Publicité

The climate impact of ICT: A review of estimates, trends and regulations (ISMB SST02 invited talk)

Professor of Computing and Sustainability à Lancaster University
26 Jul 2021
Publicité

Contenu connexe

Publicité

Plus de Adrian Friday(19)

Publicité

The climate impact of ICT: A review of estimates, trends and regulations (ISMB SST02 invited talk)

  1. The Climate Impact of ICT ISMB/ECCB 2021, July 2021 Adrian Friday School of Computing and Communications Lancaster University a.friday@Lancaster.ac.uk @gulliblefish
  2. Team effort… Dr Kelly Widdicks Dr Bran Knowles Prof Gordon Blair Prof Adrian Friday Charlotte Freitag Prof Mike Berners-Lee
  3. This talk has 3 parts: 1. Review of estimates of ICT’s impacts by leading authors 2. What might the future impact be? 3. What can you do about it? unsplash/ levi-xu-dOhJtfXJZfw
  4. • ICT estimated at 4000 TWh by 2030 • US electricity = 3660 TWh in 2020 • Global PV + Wind ~1.2 TWh in 2019 unsplash/ nasa-Q1p7bh3SHj8
  5. Climate change, net 0? Much to do… https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/net-zero-target
  6. What are ICTs energy/CO2e impacts, and where are we heading? Creation, recycling, supply chain externality Impacts we’ve not considered Devices, networks & data centres etc. energy use unsplash/ olena-sergienko-W2BI02QOncg/ lars-kienle-IlxX7xnbRF8/ dogherine-z1_z4hX9WhM/ arno-senoner-yqu6tJkSQ_k/ johannes-plenio-5_9inhy4NSE/ zhang-fengsheng-gUKv_yrQ_tk/ https://www.upsbatterycenter.com/blog/ev-makers-pushing-hard-for-ethical-cobalt/#prettyPhoto Energy and how cleanly it’s generated vs
  7. Why is this not trivial? https://www.carbontrust.com/resources/briefing-what-are-scope-3-emissions Scope 1 covers direct emissions • Lack of openness, frequently undeclared, time varying 01 Scope 2 covers indirect emissions from the generation of purchased electricity, steam, heating and cooling • Changes with time and location (constant conversion factors typically used) on short and long timescales 02 Scope 3 includes all other indirect emissions that occur in a company’s value chain • Hard to account for completely, challenging for ICT products due to their complexity (c.f. simple foods) 03
  8. Available on arxiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.026 22
  9. Methodology 1. Literature searches for peer-reviewed studies on ICT’s carbon footprint 2. Supplemented by interviews with key analysts, i.e. • Anders Andrae (Huawei Technologies) • Jens Malmodin (Ericsson) • Lotfi Belkhir (McMaster University) 3. Small World Consulting ongoing research with UK & global ICT companies
  10. When do we use energy? WHEN WE COMPUTE OR COMMUNICATE WE USE ENERGY ENERGY USE IS THUS PROPORTIONAL BUT NOT WHOLLY LINKED TO ‘COMPUTATIONAL WORK’ COMPUTERS AND NETWORKS ALSO NEED POWER JUST TO BE ‘ON’/IDLE COMPUTE GENERATES HEAT, COOLING ALSO TAKES POWER EFFICIENCY COMES FROM DOING MORE WITH LESS POWER (E.G. MOORE’S LAW) TO MAKE THE INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE FIRST PLACE
  11. 1.8-2.8% of global greenhouse gas emissions Where are we? 1,087 1,107 1,306 887 1,860 3,634 - 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 Malmodin (2020) Belkhir & Elmeligi (2018) - 2020 minimum Belkhir & Elmeligi (2018) - 2020 maximum Andrae & Edler (2015) - 2020 Best case Andrae & Edler (2015) - 2020 Expected case Andrae & Edler (2015) - 2020 Worst case Greenhouse gas emissions in MtCO2e User devices Data centres Networks TVs
  12. Considerable differences User devices, 37% Data centres, 41% Networks, 22% User devices, 57% Data centres, 18% Networks, 24% User devices, 32% Data centres, 33% Networks, 35% Andre & Edler, 2015 (2020 best case) – 623 MtCO2e Belkhir & Elmeligi, 2018 (2020 mean case) - 1,207 MtCO2e Malmodin, 2020 (2020 estimate) – 690 MtCO2e
  13. Why do these estimates vary? •1.8-2.8% •2.1-3.9% of global greenhouse gas emissions • Data sources and decisions • Truncation error • Assumed future activities and behaviours in society unsplash/ sarah-kilian-52jRtc2S_VE
  14. We ask: Will energy efficiency improvements in ICT continue? Will efficiency gains reduce ICT’s overall carbon footprint? Will ICT’s emissions stabilise due to saturation in demand? Is data traffic now independent of ICT emissions? Is ICT enabling carbon savings in other industries? Will renewable energy decarbonise ICT? unsplash/ science-in-hd-joGs6hU_EKE
  15. 1. Will energy efficiency improvements in ICT continue? Yes, there is scope for energy efficiency improvements in ICT to continue No, energy efficiency improvements are slowing down and are not fully utilised • Moore’s law • PoE in data centres • Shift to mobile devices
  16. Yes, there is scope for energy efficiency improvements in ICT to continue No, energy efficiency improvements are slowing down and are not fully utilised 1. Will energy efficiency improvements in ICT continue? • Quantum limits • Hotter CPUs = more cooling • Does new replace old?
