insights, transformations and the practical realisations of consulting – working with the ‘invisible and subtle’ dynamics.  (At the) Surface: Discussing current best-practice, theories and models that are applied in practice – working with the ‘visible and accessible’ dynamics.  Beyond: Exploring the possible future practices and implications of meeting our clients’ leadership and executive functioning requirements – taking Consulting to the next level – working with ‘future-scenario’ dynamics.
  2. 2. Introduction How do we respond to Nkandla, Marikana, Eskom load shedding, e-tolling, xenophobia, service delivery protests, corrupt government officials, toxic corporates and fat cat executives driving the bottom line, gender inequality and racism in the workplace? As South Africans we have a range of responses: irritation, shock, fear, anger, cynicism, denial, rationalising, and desperation. It depends on where we are in our lived experience of the South African story. These are all leadership issues and this is our business as consulting psychologists… This is the context of consulting psychology in post- apartheid, democratic South Africa. How does our response to our personal experiences show up in our leadership consulting work to our major clients as consulting psychologists: to government and the private sector? Climate change is at our door, nationally and globally. In the last months we have seen thousands of people die from unusual heat waves in India and Pakistan and the UK also had a record high. Many of the industries we consult to are complicit in speeding up climate change especially in Africa where massive land tracts cannot be farmed, where mining activity is impacting small farmers and damaging ecosystems. In Dec we will have another global climate dialogue in Paris to what effect? How do we consult to companies that continue to endanger the planet? I was talking to a friend of mine recently about her new executive job in the banking sector. She is a highly capable woman, with a brilliant track record and niche skill set and sought after. I asked her if she was aware that her international bank is a tax haven for many corporate multinationals evading taxes in African countries which is directly impacting the plight of the poor. In Zambia alone, one UK multinational - if it paid its taxes would fund the education needs of all Zambian children. She was unaware and felt ashamed and helpless about what she could do because she feels strongly for the poor. How would we engage with such a corporate leader as consulting psychologists? You can give me many more examples of our broken world. The world we consult in… This is a rather gloomy picture. It can either depress us and make us feel guilty for the money we make in these contexts or it can be a moment when we re-group as a community of professionals and ask how do we work in a way that makes a difference – a way that helps us pay our bills, a way that is aligned with our values, a way that brings our best without selling our souls. I believe there is a way – but we have to have the courageous conversations we teach our clients to have.
  3. 3. For my talk this morning, I will focus on leadership consulting. As part of the conference brief, I will explore what leadership consulting could look like below the surface. To do this, I want to invite you to consider some of our paradigms as consulting psychologists and critically look at what is serving not only our paying clients but also the wider society we live in. I want us to consider in this conversation ‘what makes consulting psychology in South Africa distinctive?’ and what role we can play as change activists in not only driving bottom line profits but also in making a better world. We can do both within the ethical commitment we have first as psychologists and also as informed and concerned consultants. CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY: AMERICA & SOUTH AFRICA In my preparation for this conference, Stephen kindly shared with me the special edition of the American Journal of Consulting Psychology which was reflecting on the future of consulting psychology. This gave me a good insight of the interests of American consulting psychology which sees its distinctiveness in its research competence. As I read through the special edition and other volumes of this Journal, I was disappointed in the breadth and scope of American consulting psychology which, in my view is mechanistic and instrumentalist. Much of the research interests and consulting topics are in the domain of the US corporate sector. As an example – one of the research papers is about THE WEALTHY: A FINANCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE (Klontz et al. 2015) “ A deeper understanding of the wealthy can help mental-health providers better serve this population and help individuals aspiring to increase their income and net worth by challenging inaccurate beliefs about this population’s psychology and financial behaviors.”  What would a psychology of poverty look like in the South African context and in our African marketplace?  What is consulting psychology for us in South Africa and how do we want to define this emerging discipline. Liebowitz & Blattner (2015) reflect on the shifts that typical clinical psychologists have to make to be effective in consulting psychology. A big shift is related to a new view of the client from an individual or family to a larger systems perspective. In this new space consulting psychologists have to deal with diverse topics not trained in clinical or counselling psychology – organisational culture, mergers and acquisitions, regulatory compliance, good governance, organisational politics, race, gender, labour movements, climate justice and human rights. The worlds are very different. From my observation, I feel that many consulting psychologists go into these corporate roles with their eyes wide open and quickly learn how to navigate in corporate systems – often this is a stretch and may even create tensions in our professional ethics and values systems. Overall, I feel this domain of work is being mastered.
