Darrell W. Johnson writes in Leadership Handbook of Management and Administration (Baker): Commitment. Are would-be leaders clearly committed to Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord? Do they have a passion to know Christ in all his fullness? While passion is expressed differently by different personality types, would-be leaders must be on fire to know and obey the Crucified and Risen One. Conviction. Do would-be leaders have biblically informed convictions about who God is, who humans are, the meaning of history, the nature of the church, and the meaning of Jesus’ death and resurrection? Are they learning what it means to be transformed by the renewal of the mind (Rom. 12:2) to think “Christianly” about every dimension of their lives—money, time, sex, family, recreation? Paul warns against being too quick to call recent converts to leadership; commitment and conviction take time to deepen. Competency. Do would-be leaders know how to make their way through the Scriptures? As 2 Timothy 2:15 advises, can they help others find their way around the sacred pages? Have these potential leaders been entrusted with appropriate gifts of the Holy Spirit? Do they have a working understanding of the gifts, and can they help others discern and deploy those entrusted to them? Do they have the necessary relational skills for the position? Do their personal relationships manifest the integrity and love of Jesus, especially in marriage and with their children? Character. Are would-be leaders taking on the character of Jesus? Are we moving toward greater and greater Christ-likeness? Leadership requirements are about character. Is a would-be leader known for self-control, hospitality, gentleness (control of anger), quest for holiness, temperance? Is there evidence of dying to the love of money, to manipulation, to always having one’s own way? Is this person faithful to his spouse? What about the requirements to be “above reproach”? The point is that we should seek to be all the Master calls us to be. It means being above condemnation as we confess and repent of our sins and failures and seek, by grace, to grow.
At the time of the interview, Larry Osborne was pastor at North Coast Community Church in Vista, California. He is a frequent contributor to Leadership journal and has written a book about creating healthy elder boards titled The Unity Factor (Owl’s Nest, 2001).
God forges a leadership team made up of pastors, paid and unpaid staff members, and an elder board. Each has its distinct function, and each needs the other to be effective in ministry.
Training. When I began pastoring a small church, I assumed that everybody was ready to charge the hill. Instead I found real people with real hurts. Instead of focusing on meeting their needs, I asked them to meet the needs of the world. That caused things to go sideways for three years. It was a difficult time for me until it dawned on me that we were never going to be healthier than our leadership team. So I switched my focus. For one thing, I realized that no one trains leaders for the task of leading the church. We take our church leaders and give them more theology when what they really need to know is how to lead the church. Reap insights. I now expose board members to things I learned in seminary and in conferences and journals for pastors. I teach them everything from church growth principles to group dynamics. I train them in the material before we need it. Philosophy of ministry. As pastors, we often hold information like this close to the vest until we’re in the midst of a decision and then pop it out as proof that everybody should do what we want to do. That makes you feel like a lobbyist. I now train our elder board in the material before we need it. Think like pastors. Most people tend to lead the church like a business. The church is not a trucking company. It’s completely different.
A healthy church board needs to learn and practice different governance methods as a church becomes larger, primarily because the scope of responsibility is so different between a smaller and larger church.
The right size. I suggest somewhere between 5 and 12 members. If you have too many people, there is no way to keep the lines of communication flowing. Frankly, it’s the slightly too-large board that often gets the time-bomb member because the board is trying to fill that last slot or two. Spend time together. Too many boards gather, quickly pray, do business, go home. I look for ways to have some play, socialization, and time together. Training and retreats. The more time we spend together, the more we like and understand one another. Too many boards gather, quickly pray, do business, go home. I look for ways to have some play, socialization, time together. Pray. All the leadership understanding and insight in the world can’t make up for making sure the Lord’s hand is building you in what to do.
Long-time business executive and author Fred Smith Sr. suggests these criteria: 1. Past experience. The best predictor of the future is the past. When I was in business, I took note of any worker who told me he was superintendent of a Sunday school or a deacon in his church. If he showed leadership outside of the job, I wanted to find out if he had leadership potential on the job. 2. Catching the vision. The founder of Jefferson Standard built a successful insurance company from scratch. He assembled some of the greatest insurance people by simply asking, “Why don’t you come and help me build something great?” A leader feels the thrill of challenge. 3. Look for a better way. If someone says, “There’s got to be a better way to do this,” I ask, “Have you thought about what that better way might be?” If he says no, he is being critical, not constructive. If he says yes, he has a constructive spirit of discontent. That’s the kind of creative itch inherent in a leader. 4. Practical ideas. Highly original people are often not good leaders because they are unable to judge their output. They need somebody to say, “This will work” or “This won’t.” Leaders seem to be able to identify which ideas are practical and which aren’t. 5.Take responsibility. After a long day, I walked out of the plant and passed the porter, who said, “Mr. Smith, I sure wish I had your pay, but I don’t want your worry.” He wanted to be able to drop his responsibility when he walked out the door. That’s understandable, but it’s not a trait in potential leaders.
6. Finishing the job. The person who grabs hold of a problem and won’t let go till it’s solved has leadership potential. This quality is critical in leaders, for there will be times when nothing but one’s iron will says, “Keep going.” 7. Being mentally tough. No one can lead without being criticized or without facing discouragement. I don’t want a mean leader; I want a tough-minded leader who sees things as they are and is willing to pay the price. 8. Earned peer respect. A successful real estate broker I know looks for people whose associates want them to succeed. “It’s tough enough to succeed when everybody wants you to succeed,” he says. “People who don’t want you to succeed are like weights in your running shoes.” 9. Have family respect. My daughter once said, “One thing I appreciate is that after you speak and I walk up, you are always attentive to me. You seem proud of me.” That meant a lot. A family’s feelings toward someone reveal much about a leader’s potential to lead. 10. People listen. Potential leaders have a “holding court” quality about them. When they speak, people listen. Other people may talk a great deal, but nobody listens to them. They’re making a speech; they’re not giving leadership.