  17. 2. Will efficiency gains reduce ICT’s overall carbon footprint? Yes, energy efficiencies in ICT can reduce ICT’s carbon footprint No, energy efficiencies drive growth in ICT’s carbon footprint due to rebound effects • PoE has improved • Data centres grown yet remained at ~1% global demand [Masanet, 2020]
  18. Yes, energy efficiencies in ICT can reduce ICT’s carbon footprint No, energy efficiencies drive growth in ICT’s carbon footprint due to rebound effects 2. Will efficiency gains reduce ICT’s overall carbon footprint? • Demand for more devices • Carbon footprint undeniably growing • Jevons paradox!
  19. 3. Will ICT’s emissions stabilise due to saturation in demand? Yes, the world will become saturated with ICT and this will stabilise ICT’s emissions No, innovation will prohibit saturation in ICT • 5.7bn mobile subscribers by 2023 [Cisco, 2020] • Limited available attention [Malmodin]
  20. Yes, the world will become saturated with ICT and this will stabilise ICT’s emissions No, innovation will prohibit saturation in ICT 3. Will ICT’s emissions stabilise due to saturation in demand? • Strong commercial incentives • IoT, AI • The global south…
  21. 4. Is data traffic now independent of ICT emissions? Yes, ICT emissions are largely independent of data traffic No, data traffic drives ICT growth and the associated emissions • Always on infrastructure • Provisioned for peak demand • More demand = more infrastructure
  22. Yes, ICT emissions are largely independent of data traffic No, data traffic drives ICT growth and the associated emissions 4. Is data traffic now independent of ICT emissions? • A&E, B&E agree data drives ICT growth • Innovative services drive growth (e.g. video)
  23. 5. Is ICT enabling carbon savings in other industries? Yes, ICT is enabling carbon savings in other industries No, ICT drives carbon emissions in other industries due to rebound effects • ICT could save 9.1 GtCO2e in 2020 through efficiency [GeSI 2015] • ICT enabling decarboniza tion of energy
  24. Yes, ICT is enabling carbon savings in other industries No, ICT drives carbon emissions in other industries due to rebound effects 5. Is ICT enabling carbon savings in other industries? • Global emissions still climbing • ICT enabled rebound effects
  25. Yes, renewable energy will decarbonise ICT No, renewable energy is not a silver bullet 6. Will renewable energy decarbonise ICT? • 0.1 kgCO2e/kWh vs. 0.63kg CO2e/kWh (global energy mix) • 86% reduction in emissions
  26. Yes, renewable energy will decarbonise ICT No, renewable energy is not a silver bullet 6. Will renewable energy decarbonise ICT? • Availability & share of renewables • Also embodied footprints • Resources (e.g. silver)
  27. ICT emissions, assuming the 2020 level (adjusted for truncation error) remains stable until 2050, and global CO2 emissions reduced in line with 1.5°C under scenario SSP2-19. ICT’s future share of emissions? 40.93 32.28 23.63 17.58 11.52 7.65 3.78 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Carbon emissions in GtCO2 Global CO2 emissions ICT's GHG emissions stable at 2020 level 3.2% 5.6% 11.5% 35.1% 4% 21% 42% 57% 72% 81%
  28. Three reasons to believe ICT’s environmental impacts will increase
  29. What can you do? Scope 3 Amortise embodied cost by extending the useful life of equipment; push for supply chain decarbonisation; divestment; organisational practice (e.g. how grants are costed) Scope 2 Push for ‘real’ green energy, time computation with abundant low emission energy; demand response (helps integrate renewables) Scope 1 Minimize ‘direct’ footprint: strive for efficiency, reduce waste, e.g. with energy proportionate algorithms; minimise fossil fuel use
  30. Hard questions Limits? Should there be a limit and how could this work? How would we prioritise global compute? Should a limit reduce over time? Policy? In what ways do the epistemological structures of computational biology and bioinformatics research need to change to lower overall impacts? Accountability? How can we provide better transparency to drive evidence led policy in this area? Value? Emissions isn’t everything, there are questions of broader societal value, but then that shouldn’t mean ‘do nothing’… we need to act now!
  31. The Climate Impact of ICT ISMB/ECCB 2021, July 2021 Thank you. Prof. Adrian Friday School of Computing and Communications a.friday@lancaster.ac.uk Freitag, C., Berners-Lee, M., Widdicks, K., Knowles, B., Blair, G., and Friday, A. 2020. The climate impact of ICT: A review of estimates, trends and regulations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.02622
  32. Socio-Digital Sustainability Team Kathy New PhD Student Dr Kelly Widdicks Lecturer Adam Tyler PhD Student Dr Oliver Bates Senior Researcher Dr Ally Gormally Lecturer Prof Adrian Friday Professor Dr Janine Morley Researcher http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/scc-sds/ Matt Marsden PhD Student Christina Bremer PhD Student Iman Hussain PhD Student Dr Christian Remy Senior Researcher Dr Carolynne Lord Senior Researcher
Publicité