SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  45
August 8, 2003 Principal Investigator: Brian White  Proposal Manager: Elena Adams MARS GEOPHYSICAL LANDER PROPOSAL AUTHORIZATION REVIEW 2011 MARS SCOUT AO
Team Members Cost MIT Julien-Alexandre Lamamy Ground Systems Purdue University Colleen Henry Software University of Arkansas Melissa Franzen Thermal UCLA Mike McElwain Power University of Virginia Jonathan Sheffield Propulsion Purdue University Kelly Pennell Attitude Control System MIT Emily Craparo Telecommunications Stanford Fraser Thomson Computer & Data Systems Berkeley Esperanza Nunez Structures Virginia Tech Brett Williams Entry, Descent, & Landing Princeton Chris Wyckham Mission Design Stanford Samantha Infeld Programmatics Texas A&M René Elms Instruments USC Everett Salas Science University of Colorado Jen Heldmann Systems MIT Daniel Kwon Program Manager University of Michigan Elena Adams Principal Investigator Washington University Brian White
Outline ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
MGL Mission Goals Shallow water aquifers: Implications for life-habitable zones and human exploration. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Approach Objectives Follow the   Water Geology Climate
MGL Experiments ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Water on Mars Valley networks Gullies Subsurface ice Polar caps Rampart craters Streamlined islands Outflow channels Layered terrain Follow the Water
Shallow Aquifers ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Based on previous Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) data, gully sites are most likely formed from liquid water due to the presence of shallow aquifers [Malin and Edgett, 2000]. ~500 m ~500 m Follow the Water
Geophysical Exploration for Shallow Aquifers  (GESA) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Geology
Seismic Exploration of the Martian Interior  (SEMI) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Geology
Inert Seismic Impactor Experiment (ISIE) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Geology
Minor Atmospheric Constituents Experiment (MACE) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Climate 1306 729 1443 821 Band (cm -1 ) 0.01 0.002 0.5 0.4 CH 4 C 2 H 2 C 2 H 4 C 2 H 6 Upper Limits (ppm) Constituents
Boundary Layer Meteorology Experiment (BLAME)  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Climate Wind Speed from a GCM
MGL Instrumentation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
GeoDart Design and Short Period Micro-Seismometer (SPMS) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],SPMS – Short Period Micro-Seismometer (or explosive) Parachute Deployment Hardware Telecommunication Antenna Telecommunication Hardware Li-SOCl 2  Batteries Penetrator 20 mm
Ultra BroadBand Seismometer (UBBS) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],The UBBS rests on the ground. Frequency of predicted Mars seismicity. Viking could only see a small part, while UBBS is sensitive to all of it. Comparison of UBBS to STS-2
Atmospheric Instrumentation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Radar & Camera Instrumentation
[object Object],[object Object]
MGL Systems Overview ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],5.9 1069.4 Launch Mass 4.1 577.7 Spacecraft Total (dry) 5.3 891.2 Spacecraft Total (wet) 1198.3 LV Capability 0.2 24.1 Thermal 0.3 10.8 Telecomm 2.2 237.5 Structures 0.0 65.0 Propulsion 0.9 56.5 Power 0.0 10.0 CDH 0.0 14.2 ACS 0.2 13.2 (99.9) Instruments (Darts) Single Dart Mass (kg) Lander Mass (kg) Subsystem Delta II launch of Mars Odyssey, 04/01
Mission Design Trade Space ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Mission Design ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Trajectory If clicking the image doesn’t start the movie, click here.
EDL Profile Parachute deployment (L - 2 min) 8800 m 490 m/s Heat shield jettison (L – 110 s) 7500 m 250 m/s Radar ground acquisition  (altitude mode) (L – 58 s) 2500 m 85 m/s Radar ground acquisition (Doppler speed and direction mode) (L – 44 s) 1400 m 80 m/s Lander separation &  powered descent (L – 43 s) 1300 m 80 m/s Turn to entry attitude (L - 12 min) 3000 km 4800 m/s Cruise solar array separation (L - 10 min) 2300 km 4800 m/s Atmospheric entry (L - 5 min) 125 km 5600 m/s Touchdown 2.5 m/s Solar panel & instrument deployments
Geodart Deployment Sequence 1600 m h = 1300 m v = 80 m/s L - 43 s h =23 m v = 9 m/s L - 5 s v = 30 m/s
Landing Site Selection ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Site Selection will depend on MARSIS and SHARAD finds and will be determined through a series of workshops. Nirgal Valles
Lander Design MPL/Phoenix heritage Ground Penetrating Radar Thrusters (4 each) GRP Thin Walled Tube Medium Gain Antenna Panning Camera UHF Antenna Solar Arrays (2 Each) Dart Antennae Array (5) Seismograph Met Station Pressurant and Fuel Tanks (2 Each)
Attitude Control System ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Propulsion ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],T T T T M M F T T T T L L P L T T T T F P T T T T R R M F L L P L GHe T T P P GHe N 2 H 4 4 - 3000 N Viking Thrusters 8 - 4.5 N Monoprop Thrusters N 2 H 4 NORMALLY CLOSED  PYRO VALVES SYSTEM FILTER LEGEND PRESSURE TRANSDUCER TEMPERATURE SENSOR MANUAL VALVE F NC P T MONOPROP THRUSTER   LATCH VALVE WITH FILTER   L M PROPELLANT TANK GHe PRESSURANT TANK MAIN ENGINE R REGULATOR
Command and Data Handling System ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Broad Reach Engineering CPU board
