04/22/11 - U.S. Supreme Court Filing (President Obama-StorAll Matter)

No. _____________________________________

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME
PETITIONER
V.

STOR-ALL ALFRED, LLC;
JUDGE JOHN ANDREW WEST/
HAMILTON COUNTY (OHIO) COURT OF COMMON PLEAS; AND
DOES 1 THROUGH 250
RESPONDENT(S)

IN RE VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME
ON PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT
TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

RESPONSE TO MARCH 17, 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES’ LETTER1

COMES NOW Petitioner, Vogel Denise Newsome – a/k/a Denise V. Newsome (―
Newsome‖

and/or ―
Petitioner Newsome‖) – WITHOUT WAIVING HER RIGHTS and ARGUMENTS/ISSUES

and DEFENSES raised and/or set forth in the October 9, 2010 “Emergency Motion to Stay;

Emergency Motion for Enlargement of Time and Other Relief The United States Supreme Court

Deems Appropriate To Correct The Legal Wrongs/Injustices Reported Herein” (―
EM/ORS‖),

subsequent pleadings (i.e. which includes Petition for Extraordinary Writ [―
PFEW‖]) submitted for

filing with the Supreme Court of the United States and provides this her Response To March 17,

2011 Supreme Court of the United States‘ Letter (―
RT031711SCL‖). This instant filing in response

to March 17, 2011 letter is submitted in that the information contained herein supports the

1
BOLDFACE, ITALICS, UNDERLINE, etc. added for emphasis.

Page 1 of 96

EXTRAORDINARY, EXCEPTIONAL and CRITICAL/EXIGENT circumstances involved. Said

March 17, 2011 letter which states in part:

"The above-entitled petition for an extraordinary writ seeking
unspecified relief was received on March 17, 2011.

Please inform this office by letter, as soon as possible, what type of
extraordinary writ you are seeking to file, i.e. extraordinary writ of mandamus,
mandamus/prohibition, habeas corpus.

This office will retain all of the copies of the petition."

See EXHIBIT “1” – March 17, 2011 Letter attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set

forth in full herein. In further support thereof, Newsome states the following:

1. This instant pleading is submitted in good faith and is not submitted
for purposes of delay, harassment, hindering proceedings, embarrassment,
obstructing the administration of justice, vexatious litigation, increasing the cost of
litigation, etc. and is hereby filed to protect the rights of the Petitioner/Newsome and
to provide the Supreme Court of the United States with a response to its March 17,
2011 letter.

2. This instant pleading and legal action has been timely brought in
accordance with the Rules and statutes/laws governing said matters and in accordance
with this Court‘s March 17, 2011 letter executed by Ruth Jones in the Clerk‘s Office
on behalf of this Court and/or William K. Suter.

3. While this Court requested that Newsome provide a “letter” she
believes the submittal of a response in form of pleading is appropriate and applicable
out of concerns of the DILATORY tactics as well as further unlawful/illegal practices
by members in this Court‘s Clerk‘s Office to attempt to USURP authority – i.e. little
“Indians” wanting to be Chief and perform the role of the Justices of this Court;
moreover, the DESPARATE attempts that may have been made by this Court in
efforts to AID and ABET in the COVER-UP of the CRIMINAL and CIVIL WRONGS
of its employees in efforts to shield/mask the ILLEGAL ANIMUS of President Barack
Obama, his Administration and others leveled against Newsome. While it appears
this Court may have been attempting to avoid being provided sufficient information
to aid in the handling of this matter and advising Newsome that ―M otion for Leave‖
would now not be required, this instant RT031711SCL is hereto provided for
purposes of clarifying and aiding this Court in the handling of this matter – i.e.
providing information pertinent to March 17, 2011 request and reiterating pertinent
information in the Motion for Leave Newsome previously provided this Court.

4. This instant RT031711SCL is also filed because Newsome believes it
is of PUBLIC/WORLDWIDE interest for citizens as well as Foreign
Leaders/Nations to see just what she has had to endure in seeking justice for the legal
wrongs complained of in the Petition for Extraordinary Writ (― PFEW‖) and
EM/ORS. Moreover, concerns that the Courts and United States Government may

Page 2 of 96

have moved to COVER-UP the criminal acts/civil violations leveled against
Newsome and/or citizen(s) of the United States in RETALIATION of having
EXPOSED the CORRUPTION in the United States Government/Government
Officials.

5. THE UNITED STATES CITIZENS, PUBLIC/WORLD NEEDS TO
KNOW WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON AND WHAT TERRORIST/SUPREMACIST/
RACIST GROUP(S) APPEAR TO BE IN CONTROL OF THE UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT – It is time for the Barack Obama Regime to GO – STEP DOWN!!
As President Barack Obama has recently requested Foreign Leaders – i.e. for
instance, Egypt’s President Hosni Mubarak and Lybia’s Colonel Muammar el-
Qaddafi. See EXHIBITS “2” and “3” respectively– Articles regarding President
Obama‘s request that Foreign Leaders step down attached hereto and incorporated by
reference as if set forth in full herein.

Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc., 123 S.Ct. 1057
(U.S.,2003) - Crime of “coercion” is separate from extortion and
involves the use of force or threat of force to restrict another's
freedom of action.

TERRORISM: The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or
an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating
or coercing societies or governments often for ideological or political reasons.2

DOMESTIC TERRORISM: Terrorism that occurs primarily within the territorial
jurisdiction of the United States. [18 USCA § 2331(5)] Terrorism that is carried
out against one‘s own government or fellow citizens.3

INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM: Terrorism that occurs primarily outside the territorial
jurisdiction of the United States, or that transcends national boundaries by the
means in which it is carried out, the people it is intended to intimidate, or the
place where the perpetrators operate to seek asylum.4

TERRORIST:
a) One who engage in acts or an act of terrorism. 5
b) Somebody who uses violence or the threat of violence,
especially bombing, kidnapping, and assassination, to
intimidate, often for political purposes.6
TERRORIZE:
a) To fill or overpower, with terror; terrify.
b) Coerce by intimidation or fear.7
c) Motivate somebody by violence to intimidate or coerce
somebody with violence or the threat of violence.8
d) Make somebody very fearful to fill somebody with feelings of
intense fear over a period of time.

2
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th Edition).
3
Black‘s Law Dictionary (8th Edition).
4
Id.
5
The American Heritage. . .
6
Encarta World English Dictionary (1999).
7
The American Heritage. . .
8
Encarta World. . .

Page 3 of 96

TERRORIST - a radical who employs terror as a political weapon; usually
organizes with other terrorists in small cells; often uses religion as a cover for
terrorist activities. (EMPHASIS ADDED).

ACT OF TERRORISM, TERRORISM, TERRORIST ACT - the calculated use of
violence (or the threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that
are political or religious or ideological in nature; this is done through intimidation
or coercion or instilling fear.

RADICAL CELL, TERRORIST CELL - a cell of terrorists (usually 3 to 5 members);
"to insure operational security the members of adjacent terrorist cells usually
don't know each other or the identity of their leadership."

SUPREMACIST:
1) A person who believes in or advocates the supremacy of a particular group, esp. a
racial group.9
2) One who believes that a certain group is or should be supreme. 10
3) Somebody who holds the view that a particular group is innately superior to
others and therefore, is entitled to dominate them.11
SUPREMACY: A position of superiority or authority over all others.12/13

6. Foreign Leaders are NOT going to be deceived.
They are aware of such SUPREMACIST and TERRORIST groups that are running
the United States Government. For example, see the Interview Transcript with Iran
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wherein said knowledge is made known -
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39210911/ns/world_news-mideast/n_africa.14
Knowledge confirming statements in Newsome‘s July 13, 2010 Email.

9
Random House Webster‘s Unabridged Dictionary (2nd Edition).
10
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th Edition).
11
Encarta World English Dictionary (1999).
12
Encarta World. . .
13
This can be said of this instant lawsuit. If it had not been for Newsome‘s patience, diligence, research, etc. the United
States Supreme Court as well as United States citizens would not be aware of the TERRORISTIC acts and CONSPIRACY that has
been orchestrated and carried out under the Leadership/Direction of Baker Donelson, its client (Liberty Mutual) and others against
African-Americans and/or people of color; as well as smaller countries/nations. Why? Because this instant action will EXPOSE just
how subtle/elusive such SUPREMACIST/TERRORIST in not wanting to be detected and their intelligence/experience/expertise in
covering up their RACIST/DISCRMINATORY/ PREJUDICIAL motives/agenda – i.e. exchanging the white hoods for business suits
and judicial robes, etc. to AVOID detection. See EXHIBIT “I” – DAVID DUKE/KU KLUX KLAN attached hereto and incorporated
by reference as if set forth in full herein.
14
Transcript: U.S. has 'hostility against our people,' Ahmadinejad says

. . .And-- all-- these years, they-- stood against our people. They continued hostilities, and they cooperated with all of our
enemies. President Obama said, "We are going to make it-- to make it up." And we welcomed that idea and position. I sent a message
for him after his election. Of course, I received no answer. He just gave a general response. And that is not considered a response to my
message. We think maybe President Obama wants to do something, but there are pressures-- pressure groups in the United States who do
not allow him to do so. Even if he wants to do something, apparently there are certain groups who do not allow him to do it.

Andrea Mitchell: You're suggesting that President Obama—

President Ahmadinejad: We think they are –

Andrea Mitchell: --doesn't have-- doesn't have-- the-- as Commander in Chief and leader of the United States does not have
the decision-making power over what he does?