  4. 4. This is great as a manifestation of ‘above the surface’. The question I have for us is this – how different is our value contribution from that of a McKinsey or Deloitte or Accenture consultant that has no in-depth training and experience in the psychological disciplines? Coming back to my earlier question what is our unique value proposition? Leonard et al. (2014) identify one of the challenges identified in the new era is that the leadership development market is being taken over by the big consulting houses, like McKinsey, Boston Consulting and the like. What do we do? Fight for our share of the pie or create a new value proposition? In South Africa – the coaching market is also booming and the majority of coaches are not psychologists and corporate clients are happy to use their services. Do we have something better, different, more compelling? What is our unique value add? I want to use the rest of my time to explore with you a few conversations we need to have with ourselves as consulting psychologists – conversations that take us below the surface. To keep in the allotted time – I will focus on leadership development as one domain of consulting. 1. Leadership Development – what’s the value add? Leonard (2002) reported revenues of $62 billion for management consulting in 2001. (Kaiser et al. 2014) in LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT: THE FAILURE OF AN INDUSTRY AND THE OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGISTS: Leadership training and development is big business; in the United States alone, it has doubled over the past 15 years to become a $14 billion industry. Consulting psychologists have benefited greatly from this explosive growth. Nonetheless, citizens around the world lack confidence in public and private sector leaders, and organizations are worried that they do not have enough good leaders. There is a significant opportunity for consulting psychologists to steer the leadership industry in a more constructive direction—if they have the courage to do so. (Kaiser et al. 2014) This same lament is true for us in South Africa and in Africa. Where have all the leaders gone? Are we part of the industry that churns out branded leaders through our business schools and executive coaching programmes or do we want to be part of the team that builds good leaders for social change? 2. Changing Paradigms of Leadership development (Scharmer 2009) Scharma speaks of ‘Ten propositions on transforming the current leadership development paradigm’. I will discuss two in this presentation: (1) We live in a world of massive institutional failure, a world that presents current and emerging generations of leaders with unprecedented challenges. How are the new generations of leaders in government, business, and civil society being prepared to deal with the profound economic, environmental, and social disruptions of our time? What resources and connections will help them, when thrown into the eye of the storm, to respond in innovative ways rather than resorting to the reactive responses of the past? (2) Current generations of leaders are poorly prepared to deal creatively with the major challenges of our time because the present mainstream approach to leadership development operates on a flawed model – remedial / fixing The mainstream approach to leadership development is based on (a) experts assessing current skill deficits, (b) filling these deficits by putting people through individual-?‐person-?‐centric training courses, and then (c) being surprised when those “trained” individuals, upon returning to their institutions, are “sucked back” into the old systems.
  5. 5. 3. Leadership Development to Leader Development I believe part of the problem and opportunity is in moving from leadership development as an intervention at individual and organisational level to leader development as a transformational process. This moves beyond the typical MBA model of leadership development to enquiring about: a) The purpose of leadership? b) What is ‘good’ leadership? c) How leaders can be accountable to their followers? d) How leaders can also be followers? e) what congruent leadership looks like ? - individual/organisational/societal - mind/body/soul f) what does collective/shared leadership look like? These conversations about purpose, morality, spirituality and stewardship take us below the surface and they require courageous conversations. This space is opened up in executive coaching. How do we move the conversations into these spaces as consultant-activists?
