SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 134
City Council
March 5, 2013
Zone Change
Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation
• A request for a zone change from Light Manufacturing
  (ML) to Heavy Manufacturing (MH) to allow for activities
  allowed within MH zoning districts, on the following
  property:

• 1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the
  intersection of Gateway Drive and FM 380; more specially
  occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1
  and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in
  northeast San Angelo.

One (1) notification was sent and returned in opposition.
Aerial Map
Looking East at the Subject Property from
Photographs of Subject Property
             Gateway Drive
Looking East at the Subject Property
Photographs of Subject Property
Looking East along FM 380
Photographs of Subject Property
Looking West along FM 380
Photographs of Subject Property
Looking North at the Subject Property from FM 380
Options
In considering this application, the Council may:
• Approve the proposed zone change as presented; or

• Remand the application back to Planning Commission
  for further discussion, in which case another public
  hearing will need to be scheduled; or

• Deny the proposed zone change.
Staff Recommendation
• Planning staff recommends approving the proposed
  zone change request.

• Planning Commission recommended approval of this
  request by a vote of 4-1 on February 18, 2013.
History & Background
General Information
• Light Manufacturing (ML) zoning;

• Vacant open land;

• Annexed in 1997;

• Only ML zoning in the area; and

• Open space – light to heavy brush, Angelo Achieves,
  vacant distribution center and Lucas Oil Track.
Criteria of Application
• Compatible with Plans and Policies

• Consistent with Zoning Ordinance

• Compatible with Surrounding Area

• Changed Conditions

• Effect on Natural Environment

• Community Need
Criteria of Application
• Development Patterns
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Complies with the Vision Plan which calls for „Industrial‟
   • Although lots to the south are envisioned for
     neighborhood development, no residences exist along
     FM 280 or anywhere within 3/4 of mile of the site.
   • For some time, the area has been planned and
     dedicated for intense industrial uses.
   • Clustering high intensive uses into isolated areas
     follows the goal of the Comp Plan – diminishes the
     potential for any unforeseen negative impacts
• Loud noises and the occasional odd smells emitting from
  the site will not likely bother neighboring property, given
  their distance from the site.
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• In terms of allowed uses ML and MH are similar – MH
  allows for heavy manufacturing and production
   • In ML zoning, no vibration can be produced which are
      transmitted through the ground at any point beyond the
      lot line.
   • There are also measures to reduce noise and emission
      of airborne particles – conceivably in MH these uses
      may be allowed such limitations do not apply.
   • MH zoning allows for greater flexibility in the intent as it
      relates to intensity and the level of noxious uses
      allowed.
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Depending on the intensity of the uses, the transition may
  have an effect on the natural environment
   • The site measures over 2,300 feet from any significant
     water feature – the nearest is the Concho River, which
     flows west to east (away from the city)

• This is one of the most isolated and undeveloped areas of
  the city
   • Allows for opportunities to develop the site for the most
     intensive uses, with the least potential impacts
   • Provides opportunities to develop areas for heavy
     industrial within the city limits serves a community need
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
   • The site is not directing abutting to N Loop 306, rather
     separated by a sizeable 55 acre tract of land zoned for
     ML – which provides a suitable buffer for passing
     motorist on the major highway

• The site provides quick access to highways and points
  outside the city
   • There are not many areas in the city that are isolated
     from residences that provide such access to a highway,
     vital in the manufacturing field
   • The property is positioned nearly 2,000 feet the city
     limits to the east.
Awning Approval
Texas Theatre of San Angelo
• A request to allow for an awning to extend within the public
  right-of-way of the following property:

• 212 South Irving Street, located southeast of the intersection of
  South Irving Street and West Twohig Avenue; more specially
  occupying the San Angelo Addition, Block 2, Lot 18 & West
  3.11 FT of Lot 17, in central San Angelo.




No notifications were required with this request.
General Map
Site Map
Aerial Map
Looking North along S Irving Street
Looking at the Subject Property from S Irving Street
Looking South along S Irving Street
Options
In considering this application, the Council may:
• Approve the request to place an awning in the public
   right-of-way; or

• Deny the request to place an awning in the public
  right-of-way.
Staff Recommendation
City staff recommends approving the awning request.
History & Background
General Information
• The lot is zoned CBD;

• The building was constructed around 1944;

• CBD zoning in the area; and

• Vehicle repair, offices, theater, vacant lots and surface
  parking are the surrounding uses.
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Location within the Central Business District;

• Proposal will serve as an architectural feature for the
  building;

• Provides cover from outside elements of rains and direct
  sun exposure;

• The structure will be structurally sound and allows for
  pedestrians to safely navigate from end to end; and

• The area is relatively flat and free of visual obstructions.
Proposed Conditions
• Placement of the awning must reflect the rendering
  provided to staff upon submittal of this application.
Zone Change
Z13-02 Debbie Clark
• A request for approval of a zone change from Single-
  Family Residential (RS-1) to Two-Family Residential (RS-
  2) to specifically allow for “Household Living” as allowed in
  RS-2 zoning districts on the following property:

• 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the
  intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This
  property specifically occupied the Avondale Addition, Block
  10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo.
Twenty-two (22) notifications were sent, 3 in favor.
Overview map
Map
Aerial photo
Aerial photo
Aerial photo
Subject Property looking
north from Beacon Street
Residence northeast of subject property
Subject property looking north from Beacon
                   Street
Options
In considering this application, the Council may:

• Approve the proposed zone change as presented; or

• Remand the application back to Planning Commission
  for further discussion, in which case another public
  hearing will need to be scheduled; or

• Deny the proposed zone change.
Staff Recommendation
• Planning staff recommends approving the proposed
  zone change.

• Planning Commission recommended approval of this
  request by a vote of 5-0 on January 28, 2013.
History & Background
General Information

• Currently Single-Family Residential (RS-1)

• Vacant property/vacant residence.

• Residential and vacant properties surrounding subject property.

• Residential zoning since 1949; no zoning changes to immediate
  area.
Criteria for Approval

• Compatible with Plans and Policies

• Consistent with Zoning Ordinance

• Compatible with Surrounding Area

• Changed Conditions
Criteria for Approval

• Effect on Natural Environment

• Community Need

• Development Patterns
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Intent of applicant is to convert an existing house into a duplex.

• RS-1 change to RS-2 slight. The difference is that this change
  allows a two-family residence or accessory building on the
  property.

• Comprehensive Plan calls for a mix in housing stock in
  proximity to commercial zones- addresses a community need.

• Currently RS-2 nearby with a duplex to the west on Beacon
  Street, mobile to the east- these illustrate precedence by City
  Council to allow a mix of housing.
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Due to the size of the subject area, conditions would change
  only slightly in the long run than what currently exists with
  regard to residential traffic. Any other more intense use would
  not be allowed.
• The Vision Plan calls for “Neighborhood” with a “Transitional”
   zoning district to the south side of Beacon Street as a buffer.

