2. Vision Plan Amendment
• Vision Plan Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the
following area of the City:
• Starting approximately 800 feet west from the intersection
of Loop 306 and North Baze Street, thence in a northerly
direction to FM 2105, and easterly through the city landfill
and encompassing properties annexed in December of
2011, and city owned properties east of North US Highway
67 north and east of the current Industrial Park in the far
northeast portion of San Angelo.
Notification is not required
4. Options
• Approve the proposed Vision Plan map amendments
as presented;
• Remand the Vision Plan map back to Planning
Commission for further discussion; or
• Deny the proposed Vision Plan Map Amendment in its
entirety or on a property by property basis; or
• Make Changes deemed necessary and approve the
request.
5. Recommendation
• Planning staff recommends approving the proposed
Vision Plan Amendments.
• Planning Commission recommended approval 6-0 on
July 15, 2013.
6. Process
• Field Survey of the area
• Lot by lot to observe current land use patterns
• Discussion and consultation with:
• Engineering
• Storm Water
• Water Utilities
• MPO
• Data entry and discussion of observations & findings
7. Process
• Research regarding historical land use patterns
• Aerial photos and past zoning history
• Examination of current Vision Plan Map
• Strengths
• Weaknesses
• Opportunities
• Proposed amendment was reached based upon data
and findings
8. History and Background
• Area annexed in December of 2011
• Several contrasting land uses
• “Industrial” adjacent to “Neighborhood & Rural”
• Parcel by parcel analysis of the northeast region of
town
• Proactive vs. reactive Planning
• Avoiding issues before they happen
12. Zone Change
Z13-23: Earl and Michelle Weber
• A request for a zone change from Ranch & Estate (R&E) to
Light Manufacturing (ML) to allow for industrial uses as
allowed in Section 310 of the Zoning Ordinance, on the
following property:
• 3862 Tractor Trail, located at the northwest corner of the
intersection of Tractor Trail and Porter Henderson Drive;
more specifically occupying the Paul Gregory Addition,
Section 2, 5.33 acres of Tract J & 0.310 acres in Smith
Boulevard, in northeast San Angelo.
Six (6) notifications were sent; one was returned in favor.
23. Staff Recommendation
• Planning staff recommends approval of the requested
zone change.
• On July 15, 2013, Planning Commission recommended
approval of this request by a unanimous, 6-0 vote.
24. Criteria of Application
• Compatible with Plans and Policies
• Consistent with Zoning Ordinance
• Compatible with Surrounding Area
• Changed Condition
• Effect on Natural Environment
• Community Need
• Development Patterns
25. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Consistent with aspects of the Vision Plan;
• Size of lot, relative isolation and proximity to a major
thoroughfare;
• Underutilized zoning, contribute to city‟s tax base and
supply the need for skilled labor;
• Represents logical and orderly development.
28. Zone Change
Z13-22:M&H Mueller
• A request for approval of a zone change from General
Commercial (CG) to Light Manufacturing (ML) to specifically
allow for uses found in Section 310 of the Zoning Ordinance
on the following properties:
3172 McGill Boulevard & 3733 North US Highway 67,
collectively occupying both a 5.131 acre tract and a 55.1830
acre tract located west of North US Highway 67, north of
Paulann Boulevard and east of Smith Boulevard; more
specifically occupying 5.131 acres of the J. Pointevent Survey
1113, Abstract 4873, and 55.1830 acres of the J. Fenner
Survey 0001, Abstract 4985, in northeast San Angelo.
29. Zone Change
• Ten (10) notifications were sent, 1 returned in favor.
39. Staff Recommendation
• Planning staff recommends approving the proposed
zone change providing approval of a Vision Plan
amendment that would change subject property from
“Commercial” to “Industrial.”
40. Criteria for Approval
Whether and the extent to which the proposal is:
• Compatible with plans and polices
• Consistent with Zoning Ordinance
• Compatible with surrounding area
• Changing conditions that would require an amendment
• Effect on natural environment
• Meets community need
• Consistent with development patterns
41. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• With Vision Plan amendment, zone change would be
consistent with area development.