Telecommunications System Summary ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Cruise, EDL, and Surface Block Diagram HGA SDST  X-band Tx/Rx Lander SDST  X-band Tx/Rx Quad. Electra UHF Only X-band Hybrid SSPA LGA Assy Backshell 0.29 m 15 W 15 W CMD & Cntrl High Rate I/F Clock Valid Line POR Sleep Wake-Up Cntrl & Engr. Tlm. RS-422 CMD 5 V Reboot  External Analog Tlm. Ext. Digital Tlm. (RS-422) SSPA Gimbal Waveguide Coax. Coax. Switch HGA 0.29 m LGA Assy To  C&DH TLM  To  C&DH Pol. Pol. Trans. Trans. Trans. W/G to Coax. Transition. Mono Array Phase Detect
Data Collection and Return ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],45.3 Mb/day CCD Camera 1530 Mb/day Total 45.3 Mb/day Tunable Diode Laser (TDL) Spectrometer 8.29 Mb/day Meteorology Station 48 Mb/day Ground Penetrating Radar 1240 Mb/day Seismometer 144 Mb/day Geophone Darts LS – MTO link
Thermal ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],MGL in its heat shield
Power Total Capacity = 5200 W-hr 1    90.0 A-hr Li-Ion battery (Lander) 28.59 kg, $2.5M 91.5 3. Night Standby 211.0 5. Cruise 208.0 365.1 215.3 176.8 Requirement (W) 2    Ultraflex GaAs Solar Array panels (Lander) 20.72 kg, $4.7M 1    1.4 A-hr thermal battery (EDL) 0.78 kg, $105K 17    5.0 A-hr Li-SOCL 2  batteries (1 per geodart) 9.52 kg, $2.7M (total) 6. Launch 4. EDL 2. Transmit and Receive ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Power Modes (Lander) 1.7 kW (-30 0  Martian Latitude) - 4.5 kW (Martian Equator)  Recharge Li-Ion battery in 6-7 hours Total Capacity = 35 W-hr Total Capacity = 2125 W-hr Transmit (3.75 min after data taking) Data Gathering ( 5 times@5 min) Standby (off and on over 5 days) Equipment
[object Object],[object Object]
Programmatics Schedule
Programmatics Notes ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Education/Public Outreach ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Education/Public Outreach ( cont. ) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Cost ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],83 Launch 465 Adapted model with floor science 497 Adapted model with full science 415 Free ride with full science -14 Ground operations -9 Science team (E) -6 Science development -43 Geodarts -9 CNES seism. 68 Phase E 412 Phase C/D 17 Phase B 4 Phase A 574 Team X cost model Total cost ($M) Breakdown Scenarios
Risk ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object]
Science Traceability SCIENCE OBJECTIVES MEASUREMENT REQUIREMENTS INSTRUMENT REQUIREMENTS MISSION REQUIREMENTS DATA PRODUCED Search for subsurface water sources at the landing site Seismic data, ground penetrating radar during first 10 days of mission Active seismic  array (operates from 0.01 Hz-10 Hz). Ground penetrating radar measurements (15 MHz, sensitive up to a depth of 2 km) Instruments must be operational for first 10 days after landing. Map variation of S and P wave velocity and dielectric constant with depth in shallow crust (< 500m). Determine crustal structure and thickness  Active seismic data, ground penetrating radar. Seismic data from Inert Seismic Impactor Active seismic array, seismometer (operates from 0.05 mHz-50 Hz). Ground penetrating radar measurements (15 MHz, sensitive up to a depth of 2 km) Active seismic instruments must be operational for first 10 days after landing.   Map variation of S and P wave velocity and dielectric constant with depth in shallow and deep crust, down to Moho. Characterize deep planetary structure Passive seismic data from natural sources. Passive seismic monitoring  (operates from 0.05 mHz-50 Hz) with intelligent event-detection software Instruments must monitor seismic activity continuously  at landing site for one Martian year. Mantle from body waves and normal modes Core from gravitational Love number (Phobos tide) Characterize seismic activity and meteoroid influx Passive seismic data for one Martian year Passive seismic monitoring (operates from 0.05 mHz-50 Hz) Instruments must monitor seismic activity continuously  at landing site for one Martian year. Long term record of seismic activity due to marsquakes and meteorite impact events.
Science Traceability ( cont. ) SCIENCE OBJECTIVES MEASUREMENT REQUIREMENTS INSTRUMENT REQUIREMENTS MISSION REQUIREMENTS DATA PRODUCED Characterize atmospheric boundary layer and long term climatic conditions Temperature, pressure, wind speed and direction, relative humidity, solar flux for one Martian year, CCD images of dust behavior in atmosphere after explosive darts detonated Temperature (resolution=0.5 K),  pressure (resolution=0.5 Pa), humidity (resolution 0.1%), wind direction (resolution=15 degrees), wind speed (resolution=TBD), CCD camera images Meteorological instruments must monitor atmospheric conditions on Martian surface continuously for one Martian year, CCD camera must image area of explosive darts after detonation. Temperature and wind boundary layer profiles. Long term monitoring of temperature, pressure, humidity, and solar flux. Search for minor atmospheric species Atmospheric composition species for one Martian year IR spectrometer (operates between 0.5-3.5 microns) Instrument will measure atmospheric composition for 10 minutes per day for one Martian year. IR spectra for an air column. Shallow subsurface liquid water aquifer Calibration of Mars crater counting Crustal thickness and mantle/core properties Diurnal/Seasonal weather variations at site Current seismic/tectonic activity of Mars Detection of H 2 O and/or organics in atmosphere Some Possible Exciting Results
Acknowledgements ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Contenu connexe

