Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Le téléchargement de votre SlideShare est en cours. ×

Employee engagement july smu 2015

Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Chargement dans…3
×

Consultez-les par la suite

1 sur 29 Publicité

Plus De Contenu Connexe

Diaporamas pour vous (20)

Les utilisateurs ont également aimé (16)

Publicité

Similaire à Employee engagement july smu 2015 (20)

Plus par Michael Netzley, Ph.D. (20)

Publicité

Employee engagement july smu 2015

  1. 1. What’s Wrong with Employee Engagement? Michael Netzley, PhD 6th July 2015
  2. 2. “ Just a one percent engagement improvement, for an organisation with a $750 million baseline operating income, can result in a $20 million increase to the bottom line. Aon Hewitt study, 2014
  3. 3. §  Academic Director, SMU Executive Development §  SMU faculty since 2002; 25 years in higher ed §  2011 Champion’s Award, Innovative Course Design and Delivery §  Editorial Board, Asian Management Insights §  Founding Director, SMU Teaching Excellence Initiative §  Author of numerous case studies and 4 books §  Visiting positions in Argentina, Berlin, Finland, Slovenia, and Japan §  Key clients include Unilever, IBM, IHG, Singapore Airlines, BNP Paribas, TCS, 3M, UOB, Singapore’s MFA & MoE, SingHealth, Raffles Medical, Schneider Electric, Sumitomo Chemical, Bosnalijek Pharmaceutical, Lundbeck Pharmaceutical, GSK Vaccines, and Bayer. §  Daddy with 3 daughters & 1 son Michael Netzley, Phd. 2014
  4. 4. Current State of Employee Engagement
  5. 5. 2011-12 Employee Engagement Study 1 in 10 employees are actively engaged Gallop, 2011-12
  6. 6. 2013 State of Employee Engagement Data for SE Asia Gallop, State of the Global Workplace, 2013
  7. 7. “ Over the past few years, we are seeing a global decline in employee engagement. Levels of engagement have stagnated at 2008 levels and are well behind the best performing companies – at the very point when organisations around the world need to deliver better performance. Dr. Stephen Choo, Hay Group
  8. 8. Low Employee Engagement in 2014 A similar study finding similar results Source: Kelly Global Workforce Index, 2014
  9. 9. Who Is Most Difficult to Engage?
  10. 10. Employee Engagement is a Challenge §  Ranked 2nd most important issue on minds of HR leaders (behind leadership) §  Engagement & building an enduring culture are critical §  “Overwhelmed employee” one of the biggest challenges Does any of this sound familiar? Source: Predictions for 2015, Bersin by Deloitte
  11. 11. © 2014 IBM Corporation11 RECOGNITION This company values my contribution. This company recognizes productive people.SUPPORT & INCLUSION I feel supported in my efforts to adapt to organizational changes. I feel that I am part of a team. FUTURE / VISION I believe this company has an outstanding future. The senior leadership of this company has communicated a vision of the future that motivates me. I can see a clear link between my work and this company’s objectives. TRUST I trust the leadership of this company. This organization shows a commitment to ethical business decisions and conduct. COMMUNICATION There is open and honest two-way communication at this company. My ideas and suggestions count. GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT I have opportunities to advance in this company. This company provides me with opportunity for learning and development. THE WORLD’S TOP DRIVERS OF ENGAGEMENT
  12. 12. So What is Employee Engagement?
  13. 13. What is Employee Engagement? § Ability to harness employees’ personal enthusiasm in their work roles (Kahn, 1990) § Engaged employees feel “a strong emotional bond to their employer, recommending it to others and committing time and effort to help the organization succeed” (Quirke, 2008) § Individuals’ “involvement with, satisfaction with and enthusiasm for the work they do” (Robbins, Judge, Millett and Boyle, 2011)
  14. 14. Aon Hewitt Employee Engagement Model
  15. 15. Benefits of Employee Engagement
  16. 16. “ Organizations with a high level of engagement do report 22% higher productivity, according to a new meta- analysis of 1.4 million employees conducted by the Gallup Organization. Gallop, 2013
  17. 17. “ Highly engaged organizations have double the rate of success of lower engaged organizations Harvard Business Review, 2013
  18. 18. “ Top-quartile firms have lower absenteeism and turnover. Specifically, high-turnover organizations report 25% lower turnover, and low-turnover organizations report 65% lower turnover.  Harvard Business review, 2013
  19. 19. Engagement Impacts Performance 48% Fewer Workplace Safety Incidents 41% Fewer Quality Incidents (i.e., defects) People and products are better
  20. 20. Where to Begin?
  21. 21. Preferred Methods of Engagement Periodic contact comes first Source: Kelly Global Workforce Index
  22. 22. Don’t Forget About Trust and Reputation! The Messenger Matters Greatly Edelman Trust Barometer, 2014 33,000+ responses; 27 countries
  23. 23. Attend to What Other Employees Say The real issue is what others say about us, not what we say Edelman Trust Barometer, 2014 33,000+ responses; 27 countries
  24. 24. Employees are a Skeptical Lot Thus less receptive to your messages Edelman Trust Barometer, 2014 33,000+ responses; 27 countries
  25. 25. Employees Trust the CEO Less than Execs Do Factors helping and hurting organizational trust Edelman Trust Barometer, 2014 33,000+ responses; 27 countries
  26. 26. Your Path Forward
  27. 27. Employee Engagement Checklist 1.  Are you even measuring the right things? 2.  Do implementation experts help you frame and present data in actionable ways? 3.  Do your planning processes link strategy to execution to employee engagement? 4.  Do you look at engagement during the hiring process (i.e., does this candidate have fuel remaining in the tank?) 5.  Have you made strategic use of corporate communication to embed a sense of purpose in our day-to-day work routines? Specific action steps you can take
  28. 28. Critical Talent Imperatives for 2015 Guided path the the correct starting point Source: Bersin by Deloitte, 2014
  29. 29. The Simply Irresistible Organisation Model Your desired destination Source: Bersin by Deloitte, 2014

×