Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Le téléchargement de votre SlideShare est en cours. ×

Company performance appraisal

Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Chargement dans…3
×

Consultez-les par la suite

1 sur 6 Publicité

Company performance appraisal

Télécharger pour lire hors ligne

In this file, you can ref useful information about company performance appraisal such as company performance appraisal methods, company performance appraisal tips

In this file, you can ref useful information about company performance appraisal such as company performance appraisal methods, company performance appraisal tips

Publicité
Publicité

Plus De Contenu Connexe

Diaporamas pour vous (18)

Similaire à Company performance appraisal (20)

Publicité

Plus récents (20)

Publicité

Company performance appraisal

  1. 1. Company performance appraisal In this file, you can ref useful information about company performance appraisal such as company performance appraisal methods, company performance appraisal tips, company performance appraisal forms, company performance appraisal phrases … If you need more assistant for company performance appraisal, please leave your comment at the end of file. Other useful material for you: • performanceappraisal123.com/1125-free-performance-review-phrases • performanceappraisal123.com/free-28-performance-appraisal-forms • performanceappraisal123.com/free-ebook-11-methods-for-performance-appraisal I. Contents of getting company performance appraisal ================== Performance appraisal system practices vary from employer to employer. With the exception of the forced ranking type of performance appraisal, the employer size does not dictate which type of appraisal is best. A 360-degree performance appraisal system is common among employers that practice inclusion, and the self-evaluation method of performance appraisals usually gives the impression that the employer truly values its employees’ opinions. 360-Degree Feedback Feedback from the supervisor, manager and peers become part of a 360-degree performance appraisal. Prior to implementing a performance management system that involves this method of evaluating employees, the human resources department must provide extensive training to all employees. Employees who have never been in a supervisory or management role require coaching on how to give objective feedback concerning another employee’s performance. Interpersonal relationships between peers affect the feedback, positively or negatively. The human resources trainer addresses the issue of putting aside personal feelings from the evaluation process. Everyone in the company receives a 360-degree evaluation, from hourly staff to top management. Companies that utilize this type of performance appraisal may want to examine the performance of leadership through seeking objective feedback from employees. Employee Self-Evaluation Some employers give employees an opportunity to evaluate their own performance. Prior to the performance appraisal meeting, the employee and the manager each complete an evaluation form. An employee who has been keeping track of his responsibilities and accomplishments has
  2. 2. no problem evaluating his own performance. Employees who wait until the last week before the performance appraisal meeting may have difficulty with recall. During the meeting, the employee generally reviews his self-evaluation, explaining the reasons why he evaluated his performance in every area. The manager then produces the performance appraisal she has completed. Comparison of the two appraisals becomes the topic for discussion as the employee and manager attempt to reconcile any differences. If there is a large disparity between the two evaluations, a subsequent meeting may be necessary to resolve any differences. Forced Ranking A performance appraisal system that requires forced ranking is one of the least favored types of evaluations, yet many large employers utilize this type of appraisal. Upon evaluating employee performance, managers determine where the employee is in terms of job performance, skills, motivation, and other substantive and subjective factors. Employees are then ranked A, B or C. Employees in the A group are typically hard workers who are on track to a solid future with the company. According to Jack Welch, former General Electric CEO and author of "Winning," roughly 20 percent of the workforce can be considered A-list employees. The majority of employees are in the B group, which means they are meeting expectations but not performing at an optimum level. Seventy percent of employees usually fall into this category, and their rewards for performance are usually average, too. The lowest-performing group of employees--the C-list- -is considered expendable or employees who failed to meet their job expectations. These employees are not rewarded for performance and may eventually end the employment relationship. ================== III. Performance appraisal methods 1.Ranking Method The ranking system requires the rater to rank his subordinates on overall performance. This consists in simply putting a man in a rank order. Under this method, the ranking of an employee in a work group is done against that of another employee. The relative position of each employee is tested in terms of his numerical rank. It may also be done by ranking a person on his job performance against another member of the competitive group. Advantages of Ranking Method i. Employees are ranked according to their performance levels.
  3. 3. ii. It is easier to rank the best and the worst employee. Limitations of Ranking Method i. The “whole man” is compared with another “whole man” in this method. In practice, it is very difficult to compare individuals possessing various individual traits. ii. This method speaks only of the position where an employee stands in his group. It does not test anything about how much better or how much worse an employee is when compared to another employee. iii. When a large number of employees are working, ranking of individuals become a difficult issue. iv. There is no systematic procedure for ranking individuals in the organization. The ranking system does not eliminate the possibility of snap judgements. 2. Rating Scale Rating scales consists of several numerical scales representing job related performance criterions such as dependability, initiative, output, attendance, attitude etc. Each scales ranges from excellent to poor. The total numerical scores are computed and final conclusions are derived. Advantages – Adaptability, easy to use, low cost, every type of job can be evaluated, large number of employees covered, no formal training required. Disadvantages – Rater’s biases 3. Checklist method
  4. 4. Under this method, checklist of statements of traits of employee in the form of Yes or No based questions is prepared. Here the rater only does the reporting or checking and HR department does the actual evaluation. Advantages – economy, ease of administration, limited training required, standardization. Disadvantages – Raters biases, use of improper weighs by HR, does not allow rater to give relative ratings 4. Critical Incidents Method The approach is focused on certain critical behaviors of employee that makes all the difference in the performance. Supervisors as and when they occur record such incidents. Advantages – Evaluations are based on actual job behaviors, ratings are supported by descriptions, feedback is easy, reduces recency biases, chances of subordinate improvement are high. Disadvantages – Negative incidents can be prioritized, forgetting incidents, overly close supervision; feedback may be too much and may appear to be punishment. 5. Essay Method
  5. 5. In this method the rater writes down the employee description in detail within a number of broad categories like, overall impression of performance, promoteability of employee, existing capabilities and qualifications of performing jobs, strengths and weaknesses and training needs of the employee. Advantage – It is extremely useful in filing information gaps about the employees that often occur in a better-structured checklist. Disadvantages – It its highly dependent upon the writing skills of rater and most of them are not good writers. They may get confused success depends on the memory power of raters. 6. Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales statements of effective and ineffective behaviors determine the points. They are said to be behaviorally anchored. The rater is supposed to say, which behavior describes the employee performance. Advantages – helps overcome rating errors. Disadvantages – Suffers from distortions inherent in most rating techniques. III. Other topics related to Company performance appraisal (pdf download) • Top 28 performance appraisal forms • performance appraisal comments • 11 performance appraisal methods • 25 performance appraisal examples • performance appraisal phrases • performance appraisal process • performance appraisal template • performance appraisal system • performance appraisal answers • performance appraisal questions • performance appraisal techniques • performance appraisal format • performance appraisal templates
  6. 6. • performance appraisal questionnaire • performance appraisal software • performance appraisal tools • performance appraisal interview • performance appraisal phrases examples • performance appraisal objectives • performance appraisal policy • performance appraisal letter • performance appraisal types • performance appraisal quotes • performance appraisal articles

×