Tendances

GIS Plateform and satellite
GIS Plateform and satelliteGIS Plateform and satellite
GIS Plateform and satelliteMohsin Siddique
 
Simulation of Deployment and Operation of an Earth Observing Satellite
Simulation of Deployment and Operation of an Earth Observing SatelliteSimulation of Deployment and Operation of an Earth Observing Satellite
Simulation of Deployment and Operation of an Earth Observing SatelliteAlber Douglawi
 
Integrated Geophysical Approach for Rapid & Cost Effective Site Investigation...
Integrated Geophysical Approach for Rapid & Cost Effective Site Investigation...Integrated Geophysical Approach for Rapid & Cost Effective Site Investigation...
Integrated Geophysical Approach for Rapid & Cost Effective Site Investigation...IEI GSC
 
Setellite image sensors
Setellite image sensorsSetellite image sensors
Setellite image sensorsMd Asif Hasan
 
Planetary circumnavigation
Planetary circumnavigationPlanetary circumnavigation
Planetary circumnavigationClifford Stone
 
Envi sat satellite
Envi sat satelliteEnvi sat satellite
Envi sat satelliteEhsanYousaf1
 
FR01_01_GlezetalIGARSS2011.ppt
FR01_01_GlezetalIGARSS2011.pptFR01_01_GlezetalIGARSS2011.ppt
FR01_01_GlezetalIGARSS2011.pptgrssieee
 
Seismic Modeling ASEG 082001 Andrew Long
Seismic Modeling ASEG 082001 Andrew LongSeismic Modeling ASEG 082001 Andrew Long
Seismic Modeling ASEG 082001 Andrew LongAndrew Long
 
A Comparison Between Shear Wave Velocities
A Comparison Between Shear Wave VelocitiesA Comparison Between Shear Wave Velocities
A Comparison Between Shear Wave VelocitiesAli Osman Öncel
 
Ground Geophysical Survey
Ground Geophysical SurveyGround Geophysical Survey
Ground Geophysical SurveyOmary Issa
 
Seismic Refraction Test
Seismic Refraction TestSeismic Refraction Test
Seismic Refraction TestMaliha Mehr
 
Reflecting method of seismic prospecting
Reflecting method of seismic  prospectingReflecting method of seismic  prospecting
Reflecting method of seismic prospectingPramoda Raj
 
MAGIA satellite. Experimental Astronomy (8 December 2010), pp. 1-20
MAGIA satellite. Experimental Astronomy (8 December 2010), pp. 1-20MAGIA satellite. Experimental Astronomy (8 December 2010), pp. 1-20
MAGIA satellite. Experimental Astronomy (8 December 2010), pp. 1-20Stefano Coltellacci
 
Geophysical survey for the risk management
Geophysical survey for the risk managementGeophysical survey for the risk management
Geophysical survey for the risk managementMario Naldi
 

Tendances (20)

GIS Plateform and satellite
GIS Plateform and satelliteGIS Plateform and satellite
GIS Plateform and satellite
 
Simulation of Deployment and Operation of an Earth Observing Satellite
Simulation of Deployment and Operation of an Earth Observing SatelliteSimulation of Deployment and Operation of an Earth Observing Satellite
Simulation of Deployment and Operation of an Earth Observing Satellite
 
Integrated Geophysical Approach for Rapid & Cost Effective Site Investigation...
Integrated Geophysical Approach for Rapid & Cost Effective Site Investigation...Integrated Geophysical Approach for Rapid & Cost Effective Site Investigation...
Integrated Geophysical Approach for Rapid & Cost Effective Site Investigation...
 
Introduction to Seismic Method
Introduction to Seismic Method Introduction to Seismic Method
Introduction to Seismic Method
 
Setellite image sensors
Setellite image sensorsSetellite image sensors
Setellite image sensors
 
Planetary circumnavigation
Planetary circumnavigationPlanetary circumnavigation
Planetary circumnavigation
 
Envi sat satellite
Envi sat satelliteEnvi sat satellite
Envi sat satellite
 
CEDAR2014-McMurdo
CEDAR2014-McMurdoCEDAR2014-McMurdo
CEDAR2014-McMurdo
 
FR01_01_GlezetalIGARSS2011.ppt
FR01_01_GlezetalIGARSS2011.pptFR01_01_GlezetalIGARSS2011.ppt
FR01_01_GlezetalIGARSS2011.ppt
 
Seismic Modeling ASEG 082001 Andrew Long
Seismic Modeling ASEG 082001 Andrew LongSeismic Modeling ASEG 082001 Andrew Long
Seismic Modeling ASEG 082001 Andrew Long
 
AAS National Conference 2008: Candice Hansen
AAS National Conference 2008: Candice HansenAAS National Conference 2008: Candice Hansen
AAS National Conference 2008: Candice Hansen
 
Microwave remote sensing
Microwave remote sensingMicrowave remote sensing
Microwave remote sensing
 
A Comparison Between Shear Wave Velocities
A Comparison Between Shear Wave VelocitiesA Comparison Between Shear Wave Velocities
A Comparison Between Shear Wave Velocities
 
