Publicité
Team performance appraisal system
Team performance appraisal system
Team performance appraisal system
Team performance appraisal system
Publicité
Team performance appraisal system
Team performance appraisal system
Prochain SlideShare
Parameters for performance appraisalParameters for performance appraisal
Chargement dans ... 3
1 sur 6
Publicité

Contenu connexe

Publicité
Publicité

Team performance appraisal system

  1. Team performance appraisal system In this file, you can ref useful information about team performance appraisal system such as team performance appraisal system methods, team performance appraisal system tips, team performance appraisal system forms, team performance appraisal system phrases … If you need more assistant for team performance appraisal system, please leave your comment at the end of file. Other useful material for you: • performanceappraisal123.com/1125-free-performance-review-phrases • performanceappraisal123.com/free-28-performance-appraisal-forms • performanceappraisal123.com/free-ebook-11-methods-for-performance-appraisal I. Contents of getting team performance appraisal system ================== Employers use a number of methods to evaluate employee performance -- some effective and others not so effective. The pluses and minuses of team appraisals depend on team members -- their contributions, the kind of project they worked on and even the type of appraisal their supervisor uses to evaluate a co-worker's performance. Method It's difficult to use the typical performance appraisal to evaluate a team. A typical performance appraisal is useful for rating an individual employee, while evaluating a team requires an appraisal that measures numerous other factors such as group dynamics, leadership, interpersonal relationships, logistics and coordination. The disadvantage is that team appraisals have to be done on a regular basis to justify implementing an evaluation method that meets the needs of the supervisor who's rating the team's performance. Implementation In addition to designing an appraisal that's suitable for rating a group of co-workers, the implementation of this type of appraisal is more than a notion. Implementation of a team appraisal system requires training for both supervisors and employees. Training prepares supervisors to measure the areas on which the team is evaluated -- how the group responds to the employee who assumes a leadership role, the effectiveness of group communication, communication among individual team members and dynamics that appear only in group situations.
  2. Time Although the design and implementation phases of putting a team appraisal to work take time, conducting the actual team appraisal shaves time off the entire process. Supervisors can conduct a team appraisal effectively and efficiently, provided they have all the materials they need to review the team's performance. For example, supervisors need documentation about the origin of the project, employee roles, cost estimates, deliverables and outcomes and the amount of effort made by every employee on the team. Employee Response No appraisal -- whether for a team or an individual -- would be complete without some form of employee response. Employees who enjoy work groups may appreciate that, although they're being rated as a team, they may still be able to outshine their co-workers just by virtue of their contributions to the team project. Healthy competition is an advantage of team appraisal because employees who thrive in a team environment become fully engaged in the team effort and motivate their co-workers. Health-care management consultant Tim Porter-O'Grady expresses the value of team-based evaluations within the context of connectedness and its impact on sustainability. On his website, he states: "Although the organization can certainly look at the individual's relationship to performance outcomes, sustainable outcomes are the result of the integration of the activities of a number of individuals." Compensation Allocating bonuses, salary raises and wage increases among individuals can be arduous. Employees who aren't happy with the result will file complaints with their supervisors, managers or the human resources department. However, the benefit of a team appraisal is that the company can establish set raises based on group performance and alleviate the headache of determining the percentage that individuals receive as a result of their performance. In other words, compensation standards for team appraisals can be banded. For example, teams that receive group scores receive predetermined salary increases, which prevents supervisors from worrying about possible subjectivity entering into the decision to grant raises to employees on an individual basis. ================== III. Performance appraisal methods
  3. 1.Ranking Method The ranking system requires the rater to rank his subordinates on overall performance. This consists in simply putting a man in a rank order. Under this method, the ranking of an employee in a work group is done against that of another employee. The relative position of each employee is tested in terms of his numerical rank. It may also be done by ranking a person on his job performance against another member of the competitive group. Advantages of Ranking Method i. Employees are ranked according to their performance levels. ii. It is easier to rank the best and the worst employee. Limitations of Ranking Method i. The “whole man” is compared with another “whole man” in this method. In practice, it is very difficult to compare individuals possessing various individual traits. ii. This method speaks only of the position where an employee stands in his group. It does not test anything about how much better or how much worse an employee is when compared to another employee. iii. When a large number of employees are working, ranking of individuals become a difficult issue. iv. There is no systematic procedure for ranking individuals in the organization. The ranking system does not eliminate the possibility of snap judgements. 2. Rating Scale Rating scales consists of several numerical scales representing job related performance criterions such as dependability, initiative, output, attendance, attitude etc. Each scales ranges from excellent to poor. The total numerical scores are computed and final conclusions are derived. Advantages – Adaptability, easy to use, low cost, every type of job can be evaluated, large number of employees covered, no formal training required. Disadvantages – Rater’s biases
  4. 3. Checklist method Under this method, checklist of statements of traits of employee in the form of Yes or No based questions is prepared. Here the rater only does the reporting or checking and HR department does the actual evaluation. Advantages – economy, ease of administration, limited training required, standardization. Disadvantages – Raters biases, use of improper weighs by HR, does not allow rater to give relative ratings 4. Critical Incidents Method The approach is focused on certain critical behaviors of employee that makes all the difference in the performance. Supervisors as and when they occur record such incidents. Advantages – Evaluations are based on actual job behaviors, ratings are supported by descriptions, feedback is easy, reduces recency biases, chances of subordinate improvement are high. Disadvantages – Negative incidents can be prioritized, forgetting incidents, overly close supervision; feedback may be too much and may appear to be punishment. 5. Essay Method
  5. In this method the rater writes down the employee description in detail within a number of broad categories like, overall impression of performance, promoteability of employee, existing capabilities and qualifications of performing jobs, strengths and weaknesses and training needs of the employee. Advantage – It is extremely useful in filing information gaps about the employees that often occur in a better-structured checklist. Disadvantages – It its highly dependent upon the writing skills of rater and most of them are not good writers. They may get confused success depends on the memory power of raters. 6. Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales statements of effective and ineffective behaviors determine the points. They are said to be behaviorally anchored. The rater is supposed to say, which behavior describes the employee performance. Advantages – helps overcome rating errors. Disadvantages – Suffers from distortions inherent in most rating techniques. III. Other topics related to Team performance appraisal system (pdf download) • Top 28 performance appraisal forms • performance appraisal comments • 11 performance appraisal methods • 25 performance appraisal examples • performance appraisal phrases • performance appraisal process • performance appraisal template • performance appraisal system • performance appraisal answers • performance appraisal questions • performance appraisal techniques • performance appraisal format
  6. • performance appraisal templates • performance appraisal questionnaire • performance appraisal software • performance appraisal tools • performance appraisal interview • performance appraisal phrases examples • performance appraisal objectives • performance appraisal policy • performance appraisal letter • performance appraisal types • performance appraisal quotes • performance appraisal articles
Publicité