President Ahmadinejad: Do you really think President Obama can do anything he wishes to?

Page 4 of 96

Foreign Leaders/Countries are aware that the
7.
United States Citizens DO NOT elect the President/Vice
President of the United States – Electoral Colleges do. President Barack
Obama was placed in the United States White House for DECEPTIVE purposes and
all is ―
COMING OUT IN THE WASH!!‖

8. FOREIGN LEADERS/CITIZENS are NOT DECEIVED. They have
been made aware of the WILLIE LYNCH practices and realize that the United States
DOES NOT have the likes of Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X or Medgar Evers in
the White House. NEITHER is that the likes of a NELSON MANDELA in
the United States White House – i.e. Blacks WILLING/DETERMINED to put
their lives on the line to assure FREEDOM and EQUALITY for ALL. Instead,
products of the WILLIE LYNCH practices – United States President Barack Obama,
United States Attorney General Eric Holder and President of the NAACP Benjamin
Jealous - have been placed on DISPLAY as the NEW FACES of the African-
American/Black male. See EXHIBIT “4” – Excerpt from the October PowerPoint
Presentation entitled, “Clean Out Congress 2010 – Americans Take BACK Your
Country/Government – Come November 2010 Vote OUT The Incumbents Career
Politicians” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full
herein.

9. It is of PUBLIC/WORLDWIDE interest for citizens and Foreign
Nations/Leaders to see DEMOCRACY at work and see FIRST-HAND how the
JUDICIAL system works in one of the MOST POWER COUNTRIES in the world.
Moreover, how the Respondents and United States Government has resorted to
CRIMINAL acts for purposes of OPPRESSION, THREATS, HARASSMENT,
BLACKMAIL, EXTORTION, etc. against Newsome and/or citizens who engage in
protected activities – i.e. file complaints EXPOSING Human/Civil Rights violations,
Discrimination, Retaliation, Terrorism/Supremacist/Racism, etc.

Thank God, NATIONS – such as China and others - are
coming out to address the HUMAN RIGHTS and
CORRUPTION in the United States Government. Stands as
Newsome requested in her October 2010 PowerPoint
Presentation. See EXHIBIT “5” – 04/11/11 Article ― China
Report Criticizes U.S. Human Rights Record‖ attached
hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full

Andrea Mitchell: Within-- within the—

President Ahmadinejad: He does not—

Andrea Mitchell: --the constructs of the United States Constitution. But what would you like to hear from President Obama?
And what would you like to say to him?

President Ahmadinejad: The Constitution is already on the [unintel]. What about the political scene? The reality on the
ground? Is he able to do everything he wishes to? Personally, it's not true. There are different political group, there are a lo—
different lobbyist pressure groups, and more important, there are Zionists there. We say, if he wants to do something, there are
certain groups who do not allow him to do so.

Page 5 of 96

herein. See EXHIBIT “6” October 2010 PowerPoint
Presentation entitled, “Clean Out Congress 2010 – Americans
Take BACK Your Country/Government – Come November
2010 Vote OUT The Incumbents Career Politicians” attached
hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full
herein.

It is about time for Foreign Countries/Leaders and their
citizens let the United States know that they have had enough
of its CORRUPTION and INTERFERENCE. See EXHIBIT
“7” – Meetings with Foreign Leaders attached hereto and
incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein.

10. United States President Barack Obama came out PUBLICLY and
requested that Foreign Leaders – such as for instance Egypt‘s President Hosni
Mubarak and Libya‘s Colonel Muammar Gaddafi - STEP DOWN. See EXHIBITS
“2” and “3” respectively attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth
in full herein. Now that Newsome has brought this legal action ADDRESSING THE
CORRUPTION, CONSPIRACIES and COVER-UP along with supporting evidence
as well as provided Exhibits/Appendices to sustain the EM/ORS and PFEW, ― WILL
PRESIDENT OBAMA and HIS ADMINISTRATION STEP DOWN?

11. The United States has a President (Barack Obama) who has recently
come under question regarding his CITIZENSHIP. Even under such SCRUTINY,
President Obama CANNOT and or WILL NOT produce his ― Birth Certificate.‖
Instead, information regarding a ― Certificate of LIVE Birth‖ NOT ― BIRTH
Certificate‖ is released to the PUBLIC. Furthermore, it appears that President Obama
is relying upon his Lawyers/Advisors (i.e. such as Baker, Donelson, Bearman,
Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC (― Baker Donelson‖)) who have been shown to be
CORRUPT!! See EXHIBIT “8” – regarding Birther issue attached hereto and
incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. Information which is
PERTINENT and RELEVANT because it goes to the United States President Barack

Obama‘s and his Administration‘s CREDIBILITY!!!
Which is
CRUCIAL and of PUBLIC/WORLDWIDE interest!
Newsome believes it is also IMPORTANT for the
PUBLIC/WORLD to see how Lawyers/Advisors for the
United States President handle such issues. Newsome‘s
experience with the likes of Baker Donelson and/or
Respondents in this matter is that they NEVER produce ANY
evidence to REBUT that is presented. ALL Respondents ever
do is provide MERE ― WORDS‖ by way of rebuttal and
ATTEMPT to MISLEAD the FACTFINDER away from the
TRUTH!! See for instance EXHIBIT “9” – Obama‘s
Response to Birther Issue attached hereto and incorporated by
reference as if set forth in full herein. JUST WORDS –
Surely if his Administration was willing to provide the

Page 6 of 96

―Certificate of Live Birth,‖ President Obama should have a
Birth Certificate. It is the BIRTH CERTIFICATE that the
CITIZENS of the United States want to see.

12. It is an INSULT and EMBARASSMENT that the United States
Government has allowed such firms as Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell &
Berkowitz, PC (― Baker Donelson‖) to assume KEY and CRITICAL positions for
purposes of CREATING a CORRUPT and TERRORIST/SUPREMACIST
government to INFLICT pain and suffering on its citizens and upon Foreign Nations
WITHOUT just cause to do so. Baker Donelson acknowledging their people in
PROMINENT positions as:

Chief of Staff to the President of the United States; United States Secretary of State;
United States Senate Majority Leader; Members of the United States Senate; Members
of the United States House of Representatives; Director of the Office of Foreign Assets
Control for United States; Department of Treasury; Director of the Administrative
Office of the United States; Chief Counsel, Acting Director, and Acting Deputy
Director of United States Citizenship & Immigration
Services within the United States Department of
Homeland Security; Majority and Minority Staff Director of the Senate
Committee on Appropriations; Member of United States President‘s Domestic Policy
Council; Counselor to the Deputy Secretary for the United States Department of HHS;
Chief of Staff of the Supreme Court of the United States; Administrative Assistant to
the Chief Justice of the United States; Deputy under Secretary of International Trade for
the United States Department of Commerce; Ambassador to Japan; Ambassador to
Turkey; Ambassador to Saudi Arabia; Ambassador to the Sultanate of Oman; Governor
of Tennessee; Governor of Mississippi; Deputy Governor and Chief of Staff for the
Governor of Tennessee; Commissioner of Finance & Administration (Chief Operating
Officer) - State of Tennessee; Special Counselor to the Governor of Virginia; United
States Circuit Court of Appeals Judge; United States District Court Judges; United
States Attorneys; Presidents of State and Local Bar Associations

However, upon Newsome‘s going PUBLIC and WORLDWIDE, Baker Donelson has
had this information SCRUBBED from the Internet. However, NOT before Newsome
could RETRIEVE such information to sustain its DOMINENCE and CONTROL in
HIGH POSITIONS – See EXHIBIT “10” attached hereto and incorporated by
reference as if set forth in full herein.

Baker Donelson being a law firm which has opposed and REPEATEDLY engaged in
criminal/civil wrongs leveled against Newsome for purposes of destroying her life as
well as other citizens. Furthermore, it is an EMBARASSMENT and INSULT to
the United States when it has been shown to the PUBLIC and WORLD that
such a CORRUPT law firm as Baker Donelson, its client (LIBERTY
MUTUAL INSURANCE) and those who conspire with them are
REPEATEDLY giving a SHELLACKING and BEAT DOWN in lawsuits
involving Newsome that they have to RESORT to criminal acts – i.e.
KIDNAPPING, BRIBERY, BLACKMAIL, EMBEZZLEMENT,
EXTORTION, etc. in efforts of obtaining an UNDUE/UNLAWFUL/
ILLEGAL advantage for itself and those they represent and/or conspire
with.

Page 7 of 96

IMPORTANT TO NOTE
Citizens may want to know why the United States is LOSING the Wars/Battles
in IRAN, IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN – Look at the law firm (i.e. Baker Donelson)
Government Officials may receive counsel from. A Law Firm that
PROMOTES/INCORPORATES and SUPPORTS and IMPOSES Terrorist/
Supremacist/Racist behavior on those they want to CONTROL and OPPOSES or
SPEAK OUT AGAINST THEM such as Newsome.

