Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Le téléchargement de votre SlideShare est en cours. ×

Leerink ppt presentation

Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Chargement dans…3
×

Consultez-les par la suite

1 sur 26 Publicité

Plus De Contenu Connexe

Diaporamas pour vous (20)

Les utilisateurs ont également aimé (19)

Publicité

Similaire à Leerink ppt presentation (20)

Plus récents (20)

Publicité

Leerink ppt presentation

  1. 1. Strategic Synergy Consulting Group Apostolos Antoniou | Ashleigh Womble | Dylana Suarez | Mike Kavanagh | Ni Zhan | Taylor Polchinski | Roberto Westerband Executive-in-Residence Program Spring 2014 LEERINK PARTNERS LLC MGT REPORT RE-DESIGN
  2. 2. Agenda • SWOT Analysis of Leerink Partners LLC • SWOT Analysis of Leerink’s Current MGT Report • Key Stakeholders • Design Methodology • Deliverable of Leerink Quarterly Review 2
  3. 3. SWOT Analysis Leerink Partners LLC Strengths 3 Weaknesses Opportunities Threats • Reputation/knowledge in healthcare • MEDACorp/research capability • Client service • Investment banking capability • MEDACorp use limitations • Lack of diversity within product offerings • Brand image • International presence • MEDACorp expansion to other expert networks • Brand development • Growth through acquisitions • International expansion • Increased regulation in within industry • Competition from Mature asset management companies with larger market share • Other investment banks acquiring research companies similar to MEDACorp
  4. 4. SWOT Analysis Current MGT Report Strengths 4 Weaknesses Opportunities Threats • Detailed Financial Information • Includes all necessary ratios and metrics • Quantitative information to highlight current work stream performance • Easy to miss important information • Design aesthetic is visually unpleasing • Difficultly in finding financial results due to clustered bullets • Allow transparency for key stakeholders • Better managerial decision making due to ease of use • More streamlined reporting would allow for less redundancy • Important metrics are missed • If management is misinformed, it will have negative effects on internal processes • Misinterpretation of Leerink performance
  5. 5. Key Stakeholders Who Are They? 5 What are their Needs? Stakeholder Takeaways • Board of Directors • Upper-level Management • Current and Future Investors • Interested External Parties • Understanding of Company Performance • Quick Comprehension • Easy Comparability • Key Financial Highlights and Metrics • Geographic Profitability • Historical Trends per Business Segment • A Comparative Review of Revenues, Expenses and Pre-Tax Income • Recent Banking Transactions • Top and Bottom 10 Client Accts. • Employee Metrics
  6. 6. Design Methodology 6 • Built a storyline to highlight work stream performance. • Chose a graphical approach to financial statements. • Condensed graph design that combines current year, prior year, and planned figures. • Color coding for ease of identification • Includes key highlights and metrics to provide better transparency. • Use of Current Technology to auto- populate management report Current Year Budget Overall Design Legend PY/Plan Prior Year
  7. 7. Deliverable of Leerink Quarterly Review 7 • Cover Page • Q 3 2013 Income Statement Overview • Q3 2013 Balance Sheet Overview • Financial Highlights • Location Highlights • Business Segment Trends • Revenues | Expenses | Pre-Tax Income • Q3 2013 • YTD • Performance Highlights • Deal Activity • Client Metrics • Headcount Statistics • Employee Metrics LEERINK Business Performance Storyline
