Publicité

Janez Kopac, Director of the Energy Community Secretariat

WEC Italia
30 May 2013
Publicité

Contenu connexe

Présentations pour vous(20)

Publicité

Similaire à Janez Kopac, Director of the Energy Community Secretariat(20)

Publicité

Janez Kopac, Director of the Energy Community Secretariat

  1. 1 The external impact of key EU energy strategies (echo of loud voices) Edison + WEC conference Rome, 29 May 2013 Janez Kopač, Director of the Energy Community Secretariat
  2. 2 THE COMMUNITY – A LOOK AT THE MAP Status: February 2013
  3. 3 Main upcoming legislative work • Energy Statistics – implementation by 31st December 2013 • Directive 2009/28 on Renewables – implementation by 1st January 2014 • Third Package on electricity / gas – implementation by 1st January 2015 – + missing rules from “Second Package” ! • Large Combustion Plants Directive – implementation by 31st Dec. 2017 • Sulphur in Fuels Directive was due for 31st Dec 2011 !! • Energy Efficiency was due for 31st Dec 2012 • Oil stocks – implementation by 1st January 2023 http://www.energy- community.org/portal/page/portal/ENC_HOME/ENERGY_COMMUNITY/Legal/EU_Legi slation
  4. 4 20-20-20 BY 2020 EU Greenhouse gas levels Energy consumption Renewables in the energy mix -20% -20% 100% +20% Source: EU DG ENER EU EU EC %6- EU + EC
  5. 5 Main EU energy ideas in Energy Community Contracting Parties • Area EU Energy Community • Renewable energy sources 20% in 2020 20% in 2020 • Energy efficiency 20% in 2020 9% in 2018 • CO2 emissions 20% in 2020 not applicable • Infrastructure PCI PECI • Integrated energy market 2014 2015
  6. 6 CONTRACTING PARTIES 2020 RES TARGETS 0,0% 5,0% 10,0% 15,0% 20,0% 25,0% 30,0% 35,0% 40,0% 45,0% KOSOVO* UKRAINE SERBIA MONTENEGRO MOLDOVA FYR OF MACEDONIA CROATIA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ALBANIA 18,9% 5,5% 21,2% 26,3% 11,9% 21,9% 12,6% 34,0% 31,2% 38% 40% 28% 17% 33% 27% 11% 25% 20%
  7. 7 SETTING THE 2020 RES TARGETS: “EQUIVALENCE” TO EU TARGET • Premise of equivalent level of ambition as EU 20% target • Three Components: 2009 Baseline RES Share + Flat Rate Increase - 5,5% + Additional Residual Effort based on relative GDP per capita (approx 1-2 %) - Adjusted based on the trajectory approach to reflect shorter time remaining for implementation – 15,85% • Calculated against 2009 baseline year with latest forecasts –Different from EU baseline of 2005 in order to use most accurate data available
  8. 8 ENERGY EFFICIENCY - A STRATEGIC PRIORITY Source: IEA 2012 (2010 data) ENERGY INTENSITY IS MUCH HIGHER THAN IN EU! 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 toe/thousand2005USD TPES/GDP TFEC/GDP EU 27 PEI EU 27 FEI
  9. 9 ENERGY EFFICIENCY - A STRATEGIC PRIORITY Source: IEA 2012 (2010 data) ENERGY CONSUMPTION PER CAPITA LOWER THAN IN EU, BUT EXPECTED TO RISE! 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 ALB BIH CRO KOS* MKD MNE SER MOL UKR WB EnC toe/capita TPES/population TFEC/population EU 27 TPES/population EU 27 TFEC/population
  10. 10 ACQUIS ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY MINISTERIAL COUNCIL DECISIONS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING ENERGY EFFICIENCY ACQUIS (Dec. 2009/Sep. 2010/Oct. 2011) 1. DIRECTIVE 2006/32/EC (ESD) - by 31 December 2011 2. DIRECTIVE 2010/31/EU ON THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS (EPBD) – RECAST DIRECTIVE 2002/91/EC - by 30 September 2012 3. DIRECTIVE 2010/30/EU ON LABELING (RECAST DIRECTIVE 92/75/EEC) AND IMPLEMENTING DIRECTIVES/DELEGATED ACTS (ELD) – by 31 December 2011 / 31 December 2012 New : ENERGY EFFICIENCY DIRECTIVE 2012/27/EU – Recommendation of the Ministerial Council for transposition - October 2013 10
  11. 11 Infrastructure package • EU Energy Community • PCIs PECIs • Connecting Europe Facility WBIF, neighbourhood • Streamlining of spatial planning and building permiting procedurec (3,5 years)