Recently a mother (Mary Tillman) of the late Football great (Pat
Tillman) came out blasting the Obama Administration for
retaining retired General Stanley McChrystal for Co-Chair of
the ― Joining Forces‖ Program. See EXHIBIT “11” – Article
regarding Mary Tillman attached hereto and incorporated by
reference as if set forth in full herein. What this mother may not
know, is that this is not ONLY President Barack Obama but his
Lawyers/Advisors (i.e. Baker Donelson) at work. They throw
out people and/or just merely move them to another post;
however, the PERPETRATORS/CONSPIRATORS and
CRIMINALS are ALWAYS basically the same regardless
which ADMINISTRATION (Republican or Democrat) is in the
White House. Baker Donelson and their COHORTS are
ROOTED DEEPLY in the Government, Government
Corruption, and the COVER-UP by the Government. So when
CITIZENS/PUBLIC hear for instance that there is ― Change‖ in
the Obama Administration, it is merely President Obama, Baker
Donelson, etc. merely PROJECTING information for
DECEPTIVE purposes; however, the CRIMINAL/
TERRORIST/SUPREMACIST/RACIST Regime players are
still in office. See for instance EXHIBIT “12” – Change in
Administration attached hereto and incorporated by reference as
if set forth in full herein. However, in doing research you may
find that ALL if not the MAJORITY are ASSOCIATED with
Baker Donelson.

Citizens may want to know why the ECONOMY of the United States is so bad –
Yes, look at who is sitting in the TOP/HEAD seat – BAKER DONELSON!!
Moreover, who may ACTUALLY be running the United States Government, Banks,
Real Estate, etc. See EXHIBIT “13” – The Hands Behind Government Operations
attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. Now this
law firm has SCRUBBED information from the INTERNET as it attempts to TUCK-
TAIL and HIDE!! Well Newsome has News - - BUSTED. . . BUSTED. . . BUSTED.
Just as such law firms as Baker Donelson and those they have CONSPIRED with have
felt at LIBERTY to have information POSTED on the INTERNET regarding Newsome
known to be false, obtained and provided for CRIMINAL INTENT, MALICIOUSNESS
and DAMAGING; Newsome has taken the LIBERTY to GO PUBLIC and EXPOSE

Page 8 of 96

such CORRUPTION in the United States Government to the
PUBLIC/WORLD/MEDIA at large.

Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 110 S.Ct. 2695 (1990) - Where statement of
―opinion‖ on matter of public concern reasonably implies false and
defamatory facts involving private figure, plaintiff must show that false
implications were made with some level of fault to support recovery. U.S.C.A.
Const.Amend. 1.

Paul proclaimed his innocence to . . . leaders. When is it wise to make
a public response to false accusations, and when should we just let
them go?
In the case of Paul, the gospel would have been discredited if
he had not spoken up. His circumstances made him look like a
criminal, and he had no history with these leaders to expect them to
assume otherwise without a proper defense.
If we have been publicly slandered by
credible sources, we should probably make a
public response. Otherwise our own witness will
be compromised. . . Jesus warned us that some
people will say all manner of evil against us
falsely, so we should not be surprised when it
happens. But we do need to exercise wisdom
when we become aware of it.15
13. United States President Abraham Lincoln issued and executed an
EXECUTIVE ORDER known as the EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION on or
about January 1, 1863 – approximately 148 YEARS Ago – which ORDERED
the FREEDOM of Slaves. Nevertheless, 148 years later, the United States still have
the likes of Respondents and those who conspire with them DETERMINED to take
Newsome and members of her class BACK into SLAVERY!!! However, as
recent NEWS has shown and FOREIGN NATIONS have PROVEN,
the ERA of OPPRESSION by such TERRORIST/SUPREMACIST
Regimes (i.e. as the United States) is OVER!!! - - SAY, “NO
MORE!!” Foreign Nations/Citizens making it KNOWN they do NOT want
OUTSIDE interference from the United States – THANK GOD!!!!! How can a
HYPOCRITICAL country like the United States minister to the needs of those who
have been OPPRESSED, ENSLAVED and in BONDAGE, when the United States
itself engage in such CRIMINAL and CORRUPTION against its citizens.

FREE AT LAST, FREE AT LAST – THANK GOD
ALMIGHTY WE ARE FREE AT LAST!!!

15
Upheld By God‖ -
2009-2010 Standard Lesson Commentary (King James Version) - August 29, 2010 Lesson Entitled: ―
Let’s Talk It Over.‖
Subtitle: ―

Page 9 of 96

See how ELATED citizens in the Middle East are to be FREE and out of
BONDAGE, that many were willing to DIE (i.e. sacrifice their lives) rather than
remain ENSLAVED to a Terrorist/Supremacist regime. See EXHIBIT ―14 – ‖
Photos of Citizens in the Middle East Celebrating their VICTORY attached hereto
and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. It may have only taken
seeing the SUCCESS on November 2, 2010 in the United States and the
encouragement from a Computer Website Executive, to take up the MANTLE and
LEAD/ORGANIZE the TAKE OVER!!!

14. Great SACRIFICES have been made by people such as
―Whistleblower‖ Army Spc. Bradley Manning - See EXHIBIT “15” attached hereto
and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein - who has risked his life to
REPORT and EXPOSE the CORRUPTION and CRIMINAL/CIVIL violations of the
United States because he want the PUBLIC to know the TRUTH! COURAGEOUS
acts by a citizen it appears who could NOT look the other way and allow
INJUSTICES, CORRUPTION and CRIMES to continue WITHOUT making the
CHINA is correct in SPEAKING out and
PUBLIC AWARE!
SHINING THE LIGHT on the United States and its
HYPROCRISY!!
15. Great SACRIFICES have been made by people as WIKILEAKS‘
Julian Assange - See EXHIBIT “16” attached hereto and incorporated by reference
as if set forth in full herein - who has come under attacks for releasing such
CRITICAL, DAMAGING and PERTINENT information to the PUBLIC/WORLD
regarding the United States CORRUPTION and COVER-UP of CRIMINAL/CIVIL
WRONGS.

16. There are approximately TWO United States President (i.e. Abraham
Lincoln and John F. Kennedy) who were ASSASSINATED because of the likes of
Respondents, Obama Administration, etc. and others who did not want to move
FORWARD and INSISTED on keeping a RACE of people OPPRESSED and in
BONDAGE!

17. PROMINATE Civil Rights Leaders (i.e. Medgar Evers, Malcolm X,
Martin Luther King Jr.) were ASSASSINATED because of the likes of Respondents,
Obama Administration, etc. and others who did not want to move FORWARD and
INSISTED on keeping a RACE of people OPPRESSED and in BONDAGE!

18. As with Newsome, there are other African American women who
have come under attack for speaking out and/or exercising Rights secured under the
Constitution and/or laws of the United States. For instance:

a. In July 2010, Shirley Sherrod (― Sherrod‖) was UNLAWFULLY/ILLEGALLY
removed from her job – i.e. Obama Administration requesting that she
RESIGN. See EXHIBIT “17” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as
if set forth in full herein. It does NOT look good to the PUBLIC/WORLD when

Page 10 of 96

such attacks on Sherrod comes approximately 6 days AFTER Newsome‘s
July 13, 2010 email entitled, ― .S. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: The
―U
Downfall/Doom of the Obama Administration – Corruption/Conspiracy/Cover-
Up/Criminal Acts Made Public‖ - which was received by United States
President Barack Obama and those in his Administration (i.e. like Shirley
Sherrod‘s boss – Secretary of Agriculture Thomas Vilsack) – See EXHIBIT
“18” – Excerpt of the July 13, 2010 email evidencing Thomas Vilsack as a
RECIPIENT.

Sherrod who is an ACTIVIST and a product of an HBCU (Historical Black
College and University) – Albany State University. Newsome being an
ACTIVIST and product of HBCU – Florida A&M University.

b. In November 2010, Velma Hart was FIRED/TERMINATED/LAID OFF from
her job as Chief Financial Officer for American Veterans AFTER being
TELEVISED questioning President Obama stating for instance:

―Quite frankly, I’m exhausted. Exhausted of defending you, defending your
administration, defending the man for change I voted for, and deeply disappointed with
where we are right now. I‘ve been told that I voted for a man who said he was going to
change things in a meaningful way for the middle class. I‘m one of those people and I‘m
waiting, sir, I‘m waiting. I don‘t feel it yet . . .‖

See EXHIBIT “19” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth
in full herein. Newsome knew that based upon the MEDIA coverage, that Hart’s
employment days were NUMBERED. Sure enough ― acting TRUE to form‖ Hart
may have been FIRED/TERMINATED/LAID OFF as a direct and proximate
result of exercising her First Amendment Rights.

c. Clearly under the Willie Lynch Practices one can see the concerns
such OPPRESSORS had regarding the African-American/Black
Woman. Such Oppressors thought that Malcolm X and Martin
Luther King Jr. was a problem/threat so the United States
Government was pleased with such Civil Rights Leaders’
assassinations. Now they are finding out that Newsome and a
number of other African-American/Black women are NOT
remaining silent and giving into the WILLIE LYNCH practices.
19. Newsome uses not only her own PERSONAL experiences but those
of citizens such as ―
Carl Brandon‖ and ― Omar Thornton‖ who were targeted and
subjected to DISCRIMINATORY practices and CONSPIRACIES for purposes of
forcing and driving them to commit criminal acts – See EXHIBITS “20” (Carl
Brandon) and “21” (Omar Thornton)16 attached hereto and incorporated by reference

16
http://www.omaha.com/article/20100803/NEWS/708039865/1031; http://www.examiner.com/x-48240-NY-Public-Policy-
Examiner~y2010m8d8-Possibility-that-Omar-Thornton-did-not-act-alone

Using the following excerpts:

