REVISED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE NORMS RECOMMENDED BY SEBI IN ITS BOARD MEETING HELD ON 13th FEB., 2014.
THESE NORMS WOULD BE APPLICABLE FROM 1st OCT. 2014
3. Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement
Applicable to Listed Companies
Deal with the Corporate Governance Norms
SEBI defines Corporate Governance as :
"acceptance by management of the inalienable rights
of shareholders as the true owners of the corporation
and of their own role as trustees on behalf of the
shareholders. It is about commitment to values, about
ethical business conduct and about making a distinction
between personal & corporate funds in the management
of a company."
4. NEED TO AMEND THE PROVISIONS OF Clause 49
To align the provisions of the
listing agreement with the
provisions of the newly
enacted Companies Act, 2013
To provide additional
requirements to strengthen
the Corporate Governance
framework for the listed
companies in India.
6. Person who makes public the following
• MISCONDUCT
• FRAUD
• ILLEGAL ACTIVITY
• MISAPPROPRIATION
happening within the organization.
7. MAXIMUN NUMBER OF DIRECTORSHIPS
Sec. 165 of the Companies Act, 2013
provides the maximum number of
directorship of any person to 20.
Further it lays down that the
maximum number of directorship in
a public company shall not exceed
10.
8. MAXIMUN NUMBER OF DIRECTORSHIPS
The SEBI recommendation are more
stringent, where the maximum
number of Boards an independent
director can serve on listed
companies be restricted to 7.
Maximum number of directorship
serving as Whole Time Director is
maximum 3.
10. TERM OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR
As per Companies Act, 2013, an independent director can hold up to two
5 year terms after which there needs to be a 3 year cooling off period.
The change made in Companies Act is PROSPECTIVELY (i.e. it doesn’t count
the time served already).
The change proposed by SEBI takes into consideration the previous terms
( if a person has served as independent director on a board for 5 years or
more, starting October 1st he shall be eligible to only one term of 5 years)
SEBI HAS IMPOSED
STRINGENT
PROVISIONS
WITH REGARD TO
INDEPENDENT
DIRECTOR.
11. EXCLUSION OF NOMINEE DIRECTOR FROM THE
DEFINITION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR.
NOMINEE DIRECTOR IS NO MORE INDEPENDENT
18. PRIOR APPROVAL OF AUDIT COMMITTEE
FOR ALL RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
19. APPROVAL OF ALL MATERIAL RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS THROUGH SPECIAL
RESOLUTION, WITH ABSTAINING RELATED PARTIES
FROM VOTING.
20. OTHER PROPOSALS vis-à-vis TO COMPANIES ACT, 2013
MANDATORY CONSTITUTION OF NOMINATION COMMITTEE
“A nomination committees is focused on evaluating the board of directors of its
respective firm and on examining the skills and characteristics that are needed in
board candidates.”
CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE SHALL BE INDEPENDENT.
21. OTHER PROPOSALS vis-à-vis TO COMPANIES ACT, 2013
MANDATORY CONSTITUTION OF REMUNERATION COMMITTEE
CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE SHALL BE INDEPENDENT.
23. OTHER PROPOSALS vis-à-vis TO COMPANIES ACT, 2013
WIDENED THE SCOPE OF RELATED PARTY
TRANSATION
AS – 18
Companies
Act, 2013
Definition of Related Party
25. SUMMARY:
The provisions of Companies Act applies to
all the companies.
The provisions of Listing agreement is
applicable for all the Listed Companies or on
the companies seeking listing permission
from stock exchange.
With mandating Whistle blower mechanism
and carving out a certain more stringent
provisions relating to Independent Directors,
SEBI rings in tougher governance norms on
listed companies as a condition of the Listing
Agreement.