  12. 12 Energy Community Strategy In two phases: Phase 1: A Strategy paper, endorsed by the MC in October 2012 Phase 2: Identification of Projects of Energy Community Interest (PECIs), and associated policy measures to promote these, October 2012 – October 2013 The strategy paper has set three important objectives:  Objective 1: Creating a Competitive Integrated Regional Energy Market  Objective 2: Attracting investments in the energy sector  Objective 3: Providing secure and sustainable energy supply to customers …. and a large number of actions to support these,
  13. 13 Current energy situation and national trends Brief overview of the energy sectors in the Western Balkans/Energy Community, common features:  Small and fragmented markets, with the exception of Ukraine  Dependent on domestic fossil fuel (coal/lignite) or imported gas and oil  Single source of gas imports  High potential for renewable energy, especially hydro, biomass, wind, solar  High potential for energy efficiency  Power generation based on technologies from 60‟ and 70‟ – exceeding their life span, high reliability and environmental concerns  Urgent need for major retrofit, and new power plants
  14. 14 Energy demand scenarios and investment costs Three scenarios were selected: – „Current trends‟ – if current trends in development of the energy sector continue, what are the implications? – „Minimal investment cost’ – what are the minimal costs required to ensure that there is adequate supply of electricity to meet demand? this will be meeting the energy efficiency and RE energy targets only partially, and will not meet the Large Combustion Plants Directive – „Low Emissions Development/Sustainability‟ - if more aggressive promotion of EE and RE was pursued, what might be the implications?; under this scenario all targets will be met as well as the requirements of the Large Combustion Plants Directive
  15. 15 Scenario analysis implications A few highlights: The scenario analysis demonstrates the potential for severe electricity shortages if current trends continue unabated. It also demonstrated a very large investment gap, with Contracting Parties reported plans already at approx. 27.9 billion Euros through 2020 Western Balkans and 44 billion Euros for the Energy Community – it is even higher when considering the view point of other regional energy experts or when the analysis extends to include plant in the 2021 to 2030 timeframe. The scenarios indicate the potentially large investment needs of required for the region to meet supply adequacy. Between 2012-2020, an estimated 14.7 billion Euros only for WBs or 39.1 Billion Euros for the entire Energy Community of investments are needed under the scenario that focuses on minimum supply adequacy. It is evident that there are projects of regional significance that can benefit from a coherent EnC energy strategy. An EnC strategy supported by a framework for project support should help mobilize financing.
  16. 16 Indentification of Projects of Energy Community Interest (PECIs) Categories eligible for PECI “label” Power generation  New generation capacities  Modernization, retrofitting of existing power plants, allowing for more efficient and environmentally safe production Electricity transmission Gas transmission  Gas transmission pipelines (bi-directional capacity)  Underground storage facilities  LNG and CNG terminals Oil  Refinery improvements for facilitating improved fuel quality  Storage facilities to contribute to the security stockholding obligations  Pipelines used to transport crude oil