Ground Geophysical Survey
Ground Geophysical SurveyGround Geophysical Survey
Ground Geophysical Survey
 
Seismic Refraction Test
Seismic Refraction TestSeismic Refraction Test
Seismic Refraction Test
 
Reflecting method of seismic prospecting
Reflecting method of seismic  prospectingReflecting method of seismic  prospecting
Reflecting method of seismic prospecting
 
Oceansat
OceansatOceansat
Oceansat
 
Gps
GpsGps
Gps
 
MAGIA satellite. Experimental Astronomy (8 December 2010), pp. 1-20
MAGIA satellite. Experimental Astronomy (8 December 2010), pp. 1-20MAGIA satellite. Experimental Astronomy (8 December 2010), pp. 1-20
MAGIA satellite. Experimental Astronomy (8 December 2010), pp. 1-20
 
Geophysical survey for the risk management
Geophysical survey for the risk managementGeophysical survey for the risk management
Geophysical survey for the risk management
 

Similaire à MARS GEOPHYSICAL LANDER MISSION PROPOSAL

Geo Stationary Earth Orbit imaging satellite
Geo Stationary Earth Orbit imaging satelliteGeo Stationary Earth Orbit imaging satellite
Geo Stationary Earth Orbit imaging satelliteDivya Lal
 
SIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATOR
SIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATORSIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATOR
SIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATORgrssieee
 
FR01_01_GlezetalIGARSS2011.ppt
FR01_01_GlezetalIGARSS2011.pptFR01_01_GlezetalIGARSS2011.ppt
FR01_01_GlezetalIGARSS2011.pptgrssieee
 
Identify the possibility of predication of seismic activity through the ionos...
Identify the possibility of predication of seismic activity through the ionos...Identify the possibility of predication of seismic activity through the ionos...
Identify the possibility of predication of seismic activity through the ionos...ashrafrateb1985
 
NineYearsofAtmosphericRemoteSensingwithSCIAMACHY-InstrumentPerformance.ppt
NineYearsofAtmosphericRemoteSensingwithSCIAMACHY-InstrumentPerformance.pptNineYearsofAtmosphericRemoteSensingwithSCIAMACHY-InstrumentPerformance.ppt
NineYearsofAtmosphericRemoteSensingwithSCIAMACHY-InstrumentPerformance.pptgrssieee
 
Fukao Plenary.ppt
Fukao Plenary.pptFukao Plenary.ppt
Fukao Plenary.pptgrssieee
 
Payloads Presentation for Project A.D.I.O.S.
Payloads Presentation for Project A.D.I.O.S.Payloads Presentation for Project A.D.I.O.S.
Payloads Presentation for Project A.D.I.O.S.Sung (Stephen) Kim
 
WE4.L10.5: ADVANCES IN NIGHTTIME SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING CAPABILITIES VIA TH...
WE4.L10.5: ADVANCES IN NIGHTTIME SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING CAPABILITIES VIA TH...WE4.L10.5: ADVANCES IN NIGHTTIME SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING CAPABILITIES VIA TH...
WE4.L10.5: ADVANCES IN NIGHTTIME SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING CAPABILITIES VIA TH...grssieee
 
TH1.T04.2_MULTI-FREQUENCY MICROWAVE EMISSION OF THE EAST ANTARCTIC PLATEAU_IG...
TH1.T04.2_MULTI-FREQUENCY MICROWAVE EMISSION OF THE EAST ANTARCTIC PLATEAU_IG...TH1.T04.2_MULTI-FREQUENCY MICROWAVE EMISSION OF THE EAST ANTARCTIC PLATEAU_IG...
TH1.T04.2_MULTI-FREQUENCY MICROWAVE EMISSION OF THE EAST ANTARCTIC PLATEAU_IG...grssieee
 
WE3.L10.4: KIYO TOMIYASU, CO-SEISMIC SLIP AND THE KRAFLA VOLCANO: REFLECTIONS...
WE3.L10.4: KIYO TOMIYASU, CO-SEISMIC SLIP AND THE KRAFLA VOLCANO: REFLECTIONS...WE3.L10.4: KIYO TOMIYASU, CO-SEISMIC SLIP AND THE KRAFLA VOLCANO: REFLECTIONS...
WE3.L10.4: KIYO TOMIYASU, CO-SEISMIC SLIP AND THE KRAFLA VOLCANO: REFLECTIONS...grssieee
 
1 IGARSS 2011 JPSS Monday Goldberg.pptx
1 IGARSS 2011 JPSS Monday Goldberg.pptx1 IGARSS 2011 JPSS Monday Goldberg.pptx
1 IGARSS 2011 JPSS Monday Goldberg.pptxgrssieee
 
Surveying ii ajith sir class6
Surveying ii ajith sir class6Surveying ii ajith sir class6
Surveying ii ajith sir class6SHAMJITH KM
 
First Observation of the Earth’s Permanent FreeOscillation s on Ocean Bottom ...
First Observation of the Earth’s Permanent FreeOscillation s on Ocean Bottom ...First Observation of the Earth’s Permanent FreeOscillation s on Ocean Bottom ...
First Observation of the Earth’s Permanent FreeOscillation s on Ocean Bottom ...Sérgio Sacani
 