• Two parking spaces per dwelling per Section 511 of the Zoning
  Ordinance may cause some storm water runoff; any new
  development would, as well.


• Neighbors would most likely not be affected by runoff.
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Staff feels a minor change in land use through a rezoning here
  fits in with the Vision Plan, so development pattern is
  consistent.



• Smart Growth in action here. This is a walk-able ½ mile radius
  + or - neighborhood with an elementary school to the north,
  Producer‟s Park and a restaurant at the stockyards to the NW.

• Zone change could have a positive impact on the area by
  encouraging future residential development; all in line with
  Comprehensive Plan.
Zone Change
Z 13-03: Tom Green County
• A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family
  Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to
  specifically allow for commercial opportunities as allowed in CN
  zoning districts on the following property:

• 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the
  intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This
  property specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35
  acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San
  Angelo.

Seventeen (17) Notifications sent. None received
Overview map
Map
Aerial photo
Looking northwest from the subject property
Looking south from the subject property
Looking east from the subject property
Options
In considering this application, the Council may:

• Approve the proposed zone change as presented; or

• Remand the application back to Planning Commission
  for further discussion, in which case another public
  hearing will need to be scheduled; or

• Deny the proposed zone change.
Staff Recommendation
• City staff recommends approving the proposed zone
  change

• Planning Commission recommended approval of this
  request by a vote of 5-0 on January 28, 2013
History & Background
General Information
• Area Residential in nature, intense uses on Pulliam

• CN, CG/CH and RS-1 zoning in the area;

• County Offices, churches; and

• SP 200 allowed for a welfare building on the property.
Criteria for Approval

• Compatible with Plans and Policies

• Consistent with Zoning Ordinance

• Compatible with Surrounding Area

• Changed Conditions
Criteria for Approval

• Effect on Natural Environment

• Community Need

• Development Patterns
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Within the Comprehensive Plan, Goal 3 of
  “Neighborhoods” is to “improve the relationship
  between adjacent commercial and residential
  properties”. CG/CH zoning currently borders the RS-1
  properties, a CN zoning would be a more suitable and
  less harsh buffer between the two.

• “Rezone or remove any CG/CH zoning from adjacent
  to existing neighborhoods."
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Consistent with the City‟s plans, policies, and
  ordinances;

• Compatible with the surrounding area;

• Follows development patterns of City;

• Little anticipated effect on the natural environment;
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Neighborhood oriented business(es) great fit in CN
  zoning given the characteristics of the area;

• Provide a buffer from the CG/CH zoning on Pulliam;

• Area is in need of neighborhood serving businesses
  and is a well established area;

• Will allow walkable development that is highly in-line
  with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
Zone Change
Z13-04: Abel Fernandez
• A request for approval of a zone change from Single-
  Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood Commercial
  (CN) to specifically allow for commercial opportunities as
  allowed in CN zoning districts on the following property:
• 1006 East 14th Street, located approximately 170 feet from
  the northeast intersection at East 14th Street and Wade
  Street. This property specifically occupies the Exall
  Addition, Block 9, Lot 8 Exc. West 88.7‟, in north central
  San Angelo.
Thirteen (13) notifications were sent, none returned.
Overview map
Overview map
Overview map
Overview map
Subject property looking north from E.
               14th St.
Subject Property north from E. 14th St.
Eastern section of subject property
Options
In considering this application, the Council may:

• Approve the proposed zone change as presented; or

• Remand the application back to Planning Commission
  for further discussion, in which case another public
  hearing will need to be scheduled; or

• Deny the proposed zone change.
Staff Recommendation
• Planning staff recommends approving the proposed
  zone change.

• Planning Commission recommended approval of this
  request by a vote of 5-0 on January 28, 2013
History & Background
General Information

• Currently Single-Family Residential (RS-1)

• Vacant residence.

• Single-family residential and vacant lots in areas
  surrounding subject property.

• Residential as early as 1939.
Criteria for Approval
• Compatible with Plans and Policies

• Consistent with Zoning Ordinance

• Compatible with Surrounding Area

• Changed Conditions

• Effect on Natural Environment

• Community Need

• Development Patterns
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Location of subject property on fringe of RS-1.

• Applicant wants zoning for a tax services business.

• Several zoning districts lie within ½ mile of the subject property
  providing neighborhood services such as restaurants and car
  repair shops interspersed with more intense land uses more
  industrial in nature which are located within the CG/CH zones
  to the north.

• A CN zoning district here would be compatible with plans &
  policies in place for the community.
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation

• Vision Plan calls for “Neighborhood” which includes the concept
  of low impact businesses that can serve area residents.

• CN is the least intense of commercial zoning; serves to provide
  a buffer between residential and higher impact commercial
  zoning.

• Small lot size limits businesses that could locate on the subject
  property; an inherent form of land use management here.

• Zone change triggers placement of a 6 foot opaque fence
  between residence to the west.
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Low density commercial would be a potential asset to the
  surrounding neighborhood both short and long term.

• No need to amend the Comprehensive Plan (or Vision Map,
  either) with this zone change.

• Natural environment minimally impacted; allowable low impact
  commercial uses plus the small lot should not cause storm
  water runoff to be an issue nor noise and odors associated with
  heavier commercial uses.

• Businesses allowed in CN include small new or used retail
  sales and services businesses such as product repair.
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Staff feels proposed zoning will create an orderly development
  pattern consistent with surrounding area.

• This zoning promotes infill as vacant residence on property is
  repurposed into an office.

• Goals of infill and walk-able development are highly in line with
  Comprehensive Plan and in harmony with the neighborhood.

• This potential zone change could aid in future area
  development.
Planned Development
PD 13-01: West Company/ Granger Macdonald
• A request for approval of a zone change from a combination of
  Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial
  (CG) to Planned Development (PD) to specifically allow for
  multi-family living and a lease house /amenity center on the
  following property:

• an unaddressed 9.8 acre property, located directly west of the
  intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The
  property specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of
  Arden Acres, Section Three, Block 3, Tract 3 in western San
  Angelo.
One notification was sent, none were returned
Overview map
Map
Aerial photo
Looking north across the subject property
Looking northeast from the subject property
Looking west across the subject property
Options
In considering this application, the Council may:
• approve the proposed zone change as presented;

• Remand the application back to Planning Commission for
  further discussion, in which case another public hearing
  will need to be scheduled; or

• modify the conditions to those believed to be more
  appropriate; or

• deny the proposed zone change.
Recommendation
• City staff recommends approving the proposed
  Planned Development District subject to the
  conditions of the accompanying ordinance.

• Planning Commission approved this request by a 5-0
  vote on February 18, 2013.
History & Background
General Information
• Area is generally undeveloped
• Residences in the distance & open space readily
  present;
• CG, CH and RS-1 zoning in the area;

• Ball fields to the west & undeveloped property; and

• Area Annexed in 1997.
Criteria for Approval

• Compatible with Plans and Policies

• Consistent with Zoning Ordinance

• Compatible with Surrounding Area

• Changed Conditions
Criteria for Approval

• Effect on Natural Environment

• Community Need

• Development Patterns
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
"Improve relationship between adjacent commercial
and residential land use adjacencies." One action step
of this goal states that (the city should), " Require a
buffer separating commercial, industrial, or agricultural
zoned lands from neighborhoods. This buffer may be
an intermediate “mixed-use” zone, a landscape buffer,
or public right-of-way.”

