Decoding the Tweet _ Practical Criticism in the Age of Hashtag.pptx
E-portfolios: with competence?
1. 1
E-portfolios: with
competence?
a way forward for employment
with the InLOC specification
Simon Grant, CETIS
at the Mahara UK Conference, Birmingham
2013-07-04
2. 2
Outline
what e-portfolio tools have done well
the challenge of employment and skills
example: Totara importing Ofqual frameworks
how it could all be a lot easier with InLOC
what needs to be done to make it happen more
3. 3
What e-portfolios are good at
portfolio of artistic or other works
with commentary or reflection
learning logs, with reflection
self-presentation to appropriate audiences
including skills and competences
which may be evidenced by the attached artefacts that have
needed the skill or competence
which may be explicitly claimed, and then evidenced by video,
testimonial, etc.
4. 4
Portfolios and employment
not widely used yet
why not?
employers can't afford to look through hundreds of e-
portfolios – “not more information!”
they can't easily use portfolio information to filter through
the kind of candidates that they want
a short list of candidates' e-portfolios might be looked
through to give a sense of what kind of people they are
but short lists are not now found through e-portfolios
does that make sense so far?
5. 5
Ideal solution...
employers need short lists of people who are suitable for
the positions they have to fill
to get short list, employers could specify and search for
the areas of skill and competence they want
in someone within the organisation, or someone new
the required (proficiency) levels of those areas
specifying the evidence they might accept for (pre-)selection
from the short list look at the e-portfolios for detail
example or experience: anyone suggest?
6. 6
Employers search terms?
competency names?
but how would you know whether, say, one definition of “team
working” competence would be the same as another?
or whether the same thing might have another name?
and what happens when you go international?
qualifications...
academic? vocational?
what do they really mean, anyway?
hasn't one of the problems always been that having a
qualification is not the same as being able to do the job?
7. 7
Vocational qualifications
the most directly relevant to employment
apprenticeship (one type) has long history
Trades Schools started in UK in 1907
NVQs (“National”, another type) since 1986
NVQs based on National Occupational Standards
strong industry involvement, so language is OK
however, NOSs are declining in importance
it's all “employers” at present
8. 8
Apprenticeships
are based in the work place
focused on employers and their requirements
may combine technical and employability skills
“Apprenticeships must include the following elements:
… module on personal learning and thinking skills … ”
https://www.gov.uk/apprenticeships-guide
http://www.apprenticeships.org.uk/
9. 9
Higher apprenticeships
“aims of the Higher Apprenticeship Fund are to:
generate employer contributions to support programme costs
facilitate stronger sector or occupational partnerships to drive
developments
create a lasting change in employer recruitment and training
patterns
develop new models of Apprenticeship learning at the higher
level”
10. 10
Totara for apprenticeships
Totara is a distribution of Moodle for the corporate sector
designed to work with job competencies
Totara for apprenticeships:
is based around competency etc
has strong e-portfolio connections, with Mahara
“harvests” frameworks from Ofqual
could be generalised from apprenticeships outwards
see …
http://www.totaralms.com/case-studies/wyre-academy
http://learnit-e.com/bespoke-apprenticeships/
11. Ofqual “harvester”
Ofqual's “Register of Regulated Qualifications”
see e.g. http://register.ofqual.gov.uk/Unit
over 17,000 qualifications and 41,000 units
search for the qualification or unit you want
displays learning outcomes and assessment criteria
Totara for Apprenticeships has implemented a way of
reading these into their system – “harvesting”
would take at least several days programming for each
other new source of information
(“harvesting” takes more work than just “importing”)
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18. But no standardization
they can harvest Ofqual ones, but wouldn't it be nice to
be able to import any vocational (or other) qualification,
framework, or standard?
e.g. National Occupational Standards
information is not available in standardized format
what could that standard be?
it's called InLOC, and it's new
“Integrating Learning Outcomes and Competences”
19. What is InLOC?
a European expert project that finished earlier this year
drawing on earlier work including “InteropAbility”
InLOC specifies a particular way of expressing any
structure (often “framework”) of skills, competence, etc.
an “information model” with standard formats
that can be processed freely and easily by software
together with URIs for each part of the structure
structures initially represented in XML
also potentially in JSON and RDF
specifications and other information available at
http://www.cetis.org.uk/inloc/Home
20. InLOC features
distinguishes structures and definitions
structures: like frameworks, relating a set of …
definitions: separate skills, knowledge items, competences
definitions can occur in different structures
structures can take any form, and be of any depth
clear and principled treatment of levels
both defining levels and attributing levels
can easily represent multilingual information
scope for all the most relevant educational metadata
single structure for all relationships and compound
attributes with easy mapping to RDF (linked data)
21. e.g. the European e-Competence
Framework (e-CF)
look at the PDF
the structure is the framework as a whole
the definitions are every piece of text setting out
something that people could know or do
available from http://www.ecompetences.eu/
for an explanation of how to represent it in InLOC
http://purl.org/net/inloc/InLOC+explained+through+example
the InLOC XML for the e-CF is available
from http://www.cetis.org.uk/inloc/XML
22. If e.g. Ofqual used InLOC...
they could publish everything in InLOC format
any system could import the information reliably
the system would just have to extend their software once
not dependent on detailed (and potentially inconsistent) layout
other framework owners could export similar
professional competency frameworks
National Occupational Standards
etc...
23. National Occupational Standards
http://nos.ukces.org.uk/Pages/index.aspx
http://nos.ukces.org.uk/help/Pages/FAQs.aspx
created by Sector Skills Councils and others
groups together sets of
performance criteria
knowledge and understanding
they already have a clear template
would not be difficult in principle to publish InLOC
24. Mahara and InLOC
Mahara implements Leap2A import/export, which already
has the capability to refer to URIs of “abilities”
InLOC gives framework owners the incentive to make
URIs for each of their ability / competence definitions
Viewers of an e-portfolio should be able to click on an
ability claim and link to an original definition
Mahara could hold information ready for a matching
system
Totara complements this and makes a more complete
system for occupational skills and competence
25. The argument summarised
if frameworks were widely available
then definitions could be reused rather than reinvented
communities could come together on terms to use
e-portfolios would be able to
refer clearly to definitions in the employer's terms
represent people's claims in those terms
show relevant and acceptable evidence
then if e-portfolios coordinate with recruitment matching
employers get short lists, and then are linked straight
through to the evidence in learner's own terms
26. What needs to be done
FIRST
persuade Ofqual, UKCES and others to publish the
information related to skills and competence as InLOC
carry on building tools like Totara for Apprenticeships,
making each tool able to process InLOC information
THEN
get employers to use the same frameworks when
recruiting
create the matching services to create short lists
27. Thanks!
thanks for your attention
I'm happy to advise or consider being involved in any
projects that could use InLOC, and can also recommend
other colleagues
questions?
asimong@gmail.com
@asimong
Notes de l'éditeur
Aspiration is a tricky case – serves as announcement of “I'm trying to learn this, please help!” Organisational ID and membership are naturally dealt with by organisation belonged to (and that can't be opened up) Mozilla Open Badges are mainly about ability and achievement
Electronic is in some ways better than paper, but certificates, CVs and portfolios are already electronic. Badges need to offer something more. I point at three main potential advantages, each one relating to one of the identified systems.