3_Xorbits_InSAR_IGARSS2011.ppt
3_Xorbits_InSAR_IGARSS2011.ppt3_Xorbits_InSAR_IGARSS2011.ppt
3_Xorbits_InSAR_IGARSS2011.pptgrssieee
 
IGARSS11_Atmos_Suite_MIS_TH1_T07_5.pptx
IGARSS11_Atmos_Suite_MIS_TH1_T07_5.pptxIGARSS11_Atmos_Suite_MIS_TH1_T07_5.pptx
IGARSS11_Atmos_Suite_MIS_TH1_T07_5.pptxgrssieee
 

Similaire à MARS GEOPHYSICAL LANDER MISSION PROPOSAL (20)

Microwave remote sensing
Microwave remote sensingMicrowave remote sensing
Microwave remote sensing
 
Geo imaging satellite
Geo imaging satelliteGeo imaging satellite
Geo imaging satellite
 
Geo Stationary Earth Orbit imaging satellite
Geo Stationary Earth Orbit imaging satelliteGeo Stationary Earth Orbit imaging satellite
Geo Stationary Earth Orbit imaging satellite
 
SIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATOR
SIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATORSIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATOR
SIXTEEN CHANNEL, NON-SCANNING AIRBORNE LIDAR SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY (LIST) SIMULATOR
 
ACCESS Mars project final presentation
ACCESS Mars project final presentationACCESS Mars project final presentation
ACCESS Mars project final presentation
 
915 pankine[1]
915 pankine[1]915 pankine[1]
915 pankine[1]
 
FR01_01_GlezetalIGARSS2011.ppt
FR01_01_GlezetalIGARSS2011.pptFR01_01_GlezetalIGARSS2011.ppt
FR01_01_GlezetalIGARSS2011.ppt
 
Identify the possibility of predication of seismic activity through the ionos...
Identify the possibility of predication of seismic activity through the ionos...Identify the possibility of predication of seismic activity through the ionos...
Identify the possibility of predication of seismic activity through the ionos...
 
NineYearsofAtmosphericRemoteSensingwithSCIAMACHY-InstrumentPerformance.ppt
NineYearsofAtmosphericRemoteSensingwithSCIAMACHY-InstrumentPerformance.pptNineYearsofAtmosphericRemoteSensingwithSCIAMACHY-InstrumentPerformance.ppt
NineYearsofAtmosphericRemoteSensingwithSCIAMACHY-InstrumentPerformance.ppt
 
Fukao Plenary.ppt
Fukao Plenary.pptFukao Plenary.ppt
Fukao Plenary.ppt
 
Payloads Presentation for Project A.D.I.O.S.
Payloads Presentation for Project A.D.I.O.S.Payloads Presentation for Project A.D.I.O.S.
Payloads Presentation for Project A.D.I.O.S.
 
WE4.L10.5: ADVANCES IN NIGHTTIME SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING CAPABILITIES VIA TH...
WE4.L10.5: ADVANCES IN NIGHTTIME SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING CAPABILITIES VIA TH...WE4.L10.5: ADVANCES IN NIGHTTIME SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING CAPABILITIES VIA TH...
WE4.L10.5: ADVANCES IN NIGHTTIME SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING CAPABILITIES VIA TH...
 
TH1.T04.2_MULTI-FREQUENCY MICROWAVE EMISSION OF THE EAST ANTARCTIC PLATEAU_IG...
TH1.T04.2_MULTI-FREQUENCY MICROWAVE EMISSION OF THE EAST ANTARCTIC PLATEAU_IG...TH1.T04.2_MULTI-FREQUENCY MICROWAVE EMISSION OF THE EAST ANTARCTIC PLATEAU_IG...
TH1.T04.2_MULTI-FREQUENCY MICROWAVE EMISSION OF THE EAST ANTARCTIC PLATEAU_IG...
 
WE3.L10.4: KIYO TOMIYASU, CO-SEISMIC SLIP AND THE KRAFLA VOLCANO: REFLECTIONS...
WE3.L10.4: KIYO TOMIYASU, CO-SEISMIC SLIP AND THE KRAFLA VOLCANO: REFLECTIONS...WE3.L10.4: KIYO TOMIYASU, CO-SEISMIC SLIP AND THE KRAFLA VOLCANO: REFLECTIONS...
WE3.L10.4: KIYO TOMIYASU, CO-SEISMIC SLIP AND THE KRAFLA VOLCANO: REFLECTIONS...
 
1 IGARSS 2011 JPSS Monday Goldberg.pptx
1 IGARSS 2011 JPSS Monday Goldberg.pptx1 IGARSS 2011 JPSS Monday Goldberg.pptx
1 IGARSS 2011 JPSS Monday Goldberg.pptx
 
Surveying ii ajith sir class6
Surveying ii ajith sir class6Surveying ii ajith sir class6
Surveying ii ajith sir class6
 
First Observation of the Earth’s Permanent FreeOscillation s on Ocean Bottom ...
First Observation of the Earth’s Permanent FreeOscillation s on Ocean Bottom ...First Observation of the Earth’s Permanent FreeOscillation s on Ocean Bottom ...
First Observation of the Earth’s Permanent FreeOscillation s on Ocean Bottom ...
 