"Establish transition areas between commercial areas
and nearby neighborhoods."
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
Zoning Ordinance Section 306
“promote the efficient use of land”

“allow diversification of uses, structures, and open
   spaces”

“promote flexibility of design in a manner compatible
   with…adjacent properties”
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Compatible with Area and Plans/Policies of the City
   • Traffic capabilities of area
   • Provides a transition into the neighborhood

• Transitioning uses and buffering neighborhoods is
  highly consistent with the Zoning Ordinance
   • PD is the most predictable type of development


• Compatible with the surrounding area
   • Infill development
   • High mixed use potential
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Effects on natural environment being addressed
   • Storm Water mitigation
   • Household living much less intense than commercial

• Project is serving a community need
   • Diverse mix of housing opportunities
   • Transitioning into an envisioned        neighborhood
     development

• Consistent with the development patterns of the area
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
Proposed PD ordinance:
• Only allows for multi-family living and a lease
  house/amenity center with related accessory uses
• Development in accordance with:
   • Proposed site plan
   • Built with materials and colors as approved in Urban
     Design Review 13-01
• Signage matching the materials of the dwelling units

• Sidewalks
Zone Change
Z13-07 COSA Planning
 • A request for approval of a zone change from Planned
   Development (PD) to Single- Family Residential (RS-1) to
   specifically allow for “Household Living” as allowed in RS-
   1 zoning districts on the following property:

• An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end
  of Twin Mountain Drive. This property specifically
  occupies approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey
  0182, Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B
  of The Homestead Additions, in southwest San Angelo.

• Thirteen (13) notifications were sent, 2 returned, in favor.
Overview map
Map
Aerial photo
Aerial photo
Aerial photo
Looking east from dead-end
  of Twin Mountain Drive
Looking south from Twin Mountain
  Drive at NE section of property
Looking West from Twin
    Mountain Drive
Subject Property looking
 west from Lydian Court
Subject property looking southeast from
             Lydian Court
Options
In considering this application, the Council may:
• approve the proposed zone change as presented;

• Remand the application back to Planning Commission for
  further discussion, in which case another public hearing
  will need to be scheduled; or

• modify the conditions to those believed to be more
  appropriate; or

• deny the proposed zone change.
Recommendation
• City staff recommends approving the proposed zone
  change.

• Planning Commission approved this request by a 5-0
  vote on February 18, 2013.
History & Background
General Information

• Currently remnant of a Planned Development (PD)

• Undeveloped property

• Residential and vacant properties surround subject
  property.

• Annexed in April, 2006 and zoned R&E. Rezoned as PD in
  June 2006.
Criteria for Approval
Whether and the extent to which the proposal is:

•   Compatible with plans and polices
•   Consistent with Zoning Ordinance
•   Compatible with surrounding area.
•   Changed conditions
•   Effect on natural environment
•   Community need
•   Development patterns
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Remaining section of a PD. Original plan called for a
  gated community, Homeowner‟s Association and with
  additional amenities. Other area sections rezoned RS-
  1 from original PD on January 17, 2012 (Z11-23 &Z11-
  24).
• PDs are basically a development agreement where
  approved plans should not change – Developer went
  out of business and bank did not want to adhere to
  plan.
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Zoning Ordinance Section 210.H.1: “No building permit
  may be issued and no construction or development
  requiring a building permit and situated within a PD
  District may commence unless a site plan has been
  approved for that phase of the project that is
  consistent with the approved concept plan.”

• Rezone to RS-1 corrects changed conditions and
  would keep this area more consistent with surrounding
  zoning and Vision Plan. The Vision Plan calls for
  “Neighborhood.”
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Leaving PD “as is” would make development nearly
  impossible since land transactions may be less
  attractive to prospective buyers who would want to use
  their own plans.

• New developers and homeowners may not be able to
  or not want to contribute ($) to required common areas
  originally envisioned for the PD.

• Residential opportunities still continue to address
  community need for housing, and…
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation
• Community need also met by not requiring area
  residents to pay Homeowner Assoc. fees and for
  amenities.

• Rezone allows for a mix of development concepts
  allowing for more diverse home stock.

• Recent development has yielded in thoughtful and
  consistent development patters on surrounding
  properties recently rezoned RS-1 from PD- exactly
  what the Zoning Ordinance seeks to create.
Analysis – Basis for Recommendation

• Environmental impacts from RS-1 zoning would be
  similar to PD. All subdivisions reviewed by City which
  will help monitor possible environmental impacts.

• No chance of over-development. All development has
  to adhere to RS-1 development standards, ensuring
  consistency.
City Council March 5, 2013 Planning

More Related Content

What's hot

City council 8 6-13 ai 16-19 planning presentations
City council 8 6-13 ai 16-19 planning presentationsCity council 8 6-13 ai 16-19 planning presentations
City council 8 6-13 ai 16-19 planning presentations
City of San Angelo Texas
 
City Council October 4, 2011 Planning Presentations
City Council October 4, 2011 Planning PresentationsCity Council October 4, 2011 Planning Presentations
City Council October 4, 2011 Planning Presentations
City of San Angelo Texas
 
Document Finished
Document FinishedDocument Finished
Document Finished
Gregg Boyd
 
Redevelopment strategy,.urban design, pedestrian movment, design testing Hac...
Redevelopment strategy,.urban design, pedestrian movment, design testing  Hac...Redevelopment strategy,.urban design, pedestrian movment, design testing  Hac...
Redevelopment strategy,.urban design, pedestrian movment, design testing Hac...
Sujeet Thakare
 
YLanglois_UP421_A2-Burlington Preliminary Site Plan
YLanglois_UP421_A2-Burlington Preliminary Site PlanYLanglois_UP421_A2-Burlington Preliminary Site Plan
YLanglois_UP421_A2-Burlington Preliminary Site Plan
Yuri Langlois
 

What's hot (20)

City council 8 6-13 ai 16-19 planning presentations
City council 8 6-13 ai 16-19 planning presentationsCity council 8 6-13 ai 16-19 planning presentations
City council 8 6-13 ai 16-19 planning presentations
 
Cc 5 14-13 - planning
Cc 5 14-13 - planningCc 5 14-13 - planning
Cc 5 14-13 - planning
 
City council nov. 19, 2013 planning
City council nov. 19, 2013   planningCity council nov. 19, 2013   planning
City council nov. 19, 2013 planning
 
Planning Staff Report Elizabeth Ann Seton 2010 Oct 14
Planning Staff Report Elizabeth Ann Seton 2010 Oct 14Planning Staff Report Elizabeth Ann Seton 2010 Oct 14
Planning Staff Report Elizabeth Ann Seton 2010 Oct 14
 
