3. brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
• Open access and open data (with CC-By and CC0 licenses)
would mean that all research text and data were available
for mining, reuse and analysis
• But legacy publishers are resisting open practices
Text and data mining
The ideal situation:
• A fair dealing exception is required that allows for
academic (and arguably other, e.g. commercial) mining of
both text and data
For other cases:
• Research in general
• Teaching
Exceptions also required for:
4. brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
• TDM involves multiple, highly heterogenous sources, not
only in journals and books, but anywhere on the Internet.
Licensing cannot practically scale to cover this.
• TDM is simply reading of content, a right researchers
already have. Copyright was never intended to cover such
use. This is temporary copying for reading, not creative use.
Copyright should therefore be amended, not additional
licenses imposed to perpetuate the problem.
Licensing
Additional licensing is not a suitable solution:
• TDM licenses would prevent progress, prevent efficient
use of taxpayer money, prevent growth of SMEs, and
block work that prevents deaths.
5. brian.hole@ubiquitypress.com www.ubiquitypress.com / @ubiquitypress
• TDM is not a highly frequent activity, and involves
touching each resource only once.
• This is much lower than normal user behaviour and crawling
by other services.
False objections
• Any higher level of load could be easily and cost-effectively
managed – benefits of additional use and citation far
outway this.
‘Server overload’:
• Scientific facts and information are not your content.
The need to control access to ‘our content’:
• This results in building a reputation of being against open
science and scientific progress.