Final_Croteau
Final_CroteauFinal_Croteau
Final_Croteau
 
3_Xorbits_InSAR_IGARSS2011.ppt
3_Xorbits_InSAR_IGARSS2011.ppt3_Xorbits_InSAR_IGARSS2011.ppt
3_Xorbits_InSAR_IGARSS2011.ppt
 
IGARSS11_Atmos_Suite_MIS_TH1_T07_5.pptx
IGARSS11_Atmos_Suite_MIS_TH1_T07_5.pptxIGARSS11_Atmos_Suite_MIS_TH1_T07_5.pptx
IGARSS11_Atmos_Suite_MIS_TH1_T07_5.pptx
 

Plus de Brian Shiro

How to Become a Martian
How to Become a MartianHow to Become a Martian
How to Become a MartianBrian Shiro
 
Asynchronous geological exploration operations at the HI-SEAS planetary surfa...
Asynchronous geological exploration operations at the HI-SEAS planetary surfa...Asynchronous geological exploration operations at the HI-SEAS planetary surfa...
Asynchronous geological exploration operations at the HI-SEAS planetary surfa...Brian Shiro
 
Tsunami Lessons from “The Impossible”
Tsunami Lessons from “The Impossible”Tsunami Lessons from “The Impossible”
Tsunami Lessons from “The Impossible”Brian Shiro
 
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Tsunamis and PTWC Operations
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Tsunamis and PTWC OperationsPacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Tsunamis and PTWC Operations
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Tsunamis and PTWC OperationsBrian Shiro
 
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Enhanced Pacific Products and...
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Enhanced Pacific Products and...Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Enhanced Pacific Products and...
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Enhanced Pacific Products and...Brian Shiro
 
Tsunami Warning at PTWC
Tsunami Warning at PTWCTsunami Warning at PTWC
Tsunami Warning at PTWCBrian Shiro
 
Geological field activities at the HI-SEAS planetary surface analog mission s...
Geological field activities at the HI-SEAS planetary surface analog mission s...Geological field activities at the HI-SEAS planetary surface analog mission s...
Geological field activities at the HI-SEAS planetary surface analog mission s...Brian Shiro
 
"Life on Mars in Hawaii" at 2013 Ignite STEM Week Hawaii
"Life on Mars in Hawaii" at 2013 Ignite STEM Week Hawaii"Life on Mars in Hawaii" at 2013 Ignite STEM Week Hawaii
"Life on Mars in Hawaii" at 2013 Ignite STEM Week HawaiiBrian Shiro
 
In Situ Resource Utilization by Humans in Planetary Analog Environments
In Situ Resource Utilization by Humans in Planetary Analog EnvironmentsIn Situ Resource Utilization by Humans in Planetary Analog Environments
In Situ Resource Utilization by Humans in Planetary Analog EnvironmentsBrian Shiro
 
"Astronauts4Hire" at 2012 Ignite STEM Week Hawaii
"Astronauts4Hire" at 2012 Ignite STEM Week Hawaii"Astronauts4Hire" at 2012 Ignite STEM Week Hawaii
"Astronauts4Hire" at 2012 Ignite STEM Week HawaiiBrian Shiro
 
Social Media, Tsunamis, and Crisis Management
Social Media, Tsunamis, and Crisis ManagementSocial Media, Tsunamis, and Crisis Management
Social Media, Tsunamis, and Crisis ManagementBrian Shiro
 
Global Wildland Fire Forecasting Using Space Technologies
Global Wildland Fire Forecasting Using Space TechnologiesGlobal Wildland Fire Forecasting Using Space Technologies
Global Wildland Fire Forecasting Using Space TechnologiesBrian Shiro
 
In Situ Geophysical Exploration by Humans in Mars Analog Environments
In Situ Geophysical Exploration by Humans in Mars Analog EnvironmentsIn Situ Geophysical Exploration by Humans in Mars Analog Environments
In Situ Geophysical Exploration by Humans in Mars Analog EnvironmentsBrian Shiro
 
Geophysicist to Astronaut
Geophysicist to AstronautGeophysicist to Astronaut
Geophysicist to AstronautBrian Shiro
 
Social Media in the NOAA/NWS Pacific Region
Social Media in the NOAA/NWS Pacific RegionSocial Media in the NOAA/NWS Pacific Region
Social Media in the NOAA/NWS Pacific RegionBrian Shiro
 
2009 ASMSA Career Day Presentation: My Life as a Geophysicist
2009 ASMSA Career Day Presentation: My Life as a Geophysicist2009 ASMSA Career Day Presentation: My Life as a Geophysicist
2009 ASMSA Career Day Presentation: My Life as a GeophysicistBrian Shiro
 

Plus de Brian Shiro (16)

How to Become a Martian
How to Become a MartianHow to Become a Martian
How to Become a Martian
 
Asynchronous geological exploration operations at the HI-SEAS planetary surfa...
Asynchronous geological exploration operations at the HI-SEAS planetary surfa...Asynchronous geological exploration operations at the HI-SEAS planetary surfa...
Asynchronous geological exploration operations at the HI-SEAS planetary surfa...
 
Tsunami Lessons from “The Impossible”
Tsunami Lessons from “The Impossible”Tsunami Lessons from “The Impossible”
Tsunami Lessons from “The Impossible”
 
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Tsunamis and PTWC Operations
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Tsunamis and PTWC OperationsPacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Tsunamis and PTWC Operations
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Tsunamis and PTWC Operations
 
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Enhanced Pacific Products and...
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Enhanced Pacific Products and...Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Enhanced Pacific Products and...
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: Introduction to Enhanced Pacific Products and...
 