Page 11 of 96

Some people don‘t want to discuss racism as being a form of violence because it would reveal that they themselves are in fact
extremely violent and in denial about it.
Omar Thornton‘s incident has a host of websites spewing hate talk toward African-Americans. Hartford Distributors may
have used racism and gradually managed to kill Omar Thornton mentally and emotionally before the killing spree via attrition. Jessica
Anne Brocuglio, an ex-girlfriend of Omar Thornton, comes forward with character evidence:
He always felt like he was being discriminated (against) because he was black[.]‖ ― Basically they wouldn’t give him pay
raises. He never felt like they accepted him as a hard working person.‖
This statement corroborates with what Kristi Hannah, Omar Thornton‘s fiancée before his death, had been telling the
Manchester Police Department about Hartford Distributors treating him like a persona non grata.
Plus, a fellow co-worker who was employed with Omar Thornton at Hartford Distributors has come forward stating that he
had seen the racist taunts: ― Stuff on walls. Racist comments. I saw with my own eyes.‖ More importantly, the fellow co-worker said
Mr. Thornton was hired as a truck driver; yet, he was assigned to loading boxes in the warehouse. Mr. Thornton had to fight to get
behind the wheel. The co-worker then states that Hartford Distributors are lying and the evidence is in Omar‘s cell phone. These
statements are serious and they are not based upon speculation. This places the co-worker in a position to be called as a key witness to
racism within Hartford Distributors. Although the co-worker is no longer under the employ of Hartford Distributors, he has witnessed
these incidents first-hand. These statements make it appear as if Hartford Distributors is deliberately being obtuse to shield themselves
from potential liability. As Marcellus said in William Shakespeare‘s play ― Hamlet,‖ ― [s]omething is rotten in the state of Denmark.‖
Thus far, the answers provided by Hartford Distributors just rubs me the wrong way.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jBNP73m9cp2g6qFtWxCbJH6IAD3gD9HEV71O0

But underneath, Thornton seethed with a sense of racial injustice for years that culminated in a shooting rampage Tuesday in
which the Connecticut man killed eight and wounded two others at his job at Hartford Distributors in Manchester before killing himself.
"I know what pushed him over the edge was all the racial stuff that was happening at work," said his girlfriend, Kristi
Hannah.
Thornton, a black man, said as much in a chilling, four-minute 911 call.
"You probably want to know the reason why I shot this place up," Thornton said in a recording released Thursday. "This
place is a racist place. They're treating me bad over here. And treat all other black employees bad over here, too. So I took it to my
own hands and handled the problem. I wish I could have got more of the people." . . .
One time Thornton had a confrontation with a white co-worker who used a racial slur against him, she said. Thornton changed
jobs a few times because he was not getting raises, Brocuglio said.
"I'm sick of having to quit jobs and get another job because they can't accept me," she said he told her. . . .
Brocuglio's sister, Toni, said Thornton would come home and say co-workers called him racial slurs. He was also upset by
comments made by passers-by about the interracial couple, she said.
"He just didn't understand why people had so much hatred in their lives," Toni Brocuglio said. . . .
But Hannah said he showed her cell phone photos of racist graffiti in the bathroom at the beer company and overheard a
company official using a racial epithet in reference to him, but a union representative did not return his phone calls. Police said they
recovered the phone and forensics experts would examine it.

and Port Gibson Shooter (Carl Brandon) complained of:

http://workplaceviolence.blogspot.com/2006_04_01_archive.html

Apparently, the deadly shooting rampage was the culmination of years of anger and frustration over what the shooter believed
to be false accusations of sexual harassment. "I don't know how you can consider me a danger. I was made a criminal through the
system. . .

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/port-gibson-ms/T0RUM1ECTB788O4HN

― would put Carl Brandon as a model from my town. I think he was one of the more intellegent and well manners persons in
I
the class. i cannot imagine this guy walking up one morning to decide that he want to destroy his life and others.‖ – Sarah Kelly
(Chicago, IL)
―Some time a person try to walk away from a problem, but there are people in this world that want let them do that. This
man had left his job and move on, but that was not good enough. They had to call his job and tell them what happened 9 years ago,
and got this man fired. I hate that he let the devil take over him at the time, but I do understand . . . I hope we can learn something from
this tragedy.‖ – Shelly Jones (Nashville, TN)
― had lost his job because someone said he had harassed them. He lost his reputation and the respect of some. When he
He
tried to move on some vindictive, vicious persons went to his next job and scandalized him. He fought through every legal avenue
available to him and found no justice.‖ – Cassandra Cook Butler (AOL)

Page 12 of 96

as if set forth in full herein. Newsome having gone PUBLIC and WORLDWIDE in
showing how the ― WILLIE LYNCH‖17 practices are implemented by the likes of
Respondents for purposes of breaking down Newsome and those of her Race for
purposes of keeping them OPPRESSED, ENSLAVED and in BONDAGE!
Moreover, to drive CITIZENS into committing criminal acts as a direct and
proximate result of CONSPIRACIES involving racially motivated violations of the
laws. See EXHIBIT “22” – Willie Lynch document attached hereto and
incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. So NO foreign citizens in
the MIDDLE EAST can clearly see from documentation and
EVIDENCE provided them that the “Obama Administration” is a
SHAM – i.e. CORRUPT as well as the United States JUDICIAL
SYSTEM. Clearly the United States can be NO role model in that it engages in
CORRUPTION and the COVER-UP of discriminatory practices, human/civil rights
violations, obstruction of justice, and other criminal/civil wrongs leveled against
African-Americans and/or people of color.

20. It was IMPORTANT to Newsome that the PUBLIC/WORLD saw
just how the First ALLEDGED African-American President (Barack Obama)
ABANDONED his Pastor Jeremiah Wright when EXCERPTS of his sermons (i.e.
SIMILAR practice as that used on Shirley Sherrod) were taken OUT-OF-
CONTEXT to makeWright appear as CRAZY, LUNATIC, and HOSTILE.
Moreover, how the WHITE candidates (i.e. Hilary Clinton – now Secretary of State
and Sarah Palin who was the Vice Presidential Candidate for Republican Party)
wanted to paint Wright as a TERRORIST!! IMPORTANT TO NOTE: It was a
good thing that Army Spc. Bradley Manning released information regarding the
United States Government‘s CORRUPTION and COVER-UP of crimes. Moreover,
WikiLeaks sharing information with the WORLD – then the coming of a release of
―U.S.: 1940s STD
an Article on or about October 1, 2010, entitled,
Experiments ―Clearly Unethical‖ SUPPORTING the United
States Government‘s role in UNETHICAL practices – i.e. as
that of the Tuskegee Test which were INFLICTED on
African-American men. See EXHIBIT “23” - “U.S.: 1940s STD
Experiments “Clearly Unethical” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if
set forth in full herein. So while the United States was trying to portray the preacher
(Jeremiah Wright) as being CRAZY, TERRORIST, etc. and taking EXCERPTS from
sermons to DECEIVE the Nation – LOOK WHAT HAPPENED!!! The TRUTH is

17
― my bag here, I have a foolproof [sic] method of controlling your black slaves. I guarantee every one of you that if
In
installed correctly it will control the slaves for at least 300 years. . . Any member of your family or your overseer can use it. . . I use fear,
distrust and envy for control. . .

The Breaking Process of the African Woman
Take the female and run a series of tests on her to see if she will submit to your desires willingly. TEST her in every way,
because she is the most important factor for good economics. If she shows any sign of resistance in submitting completely to your will,
do not hesitate to use the bull whip on her to extract the last bit of resistance out of her. Take care not to kill her, for in doing so, you
spoil good economic. . . .‖

Page 13 of 96

surfacing and being released to the PUBLIC/WORLD as with that provided by
WikiLeaks.

21. While President Obama and his Administration are attempting to
make it APPEAR that they were for the citizens of Egypt and other Foreign Nations
taking back their Government, they were NOT. President Obama and his
Administration CLEARLY are in FEAR now because they realize that the NEW
Foreign Governments being established by those who have been OPPRESSED,
ENSLAVED and in BONDAGE for DECADES (i.e. some over 40 Years) will NOT
allow the United States to DICTATE and continue to use their POWER to
TERRORIZE them as they have done to Newsome and others that SPEAK OUT and
EXPOSE CORRUPTION, INJUSTICES, RACISM, DISCRIMINATION, etc.
Newsome believes it is President Obama‘s time to take his OWN advice:

STEP DOWN FROM OFFICE – i.e. in that he has known
of the CORRUPTION and COVER-UP of crimes and civil wrongs leveled not
only against Newsome but those of other citizens of the United States that were
TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY brought to his attention; however,
made a CONSCIOUS and WILLING decision to look the other way.
Leaving to question as with IMPEACHED
President Nixon – WHAT did President Barack
Obama know and WHEN did he know it? Newsome
believesit is time for President Obama and his
TERRORIST/SUPREMACIST/RACIST Regime to LEAVE
the White House. Therefore, Newsome has INITIATED the appropriate
legal action(s) – Petition for EXTRAORDINARY WRIT with the Supreme
Court of the United States for the CORRECTION and EXPOSURE of practices
OUTLAWED HUNDREDS of Years Ago.