City Council October 4, 2011 Planning Presentations
City Council October 4, 2011 Planning PresentationsCity Council October 4, 2011 Planning Presentations
City Council October 4, 2011 Planning Presentations
 
Luis Munoz Marin redevelopment Plan 08.29.2012
Luis Munoz Marin redevelopment Plan 08.29.2012Luis Munoz Marin redevelopment Plan 08.29.2012
Luis Munoz Marin redevelopment Plan 08.29.2012
 
Pbz 04 40 (04.28.05)
Pbz 04 40 (04.28.05)Pbz 04 40 (04.28.05)
Pbz 04 40 (04.28.05)
 
Document Finished
Document FinishedDocument Finished
Document Finished
 
Proposed hotel resort zoning august 30 2010
Proposed hotel resort zoning august 30 2010Proposed hotel resort zoning august 30 2010
Proposed hotel resort zoning august 30 2010
 
12900 Old Wellborn Rd. Rezoning
12900 Old Wellborn Rd. Rezoning12900 Old Wellborn Rd. Rezoning
12900 Old Wellborn Rd. Rezoning
 
Gopi Talav
Gopi Talav Gopi Talav
Gopi Talav
 
Modification of Maximum Coverage Limitation for Minimum Required Rear Yards -...
Modification of Maximum Coverage Limitation for Minimum Required Rear Yards -...Modification of Maximum Coverage Limitation for Minimum Required Rear Yards -...
Modification of Maximum Coverage Limitation for Minimum Required Rear Yards -...
 
Redevelopment strategy,.urban design, pedestrian movment, design testing Hac...
Redevelopment strategy,.urban design, pedestrian movment, design testing  Hac...Redevelopment strategy,.urban design, pedestrian movment, design testing  Hac...
Redevelopment strategy,.urban design, pedestrian movment, design testing Hac...
 
City Council August 21, 2012 Planning
City Council August 21, 2012 PlanningCity Council August 21, 2012 Planning
City Council August 21, 2012 Planning
 
Development control rules and regulation
Development control rules and regulationDevelopment control rules and regulation
Development control rules and regulation
 
Applicant Presentation -- Aggieland Outfitters Rezoning
Applicant Presentation -- Aggieland Outfitters RezoningApplicant Presentation -- Aggieland Outfitters Rezoning
Applicant Presentation -- Aggieland Outfitters Rezoning
 
University Town Center Rezoning - Developer Presentation
University Town Center Rezoning - Developer PresentationUniversity Town Center Rezoning - Developer Presentation
University Town Center Rezoning - Developer Presentation
 
Proposed Central Area Hotel Resort District
Proposed Central Area Hotel Resort DistrictProposed Central Area Hotel Resort District
Proposed Central Area Hotel Resort District
 
YLanglois_UP421_A2-Burlington Preliminary Site Plan
YLanglois_UP421_A2-Burlington Preliminary Site PlanYLanglois_UP421_A2-Burlington Preliminary Site Plan
YLanglois_UP421_A2-Burlington Preliminary Site Plan
 
Aggieland Outfitters Rezoning on Fairview Avenue
Aggieland Outfitters Rezoning on Fairview AvenueAggieland Outfitters Rezoning on Fairview Avenue
Aggieland Outfitters Rezoning on Fairview Avenue
 

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (8)

City Council January 17, 2012 Planning
City Council January 17, 2012 PlanningCity Council January 17, 2012 Planning
City Council January 17, 2012 Planning
 
City Council March 5, 2013 risk management self insured fund
City Council March 5, 2013 risk management self insured fundCity Council March 5, 2013 risk management self insured fund
City Council March 5, 2013 risk management self insured fund
 
June 4, 2013 Agenda Packet
June 4, 2013 Agenda PacketJune 4, 2013 Agenda Packet
June 4, 2013 Agenda Packet
 
March 19, 2013 Agenda Packet
March 19, 2013 Agenda PacketMarch 19, 2013 Agenda Packet
March 19, 2013 Agenda Packet
 
City Council February 21, 2013 community garden rio vista
City Council February 21, 2013 community garden rio vistaCity Council February 21, 2013 community garden rio vista
City Council February 21, 2013 community garden rio vista
 
City Council May 1, 2012 Recreation Netting at Sports Complex
City Council May 1, 2012 Recreation Netting at Sports ComplexCity Council May 1, 2012 Recreation Netting at Sports Complex
City Council May 1, 2012 Recreation Netting at Sports Complex
 
February 4, 2014 Agenda Packet
February 4, 2014 Agenda PacketFebruary 4, 2014 Agenda Packet
February 4, 2014 Agenda Packet
 
January 21, 2014 Agenda packet
January 21, 2014 Agenda packetJanuary 21, 2014 Agenda packet
January 21, 2014 Agenda packet
 

Similar to City Council March 5, 2013 Planning

City Council May 3, 2011 Planning Presentation
City Council May 3, 2011 Planning PresentationCity Council May 3, 2011 Planning Presentation
City Council May 3, 2011 Planning Presentation
City of San Angelo Texas
 
City Council August 30, 2011 Planning Presentation
City Council August 30, 2011 Planning PresentationCity Council August 30, 2011 Planning Presentation
City Council August 30, 2011 Planning Presentation
City of San Angelo Texas
 
City council january 7, 2014 sidewalk agreement
City council january 7, 2014   sidewalk agreementCity council january 7, 2014   sidewalk agreement
City council january 7, 2014 sidewalk agreement
City of San Angelo Texas
 
City Council May 17, 2011 Planning Presentation
City Council May 17, 2011 Planning PresentationCity Council May 17, 2011 Planning Presentation
City Council May 17, 2011 Planning Presentation
City of San Angelo Texas
 
City Council September 20, 2011 Planning abandonment
City Council September 20, 2011 Planning abandonmentCity Council September 20, 2011 Planning abandonment
City Council September 20, 2011 Planning abandonment
City of San Angelo Texas
 
City council 12 17-13 planning presentation
City council 12 17-13 planning presentationCity council 12 17-13 planning presentation
City council 12 17-13 planning presentation
City of San Angelo Texas
 

Similar to City Council March 5, 2013 Planning (20)

City council june 18, 2013 planning
City council june 18, 2013   planningCity council june 18, 2013   planning
City council june 18, 2013 planning
 
City Council March 19, 2013 Planning
City Council March 19, 2013 PlanningCity Council March 19, 2013 Planning
City Council March 19, 2013 Planning
 
City Council February 7, 2012 Planning
City Council February 7, 2012 PlanningCity Council February 7, 2012 Planning
City Council February 7, 2012 Planning
 
Eastgate Neighborhood Plan Amendment - Developer Presentation
Eastgate Neighborhood Plan Amendment - Developer PresentationEastgate Neighborhood Plan Amendment - Developer Presentation
Eastgate Neighborhood Plan Amendment - Developer Presentation
 