  8. 8. The Healthcare Investment Bank 2013 Third Quarter Review
  9. 9. Q3 2013 Income Statement Overview Financial Highlights $36.1M Operating Revenue for Q3 13, ahead of Plan by $11.4M and Q3 12 by $17.2 M (+91.0%). It was the firms highest ever quarterly revenue. $23.1M Compensation Costs for Q3 13, unfavorable to Plan of $7.3M (+46.3%), which was mostly the effect of the favorable revenue on the incentive compensation accrual. $7.7M Operating NPE for Q3 13, unfavorable to Plan of $6.4M (+19.3%) and Q3 12 of $5.5M (+40.1%). $5.3M Pre-tax Net Operating Income, far surpassed the $2.4M planned for the quarter (+117.4%) and $2.7M earned in Q3 12 (+96.4%). 14.7% Pre-tax Operating Margin % for The Firm’s Q3 13. 9 PY/Plan PY/Plan PY/Plan PY/Plan PY Plan
  10. 10. Q3 2013 Balance Sheet Overview Financial Highlights 10 $68.5M Cash and Cash Equivalents increased $22.1M from year-end primarily due to the proceeds from the sale of Humica and positive net cash flows from business operations. $25.5M Receivables include customer ($18.6M) and employee and other receivables ($6.9M). The increase of $9.5M from PY is mostly related to accrued banking revenue. $8.6M Other Assets increased largely due to a $1.7M letter of credit that was signed related to the NY lease as well as purchases of fixed assets. $43.9M Members’ Equity decreased by $7.8M from Dec. 2012 due to the Lovell Minnick equity repurchase ($40.0M) mostly offset by net income ($32.4M). $4.02 Tangible Book Value per share was $4.02, up from $3.52 in Dec. PY/Plan PY/Plan PY/Plan PY/Plan PY/Plan
  11. 11. Financial Highlights
  12. 12. Location Highlights Comparative Expenses by Location • +30% Q3 Revenue from San Francisco Year-Over-Year • Attributed to increased sales force • 10 More Clients Out of New York Year-Over-Year • Attributed to higher referral rate • -15% Expenses in Boston Year-Over-Year • Attributed to decreased rent expense Location Metrics Key Highlights Comparative Revenue by Location 12 $15,000,000 $6,500,000 $1,250,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 New York San Francisco Boston Q3 2013 Q3 2012 $750,000 $300,000 $125,000 $500,000 $250,000 $100,000 New York San Francisco Boston Q3 2013 Q3 2012 Boston, MA • $$ Revenue • 94 Employees • $$ Rev/HC New York, NY • $$ Revenue • 82 Employees • $$ Rev/HC San Francisco, CA • $$ Revenue • 10 Employees • $$ Rev/HC
  13. 13. Business Segment Trends Institutional Equities • Executed 19 Deals in Q3 13, up from 15 deals in Q2 13. • Average Fee per Transaction was up in Q3 13 at $1.18M vs. $992k in Q2 13. • 20% M&A Deals of total Q3 13 revenue. • 263m Shares Trade Volume was up compared to prior quarter of 245m shares. Asset Management Key Highlights Investment Banking $17,250 $18,650 $18,200 $19,850 $20,275 $20,850 $22,600 $21,002 $22,041 $22,347 Q3'10 Q1'11 Q2'11 Q3'11 Q1'12 Q2'12 Q3'12 Q1'13 Q2'13 Q3'13 $7,200 $7,900 $7,850 $9,000 $8,750 $9,000 $9,450 $10,000 $11,250 $10,144 Q3'10 Q1'11 Q2'11 Q3'11 Q1'12 Q2'12 Q3'12 Q1'13 Q2'13 Q3'13 $1,450 $1,500 $1,586 $1,620 $1,700 $1,750 $1,800 $1,900 $1,950 $2,048 Q3'10 Q1'11 Q2'11 Q3'11 Q1'12 Q2'12 Q3'12 Q1'13 Q2'13 Q3'13 13