22. President Obama‘s/United States Government‘s RECENTLY coming
out and speaking out as though they were for the citizens in Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen,
Syria, Libya, etc. and other Foreign citizens taking ON/BACK their government is a
FARCE and the Foreign Citizens/Leaders know it. Foreign
Leaders/Media/Citizens may be aware of the attacks on Newsome because she has
released information to be shared as to the OPPRESSIVE and ENSLAVEMENT
practices of the United States Government, employers and those who have conspired
with them to destroy her life. For instance leaders in EGYPT knew that
placing President Obama in the White House was a FRONT and merely
DECEPTIVE acts to mislead Foreign Countries, their Leaders and
Citizens:
Muhammad Habib, first deputy to the general guide of the Muslim Brotherhood, said:
He said
― US Administration employs all cards to serve its own interests.”
the

that the speech that Obama intends to deliver in
Egypt is “of no value.‖ He added: ―
Statements and
speeches must be associated with, or preceded by

Page 14 of 96

real change in policy on the ground, because
policy is judged by deeds, not words.‖
See EXHIBIT “24”“EGYPT‘S Opposition Leaders Sound Off On
-
Upcoming Obama Visit” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set
forth in full herein. As well as the following information at:

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2009/06/03/v-print/69398/obama-to-lay-
out-vision-of-muslim.html

. . . Bin Laden said that Obama's approach
to the Muslim world was no different from that of
Bush18, whose policies — from the invasion of Iraq to the use of
some interrogation methods widely considered torture — convinced many
Muslims that the United States had launched a war on Islam. . .

However, Gamal Eid, the head of the Arabic Network for Human Rights
Information, said he planned to decline the invitation. The Israeli ambassador to
he didn't want to be in the same
Egypt also is invited, and Eid said
room as a representative of what he called a "criminal"
government.
See EXHIBIT “25” – “Obama to Lay Out Vision of Muslim’s World’s
Future” Article attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
23. This Court has retained copies of the PFEW in this action as well as
the $300 Filing Fee submitted. Newsome being a paying litigant in that it appeared
to her that this Court may have attempted to try and get her to come before it in the
“In Forma Pauperis” (― IFP‖) status to avoid having to address the issues presented
therein – i.e. in that IFP pleadings/filings do NOT appear to be subject to the same
standard of review as that of PAYING litigants.

In re McDonald, 489 U.S. 180, 109 S.Ct. 993 (1989) Jessie
McDonald may well have abused his right to file petitions in this Court
without payment of the docketing fee; the Court's order documents that
fact. I do not agree, however, that he poses such a threat to the orderly
administration of justice that we should embark on the unprecedented
and dangerous course the Court charts today. . . . I am most concerned,
however, that if, as I fear, we continue on the course we chart today, we
will end by closing our doors to a litigant with a meritorious claim. It is
rare, but it does happen on occasion that we grant review and even
decide in favor of a litigant who previously had presented multiple
unsuccessful*188 petitions on the same issue. See, e.g., Chessman v.
Teets, 354

18
PUBLIC/WORLD needs to know because President Obama may be relying upon the advice of the same counsel and/or
advisors used by President Bush.

Page 15 of 96

U.S. 156, 77 S.Ct. 1127, 1 L.Ed.2d 1253 (1957); see id., at 173-177, 77
S.Ct. at 1136-1138 (Douglas, J., dissenting).
"Petitioner is no stranger to us. Since 1971, he has made 73
separate filings with the Court, not including this petition, which is his
eighth so far this Term. These include 4 appeals, 33 petitions for
certiorari, 99 petitions for extraordinary writs, 7 applications for stay
and other injunctive relief, and 10 petitions for rehearing." Id. pp. 994-
995.
"But paupers filing pro se petitions are not subject to the
financial considerations - filing fees and attorney's fees - that deter
other litigants from filing frivolous petitions." Id. p. 996.
The Supreme Court (even after all of McDonald's filings) did
not close the door to McDonald. A litigant who is identified as filing 73
separate filings in a one-year period; however, ruled, "Petitioner
remains free under the present order to file in forma pauperis requests
for relief other than an extraordinary writ, if he qualifies under the
Court's Rule 46 and does not similarly abuse that privilege." Id. p. 996.

24. The EMERGENCY relief sought through EM/ORS and PFEW is that
which is required to deter and mitigate damages sustained by Newsome. Moreover,
is relief that should have been sought by the appropriate Government Agency(s) to
which matters were brought; however, failed to perform ministerial duties owed
Newsome in RETALIATION of her having brought legal action and/or knowledge of
her engagement in protected activities – i.e. active role in conspiracy(s) leveled
against Newsome.

25. Newsome would be prejudiced by this action should this Court deny
her EQUAL protection of the laws, EQUAL privileges and immunities of the laws
and DUE PROCESS of laws in the handling of this instant RT031711SCL to which
it supports the PFEW and EM/ORS submitted to the attention of this Court for filing.
Therefore, this instant RT031711SCL is being filed to preserve the rights, arguments
and defenses asserted by Newsome under the statutes/laws governing said matters.

26. For the sake from having to reargue issues/arguments/defenses and
legal conclusions, Newsome incorporates by reference ― PFEW‖ and ― EM/ORS‖ as
well as their supporting Appendices/Exhibits submitted to the Supreme Court of the
United States for filing.

27. Newsome believes that the facts, evidence and legal conclusions
provided herein as well as in ―
PFEW‖ and ― EM/ORS‖ will sustain that the Supreme
Court of the United States MUST take jurisdiction in this matter; CANNOT pass it by
because it may be doubtful; MUST decide the issues/questions presented before this
Court; and CANNOT decline the exercise of jurisdiction to which Newsome is
entitled:

Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 165, 28 S.Ct. 441, 52 L.Ed.
714 (1908) - [HN1] The United States Supreme Court will not
take jurisdiction if it should not; but it is equally true that it
MUST take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary CANNOT,
as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches
the confines of the Constitution. The court CANNOT pass it
by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with

Page 16 of 96

whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, the court MUST
decide it, if it is brought before it. The court has NO more
right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction, which is given,
than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other
would be TREASON to the Constitution. Questions may
occur which the court would gladly avoid, but the court
CANNOT avoid them. All the court can do is to exercise its
best judgment, and conscientiously perform its duty.

for to do so would be TREASON to the Constitution. Therefore, Newsome seeks this
Court‘s addressing issues/questions presented it and to perform the duties owed her
as well as the citizens of the United States.

I. ALL WRITS ACT

Newsome hopes that the Supreme Court of the United States understands that due to the

EXTRAORDINARY, EXCEPTIONAL and CRITICAL/EXIGENT circumstances involved in this

case, this instant RT031711SCL is necessary in response its March 17, 2011 letter to her. Newsome

hopes that there is sufficient and adequate information contained herein as well as in EM/ORS,

PFEW and their supporting Exhibits/Appendices to end concerns of what she believes may be

DILATORY practices by this Court in light of the DAMAGING information contained herein which

actually has LED back to its DOORSTEPS due to its FAILURE to act when Newsome first began

coming to this Court to address such HIDEOUS criminal behavior and civil violations. Due to the

extenuating factors involved and the impact such crimes/civil wrongs have had not only on Newsome

but the PUBLIC/WORLD at large, she request that her Petition for Extraordinary Writ be filed and

this Court issue the required legal process on Respondents. Newsome believes that there is sufficient

Respondent information – i.e. names, addresses, etc. - available in this EM/ORS, PFEW and their

supporting Exhibits/Appendices to move forward. Even if not, this Court has the proper legal tools

and resources to retain information to avoid any further delays in the PROSECUTION and

ADMINISTRATION of justice.

28 USC § 1651 Writs:
(a) The Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of
Congress may issue ALL writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their
respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.

Page 17 of 96

Section 376 provided:
―. . The Supreme Court. . . shall have power to issue ALL writs NOT
.
specifically provided for by statute, which may be NECESSARY for the
exercise of their respective jurisdictions, and agreeable to the usages and
principles of law.‖

Ex parte Fahey, 67 S.Ct. 1558 (1947) - United States Supreme
Court has power to issue extraordinary writs . . .but such
remedies should be resorted to only where appeal is clearly
inadequate, and they are reserved for really extraordinary
causes.

Black’s Law Dictionary (8th Edition): All Writs Act – A federal statute that
gives the U.S. Supreme Court and all courts established by Congress the power
to issue writs in aid of their jurisdiction and in conformity with the usages and
principles of law.

Black’s Law Dictionary – Second Pocket Edition:
Writ: A court‘s written order, in the name of a state or other competent
legal authority, commanding the addressee to do or refrain from doing some
specified act.

Extraordinary Writ: A writ issued by a court exercising unusual or
discretionary power.

Original Writ: A writ commencing an action and directing the
defendant to appear and answer.

U.S. v. Denedo, 129 S.Ct. 2213 (U.S.,2009) - Under the All Writs Act, a court's
power to issue any form of relief, extraordinary or otherwise, is contingent on
that court's subject-matter jurisdiction over the case or controversy. 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 1651(a).

Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Com'n, 125 S.Ct. 2 (U.S.,2004)
- Authority granted to courts under the All Writs Act is to be used sparingly and
only in the most critical and exigent circumstances. (Per Chief Justice
Rehnquist, sitting as single Justice.) 28 U.S.C.A. § 1651(a).

Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Com'n, 125 S.Ct. 2 (U.S.,2004)
- Authority granted to courts under the All Writs Act is appropriately exercised
only: (1) when necessary or appropriate in aid of court's jurisdiction; and (2)
when legal rights at issue are indisputably clear. (Per Chief Justice Rehnquist,
sitting as single Justice.) 28 U.S.C.A. § 1651(a).

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that in compliance with the March 17, 2011 Letter issued by this

Court, and in furtherance of claims addressed in EM/ORS, PFEW and subsequent filings to said

pleadings, Newsome states:

28. Her concerns as to what she believes to be this Court‘s attempt to
MISLEAD her and/or MISGUIDE her into thinking that the ONLY type of

Page 18 of 96

Extraordinary Writs this Court will address are: extraordinary writ of mandamus,
mandamus/prohibition, habeas corpus – when it IS NOT!!