  6. 6. 4. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR US AS CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGISTS? 1. Getting comfortable with our change as social – practitioners - breaking away from technical/expert as our core competence - taking our ethics seriously – do no harm - bringing our whole being into our leadership development practice - stretching ourselves in non-corporate roles and experiences 2. Inviting transformation through our curiosity and compassion for the world - finding how our talents meet the needs of the word - building partnerships with diverse groups and people - working with a NGO - knowing that our work can make a difference in this world 3. Finding the distinctiveness of consulting psychology in South Africa - leveraging our history and experience to build a discipline that is socially conscious - creating safe spaces for conversations about race & gender in organisations - taking the triple bottom-line seriously: profit – people – planet - making politics and social issues our business 4. Developing pan African models for leadership development - How do we move away from the US business schools to embracing indigenous models of African leadership especially as we advance into the African market? - How do we avoid South African imperialism in Africa and partner with humility? Call to Action : “Be the change you want to see in this world” Mahatma Gandhi END
  7. 7. APPENDIX 1: LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FROM A COMPLEXITY PERSPECTIVE Richard E. Boyatzis - Case Western Reserve University Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 2008, Vol. 60, No. 4, 298–313 Intentional change theory (ICT) explains sustainable leadership development in terms of the essential components of behavior, thoughts, feelings, and perceptions related to leadership effectiveness as a complex system (Boyatzis, 2001, 2006a, 2006b). Sustained, desired change represents a metamorphosis in actions, habits, or competencies associated with leadership effectiveness Five Discoveries of ICT Leadership development involves emergence of nonlinear and often discontinuous experiences in an iterative cycle: Boyatzis (2006a, 2006b) observed that the moments of emergence are (a) the ideal self; (b) the real self; (c) a learning agenda; (d) practice; and (e) trusting relationships that facilitate openness to the moments of emergence. First Emergence: Seeing His/Her Desired Future The starting point in leadership development is the discovery of who the person wants to be. This occurs through a moment of emergence of a new awareness into the person’s consciousness. Second Emergence: How Does the Person Act With Others? Awareness of the current self—the person others see—is elusive. The human psyche protects itself from the automatic intake of information, but this ego defense mechanism can confuse us into an image of who we are. Third Emergence: Developing a Learning Agenda The third emergence is the articulation of a way to get to the desired self, using strengths and building on some weaknesses. The most critical element of this emergence is that it is a type of plan for things the person wants to try and explore. Fourth Emergence: Experimenting With New Habits The next emergent awareness in leadership development comes in the form of experimenting and practicing behavior characteristics of effective leaders. This may be reinforcing some behavioral habits that have been effective in the past or trying new ones. Fifth Emergence: Others Helping Us Boyatzis (2006a, 2006b) explained how sustained, desired change for individuals needs others to help, guide, support, and sometimes coax us along the process and through the emergent moments. Concluding Thoughts Leaders can be developed, or more accurately, they can learn behavioral habits of effective leaders. They can change in desired ways but not without effort and intent. By extension, teams, organizations, communities, and even countries can change in desired ways, but again, without purposeful desire, the changes may be slow or result in unwanted consequences. Such unintended effects may engender a shared hopelessness. Various segments of this article explored the emergent discoveries of intentional change to assist a consultant, coach, or faculty member in designing and executing change efforts. ICT helps us examine leadership development and see how individuals, groups, and organizations can create leaders and bring about desired changes in a sustainable manner.
  8. 8. REFERENCES Boyatzis,R.E.2008. LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FROM A COMPLEXITY PERSPECTIVE. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 60(4),pp.298–313. Kaiser, R.B., Carolina, N. & Curphy, G., 2014. LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT : THE FAILURE OF AN INDUSTRY AND THE OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGISTS. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 65(4), pp.294–302. Klontz, B.T. et al., 2015. THE WEALTHY : A FINANCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 67(2), pp.127–143. Leonard, H.S., Freedman, A.M. & Kilburg, R., 2014. TRIBAL ELDERS ’ VIEWS OF CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY ’ S PAST , PRESENT ,. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 65(4), pp.266–277. Liebowitz, B. & Blattner, J., 2015. ON BECOMING A CONSULTANT : THE TRANSITION FOR A CLINICAL. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 67(2), pp.144–161. Scharmer, O., 2009. Ten propositions on transforming the current leadership development paradigm, Available at: http://www.ottoscharmer.com/sites/default/files/2009_FieldBasedLeadDev.pdf.

×