  14. 14. Q3 2013 Revenue Key Highlights Revenue Comparison • Q3 Investment Banking revenue was 22.3M favorable to plan by 9.8 Million. The highest quarterly revenue result in the Firm’s history. • Q3 Institutional Equities revenue was 10.1M favorable to plan by .8M. • Trade volumes for the quarter were up 7% from the previous year to 263M shares. • Asset Management continues to grow steadily with a 15% increase from the previous quarter. Revenue Breakdown by Segment 14 62% 28% 6%4% Investment Banking Institutional Equities Asset Management Other Revenue 22,347 10,144 2,048 1,514 36,053 7,693 8,742 2,809 (372) 18,872 Investment Banking Institutional Equities Asset Management Other Revenue Total Revenue Q3 2013 Q3 2012 Budget
  15. 15. YTD 2013 Revenue Key Highlights YTD Revenue Comparison YTD Revenue Breakdown by Segment 15 61% 29% 6% 4% Investment Banking Institutional Equities Asset Management Other Revenue 58,994 31,113 6,038 4,359 100,504 26,975 29,344 8,565 1,173 66,057 Investment Banking Institutional Equities Asset Management Other Revenue Total Revenue YTD 2013 YTD 2012 Budget • YTD Operating Revenue was $100.5M, up 52% (+$34.4M) vs. 2012, and up 34% (+25.2M) when compared to plan. • YTD Institutional Equities revenue ($31.1M) increased 6% (+$1.8M) vs. 2012, and up $5.3% (+$1.6M) when compared to plan. • YTD Asset Management revenue ($6M) declined 30% (-$2.5M) from 2012, and down 15% (-$1.1M) vs. plan.
  16. 16. Q3 2013 Expenses Q3 2013 Key Metrics Expenses Comparison 16 Key Highlights 23,073 7,666 30,739 10,672 5,470 16,142 Comp Expenses NPE Expenses Total Expenses Q3 2013 Q3 2012 Budget 43% 32% 25% Variable Comp. Fixed Comp. NPE • Compensation vs. Revenue Ratio was 64%, flat compared to prior year. • NPE Expenses was $7.7M up 40% (+$2.2M) when compared to prior year, up 12% ($792k) from Q2 2013, and up 19% (+1.2M) compared to plan. • NPE vs. Revenue Ratio was 21.3%, down when compared to the last 8-quarter average of 25.9%, and down vs. plan levels of 26.1%.
  17. 17. YTD 2013 Expenses YTD Key Metrics Expenses Current Year to Prior Year 64% Variable Compensation Ratio to Revenue 17 39% 35% 26% Variable Comp. Fixed Comp. NPE 64,322 22,414 86,736 40,871 19,224 60,095 Comp Expenses NPE Expenses Total Expenses YTD 2013 YTD 2012 Budget
  18. 18. Q3 2013 Pre-tax Income Pre-tax Income Current Year to Prior Year Pre-tax Income Actual to Budget 18 36,053 30,739 5,314 24,644 22,201 2,443 Q3 Revenue Q3 Expenses Q3 Pre-Tax Income Actual Budget 5,314 2,730 Pre-Tax Income Q3 2012 Q3 2013 Key Highlights • Operating Pre-tax Income was $5.3M, which was the 2nd highest ever (next to $7.6M in Q2 2007). • Pre-Tax Margin was +14.7%, higher than a year ago levels of +14.5%, and up vs Q2 2013 levels of 13.1%, and up compared to plan levels of +9.9%. • Operating Leverage was a +0.6%, vs. plan of -6.9%, a full year 2012 of +11.8%.
  19. 19. YTD 2013 Pre-tax Income Pre-tax Income Current Year to Prior Year Pre-tax Income Actual to Budget 19 13,768 5,962 Pre Tax Income YTD 2012 YTD 2013 100,504 86,736 13,768 75,296 68,530 6,766 Q3 Revenue Q3 Expenses Q3 Pre-Tax Income Actual Budget • Operating Pre-tax Income was $13.8M, up 131% (+$7.8M) vs. 2012, and up 103% (+$7M) when compared to plan. This already have exceeded full year target levels of $10M. • Pre-Tax Margin was +13.7%, up from last year’s levels of +9%, and up vs. plan of +9%. • Operating Leverage was a +7.8%, up vs. plan of 0%. Key Highlights
  20. 20. Performance Highlights
