Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Le téléchargement de votre SlideShare est en cours. ×

GITA CAD GIS Workshop Notes

Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Chargement dans…3
×

Consultez-les par la suite

1 sur 10 Publicité
Publicité

Plus De Contenu Connexe

Diaporamas pour vous (17)

Publicité

Similaire à GITA CAD GIS Workshop Notes (20)

Publicité

Plus récents (20)

GITA CAD GIS Workshop Notes

  1. 1. WORKSHOP: November 2008 Automated CAD & GIS Integration for better asset management AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND DIVISION
  2. 2. CAD-GIS INTEGRATION WORKSHOP NOTES <ul><li>GITA Brisbane 5 Nov 2008 </li></ul><ul><li>Table 1 - Issues </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Movement of assets into GIS </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Departmental silos </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Amalgamated councils </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Designed vs. as-constructed </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ADAC </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Massive integration projects </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Corporate sponsorship </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Corporate restructure </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Formulation & adherence to standards </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Lack of internal resources for data maintenance & system development </li></ul></ul>
  3. 3. CAD-GIS INTEGRATION WORKSHOP NOTES <ul><li>GITA Brisbane 5 Nov 2008 </li></ul><ul><li>Table 2 - Governance </li></ul><ul><ul><li>People issues not technology issues </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Some issues of currency </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Integration must be justified by business value </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Table 3 – Other Issues </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Drawing matching as-constructed data </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>ADAC -> GIS integration -> Developer Accountability </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Time for a New ADAC? </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. CAD-GIS INTEGRATION WORKSHOP NOTES <ul><li>GITA Sydney 11 Nov 2008 </li></ul><ul><li>Table 1 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Design data: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Data distribution to design </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Data from design into GIS </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Paper still used </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Make design data GIS ready </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Schematic: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Design vs. GIS </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Standards for visualisation </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Can we define schematic rules? </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>If not manual data management </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Hand drawn – Visio, PPT! </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>GIS data – </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Design, </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>So many formats for data </li></ul></ul></ul>
  5. 5. CAD-GIS INTEGRATION WORKSHOP NOTES <ul><li>GITA Sydney 11 Nov 2008 </li></ul><ul><li>Table 2 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Lack of Integration: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Electronic paper </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Re-work </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Use of contractor, tool of choice </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Field force capability; IT, skill </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Field force “confidence in data” -> Feedback </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Designed vs. As-built; responsibility? Individual, corporate </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>$-value to executive management </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Cost up front vs. lifecycle </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Outage management -> Process </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Start with the End in Mind </li></ul></ul>
  6. 6. CAD-GIS INTEGRATION WORKSHOP NOTES <ul><li>GITA Sydney 11 Nov 2008 </li></ul><ul><li>Table 3 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>No line of sight </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Extension Design – Top of Management Tool </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Variation in accuracy of cadastre </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Mandate software </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Efficient design results in quicker payment to designers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Differences between engineering design and design layout </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Design data accuracy is major driver </li></ul></ul>
  7. 7. CAD-GIS INTEGRATION WORKSHOP NOTES <ul><li>GITA Melbourne 13 Nov 2008 </li></ul><ul><li>Table 1 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Single point of reference </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>VicMap – input data not correct or consistent </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Looking for standards and metadata </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Survey regulations? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Water, power infrastructure as constructed </li></ul></ul>
  8. 8. CAD-GIS INTEGRATION WORKSHOP NOTES <ul><li>GITA Melbourne 13 Nov 2008 </li></ul><ul><li>Table 2 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>GIS / Spatial has become generic tool </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Manual process to be automated </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Enforce standard design </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Designers sticking to their own tools and methods </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Standardising across industries state -> nationwide </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Standardise across companies wishing to use the same toolset </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Technology not an issue, people </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Regulations and operations driving change </li></ul></ul>
  9. 9. CAD-GIS INTEGRATION WORKSHOP NOTES <ul><li>GITA Melbourne 13 Nov 2008 </li></ul><ul><li>Table 3 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Impact on design time </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Air-Gap” – Design vs. Useful </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Lack of Standards </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Re-training $s </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Downstream value </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Changing Process: Richness, $ Budgets </li></ul></ul>
  10. 10. Andrew Bashfield, Stratelead: [email_address]

×