29. Newsome believes that a reasonable mind may conclude that the
EM/ORS, PFEW and their supporting Exhibits/Appendices clearly supports and
provides this Court with ADEQUATE and SUFFICIENT information that it could
have concluded that Newsome seeks to bring legal actions under the ―
ALL WRITS
ACT‖ and/or applicable statutes/laws governing claims addressed in EM/ORS and
PFEW. Furthermore, based upon the facts, evidence and legal conclusions, this
Court having the DUTY and OBLIGATION to correct any/all miscarriage of justice
reported through this action and/or known to it.

30. Based upon the facts, evidence and legal conclusion provided in
Newsome‘s EM/ORS and PFEW, she seeks legal relief under the All Writs Act and
any/all applicable statutes/laws to correct legal wrongs addressed and/or known to
this Court which may include the following (i.e. however, is not limited to said
listing):

a. Original Writ

b. Writ of Conspiracy

c. Writ of Course

d. Writ of Detinue

e. Writ of Entry

f. Writ of Exigi Facias

g. Writ of Formedon

h. Writ of Injunction

i. Writ of Mandamus

j. Writ of Possession

k. Writ of Praecipe

l. Writ of Protection

m. Writ of Recaption

n. Writ of Prohibition

o. Writ of Review

p. Writ of Supersedeas

Page 19 of 96

q. Writ of SUPERVISORY CONTROL

r. Writ of Securitate Pacis

s. Extraterritorial Writs

31. Newsome believes based upon the facts, evidence and legal
conclusions, that the record evidence will sustain that CRITICAL and EXIGENT
circumstances exist to support her EM/ORS and PFEW; moreover, relief under the
― Writs Act.‖ Furthermore, Newsome‘s EM/ORS and PFEW sets forth evidence
All
and facts that authority under the ― Writs Act‖ is warranted to aid in this Court‘s
All
Jurisdiction and that the Legal Rights at ISSUE are INDISPUTABLY clear.

Wisconsin Right to Life v. Federal Election Com’n, 125 S.Ct. 2, 542
U.S. 1305, 159 L.Ed.2d 805 (2004) – Authority granted to courts under
the All Writs Act is to be used sparingly and only in the most
CRITICAL and EXIGENT circumstances (Per Chief Justice
Rehnquist).
Authority granted under the All Rights Act is appropriately
exercised only: (1) when necessary or appropriate to aid in court‘s
jurisdiction; and (2) when legal rights at ISSUE are INDISPUTABLY
clear. (Per Chief Justice Rehnquist). Id.

provided in EM/ORS and PFEW and their supporting Exhibits/Appendices will
sustain that the Writs sought as well as other applicable relief KNOWN to this Court
to correct the legal wrongs reported will sustain LEGISLATIVELY approved sources
of PROCEDURAL INSTRUMENTS designed to achieve RATIONAL ends of law
and may be used by this Court in ISSUING the APPROPRIATE Orders to assist it in
conducting FACTUAL INQUIRIES/INVESTIGATIONS into the Issues/Claims set
forth in EM/ORS, PFEW and their supporting Exhibits/Appendices.

Harris v. Nelson, 89 S.Ct. 1082, 394 U.S. 286, 22 L.Ed.2d 281,
rehearing denied 89 S.Ct. 1623, 394 U.S. 1025, 23 L.Ed. 50 (1969) –
All Writs Act serves as LEGISLATIVELY approved source of
procedural instruments designed to achieve rational ends of law and
may be relied on by courts in issuing order appropriate to ASSIST
them in CONDUCTING FACTUAL INQUIRIES.

33. The Supreme Court of the United States have statutory authority as
well as inherent power to execute the applicable Orders that are necessary to
CORRECT the legal wrongs/injustices and prevent interference/obstruction of justice
to the implementation of said Orders sought.

U.S. v. Wallace, 218 F.Supp. 290 (1963) – The courts of the United
States have statutory authority as well as inherent power to enter such
orders as may be necessary to effectuate their lawful decrees and to
prevent interference with, and obstruction to, their implementation.

Page 20 of 96

34. Newsome believes that the facts, evidence and legal conclusion
provided in the EM/ORS and PFEW and their supporting Exhibits/Appendices will
sustain that this matter is of ― PUBLIC IMPORTANCE‖ and is of
PUBLIC/NATIONAL security in that it supports the COVER-UP of Respondents,
President Barack Obama, his Administration and the United States Government of
CORRUPTION, CRIMINAL/CIVIL VIOLATIONS and TERRORIST/RACIST/
SUPREMACIST practices. Furthermore, the record evidence will SUPPORT a
WILLFUL disregard of legislative policy, rules of the Supreme Court of the United
States, which are a DIRECT and PROXIMATE RESULT of the SERIOUS
HARDSHIP and LEGAL INJUSTICES leveled against Newsome, members of her
class and/or citizens of the United States.

This instant action has been brought seeking the filing of ORIGINAL
ACTION and issuance of EXTRAORDINARY WRITS because of the extraordinary
circumstances sustained by the facts, evidence and legal conclusions provided in the
EM/ORS and PFEW and their supporting Exhibits/Appendices – for purposes of
confining the inferior courts and Administrative Agency(s) addressed, to the lawful
exercise of their prescribed jurisdiction and to compel them to exercise authority
MANDATORILY required and GOVERNED by statutes/laws.

Morrow v. District of Columbia, 417 F.Ed 728, 135 U.S. App.Dc. 160
on remand 259 A.2d 592 (1969) – Among the factors to be considered
in determining whether prerogative writs should issue are whether the
matter is of ― PUBLIC IMPORTANCE,” whether the policy against
piecemeal appeals would be frustrated, whether there has been a
WILLFUL disregard of legislative policy, or of rules of the higher
court, and whether refusal to issue the writ may work a serious hardship
on the parties.

Platt v. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co., 84 S.Ct. 769, 376 U.S. 240, 11
L.Ed.2d 674 (1964) – Extraordinary writs are reserved for really
extraordinary causes, and then only to confine an inferior court to a
lawful exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction or compel it to exercise its
authority when it is duty to do so.

35. Newsome seeks any and all applicable relief KNOWN to the Supreme
Court of the United States to correct the injustices/miscarriages of justice addressed
herein as well as in EM/ORS, PFEW and their supporting Exhibits/Appendices.
Newsome believes that the record evidence will further support Orders entered by
judges with KNOWLEDGE that they lacked jurisdiction to act in legal
action/lawsuit.

Anderson v. McLaughlin, 263 F.2d 723 (1959) – (n.2) Authority
conferred by statute authorizing courts to issue ALL writs necessary is
NOT confined to issuance of writs in aid of jurisdiction already
acquired by appeal but extends to those cases which are within court‘s
appellate jurisdiction although NO appeal has yet been perfected. 28
U.S.C.A. § 1651. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass’n, 319 U.S.21, 25, 63
S.Ct. 938, 941, 87 L.Ed. 1185.
(n. 3) Extraordinary writs authorized to be issued by courts
established by Act of Congress should be issued only under unique and
compelling circumstances.

Page 21 of 96

De Beers Consol. Mines v. U.S., 65 S.Ct. 1130, 325 U.S. 212, 89 L.Ed.
1566 (1945) - . . . petitioners applied to this court for certiorari under §
262. That section provides in part: “The Supreme Court. . . shall have
power to issue all writs not specifically provided for by statute, which
may be necessary for the exercise of their respective jurisdictions, and
agreeable to the usages and principles of law.”
. . . When Congress withholds interlocutory reviews, § 262
can, of course be availed to correct a mere error in the exercise of
conceded judicial power. But when a court has no judicial power to do
what it purports to do – when its action is not mere error or usurpation
of power – the situation falls precisely within the allowable use of §
262. We proceed, therefore, to inquire whether the . . . Court is
empowered to enter the order under attack.

Also see, 80th Congress House Report No. 308.

36. Newsome believes it is of PUBLIC/WORLDWIDE interest for
citizens to see just how the courts in the United States operate and COVER-UP the
CORRUPTION of the United States Government/Government Officials, BIG
corporations, BIG law firms, BIG insurance companies, SPECIAL INTEREST
groups, their lobbyists, etc. who engage in criminal/civil wrongs leveled against
citizens such as Newsome who OPPOSE such unlawful/illegal/unethical practices as
that raised and addressed in EM/ORS, PFEW and supporting Exhibits/Appendices.
In fact, it is IMPORTANT for the PUBLIC/WORLD to see just how far the United
States Government, WHITE employers, their lawyers, their insurance companies, etc.
will go to POST FALSE, MALICIOUS and MISLEADING information known to be
received through criminal acts on the INTERNET for purposes of destroying
citizens‘ (i.e. such as Newsome) lives. See EXHIBIT “26” – Google Information
regarding Newsome attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in
full herein. Furthermore, how the Government and WHITE employers engage in
criminal/civil wrongs against citizens (i.e. such as Newsome) to see that the ―
DOORS
OF THE COURTS‖ are closed to citizens who have VALID and MERITABLE
claims. Either engaging and/or condoning the criminal acts of judges/justices who
AID and ABET in the COVER-UP of CORRUPTION and CRIMINAL behavior. In
Newsome case, the United States Government and White employers CONSPIRED to
place information on the INTERNET they knew to be FALSE, MALICIOUS and
MISLEADING for purposes of having Newsome BLACKLISTED/
BLACKBALLED and creating situation to see that Newsome is NEVER employable
in EFFORTS of keeping the CRIMINAL/TERRORIST/ RACIST/SUPREMACIST
practices of WHITE employers OUT of the eyes/knowledge of CITIZENS and/or
PUBLIC/WORLD.

