PART II Questions 9 and 10 below require you to select the best answ.pdf

PART II: Questions 9 and 10 below require you to select the best answer to fit the question asked. 9. The mayor of a town believes that over 20% of the residents favor construction of a new bridge. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level to support the mayor's claim? After information is gathered from 230 voters and a hypothesis test is completed, the mayor fails to reject the null hypothesis at the 0.10 level. What is the conclusion regarding the mayor's claim? A) There is sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level of significance that the percentage of residents who support the construction is over 20%. B) There is not sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level of significance that the percentage of residents who support the construction is over 20%. 10. The mayor of a town believes that 27% of the residents favor construction of an adjoining bridge. A community group believes this is inaccurate and decides to perform a hypothesis test to dispute the mayor's claim. After information is gathered from 420 voters and a hypothesis test is completed, the group decides to reject the null hypothesis at the 0.02 level. What is the conclusion regarding the mayor's claim? A) There is sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level of significance to say that the percentage of residents who support the construction is not 27%. B) There is not sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level of significance to say that the percentage of residents who support the construction is not 27%..

PART II: Questions 9 and 10 below require you to select the best answer to fit the question
asked. 9. The mayor of a town believes that over 20% of the residents favor construction of a
new bridge. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level to support the mayor's claim? After
information is gathered from 230 voters and a hypothesis test is completed, the mayor fails to
reject the null hypothesis at the 0.10 level. What is the conclusion regarding the mayor's claim?
A) There is sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level of significance that the percentage of residents
who support the construction is over 20%. B) There is not sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level of
significance that the percentage of residents who support the construction is over 20%.
10. The mayor of a town believes that 27% of the residents favor construction of an adjoining
bridge. A community group believes this is inaccurate and decides to perform a hypothesis test to
dispute the mayor's claim. After information is gathered from 420 voters and a hypothesis test is
completed, the group decides to reject the null hypothesis at the 0.02 level. What is the
conclusion regarding the mayor's claim? A) There is sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level of
significance to say that the percentage of residents who support the construction is not 27%. B)
There is not sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level of significance to say that the percentage of
residents who support the construction is not 27%.

Contenu connexe

Plus de ambritmobiles(20)

Dernier(20)

Education and Diversity.pptxEducation and Diversity.pptx
Education and Diversity.pptx
DrHafizKosar87 vues
Material del tarjetero LEES Travesías.docxMaterial del tarjetero LEES Travesías.docx
Material del tarjetero LEES Travesías.docx
Norberto Millán Muñoz60 vues
ACTIVITY BOOK key water sports.pptxACTIVITY BOOK key water sports.pptx
ACTIVITY BOOK key water sports.pptx
Mar Caston Palacio275 vues
Chemistry of sex hormones.pptxChemistry of sex hormones.pptx
Chemistry of sex hormones.pptx
RAJ K. MAURYA107 vues
AI Tools for Business and StartupsAI Tools for Business and Startups
AI Tools for Business and Startups
Svetlin Nakov74 vues
2022 CAPE Merit List 2023 2022 CAPE Merit List 2023
2022 CAPE Merit List 2023
Caribbean Examinations Council3.5K vues
Nico Baumbach IMR Media ComponentNico Baumbach IMR Media Component
Nico Baumbach IMR Media Component
InMediaRes1368 vues
Azure DevOps Pipeline setup for Mule APIs #36Azure DevOps Pipeline setup for Mule APIs #36
Azure DevOps Pipeline setup for Mule APIs #36
MysoreMuleSoftMeetup84 vues
Industry4wrd.pptxIndustry4wrd.pptx
Industry4wrd.pptx
BC Chew157 vues
Narration  ppt.pptxNarration  ppt.pptx
Narration ppt.pptx
TARIQ KHAN76 vues
GSoC 2024GSoC 2024
GSoC 2024
DeveloperStudentClub1056 vues
SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE_new.pptxSIMPLE PRESENT TENSE_new.pptx
SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE_new.pptx
nisrinamadani2159 vues
Dance KS5 BreakdownDance KS5 Breakdown
Dance KS5 Breakdown
WestHatch53 vues
ICANNICANN
ICANN
RajaulKarim2061 vues

PART II Questions 9 and 10 below require you to select the best answ.pdf

  • 1. PART II: Questions 9 and 10 below require you to select the best answer to fit the question asked. 9. The mayor of a town believes that over 20% of the residents favor construction of a new bridge. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level to support the mayor's claim? After information is gathered from 230 voters and a hypothesis test is completed, the mayor fails to reject the null hypothesis at the 0.10 level. What is the conclusion regarding the mayor's claim? A) There is sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level of significance that the percentage of residents who support the construction is over 20%. B) There is not sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level of significance that the percentage of residents who support the construction is over 20%. 10. The mayor of a town believes that 27% of the residents favor construction of an adjoining bridge. A community group believes this is inaccurate and decides to perform a hypothesis test to dispute the mayor's claim. After information is gathered from 420 voters and a hypothesis test is completed, the group decides to reject the null hypothesis at the 0.02 level. What is the conclusion regarding the mayor's claim? A) There is sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level of significance to say that the percentage of residents who support the construction is not 27%. B) There is not sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level of significance to say that the percentage of residents who support the construction is not 27%.