Tsunami Warning at PTWC
Tsunami Warning at PTWCTsunami Warning at PTWC
Tsunami Warning at PTWC
 
Geological field activities at the HI-SEAS planetary surface analog mission s...
Geological field activities at the HI-SEAS planetary surface analog mission s...Geological field activities at the HI-SEAS planetary surface analog mission s...
Geological field activities at the HI-SEAS planetary surface analog mission s...
 
"Life on Mars in Hawaii" at 2013 Ignite STEM Week Hawaii
"Life on Mars in Hawaii" at 2013 Ignite STEM Week Hawaii"Life on Mars in Hawaii" at 2013 Ignite STEM Week Hawaii
"Life on Mars in Hawaii" at 2013 Ignite STEM Week Hawaii
 
In Situ Resource Utilization by Humans in Planetary Analog Environments
In Situ Resource Utilization by Humans in Planetary Analog EnvironmentsIn Situ Resource Utilization by Humans in Planetary Analog Environments
In Situ Resource Utilization by Humans in Planetary Analog Environments
 
"Astronauts4Hire" at 2012 Ignite STEM Week Hawaii
"Astronauts4Hire" at 2012 Ignite STEM Week Hawaii"Astronauts4Hire" at 2012 Ignite STEM Week Hawaii
"Astronauts4Hire" at 2012 Ignite STEM Week Hawaii
 
Social Media, Tsunamis, and Crisis Management
Social Media, Tsunamis, and Crisis ManagementSocial Media, Tsunamis, and Crisis Management
Social Media, Tsunamis, and Crisis Management
 
Global Wildland Fire Forecasting Using Space Technologies
Global Wildland Fire Forecasting Using Space TechnologiesGlobal Wildland Fire Forecasting Using Space Technologies
Global Wildland Fire Forecasting Using Space Technologies
 
In Situ Geophysical Exploration by Humans in Mars Analog Environments
In Situ Geophysical Exploration by Humans in Mars Analog EnvironmentsIn Situ Geophysical Exploration by Humans in Mars Analog Environments
In Situ Geophysical Exploration by Humans in Mars Analog Environments
 
Geophysicist to Astronaut
Geophysicist to AstronautGeophysicist to Astronaut
Geophysicist to Astronaut
 
Social Media in the NOAA/NWS Pacific Region
Social Media in the NOAA/NWS Pacific RegionSocial Media in the NOAA/NWS Pacific Region
Social Media in the NOAA/NWS Pacific Region
 
2009 ASMSA Career Day Presentation: My Life as a Geophysicist
2009 ASMSA Career Day Presentation: My Life as a Geophysicist2009 ASMSA Career Day Presentation: My Life as a Geophysicist
2009 ASMSA Career Day Presentation: My Life as a Geophysicist
 