City Council Feb. 5, 2013 planning
City Council Feb. 5, 2013 planningCity Council Feb. 5, 2013 planning
City Council Feb. 5, 2013 planning
 
City Council May 3, 2011 Planning Presentation
City Council May 3, 2011 Planning PresentationCity Council May 3, 2011 Planning Presentation
City Council May 3, 2011 Planning Presentation
 
City Council February 21, 2013 Planning
City Council February 21, 2013 Planning City Council February 21, 2013 Planning
City Council February 21, 2013 Planning
 
City Council August 30, 2011 Planning Presentation
City Council August 30, 2011 Planning PresentationCity Council August 30, 2011 Planning Presentation
City Council August 30, 2011 Planning Presentation
 
City council january 7, 2014 sidewalk agreement
City council january 7, 2014   sidewalk agreementCity council january 7, 2014   sidewalk agreement
City council january 7, 2014 sidewalk agreement
 
CPA-2-03 West Canal
CPA-2-03 West CanalCPA-2-03 West Canal
CPA-2-03 West Canal
 
City Council May 17, 2011 Planning Presentation
City Council May 17, 2011 Planning PresentationCity Council May 17, 2011 Planning Presentation
City Council May 17, 2011 Planning Presentation
 
Denton Baptist Temple Rezoning Analysis
Denton Baptist Temple Rezoning AnalysisDenton Baptist Temple Rezoning Analysis
Denton Baptist Temple Rezoning Analysis
 
City Council January 22, 2013 Planning
City Council January 22, 2013 PlanningCity Council January 22, 2013 Planning
City Council January 22, 2013 Planning
 
City Council September 20, 2011 Planning abandonment
City Council September 20, 2011 Planning abandonmentCity Council September 20, 2011 Planning abandonment
City Council September 20, 2011 Planning abandonment
 
Two Fulton Market District Projects Approved!
Two Fulton Market District Projects Approved!Two Fulton Market District Projects Approved!
Two Fulton Market District Projects Approved!
 
Bob Moore Farms_Due Diligence Presentation_6.14.23.pptx
Bob Moore Farms_Due Diligence Presentation_6.14.23.pptxBob Moore Farms_Due Diligence Presentation_6.14.23.pptx
Bob Moore Farms_Due Diligence Presentation_6.14.23.pptx
 
Airport Commerce
Airport CommerceAirport Commerce
Airport Commerce
 
CC 5-21-13 planning
CC 5-21-13 planningCC 5-21-13 planning
CC 5-21-13 planning
 
City council 12 17-13 planning presentation
City council 12 17-13 planning presentationCity council 12 17-13 planning presentation
City council 12 17-13 planning presentation
 
City Council May 15, 2012 Planning
City Council May 15, 2012 PlanningCity Council May 15, 2012 Planning
City Council May 15, 2012 Planning
 

More from City of San Angelo Texas

City council january 7, 2014 bandits presentation
City council january 7, 2014   bandits presentationCity council january 7, 2014   bandits presentation
City council january 7, 2014 bandits presentation
City of San Angelo Texas
 
City council 12 17-13 downtown development plan
City council 12 17-13 downtown development planCity council 12 17-13 downtown development plan
City council 12 17-13 downtown development plan
City of San Angelo Texas
 
City council nov. 19, 2013 san angelo public housing authority
City council nov. 19, 2013   san angelo public housing  authorityCity council nov. 19, 2013   san angelo public housing  authority
City council nov. 19, 2013 san angelo public housing authority
City of San Angelo Texas
 
City council nov. 19, 2013 cosadc budget presentation 11-19-13
City council nov. 19, 2013    cosadc budget presentation 11-19-13City council nov. 19, 2013    cosadc budget presentation 11-19-13
City council nov. 19, 2013 cosadc budget presentation 11-19-13
City of San Angelo Texas
 
City council nov. 19, 2013 cosadc ballot language presentation
City council nov. 19, 2013    cosadc ballot language presentationCity council nov. 19, 2013    cosadc ballot language presentation
City council nov. 19, 2013 cosadc ballot language presentation
City of San Angelo Texas
 
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - west texas water partnership
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - west texas water partnershipSan angelo city council 11 5-13 - west texas water partnership
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - west texas water partnership
City of San Angelo Texas
 
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - wastewater pilot
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - wastewater pilotSan angelo city council 11 5-13 - wastewater pilot
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - wastewater pilot
City of San Angelo Texas
 
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - solid waste collection and operation presen...
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - solid waste collection and operation presen...San angelo city council 11 5-13 - solid waste collection and operation presen...
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - solid waste collection and operation presen...
City of San Angelo Texas
 
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - nasworthy presentation
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - nasworthy presentationSan angelo city council 11 5-13 - nasworthy presentation
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - nasworthy presentation
City of San Angelo Texas
 
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - economic development budget
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - economic development budgetSan angelo city council 11 5-13 - economic development budget
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - economic development budget
City of San Angelo Texas
 
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - request for competitive sealed proposals
San angelo city council 11 5-13 -  request for competitive sealed proposalsSan angelo city council 11 5-13 -  request for competitive sealed proposals
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - request for competitive sealed proposals
City of San Angelo Texas
 
San Angelo City Council 10-15-13 red arroyo project update
San Angelo City Council 10-15-13 red arroyo project updateSan Angelo City Council 10-15-13 red arroyo project update
San Angelo City Council 10-15-13 red arroyo project update
City of San Angelo Texas
 
San Angelo City Council 10-15-13 development corporation annual report
San Angelo City Council 10-15-13 development corporation annual reportSan Angelo City Council 10-15-13 development corporation annual report
San Angelo City Council 10-15-13 development corporation annual report
City of San Angelo Texas
 

More from City of San Angelo Texas (20)

City council january 7, 2014 bandits presentation
City council january 7, 2014   bandits presentationCity council january 7, 2014   bandits presentation
City council january 7, 2014 bandits presentation
 
City council january 7, 2014 river fest
City council january 7, 2014   river festCity council january 7, 2014   river fest
City council january 7, 2014 river fest
 
January 7, 2014 Agenda Packet
January 7, 2014 Agenda PacketJanuary 7, 2014 Agenda Packet
January 7, 2014 Agenda Packet
 
City council 12 17-13 downtown development plan
City council 12 17-13 downtown development planCity council 12 17-13 downtown development plan
City council 12 17-13 downtown development plan
 
December 17, 2013 Agenda Packet
December 17, 2013 Agenda PacketDecember 17, 2013 Agenda Packet
December 17, 2013 Agenda Packet
 
December 3, 2013 Agenda packet
December 3, 2013 Agenda packetDecember 3, 2013 Agenda packet
December 3, 2013 Agenda packet
 
City council nov. 19, 2013 san angelo public housing authority
City council nov. 19, 2013   san angelo public housing  authorityCity council nov. 19, 2013   san angelo public housing  authority
City council nov. 19, 2013 san angelo public housing authority
 
City council nov. 19, 2013 cosadc budget presentation 11-19-13
City council nov. 19, 2013    cosadc budget presentation 11-19-13City council nov. 19, 2013    cosadc budget presentation 11-19-13
City council nov. 19, 2013 cosadc budget presentation 11-19-13
 
City council nov. 19, 2013 cosadc ballot language presentation
City council nov. 19, 2013    cosadc ballot language presentationCity council nov. 19, 2013    cosadc ballot language presentation
City council nov. 19, 2013 cosadc ballot language presentation
 
November 19, 2013 Agenda Packet
November 19, 2013 Agenda PacketNovember 19, 2013 Agenda Packet
November 19, 2013 Agenda Packet
 
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - west texas water partnership
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - west texas water partnershipSan angelo city council 11 5-13 - west texas water partnership
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - west texas water partnership
 
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - wastewater pilot
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - wastewater pilotSan angelo city council 11 5-13 - wastewater pilot
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - wastewater pilot
 
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - solid waste collection and operation presen...
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - solid waste collection and operation presen...San angelo city council 11 5-13 - solid waste collection and operation presen...
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - solid waste collection and operation presen...
 