Rich Nathan writes: People’s projections. A woman in our congregation gave me a 60-page epistle detailing how I was like her ex-husband. I did not want her to have a career, I did not believe she was smart, and I was critical of her ministry ambitions. When Rita asked, “What do you think of what I wrote?” I said gently, “I believe you have never forgiven your ex-husband.” She burst into tears. We talked about some things she had suffered at the hands of men. In sum, often leaders are asked to pay bills that aren’t theirs. A lightning rod. One way to prevent this is to teach the difference between godly ambition and selfish ambition. Selfish ambition focuses on a role, whereas godly ambition focuses on a need. For example, I asked a man, “If you are denied this position as a youth pastor, can you find another way to minister to teens? If your heart is set on meeting needs and not on a particular role, then you are secure.” Displeasing people. My willingness to displease people has actually gained me respect. I’ve had staff members tell me they were upset because they got overly positive evaluations from other leaders. People of good character do not want to be flattered or lied to. They want to hear the truth, as long as they feel loved and nurtured in the process. Unrealistic expectations. Sometimes I think, “You are not meeting with enough people! You need to be praying more! Things would go better if you spent more time in the Word!” I have to go back to Scripture for the right perspective. Elijah prayed earnestly that it would not rain, and it didn’t rain. But after his victory over the prophets of Baal, Elijah became so discouraged that he asked to die. I can identify with both moods. Fatigue. A few years ago, I returned from two weeks of teaching, went to work, and wondered, “Why am I feeling exhausted and depressed?” Leaders must pay the price of fatigue, yet also learn how to prevent it.
We are quite willing to press ahead when we do not have doubts. Like Jonah, it is far easier to hear God say audibly, “Go to Nineveh!” More often, though, there are positives and negatives in each and every decision. True leadership discerns carefully when it is time to move, time to wait, and, in the waiting, time to work and time to rest.
We are quite willing to press ahead when we do not have doubts. Like Jonah, it is far easier to hear God say audibly, “Go to Nineveh!” More often, though, there are positives and negatives in each and every decision. True leadership discerns carefully when it is time to move, time to wait, and, in the waiting, time to work and time to rest.
No doubt, Christians must resist a certain kind of ambition. But we must also acknowledge other ambitions as noble, worthy, and honorable. Our Scripture texts offer both warning and encouragement for sorting out the difference. When our ambition is to be effective in the service of God—to realize God’s highest potential for our lives—we can keep both of these verses in tension.
There can be a significant tension between an honorable ambition and a dishonorable ambition. We may live with an element of each in our desire to lead and serve. Desiring to be great, to want to achieve highly, is not a sin, but to do great things for self is. Christians are called to develop God-given talents, to make the most of their lives, to develop God-given capacities and talents to the fullest. But that desire must focus on glorifying God and building the church, and rendering service to others with great impact in Jesus’ name.
Max DePree lists these traits in his fine book Leadership Jazz (Doubleday). Notice that the primary focus on these attributes is that they put other people before self. Integrity. Where integrity is at stake, the leader works publicly. Behavior is the only score that’s kept. Lose integrity, and a leader will find himself in a directionless organization going nowhere. Vulnerability. Vulnerable leaders trust in the abilities of other people and allow those who follow them to do their best. An invulnerable leader can be only as good as his own performance—how terrifying! Discernment. This attribute lies somewhere between wisdom and judgment. Leaders are required to see many things (pain, beauty, anxiety, loneliness, and heartbreak. Two elements to keep your eye on: the detection of nuance and the perception of changing realities. What kind of antennae do you have?
Empathy. Without understanding the cares, yearnings, and struggles of the human spirit, how could anyone presume to lead a group of people? Person skills always precede professional skills. Courage. When conflict must be resolved, when justice must be defined and carried out, when promises need to be kept, when the organization needs to hear who counts—these are the times when leaders act with ruthless honesty and live up to their covenant with the people they lead. Humor. A compassionate sense of humor requires a broad perspective on the human condition and an accounting for many points of view. You’ll find a sense of humor essential to living with ambiguity.
Intellectual energy. When you seek out the competence of your followers, you begin to enable them to fulfill their potential. When followers are allowed to do their best, they make leadership infinitely easier, and you’re free to learn even more. Respect for timing. The future requires humility in the face of all we cannot control. The present requires attention to all the people to whom we are accountable. The past gives us the opportunity to build on the work of our elders. Breadth. A vision of what an organization can become has room for all contributions from all quarters. To borrow from Walt Whitman, leaders are people large enough to contain multitudes. Comfort with ambiguity. Healthy organizations exhibit a degree of chaos. A leader will make some sense of it. The more comfortable you can make yourself with ambiguity, the better a leader you will be. Organizations always delegate the job of dealing constructively with ambiguity to their leaders.
Write each style on a scrap of paper, fold them, and put them in a container (include enough for each board member). Have each person draw out his or her style. Without saying what they are to others, they should then act out that style throughout the discussions that follow.