• Comprehensive Plan seeks to organize Locally
Undesirable Land Uses (LULU‟s) away from residential
areas, so request is compatible with the area in this
respect.
• Aside from Vision Plan amendment as previously
proposed, no other change is needed.
.
.
42. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Environment would change with any development here-
commercial development would experience more frequent
traffic than infrastructure can handle- ML businesses
attract industry related traffic-not intense commercial.
• Zone change would not adversely affect conditions of
surrounding area- it would be more compatible.
• Continued ML zoning meets a community need. –
-Potential for bringing industrial businesses and jobs to
the area.
-City needs industrial clusters focused near major
thoroughfares and railways and away from residential
and more intensive commercial activities (safety).
43.
44. Temporary Mobile Home Permit
Mobile Home Permit # 41
• A request for temporary placement of a mobile home, not to
exceed 1 year, during construction of a permanent home on
the same 2 acre site in a Single-Family Residential (RS-1)
zoning district, on the following property:
• 4609 Armstrong Street, located approximately 170 feet south
of the intersection of Armstrong Street and East 47th Street;
more specifically occupying the Carrigan Addition, Tract 2
being 2 acres, in northern San Angelo.
Nine (9) notifications were sent, 1 returned in favor, 2 opposed.
54. Options
In considering this application, City Council may:
• Approve the proposed Temporary Mobile Home
Permit as requested;
• Modify the proposed Temporary Mobile Home Permit
as believed to be more appropriate; or
• Deny the proposed Temporary Mobile Home Permit
as, altogether.
55. History & Background
General Information
• Existing Zoning: RS-1;
• Currently vacant lot;
• Surrounding land use is predominately single-family
detached housing;
• Vision Plan calls for „Neighborhood‟.
56. Analysis – Mobile Home Permit
• Provides a temporary living solution while completing
construction of a permanent home;
• Underlying zoning would not allow placement;
• Provision of the general City code dating back to 1954;
• Possible one year extension (must come back to
Council) after period expires.
57. Proposed Conditions
• The proposed temporary mobile home residence must
comply will all applicable standards for Manufactured
Housing as outlined in Article 12.200 of the City
Ordinance.
• The mobile home shall cease to be a dwelling unit on
the property by August 6, 2014 as requested by the
applicant, unless modified and approved by the City
Council.
58.
59. Ordinance Amendment
• FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING CHAPTER 12 ENTITLED “PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT”,
ARTICLE 12.500 ENTITLED “MOBILE HOME REGULATIONS”, BY
AMENDING ARTICLE‟S TITLE TO READ, “MANUFACTURED HOME AND
MOBILE HOME REGULATIONS”; REPEALING SUB-SECTION 12.503
ENTITLED “SKIRTING”, ENACTING A NEW SUB-SECTION 12.503
ENTITLED “SKIRTING” AND ADDING SUB-SECTION 12.503(a) AND SUB-
SECTION 12.503(b); RENAMING 12.504 ENTITLED “TEMPORARY
MOBILE HOME INSTALLATION”, TO “TEMPORARY MANUFACTURED
HOME, MOBILE HOME OR BUILDING INSTALLATION”, ADDING
REFERENCE TO “MANUFACTURED HOME” IN SUB-SECTION 12.504(a)
AND SUB-SECTION 12.504(c), OF THE SAN ANGELO CODE OF
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
60. The Problem
• Skirting is currently required for any mobile or
manufactured home regardless of status for living or
sale;
• This places an unnecessary and undue hardship on
business owners;
• Arisen twice in the last 2 years, but still needs to be
resolved.
61. Options
The City Council may:
1) Approve the Amendment; or
2) Modify and approve the Amendment; or
3) Deny the Amendment.
64. Rationale
• Allowed mobile home dealers not allowed in zoning
districts generally placed adjacent to residential
• Classified as wholesale trade; only in CG with a CU
• Not eligible in CN, CO districts under any circumstance
• Manufactured homes at licensed dealers are not lived
in; neighborhood aesthetics is much less of an issue