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - nasworthy presentation
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - nasworthy presentationSan angelo city council 11 5-13 - nasworthy presentation
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - nasworthy presentation
 
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - economic development budget
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - economic development budgetSan angelo city council 11 5-13 - economic development budget
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - economic development budget
 
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - request for competitive sealed proposals
San angelo city council 11 5-13 -  request for competitive sealed proposalsSan angelo city council 11 5-13 -  request for competitive sealed proposals
San angelo city council 11 5-13 - request for competitive sealed proposals
 
November 5, 2013 Agenda packet
November 5, 2013 Agenda packetNovember 5, 2013 Agenda packet
November 5, 2013 Agenda packet
 
Lake Nasworthy Plan Presentation 10.21.13
Lake Nasworthy Plan Presentation 10.21.13Lake Nasworthy Plan Presentation 10.21.13
Lake Nasworthy Plan Presentation 10.21.13
 
San Angelo City Council 10-15-13 red arroyo project update
San Angelo City Council 10-15-13 red arroyo project updateSan Angelo City Council 10-15-13 red arroyo project update
San Angelo City Council 10-15-13 red arroyo project update
 
San Angelo City Council 10-15-13 development corporation annual report
San Angelo City Council 10-15-13 development corporation annual reportSan Angelo City Council 10-15-13 development corporation annual report
San Angelo City Council 10-15-13 development corporation annual report
 