Weber v. Henderson, 275 F.Supp.2d 616 (2003) – Postal employee who
filed fifteen lawsuits in nine years against United States Postal Service
(USPS), stemming from his removal from full-service carrier duty,
failed to raise claims in any action relating to events at issue that were
neither meritless nor frivolous, and thus any further pro se pleadings
submitted by employee on same basis would be PROPERLY reviewed
under ALL WRITS ACT . . .

Page 22 of 96

In re McDonald, 489 U.S. 180, 109 S.Ct. 993 (1989) Jessie
McDonald may well have abused his right to file petitions in this Court
without payment of the docketing fee; the Court's order documents that
fact. I do not agree, however, that he poses such a threat to the orderly
administration of justice that we should embark on the unprecedented
and dangerous course the Court charts today. . . . I am most concerned,
however, that if, as I fear, we continue on the course we chart today, we
will end by closing our doors to a litigant with a meritorious claim. It is
rare, but it does happen on occasion that we grant review and even
decide in favor of a litigant who previously had presented multiple
unsuccessful*188 petitions on the same issue. See, e.g., Chessman v.
Teets, 354
U.S. 156, 77 S.Ct. 1127, 1 L.Ed.2d 1253 (1957); see id., at 173-177, 77
S.Ct. at 1136-1138 (Douglas, J., dissenting).
"Petitioner is no stranger to us. Since 1971, he has made 73
separate filings with the Court, not including this petition, which is his
eighth so far this Term. These include 4 appeals, 33 petitions for
certiorari, 99 petitions for extraordinary writs, 7 applications for stay
and other injunctive relief, and 10 petitions for rehearing." Id. pp. 994-
995.
"But paupers filing pro se petitions are not subject to the
financial considerations - filing fees and attorney's fees - that deter
other litigants from filing frivolous petitions." Id. p. 996.
The Supreme Court (even after all of McDonald's filings) did
not close the door to McDonald. A litigant who is identified as filing 73
separate filings in a one-year period; however, ruled, "Petitioner
remains free under the present order to file in forma pauperis requests
for relief other than an extraordinary writ, if he qualifies under the
Court's Rule 46 and does not similarly abuse that privilege." Id. p. 996.

Newsome believes that a reasonable mind may conclude, that based upon the facts,
evidenced and legal conclusions provided in EM/ORS, PFEW, and their supporting
Exhibits/Appendices, that the role the Respondents, United States Government,
courts, WHITE employers, etc. played in the posting of PROTECTED ACTIVITIES
involving Newsome on the INTERNET – see EXHIBIT “26” – Internet information
regarding PROTECTED ACTIVITIES involving Newsome which was posted for
unlawful/illegal/unethical/malicious/willful intent attached hereto and incorporated
by reference as if set forth in full herein.

37. Newsome believes that the record will sustain that the facts, evidence
and legal conclusions set forth in EM/ORS and PFEW and their supporting
Exhibits/Appendices will sustain that RELIEF under the ― Writs Act‖ will sustain
All
that there ― persons/parties, though not parties to original action‖ - such as: (a)
are
United States President Barack Obama and members of his Administration, lawyers,
advisors, etc.; (b) Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC (― Baker
Donelson‖) their client (LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY); (c) and
others that may be identified through FACTUAL inquiries/INVESTIGATIONS that
engaged in CONSPIRACIES and criminal/civil wrongs leveled against Newsome –
that RELY upon their DOMINENT/PROMINENT positions to INFLUENCE and
FRUSTRATE the implementation of the laws, OBSTRUCT the administration of
justice, and implementation of Orders issued by this Court.

Page 23 of 96

Sable v. General Motors Corp., 90 F.3d 171 (1996) – Power conferred
by All Writs Act extends, under appropriate circumstances, to persons
who, though not parties to original action . . . are in position to frustrate
implementation of court order or proper administration of justice.

U.S. v. New York Tel. Co., 98 S.Ct. 364, 434 U.S. 159, 54 L.Ed.2d 376
– Power conferred by this section extends, under appropriate
circumstances, to persons who though not parties to original action . . .
are in position to frustrate implementation of court order or proper
administration of justice and encompasses even those who have not
taken any affirmative action to hinder justice.

U.S. v. International Broth. Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen
and Helpers of America, AFL-CIO, 911 F.Supp. 743 (1996) –
Important feature of All Writs Act is its grant of authority to enjoin and
bind nonparties to action when needed to preserve court‘s ability to
reach or enforce its decision in case over which it has proper
jurisdiction.

Mongelli v. Mongelli, 849 F.Supp. 215 (1994) - Under All Writs Act,
federal courts has authority to issue commands as necessary to
effectuate orders it has previously issued and extends to persons who
were not parties to original action but are in position to frustrate
implementation of court order.

Moreover, it is of PUBLIC IMPORTANCE for the CITIZENS/WORLD to see the
Terrorist/Supremacist/Racist Regime that may be running the United States
Government – Baker Donelson - and the positions it holds/held in the Government
for purposes of exposing how ONE law firm has been ALLOWED to infiltrate the
United States Government for PROMOTING its RACIST/DISCRIMINATORY/
SUPREMACIST ideas over their victims such as Newsome, other citizens and
Foreign Countries/Leaders:

Chief of Staff to the President of the United States
United States Secretary of State
United States Senate Majority Leader
Members of the United States Senate
Members of the United States House of Representatives
Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control for United States
Department of Treasury
Director of the Administrative Office of the United States

Chief Counsel, Acting Director, and
Acting Deputy Director of United
States Citizenship & Immigration
Services within the United States
Department of Homeland Security

Page 24 of 96

Majority and Minority Staff Director of the Senate Committee on
Appropriations
Member of United States President‘s Domestic Policy Council
Counselor to the Deputy Secretary for the United States Department of
HHS
Chief of Staff of the Supreme Court of the United States
Administrative Assistant to the Chief Justice of the United States
Deputy under Secretary of International Trade for the United States
Department of Commerce
Ambassador to Japan
Ambassador to Turkey
Ambassador to Saudi Arabia
Ambassador to the Sultanate of Oman
Governor of Tennessee
Governor of Mississippi
Deputy Governor and Chief of Staff for the Governor of Tennessee
Commissioner of Finance & Administration (Chief Operating Officer) -
State of Tennessee
Special Counselor to the Governor of Virginia
United States Circuit Court of Appeals Judge
United States District Court Judges
United States Attorneys
Presidents of State and Local Bar Associations

EMPHASIS ADDED in that this information is pertinent to establish - ― though not
parties to original action . . .are in position to frustrate implementation of court
order or proper administration of justice‖ - the CONSPIRACY and PATTERN-OF-
CRIMINAL/CIVIL wrongs leveled against Newsome out of which this instant relief
is sought. This information was originally located at:

http://www.martindale.com/Baker-Donelson-Bearman-Caldwell/law-firm-
307399.htm

see attached at EXHIBIT “10” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if
set forth in full herein. It is such information which had been posted for several
years. See APPENDIX “27” listing pulled approximately September 11, 2004.
However, when Newsome went PUBLIC and released this information, Baker
Donelson moved SWIFTLY for DAMAGE-CONTROL purposes and SCRUBBED
this information from the Internet. It is a GOOD THING NEWSOME RETAINED
HARD COPIES so that the PUBLIC/WORLD can see COVER-UP and
COWARDLY tactics of one of the most Powerful Leaders (Barack
Obama)/Countries (United States) attempting to HIDE/MASK their CRIMES/CIVIL

Page 25 of 96

WRONGS leveled against Newsome, members of her class and/or citizens of the
United States.

provided in EM/ORS, PFEW and their supporting Exhibits/Appendices will further
sustain that prior to bringing this matter before the Supreme Court of the United
States, that Newsome first sought administrative and/or judicial relief first. To NO
avail. Furthermore, that based upon the EXTRAORDINARY, EXCEPTIONAL and
CRITICAL/EXIGENT circumstances involved that any such claims and/or defenses
such as ― other remedies available‖ to Newsome will further prove FRUITLESS
and/or FRIVOLOUS because of the KEY/HIGH positions that Respondents hold and
their use of said positions to INFLUENCE the outcome of legal matters. Therefore,
in efforts to seek justice for the PATTERN-OF-MISCARRIAGE-OF-JUSTICE,
PATTERN-OF-PRACTICE, PATTERN-OF-CRIMINAL-BEHAVIOR, etc. leveled
against Newsome, she knew it was IMPERATIVE to submit her EM/ORS to put on
DISPLAY and PRESENT/EXPOSE to the PUBLIC/WORLD how the judicial
process works AGAINST citizens (i.e. such as Newsome) who in GOOD FAITH
bring legal actions through proper legal recourse and is REJECTED and
SUBJECTED to criminal/civil wrongs in RETALIATION for exercising rights
secured/guaranteed under the Constitution, Civil/Human Rights Act, and other
laws of the United States.

Harris v. Nelson, 89 S.Ct. 1082 (1969) - All Writs Act serves as
legislatively approved source of procedural instruments designed to
achieve rational ends of law and may be relied on by courts in issuing
orders appropriate to assist them in conducting factual inquiries. 28
U.S.C.A. § 1651.
All Writs Act serves as legislatively approved source of
procedural instruments designed to achieve rational ends of law and
may be relied on by courts in issuing orders appropriate to assist them
in conducting factual inquiries. Id.

