DISCUSSION: standards in health care regulation
DISCUSSION: standards in health care regulation ON DISCUSSION: standards in health care
regulationThere are common overarching standards in health care regulation, but there are
important differences depending on the practice setting. This assignment is designed to
familiarize you with conditions of coverage and participation specific to different types of
health care organizations.Choose 2 different practice settings: one that represents where
you currently work or have worked, and another that you are interested in
exploring.Examine the similarities and differences in conditions of coverage and
participation related to your 2 chosen factors. Consider the following:Staffing
requirementsRelease of patient recordsPatient rightsAdministrative structureAnother
aspect relative to the specific care environmentCite at least 3 peer-reviewed sources
published within the last 5 years.Format your assignment as one of the following:18- to 20-
slide presentation15- to 20-minute oral presentation875-word paperAnother format
approved by your instructorInclude an APA-formatted reference list.Grading Criteria
NSG/426 r2 University of Phoenix Material Grading Criteria Week 1: Legal Issues Facing
Nurses Content: 16 points possible Points possible Summarizes the legal issues present in
the case 6 Lists risk-mitigation techniques 5 Includes potential nurse actions for improving
the outcome 5 Format: 2 points possible Points possible Cites at least 3 evidence-based,
peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years Points earned Comments Points
earned Comments 1 Assignment is free of grammatical errors, language maintains a
scholarly and succinct tone 0.5 Follows a structure that is clear, concise, and appropriate 0.5
Points earned/possible /18 Copyright © 2018, 2017 by University of Phoenix. All rights
reserved. 1 Grading Criteria NSG/426 r2 Week 2: Applying Regulations in Varying Practice
Settings Content: 16 points possible Points possible Chooses 2 different practice settings,
with varying CfCs and CoPs 4 Compares and contrasts conditions for coverage 4 Compares
and contrasts conditions of participation 4 Selects 2 appropriate factors 4 Format: 2 points
possible Points possible Cites at least 3 peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5
years .Points earned Comments Points earned Comments 1 Assignment is free of
grammatical errors, language maintains a scholarly and succinct tone 0.5 Follows a
structure that is clear, concise, and appropriate 0.5 Points earned/possible /18 Copyright ©
2018, 2017 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. 2 Grading Criteria NSG/426 r2
Week 3: Applying an Ethical Decision Making Model Content: 16 points possible Points
possible Clearly states the ethical issue and its relevance to nursing practice 4 Analyzes
additional information: • Populations served • Key stakeholders • Information needed to

overcome the problem • Was the problem stated correctly initially? 4 Lists alternative
programs that address the issues 3 Explains why this is important, needed, or beneficial for
vulnerable populations 3 Lists strategies to implement the plan 2 Format: 2 points possible
Points possible Cites at least 3 peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years that
clearly the position(s) Points earned Comments Points earned Comments 1 Assignment is
free of grammatical errors, language maintains a scholarly and succinct tone 0.5 Follows a
structure that is clear, concise, and appropriate 0.5 Points earned/possible /18 Copyright ©
2018, 2017 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. 3 Grading Criteria NSG/426 r2
Week 4: Signature Assignment – Legal and Ethical Responsibilities See embedded signature
assignment rubric in the classroom. Copyright © 2018, 2017 by University of Phoenix. All
rights reserved. 4 Grading Criteria NSG/426 r2 Week 5: Learning Team: Current Issues in
Nursing Content: 6 points possible Points possible Discussion shows evidence of selection
of appropriate topic 2 Discussion shows evidence of personal stance with sources to 2
Discussion shows evidence of consideration for other viewpoints with evidence to
positions 2 Format: 2 points possible Points possible Discussion is substantive and provides
evidence to stance 1 Discussion is professional, appropriate, and maintains scholarly,
respectful tone 1 Points earned Comments Points earned Comments Points earned
Comments Points earned/possible /8 Week 5: Reflection: Current Issues in Nursing
Content: 8 points possible Points possible Chooses an appropriate decision-making model 2
Summarizes the decision-making model 2 Explains each person’s position and evidence 2
Explains how seeing other positions affected their own stance 2 Copyright © 2018, 2017 by
University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. 5 Grading Criteria NSG/426 r2 Format: 2 points
possible Points possible Cites at least 3 peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5
years Points earned 1 Assignment is free of grammatical errors, language maintains a
scholarly and succinct tone 0.5 Follows a structure that is clear, concise, and appropriate 0.5
Points earned/possible /10 Copyright © 2018, 2017 by University of Phoenix. All rights
reserved. Comments 6 …Purchase answer to see full attachment