MARS GEOPHYSICAL LANDER MISSION PROPOSAL

  • 1. August 8, 2003 Principal Investigator: Brian White Proposal Manager: Elena Adams MARS GEOPHYSICAL LANDER PROPOSAL AUTHORIZATION REVIEW 2011 MARS SCOUT AO
  • 2. Team Members Cost MIT Julien-Alexandre Lamamy Ground Systems Purdue University Colleen Henry Software University of Arkansas Melissa Franzen Thermal UCLA Mike McElwain Power University of Virginia Jonathan Sheffield Propulsion Purdue University Kelly Pennell Attitude Control System MIT Emily Craparo Telecommunications Stanford Fraser Thomson Computer & Data Systems Berkeley Esperanza Nunez Structures Virginia Tech Brett Williams Entry, Descent, & Landing Princeton Chris Wyckham Mission Design Stanford Samantha Infeld Programmatics Texas A&M René Elms Instruments USC Everett Salas Science University of Colorado Jen Heldmann Systems MIT Daniel Kwon Program Manager University of Michigan Elena Adams Principal Investigator Washington University Brian White
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6. Water on Mars Valley networks Gullies Subsurface ice Polar caps Rampart craters Streamlined islands Outflow channels Layered terrain Follow the Water
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22. Trajectory If clicking the image doesn’t start the movie, click here.
  • 23. EDL Profile Parachute deployment (L - 2 min) 8800 m 490 m/s Heat shield jettison (L – 110 s) 7500 m 250 m/s Radar ground acquisition (altitude mode) (L – 58 s) 2500 m 85 m/s Radar ground acquisition (Doppler speed and direction mode) (L – 44 s) 1400 m 80 m/s Lander separation & powered descent (L – 43 s) 1300 m 80 m/s Turn to entry attitude (L - 12 min) 3000 km 4800 m/s Cruise solar array separation (L - 10 min) 2300 km 4800 m/s Atmospheric entry (L - 5 min) 125 km 5600 m/s Touchdown 2.5 m/s Solar panel & instrument deployments
  • 24. Geodart Deployment Sequence 1600 m h = 1300 m v = 80 m/s L - 43 s h =23 m v = 9 m/s L - 5 s v = 30 m/s
  • 25.
  • 26. Lander Design MPL/Phoenix heritage Ground Penetrating Radar Thrusters (4 each) GRP Thin Walled Tube Medium Gain Antenna Panning Camera UHF Antenna Solar Arrays (2 Each) Dart Antennae Array (5) Seismograph Met Station Pressurant and Fuel Tanks (2 Each)
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31. Cruise, EDL, and Surface Block Diagram HGA SDST X-band Tx/Rx Lander SDST X-band Tx/Rx Quad. Electra UHF Only X-band Hybrid SSPA LGA Assy Backshell 0.29 m 15 W 15 W CMD & Cntrl High Rate I/F Clock Valid Line POR Sleep Wake-Up Cntrl & Engr. Tlm. RS-422 CMD 5 V Reboot External Analog Tlm. Ext. Digital Tlm. (RS-422) SSPA Gimbal Waveguide Coax. Coax. Switch HGA 0.29 m LGA Assy To C&DH TLM To C&DH Pol. Pol. Trans. Trans. Trans. W/G to Coax. Transition. Mono Array Phase Detect
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 42.
  • 43. Science Traceability SCIENCE OBJECTIVES MEASUREMENT REQUIREMENTS INSTRUMENT REQUIREMENTS MISSION REQUIREMENTS DATA PRODUCED Search for subsurface water sources at the landing site Seismic data, ground penetrating radar during first 10 days of mission Active seismic array (operates from 0.01 Hz-10 Hz). Ground penetrating radar measurements (15 MHz, sensitive up to a depth of 2 km) Instruments must be operational for first 10 days after landing. Map variation of S and P wave velocity and dielectric constant with depth in shallow crust (< 500m). Determine crustal structure and thickness Active seismic data, ground penetrating radar. Seismic data from Inert Seismic Impactor Active seismic array, seismometer (operates from 0.05 mHz-50 Hz). Ground penetrating radar measurements (15 MHz, sensitive up to a depth of 2 km) Active seismic instruments must be operational for first 10 days after landing.   Map variation of S and P wave velocity and dielectric constant with depth in shallow and deep crust, down to Moho. Characterize deep planetary structure Passive seismic data from natural sources. Passive seismic monitoring (operates from 0.05 mHz-50 Hz) with intelligent event-detection software Instruments must monitor seismic activity continuously at landing site for one Martian year. Mantle from body waves and normal modes Core from gravitational Love number (Phobos tide) Characterize seismic activity and meteoroid influx Passive seismic data for one Martian year Passive seismic monitoring (operates from 0.05 mHz-50 Hz) Instruments must monitor seismic activity continuously at landing site for one Martian year. Long term record of seismic activity due to marsquakes and meteorite impact events.
  • 44. Science Traceability ( cont. ) SCIENCE OBJECTIVES MEASUREMENT REQUIREMENTS INSTRUMENT REQUIREMENTS MISSION REQUIREMENTS DATA PRODUCED Characterize atmospheric boundary layer and long term climatic conditions Temperature, pressure, wind speed and direction, relative humidity, solar flux for one Martian year, CCD images of dust behavior in atmosphere after explosive darts detonated Temperature (resolution=0.5 K), pressure (resolution=0.5 Pa), humidity (resolution 0.1%), wind direction (resolution=15 degrees), wind speed (resolution=TBD), CCD camera images Meteorological instruments must monitor atmospheric conditions on Martian surface continuously for one Martian year, CCD camera must image area of explosive darts after detonation. Temperature and wind boundary layer profiles. Long term monitoring of temperature, pressure, humidity, and solar flux. Search for minor atmospheric species Atmospheric composition species for one Martian year IR spectrometer (operates between 0.5-3.5 microns) Instrument will measure atmospheric composition for 10 minutes per day for one Martian year. IR spectra for an air column. Shallow subsurface liquid water aquifer Calibration of Mars crater counting Crustal thickness and mantle/core properties Diurnal/Seasonal weather variations at site Current seismic/tectonic activity of Mars Detection of H 2 O and/or organics in atmosphere Some Possible Exciting Results
  • 45.

Notes de l'éditeur

  1. The propulsion system will consist of: Four (4) 3000 N Viking-like thrusters with throttle control. Eight (8) 4.5 N thrusters for roll control during landing, and TCMs and ACS during cruise Development Issues: Ultralight composite tanks are proposed to reduce total tank mass since two propellant and two pressurant tanks must be used for configuration reasons. These tanks are currently being developed by MSL and Scout efforts, and should be available at the time of launch. Monoprop and Viking Thrusters are all fed from a single feed system. It is assumed that some development and testing will need to be performed to confirm the 4.5 N thrusters can handle the higher pressure that is required by the Viking thrusters.
  2. RAD 750 Based Processor, 33 Mhz &lt; 5.7Kg and &lt; 45Watts Typ
  3. Aggressive mission as regard cost: science similar to Phoenix mission with $100M dart equipment and no free lander. Hard constraint: no less than 10 geophones and 5 explosives -&gt; no cost flexibility/ incrementation Geophone = Explosive dart assumption: Does not take R&amp;D (actually limited) and testing costs for explosive darts. This is offset by the fact that explosive is less expensive than instrumentation. Geophone study is the primary objective Adapt cost model to MGL: Darts: JPL model is not made for learning curve with 20 duplicates. Testing too conservative : test every batt and parachute Science dvpt: done in university Science team: the model accounts for too many people Ground operations: transferred to private contractors Total cost: Full science total cost is over the 450 cap. However we have a fall back plan. JPL CNES cooperation: Seismometer from Netlander mission (free) pay for some darts? Not politically easy… Free ride: No European mission to Mars is currently planned to follow Mars and Express Beagle 2 results (until 2020). France and Europe may well be interested in taking the MGL opportunity to fly their Netlander instruments and participate in launch costs