39. The facts, evidence and legal conclusions set forth in Newsome‘s
EM/ORS, PFEW and their supporting Exhibits/Appendices will further sustain that
based upon the FACTS, EVIDENCE and RULES of this Court that some of the
Respondents involved in this matter may include STATES, COUNTIES,
MUNICIPALITIES, etc. which warrants this Court‘s ORIGINAL jurisdiction.

U.S. v. Hayman, 72 S.Ct. 263 (1952) - In determining what auxiliary
writs are "agreeable to usages and principles of law' within purview of
judicial code provision authorizing federal court to issue all writs
necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and
agreeable to usages and principles of law, court must look first to
common law.

40. Newsome further believes that given the facts, evidence and legal
conclusions presented to this Court in her EM/ORS, PFEW, their supporting
Exhibits/Appendices, MALICIOUS and CRIMINAL acts in placing PROTECTED
information on the INTERNET, and what may be DILATORY practices of this Court
in the handling of this matter thus far, that a reasonable mind may conclude that there
may have been SUFFICIENT and ADEQUATE information provided this Court

Page 26 of 96

already to aid in its jurisdiction and handling of this matter; rather than rely upon
what may be seen as dilatory tactics to AID and ABET Respondents (i.e. who based
on established relationships have engaged in CONSPIRACIES and the COVER-UP
of same) in the FURTHERANCE of their criminal/civil violations leveled against
Newsome. As a matter of law the Supreme Court of the United States has a DUTY
to correct the miscarriage of justices made known to it through any/all legal means
known to it. Newsome need NOT be specific because this Court has VAST legal
resources and KNOWLEDGE and/or the TOOLS TO OBTAIN SUCH
KNOWLEDGE in how to handle the EXTRAORDINRY, EXCEPTION and
CRITICAL/EXIGENT circumstances brought to its attention by Newsome.

Adams v. U.S. ex rel. McCann, 63 S.Ct. 236 (1942) - Unless
appropriately confined by Congress, a federal court may avail itself of
all auxiliary writs as aids in performance of its duties, when the use of
such historic aids is calculated in its sound judgment to achieve the
ends of justice entrusted to it.

Ex parte Milwaukee R. Co., 72 U.S. 188 (1866) - Where a case is
properly in the Supreme Court . . ., the Supreme Court has a right under
Judiciary Act § 14, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1651, to issue any writ which may be
necessary to render their . . . jurisdiction effectual.

Platt v. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co., 84 S.Ct. 769 (1964) -
Extraordinary writs are reserved for really extraordinary causes, and
then only to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its
prescribed jurisdiction or to compel it to exercise its authority when it
is its duty to do so. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1651(a).

See also 42 USC § 1986: Action for neglect to prevent.19

41. Newsome believes that there is sufficient evidence to further sustain
that those among Respondents may be the United States, States, Counties,
Municipalities, etc.; moreover their state/government officials in which
ORDERS/JUDGMENTS deterring/prohibiting/precluding/preventing present and
future unlawful/illegal/unethical behavior

Riggs v. Johnson County, 73 U.S. 166 (1867) - Under section 14 of the
judiciary act, authorizing the issue of ― other writs not specially
provided for by statute, which may be necessary for the exercise of
their respective jurisdiction,‖ . . . courts may issue a mandamus to a
state officer.

42. Newsome is CONFIDENT that the facts, evidence and legal
conclusions provided in her EM/ORS, PFEW and their supporting
Exhibits/Appendices will sustain that this legal matter that she has brought before the
Supreme Court of the United States is one of EXTRAORDINARY, EXCEPTIONAL
and CRITICAL/EXIGENT circumstances. Furthermore, will sustain a CLEAR
19
Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in section 1985 of this
title, are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to
do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such
wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; and such damages may be recovered in an action on the
case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action; . . .

Page 27 of 96

ABUSE OF DISCRETION, USURPATION OF JUDICIAL POWER/AUTHORITY,
LACK OF JURISDICTION in lower court actions to act, etc. Moreover, a REPEAT
Pattern-Of-Such-Abuses/Usurpation because Respondents PLACED THEMSELVES
ABOVE THE STATUTES and LAWS of the United States and thought they were
INVINCIBLE!!! However, like the MAJORITY of career criminals (i.e. as
Respondents) they commit way too many crimes and through their ARROGANCE and
PRIDE they eventually commit one crime to many and slip up which eventually leads
to their DEMISE as in this instant legal action.

Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. Holland, 74 S.Ct. 145(1953) - The
supplementary review power conferred on courts by Congress in the
All Writs Act is meant to be used only in the exceptional case where
there is a clear abuse of discretion or usurpation of judicial power. 28
U.S.C.A. s 1651(a).

II. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF FACT/CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Newsome believes that the facts, evidence and legal conclusions provided in the EM/ORS,

PFEW and their Exhibits/Appendices will sustain that, as a matter of law, Newsome is entitled to

Findings of Fact/Conclusion of Law that Courts and/or Administrative Agencies relied upon to reach

their rulings/decisions. Furthermore, that Newsome TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY

provided her demands for Findings of Fact/Conclusion of Laws in WRITING and through the

applicable legal processes – to NO avail. Therefore, sustaining the relief sought through this instant

legal action before the Supreme Court of the United States.

43. Newsome is CONFIDENT that the facts, evidence and legal
conclusions in the lower courts‘ and administrative agencies‘ records will SUSTAIN
timely requests for Findings of Fact/Conclusion of Laws for any decisions
Respondents may alleged was rendered. However, to date, Newsome has NOT
received Findings of Fact/Conclusion of Laws requested. Thus, clearly
SUPPORTING courts and/or administrative agencies depriving Newsome EQUAL
protection of the laws, EQUAL privileges and immunities and DUE PROCESS of
laws secured/guaranteed to her under the Constitution and other laws of the United
States.

Ben David v. Travisono, 495 F.2d 562 (1974) – Whether proceeding
under this section or not, . . .court has NO license to ignore
REQUIREMENT that it LET PARTIES and appellate court KNOW
WHY IT ACTS, and on what FACTUAL BASIS.
(n.1) . . . The latter incorporate the common sense rule that a
court should let the parties and . . . court know why it acts, and on what
factual basis. United States v. Merz, 376 U.S. 192, 84 S.Ct. 639, 11
L.Ed.2d 629 (1964). Whether proceeding under the All Writs Act or

Page 28 of 96

not, . . . court has NO license to ignore that requirement. Golden State
Bottling Co. v. NLRB, 414 U.S. 168, 177 n.4, 94 S.Ct. 414, 422 n.4, 38
L.Ed. 388 (1973).
(n.4) Those enjoined are ENTITLED to be TOLD
PRECISELY what conduct is outlawed. Schmidt v. Lessard, 414 U.S.
473, 94 S.Ct. 713, 715, 35 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974).

44. Newsome is confident that the Supreme Court of the United States‘
inquires and/or investigations into the Judicial and Administrative proceedings
brought by Newsome will support that NEITHER organization will have facts,
evidence or legal conclusions to REBUT Newsome‘s claims, evidence and case laws
provided and there is NOTHING to sustain organizations‘ decisions. Though
Newsome requested Findings of Fact/Conclusion of Laws to sustain
courts‘/administrations‘ actions, ALL FAILED to produce Newsome with Findings
of Fact and the Conclusion of Laws relied upon to reach their decision.

American Propeller & Manufacturing Co. v. U.S., 57 S.Ct. 521
(U.S.,1937) - Findings should be examined in light of pleadings to
determine scope of findings.

45. Newsome further believes that while she was laughed and mocked at
for being so thorough, detailed and presented pleadings considered voluminous, she
in GOOD FAITH prepared pleadings for purposes of PRESERVING the claims and
issues presented for review by this Court. Furthermore, Newsome knew that
Respondents‘ INABILITY to defend against her claims/legal actions were also the
reason they did their best to STEER CLEAR of addressing the claims and issues
raised. Nevertheless, Newsome remained focused and did not embark and engage in
the RAMBLINGS of such criminals and responded with the applicable pleadings to
PRESERVE and SUPPORT claims/issues raised and the TIMELY, PROPERLY and
ADEQUATE submission thereof for review.

Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire, 105 S.Ct. 1713 (1985) - Claim not
raised below was bound to fail on review.

III. ORIGINAL WRIT

Newsome believes that the facts, evidence and legal conclusions provided in her EM/ORS,

PFEW and supporting Exhibits/Appendices will further support that prior to bringing this legal action

before the Supreme Court of the United States, Newsome in GOOD FAITH and DILIGENTLY

sought relief through the applicable process – to NO avail. Newsome‘s efforts proving to be fruitless

based upon the CORRUPTION and Extraordinary, Exceptional and Critical/Exigent circumstances

of the KEY/BIG MONEY interest groups (i.e. United States President Barack Obama, his

Administration, Baker Donelson, Libert Mutual, etc.) involved and their ties to POWER POSITIONS

Page 29 of 96

04/22/11 - U.S. Supreme Court Filing (President Obama-StorAll Matter)

04/22/11 - U.S. Supreme Court Filing (President Obama-StorAll Matter)

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Tendances (20)

En vedette

En vedette (20)

Similaire à 04/22/11 - U.S. Supreme Court Filing (President Obama-StorAll Matter)

Similaire à 04/22/11 - U.S. Supreme Court Filing (President Obama-StorAll Matter) (20)

Dernier

Dernier (8)

04/22/11 - U.S. Supreme Court Filing (President Obama-StorAll Matter)