  21. 21. Deal Activity Q3 2013 Banking Transactions Future Transactions • October revenue includes $7.7M from the Restat M&A, the largest banking transaction fee received in the history of the firm. • Three biopharma public equity transactions expected to price in October ($2.7M of fees). • $75M IPO for Veracyte, Jt. BR, expected to launch in October. • Two private placement offerings expected to close by early November, ($1.7M). 21 Client Deal Type II Deal Type III Capital Raised Total Revenue Insmed Follow-On Sole Bookerunner - $ 2,310,438 Medicines Co. Follow-On Jt Bookrunner $ 46,000,000 2,097,236 OncoMed IPO Jt Bookrunner - 2,078,975 Ophthotech IPO Co-Manager 90,000,000 1,680,897 Acceleron IPO Jt Bookrunner 103,500,000 1,640,260 Onconova Therapeutics IPO Jt Bookrunner - 1,578,994 Foundation Medicine IPO Co-Manager 40,000,000 1,225,953 Sophiris IPO Jt Bookrunner 197,000,000 1,010,751 Verastem Follow-On Jt Bookrunner - 1,006,655 Agios IPO Co-Manager - 894,178 Kalobios Follow-On Sole Bookerunner - 800,832 Cellular Dynamics IPO Co-Manager 275,000,000 558,421
  22. 22. Client Metrics Top 10 Accounts YTD Top 10 Largest Producers YTD Net Eligible YTD Net Budget $ Diff % Diff Fidelity Management & Research, LLC $ 1,099,963 $ 678,973 $ 420,990 62% Hennion & Walsh 854,192 941,006 -86,814 -9% Visium Asset Management 791,450 749,282 42,168 6% Balyasny Asset Management 747,819 405,426 342,393 84% Pyramis Global Advisors, LLC 704,547 695,419 9,128 1% Mason Capital 575,309 403,897 171,412 42% Sabby Capital 549,898 485,279 64,619 13% Partner Funds 514,789 265,104 249,685 94% Orbimed Advisors 452,168 250,185 201,983 81% Ridgeback Capital Management 449,379 295,881 153,498 52% Accounts as % of Revenue Key Financial Highlights • YTD Net Eligible: $123,456,789 • Average Loss Ratio: 23% • Top 5 Capital Users • Fidelity Management & Research, LLC • Visium Asset Management • Partner Funds • Mason Capital • Capital World Investors 22 32% 20% 26% 22% Top 10 Accounts Accounts #11 to #25 Accounts #26 to #50 Accounts #51 to #100
  23. 23. Client Metrics Bottom 10 Accounts 23 YTD Top 10 Laggard vs Budget YTD Net Eligible YTD Net Budget $ Diff % Diff Tradewinds Global Investors $ 32,551 $ 352,846 -320,295 -91% Columbia Mgmt 197,237 352,436 -155,199 -44% Capital Research Global 397,218 544,611 -147,393 -27% Ayer Capital 93,039 222,075 -129,036 -58% Tang Capital 0 127,876 -127,876 -100% PointState Capital 21,054 147,725 -126,671 -86% Marshall Wace 214,516 340,766 -126,250 -37% Turner Investment Partners 133,358 230,312 -96,954 -42% JP Morgan 133,015 229,372 -96,357 -42% UBS O'Connor 141,215 235,825 -94,610 -40% 32,551 197,237 397,218 93,039 0 21,054 214,516 133,358 133,015 141,215 Tradewinds Global Investors Columbia Mgmt Capital Research Global Ayer Capital Tang Capital PointState Capital Marshall Wace Turner Investment Partners JP Morgan UBS O'Connor YTD Net Eligible YTD Net Budget
  24. 24. Headcount Statistics 2013 2012 Q3 A Q3 P Delta Q3 A Headcount - End 187 196 -4.6% 180 Headcount - Avg 183 194 -5.8% 182 Rev / HC $197.0 $126.8 55.3% $103.5 Q3 2013 Headcount Roll Forward 43 128 25% 75% Managing Directors All Others 98 73 57% 43% Revenue Generator Non-Revenue Generator 19 152 11% 89% Administrative Professionals Managing Director Summary Revenue Generator Summary Administrative Staff Summary 24
  25. 25. Previous Year $789 Plan $456 $845 Comp. Cost per FTE Employee Metrics Q3 2013 Highlights Key Metric Comparisons 96.3% Employee Satisfaction 4.2% Turnover Rate Previous Year 9% Plan 3% $1,072 Profit per FTE Previous Year $543 Plan $876 $2,492 Revenue per FTE Previous Year $3,456 Plan $1,234 Success Against Hiring Initiatives Department Plan To Date Sales 10 13 HR 2 1 Admin 3 0 25
  26. 26. Thank You! Strategic Synergy Consulting Group

×