City Council March 5, 2013 Planning

  • 2. Zone Change Z 13-06: City of San Angelo Development Corporation • A request for a zone change from Light Manufacturing (ML) to Heavy Manufacturing (MH) to allow for activities allowed within MH zoning districts, on the following property: • 1020, 1030, & 1040 Gateway Drive, located east of the intersection of Gateway Drive and FM 380; more specially occupying the Gateway Addition, Section 1, Block 3, Lots 1 and 2 and Tract A, in Section 1 being a 20.059 acres, in northeast San Angelo. One (1) notification was sent and returned in opposition.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8. Looking East at the Subject Property from Photographs of Subject Property Gateway Drive
  • 9. Looking East at the Subject Property Photographs of Subject Property
  • 10. Looking East along FM 380 Photographs of Subject Property
  • 11. Looking West along FM 380 Photographs of Subject Property
  • 12. Looking North at the Subject Property from FM 380
  • 13. Options In considering this application, the Council may: • Approve the proposed zone change as presented; or • Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion, in which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or • Deny the proposed zone change.
  • 14. Staff Recommendation • Planning staff recommends approving the proposed zone change request. • Planning Commission recommended approval of this request by a vote of 4-1 on February 18, 2013.
  • 15. History & Background General Information • Light Manufacturing (ML) zoning; • Vacant open land; • Annexed in 1997; • Only ML zoning in the area; and • Open space – light to heavy brush, Angelo Achieves, vacant distribution center and Lucas Oil Track.
  • 16. Criteria of Application • Compatible with Plans and Policies • Consistent with Zoning Ordinance • Compatible with Surrounding Area • Changed Conditions • Effect on Natural Environment • Community Need
  • 17. Criteria of Application • Development Patterns
  • 18. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Complies with the Vision Plan which calls for „Industrial‟ • Although lots to the south are envisioned for neighborhood development, no residences exist along FM 280 or anywhere within 3/4 of mile of the site. • For some time, the area has been planned and dedicated for intense industrial uses. • Clustering high intensive uses into isolated areas follows the goal of the Comp Plan – diminishes the potential for any unforeseen negative impacts • Loud noises and the occasional odd smells emitting from the site will not likely bother neighboring property, given their distance from the site.
  • 19. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • In terms of allowed uses ML and MH are similar – MH allows for heavy manufacturing and production • In ML zoning, no vibration can be produced which are transmitted through the ground at any point beyond the lot line. • There are also measures to reduce noise and emission of airborne particles – conceivably in MH these uses may be allowed such limitations do not apply. • MH zoning allows for greater flexibility in the intent as it relates to intensity and the level of noxious uses allowed.
  • 20. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Depending on the intensity of the uses, the transition may have an effect on the natural environment • The site measures over 2,300 feet from any significant water feature – the nearest is the Concho River, which flows west to east (away from the city) • This is one of the most isolated and undeveloped areas of the city • Allows for opportunities to develop the site for the most intensive uses, with the least potential impacts • Provides opportunities to develop areas for heavy industrial within the city limits serves a community need
  • 21. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • The site is not directing abutting to N Loop 306, rather separated by a sizeable 55 acre tract of land zoned for ML – which provides a suitable buffer for passing motorist on the major highway • The site provides quick access to highways and points outside the city • There are not many areas in the city that are isolated from residences that provide such access to a highway, vital in the manufacturing field • The property is positioned nearly 2,000 feet the city limits to the east.
  • 22.
  • 23. Awning Approval Texas Theatre of San Angelo • A request to allow for an awning to extend within the public right-of-way of the following property: • 212 South Irving Street, located southeast of the intersection of South Irving Street and West Twohig Avenue; more specially occupying the San Angelo Addition, Block 2, Lot 18 & West 3.11 FT of Lot 17, in central San Angelo. No notifications were required with this request.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30. Looking North along S Irving Street
  • 31. Looking at the Subject Property from S Irving Street
  • 32. Looking South along S Irving Street
  • 33. Options In considering this application, the Council may: • Approve the request to place an awning in the public right-of-way; or • Deny the request to place an awning in the public right-of-way.
  • 34. Staff Recommendation City staff recommends approving the awning request.
  • 35. History & Background General Information • The lot is zoned CBD; • The building was constructed around 1944; • CBD zoning in the area; and • Vehicle repair, offices, theater, vacant lots and surface parking are the surrounding uses.
  • 36. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Location within the Central Business District; • Proposal will serve as an architectural feature for the building; • Provides cover from outside elements of rains and direct sun exposure; • The structure will be structurally sound and allows for pedestrians to safely navigate from end to end; and • The area is relatively flat and free of visual obstructions.
  • 37. Proposed Conditions • Placement of the awning must reflect the rendering provided to staff upon submittal of this application.
  • 38.
  • 39. Zone Change Z13-02 Debbie Clark • A request for approval of a zone change from Single- Family Residential (RS-1) to Two-Family Residential (RS- 2) to specifically allow for “Household Living” as allowed in RS-2 zoning districts on the following property: • 2008 Beacon Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Beacon Street and Montague Avenue. This property specifically occupied the Avondale Addition, Block 10, Lots 15-20, in central San Angelo. Twenty-two (22) notifications were sent, 3 in favor.
  • 41. Map
  • 45. Subject Property looking north from Beacon Street
  • 46. Residence northeast of subject property
  • 47. Subject property looking north from Beacon Street
  • 48. Options In considering this application, the Council may: • Approve the proposed zone change as presented; or • Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion, in which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or • Deny the proposed zone change.
  • 49. Staff Recommendation • Planning staff recommends approving the proposed zone change. • Planning Commission recommended approval of this request by a vote of 5-0 on January 28, 2013.
  • 50. History & Background General Information • Currently Single-Family Residential (RS-1) • Vacant property/vacant residence. • Residential and vacant properties surrounding subject property. • Residential zoning since 1949; no zoning changes to immediate area.
  • 51. Criteria for Approval • Compatible with Plans and Policies • Consistent with Zoning Ordinance • Compatible with Surrounding Area • Changed Conditions
  • 52. Criteria for Approval • Effect on Natural Environment • Community Need • Development Patterns
  • 53. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Intent of applicant is to convert an existing house into a duplex. • RS-1 change to RS-2 slight. The difference is that this change allows a two-family residence or accessory building on the property. • Comprehensive Plan calls for a mix in housing stock in proximity to commercial zones- addresses a community need. • Currently RS-2 nearby with a duplex to the west on Beacon Street, mobile to the east- these illustrate precedence by City Council to allow a mix of housing.
  • 54. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Due to the size of the subject area, conditions would change only slightly in the long run than what currently exists with regard to residential traffic. Any other more intense use would not be allowed. • The Vision Plan calls for “Neighborhood” with a “Transitional” zoning district to the south side of Beacon Street as a buffer. • Two parking spaces per dwelling per Section 511 of the Zoning Ordinance may cause some storm water runoff; any new development would, as well. • Neighbors would most likely not be affected by runoff.
  • 55. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Staff feels a minor change in land use through a rezoning here fits in with the Vision Plan, so development pattern is consistent. • Smart Growth in action here. This is a walk-able ½ mile radius + or - neighborhood with an elementary school to the north, Producer‟s Park and a restaurant at the stockyards to the NW. • Zone change could have a positive impact on the area by encouraging future residential development; all in line with Comprehensive Plan.
  • 56.
  • 57. Zone Change Z 13-03: Tom Green County • A request for approval of a zone change from Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to specifically allow for commercial opportunities as allowed in CN zoning districts on the following property: • 318 North Bell Street, located on the northeast corner of the intersection of North Bell Street and Spaulding Street. This property specifically occupies the Bell Addition, Block 9, 2.35 acres in the southwest corner of Block 9, in north central San Angelo. Seventeen (17) Notifications sent. None received
  • 59. Map
  • 61.
  • 62. Looking northwest from the subject property
  • 63. Looking south from the subject property
  • 64. Looking east from the subject property
  • 65. Options In considering this application, the Council may: • Approve the proposed zone change as presented; or • Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion, in which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or • Deny the proposed zone change.
  • 66. Staff Recommendation • City staff recommends approving the proposed zone change • Planning Commission recommended approval of this request by a vote of 5-0 on January 28, 2013
  • 67. History & Background General Information • Area Residential in nature, intense uses on Pulliam • CN, CG/CH and RS-1 zoning in the area; • County Offices, churches; and • SP 200 allowed for a welfare building on the property.
  • 68. Criteria for Approval • Compatible with Plans and Policies • Consistent with Zoning Ordinance • Compatible with Surrounding Area • Changed Conditions
  • 69. Criteria for Approval • Effect on Natural Environment • Community Need • Development Patterns
  • 70. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Within the Comprehensive Plan, Goal 3 of “Neighborhoods” is to “improve the relationship between adjacent commercial and residential properties”. CG/CH zoning currently borders the RS-1 properties, a CN zoning would be a more suitable and less harsh buffer between the two. • “Rezone or remove any CG/CH zoning from adjacent to existing neighborhoods."
  • 71. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Consistent with the City‟s plans, policies, and ordinances; • Compatible with the surrounding area; • Follows development patterns of City; • Little anticipated effect on the natural environment;
  • 72. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Neighborhood oriented business(es) great fit in CN zoning given the characteristics of the area; • Provide a buffer from the CG/CH zoning on Pulliam; • Area is in need of neighborhood serving businesses and is a well established area; • Will allow walkable development that is highly in-line with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
