SlideShare utilise les cookies pour améliorer les fonctionnalités et les performances, et également pour vous montrer des publicités pertinentes. Si vous continuez à naviguer sur ce site, vous acceptez l’utilisation de cookies. Consultez nos Conditions d’utilisation et notre Politique de confidentialité.
SlideShare utilise les cookies pour améliorer les fonctionnalités et les performances, et également pour vous montrer des publicités pertinentes. Si vous continuez à naviguer sur ce site, vous acceptez l’utilisation de cookies. Consultez notre Politique de confidentialité et nos Conditions d’utilisation pour en savoir plus.
Fine, some interesting things here, but mostly what’s interesting is the fact that this election wasn’t about the traditional forms of social media. The parties were using social media is much the same way as a broadcasting platform.
Media140 canberra ppt
The UK election & social media <ul><li>Dr Claire Wardle </li></ul>
today the story of the UK election what social media did and didn’t manage to do lessons learned
before the election… “ this will definitely be the first social media election for the UK. Look at all the parties on twitter, facebook and youtube.” “ this will definitely be the first social media election in the UK. I’ll put money on a politician being caught out on a camera phone and the footage going viral on youtube.”
David Cameron Conservatives Gordon Brown Labour Nick Clegg Liberal Democrats
after the election… the way the electorate ‘played’ with the election, demonstrated the power of social media, not the parties use of them a gaffe did define the election, but it was caught on an old-fashioned radio mic, not a camera phone
What did happen? Provided different ways for people to get ‘involved’, including humour What didn’t happen? Political parties didn’t use social media to connect in new ways with the electorate Political parties didn’t move online activities and enthusiasm offline Social media sped up the news cycle, connecting politicians and advisers to journalists Provided significantly better coverage on policies Mainstream media didn’t point to the best of the policy driven coverage online
one: when we’re considering impact of social media, we need to measure the same things Off-Line Online Activism Involved in campaign activities: voter registration, Get-Out-The-Vote, door-step campaigning Using the web to actively campaign; encouraging debate about policies Active engagement Voting, giving money Commenting online Passive engagement Talking about the election Sharing content online Passive consumption Watching a debate, following mainstream coverage Lurking on twitter, reading comments on facebook No involvement
two: horse race coverage is having a significant impact on the electorate, but the web offers real alternatives
three: mainstream coverage and political parties need to understand the collaborative nature of the social media space Political parties…
three: mainstream coverage and political parties need to understand the collaborative nature of the social media space mainstream coverage…