  17. 17 Overview of Submitted Project Proposals Contracting Party/Project Promoter Country Electricity transmission Electricity generation Gas infrastructure Oil infrastructure TOTAL ALBANIA 2 2 2 - 6 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 3 15 4 - 22 CROATIA 4 2 4 1 11 FYR of MACEDONIA 2 3 - - 5 KOSOVO* 6 4 - - 10 MOLDOVA 2 - 1 - 3 MONTENEGRO 3 2 - - 5 SERBIA 6 13 9 2 30 UKRAINE 2 2 2 1 7 TAP (Company) - - 1 - 1 TOTAL 30 43 23 4 100
  18. 18 Policy/regulatory tools to facilitate PECIs Harmonized permit granting regime for PECIs  Most preferential treatment in Contracting Parties  Streamlining procedures  Competent Authority with powers to manage permit granting process  Time limit for the permit granting decision  Increased transparency and public participation Energy system wide cost benefit analysis Cross-border actions and benefits  Cross-border cost-allocation  National Regulatory Authorities joint decision on investments and cost-allocation  ECRB arbitration/decision if no agreement Long-term investment incentives  Obligation on National Regulatory Authorities to grant appropriate risk-related incentives
  19. 19 GEOGRAPHIC TARGET Energy Community vs 8th Region 19 8TH REGION
  20. 20 Energy market • EU - internal energy market by the end of 2014 • Energy Community wholesale market opening by 2012, regional market coupling by 2014, adoption of 3rd Energy Package by Jan 2015, Network Codes ???
  21. 21 REALITY CHECK Electricty Wholesale Market Opening in the 8th Region 21 SEE WMO RAP Deadline & responsibility Done? Developments 1. Capacity calculation - Harmonized methodologies/ procedures for capacity calculation (yearly / monthly / day ahead) Q1 2011 ENTSO-E SEE RG NO 2. Long-term allocation - Coordinated bilateral explicit auctions implemented on all borders within the SEE region - Multilateral coordinated auctions on several borders (NTC-based) - Centralized auctions via SEE CAO (NTC based in a first step) - Multilateral coordinated auctions on all borders (regional one stop shop) Q1 2012 TSOs, Ministries, NRAs Q3 2012 TSOs, Ministries, NRAs Q4 2012 TSOs, Ministries, NRAs Q4 2014 ENTSO-E SEE RG NO PARTLY NO Yearly 2014 capacities expected to be auctioned by SEE CAO end 2013 But: Serbia, Bulgaria missing
  22. 22 THE KEY BARRIERS Electricty Wholesale Market Opening in the 8th Region 22 SEE WMO RAP Deadline & responsibility Done? Developments 3. Day ahead allocation - Establishment of power exchanges in several SEE countries or contracting services from the existing PX - Bilateral/ trilateral market coupling in SEE region - Price based market coupling (EU target model) in entire SEE region - Pan-European market coupling including the SEE region 31.12.2011 the latest National Q2 2012 Q4 2014 ECRB, PHLG, ENTSO-E RG SEE Q2 2015 NO NO Developemnts in Croatia & Serbia towards establishment of a PX 4. Intraday allocation -on several borders -harmonised regional solution Q2 2014 TSO‟s Q2 2015 ENTSO-E RG NO 5. Balancing 2013 NRA‟s, ECRB NO SEE balancing target model
  23. 23 REAL CHALENGES • Price liberalization • Definition of socially vulnerable customers A socially vulnerable customer is an electricity consumer: using energy for supplying her/his permanent housing through single-phase meter with a connection not exceeding maximum power, not exceeding maximum energy consumption per person and belonging to a category of citizens with lowest income. The definition shall not include more than a minority of population. When defining power of a mono phase meter and energy consumption level per person, Contracting Parties shall consider power of up to 16 Ampere and total consumption of up to 100 kWh/month for a family with up to 4 members as maximum including the need to reflect seasonality. For the definition of low income, beside the income all available assets shall be taken into account. • Large combustion plants directive - 2017
  24. 24 IN CONCLUSION...
Publicité