  • 73.
  • 74. Zone Change Z13-04: Abel Fernandez • A request for approval of a zone change from Single- Family Residential (RS-1) to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) to specifically allow for commercial opportunities as allowed in CN zoning districts on the following property: • 1006 East 14th Street, located approximately 170 feet from the northeast intersection at East 14th Street and Wade Street. This property specifically occupies the Exall Addition, Block 9, Lot 8 Exc. West 88.7‟, in north central San Angelo. Thirteen (13) notifications were sent, none returned.
  • 79. Subject property looking north from E. 14th St.
  • 80. Subject Property north from E. 14th St.
  • 81. Eastern section of subject property
  • 82. Options In considering this application, the Council may: • Approve the proposed zone change as presented; or • Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion, in which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or • Deny the proposed zone change.
  • 83. Staff Recommendation • Planning staff recommends approving the proposed zone change. • Planning Commission recommended approval of this request by a vote of 5-0 on January 28, 2013
  • 84. History & Background General Information • Currently Single-Family Residential (RS-1) • Vacant residence. • Single-family residential and vacant lots in areas surrounding subject property. • Residential as early as 1939.
  • 85. Criteria for Approval • Compatible with Plans and Policies • Consistent with Zoning Ordinance • Compatible with Surrounding Area • Changed Conditions • Effect on Natural Environment • Community Need • Development Patterns
  • 86. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Location of subject property on fringe of RS-1. • Applicant wants zoning for a tax services business. • Several zoning districts lie within ½ mile of the subject property providing neighborhood services such as restaurants and car repair shops interspersed with more intense land uses more industrial in nature which are located within the CG/CH zones to the north. • A CN zoning district here would be compatible with plans & policies in place for the community.
  • 87. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Vision Plan calls for “Neighborhood” which includes the concept of low impact businesses that can serve area residents. • CN is the least intense of commercial zoning; serves to provide a buffer between residential and higher impact commercial zoning. • Small lot size limits businesses that could locate on the subject property; an inherent form of land use management here. • Zone change triggers placement of a 6 foot opaque fence between residence to the west.
  • 88. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Low density commercial would be a potential asset to the surrounding neighborhood both short and long term. • No need to amend the Comprehensive Plan (or Vision Map, either) with this zone change. • Natural environment minimally impacted; allowable low impact commercial uses plus the small lot should not cause storm water runoff to be an issue nor noise and odors associated with heavier commercial uses. • Businesses allowed in CN include small new or used retail sales and services businesses such as product repair.
  • 89. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Staff feels proposed zoning will create an orderly development pattern consistent with surrounding area. • This zoning promotes infill as vacant residence on property is repurposed into an office. • Goals of infill and walk-able development are highly in line with Comprehensive Plan and in harmony with the neighborhood. • This potential zone change could aid in future area development.
  • 90.
  • 91. Planned Development PD 13-01: West Company/ Granger Macdonald • A request for approval of a zone change from a combination of Single-Family Residential (RS-1) and General Commercial (CG) to Planned Development (PD) to specifically allow for multi-family living and a lease house /amenity center on the following property: • an unaddressed 9.8 acre property, located directly west of the intersection of Northwest Drive and Green Hill Road. The property specifically occupies a proposed Second Replat of Arden Acres, Section Three, Block 3, Tract 3 in western San Angelo. One notification was sent, none were returned
  • 93. Map
  • 95.
  • 96. Looking north across the subject property
  • 97. Looking northeast from the subject property
  • 98. Looking west across the subject property
  • 99. Options In considering this application, the Council may: • approve the proposed zone change as presented; • Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion, in which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or • modify the conditions to those believed to be more appropriate; or • deny the proposed zone change.
  • 100. Recommendation • City staff recommends approving the proposed Planned Development District subject to the conditions of the accompanying ordinance. • Planning Commission approved this request by a 5-0 vote on February 18, 2013.
  • 101. History & Background General Information • Area is generally undeveloped • Residences in the distance & open space readily present; • CG, CH and RS-1 zoning in the area; • Ball fields to the west & undeveloped property; and • Area Annexed in 1997.
  • 102. Criteria for Approval • Compatible with Plans and Policies • Consistent with Zoning Ordinance • Compatible with Surrounding Area • Changed Conditions
  • 103. Criteria for Approval • Effect on Natural Environment • Community Need • Development Patterns
  • 104. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation "Improve relationship between adjacent commercial and residential land use adjacencies." One action step of this goal states that (the city should), " Require a buffer separating commercial, industrial, or agricultural zoned lands from neighborhoods. This buffer may be an intermediate “mixed-use” zone, a landscape buffer, or public right-of-way.” "Establish transition areas between commercial areas and nearby neighborhoods."
  • 105. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation Zoning Ordinance Section 306 “promote the efficient use of land” “allow diversification of uses, structures, and open spaces” “promote flexibility of design in a manner compatible with…adjacent properties”
  • 106. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Compatible with Area and Plans/Policies of the City • Traffic capabilities of area • Provides a transition into the neighborhood • Transitioning uses and buffering neighborhoods is highly consistent with the Zoning Ordinance • PD is the most predictable type of development • Compatible with the surrounding area • Infill development • High mixed use potential
  • 107. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Effects on natural environment being addressed • Storm Water mitigation • Household living much less intense than commercial • Project is serving a community need • Diverse mix of housing opportunities • Transitioning into an envisioned neighborhood development • Consistent with the development patterns of the area
  • 108.
  • 109.
  • 110.
  • 111. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation Proposed PD ordinance: • Only allows for multi-family living and a lease house/amenity center with related accessory uses • Development in accordance with: • Proposed site plan • Built with materials and colors as approved in Urban Design Review 13-01 • Signage matching the materials of the dwelling units • Sidewalks
  • 112.
  • 113. Zone Change Z13-07 COSA Planning • A request for approval of a zone change from Planned Development (PD) to Single- Family Residential (RS-1) to specifically allow for “Household Living” as allowed in RS- 1 zoning districts on the following property: • An unaddressed tract of land located at the southwest end of Twin Mountain Drive. This property specifically occupies approximately 24 acres of the G. Maurer Survey 0182, Abstract 1649, west of Sections One-A and One-B of The Homestead Additions, in southwest San Angelo. • Thirteen (13) notifications were sent, 2 returned, in favor.
  • 115. Map
  • 119.
  • 120. Looking east from dead-end of Twin Mountain Drive
  • 121. Looking south from Twin Mountain Drive at NE section of property
  • 122. Looking West from Twin Mountain Drive
  • 123. Subject Property looking west from Lydian Court
  • 124. Subject property looking southeast from Lydian Court
  • 125. Options In considering this application, the Council may: • approve the proposed zone change as presented; • Remand the application back to Planning Commission for further discussion, in which case another public hearing will need to be scheduled; or • modify the conditions to those believed to be more appropriate; or • deny the proposed zone change.
  • 126. Recommendation • City staff recommends approving the proposed zone change. • Planning Commission approved this request by a 5-0 vote on February 18, 2013.
  • 127. History & Background General Information • Currently remnant of a Planned Development (PD) • Undeveloped property • Residential and vacant properties surround subject property. • Annexed in April, 2006 and zoned R&E. Rezoned as PD in June 2006.
  • 128. Criteria for Approval Whether and the extent to which the proposal is: • Compatible with plans and polices • Consistent with Zoning Ordinance • Compatible with surrounding area. • Changed conditions • Effect on natural environment • Community need • Development patterns
  • 129. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Remaining section of a PD. Original plan called for a gated community, Homeowner‟s Association and with additional amenities. Other area sections rezoned RS- 1 from original PD on January 17, 2012 (Z11-23 &Z11- 24). • PDs are basically a development agreement where approved plans should not change – Developer went out of business and bank did not want to adhere to plan.
  • 130. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Zoning Ordinance Section 210.H.1: “No building permit may be issued and no construction or development requiring a building permit and situated within a PD District may commence unless a site plan has been approved for that phase of the project that is consistent with the approved concept plan.” • Rezone to RS-1 corrects changed conditions and would keep this area more consistent with surrounding zoning and Vision Plan. The Vision Plan calls for “Neighborhood.”
  • 131. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Leaving PD “as is” would make development nearly impossible since land transactions may be less attractive to prospective buyers who would want to use their own plans. • New developers and homeowners may not be able to or not want to contribute ($) to required common areas originally envisioned for the PD. • Residential opportunities still continue to address community need for housing, and…
  • 132. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Community need also met by not requiring area residents to pay Homeowner Assoc. fees and for amenities. • Rezone allows for a mix of development concepts allowing for more diverse home stock. • Recent development has yielded in thoughtful and consistent development patters on surrounding properties recently rezoned RS-1 from PD- exactly what the Zoning Ordinance seeks to create.
  • 133. Analysis – Basis for Recommendation • Environmental impacts from RS-1 zoning would be similar to PD. All subdivisions reviewed by City which will help monitor possible environmental impacts. • No chance of over-development. All development has to adhere to RS-1 development standards, ensuring consistency.