SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  20
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
QUICK SURVEY
Questions
• Rate the following statements on a
Likert scale
(1) strongly disagree
(2) disagree
(3) neither agree or disagree
(4) agree
(5) strongly agree
1. World hunger is a serious
problem that needs attention.
2. Our country needs to
address the growing number
of homeless.
3. Sleep, exercise and a
healthy diet is key for one’s
well-being.
4. Green bags at grocery
stores will help the
environment in the long run
5. Our government should
spend more money on more
buses and routes in Canberra
6. The public needs better
understanding of mental
health issues in order to
reduce stigma
Answer Yes/No for the following questions
• 1. Do you personally do anything to lessen world hunger (e.g.,
donate money or food)?
• 2. Do you personally do anything to help the homeless (e.g.,
volunteer at a homeless shelter or donate money)?
• 3. Do you ensure that you have the required hours of sleep
each night, exercise regularly and maintain a healthy diet?
• 4. Do you bring your own green bag or shopping bag when
you go shopping?
• 5. Do you personally convey your feelings to the government
(e.g., by writing your representative or by participating in
protests/marches)?
• 6. Do you personally do anything to help promote community
understanding of mental health issues (e.g. volunteer for
Lifeline, etc)
How did these inconsistencies
make you feel??
CHANGING ATTITUDES:
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE
Definition
• An unpleasant state of psychological tension
generated when a person has two or more
cognitions (thoughts, attitudes, beliefs or states of
awareness of behaviour) that are inconsistent or do
not fit together.
• E.g. If a person believes that monogamy is an
important feature of marriage and yet is having an
affair, he/she may experience a measure of guilt
and discomfort (dissonance)
Leon Festinger
• Proposed that we seek harmony in our
attitudes, beliefs and behaviour and
that we try to reduce tension from
inconsistency between these
elements.
• Theory holds that people will try to
reduce dissonance by changing one
or more of the inconsistent cognitions
by looking for additional evidence to
support one side or the other, or by
derogating the source of one of the
cognitions.
• Dissonance has physiological
consequences – changes in the
electrical conductivity of the skin that
can be detected by a polygraph
The greater the dissonance,
the stronger the attempts to
reduce it
Festinger’s 1959 experiment
• Induced compliance – a special
case of cognitive dissonance:
inconsistency is experienced when a
person is persuaded to behave in a
way that is contrary to an attitude
• 1) Students were given a very boring
task (turning wooden pegs round
and round)
• 2) Then bribed them $1, $20 or $0 to
go and persuade another student
that the task had been really
interesting and to be on call to help
again at some time in the future.
• He then got the students to rate how
interesting they thought the task had
been.
Results
• Those in the $1 group rated the
task as interesting, but those in
the $20 group reported it as
boring ($0 group even more
so).
• This can be explained by
cognitive dissonance because
lying to the other student
created dissonance ("I am
truthful" vs "I just told a lie")
• The $1 students managed to
persuade themselves that they
hadn't lied and the task had
been interesting, just to get rid
of the dissonance.
• i.e. $20 person could explain
their lie with the thought ‘I
did it for the $20’. It must
have been a lousy task
indeed.’ = no dissonance
• $1 person had the dilemma:
‘I’ve done a really boring
task, then told someone else
that it is interesting, and
even agreed to come back
and do it again for a measly
$1???
Effort Justification
• Inconsistency is experienced when a person makes a
considerable effort to achieve a modest goal.
• Aronson and Mills (1959) study –
• Female students volunteered for a group discussion about sex.
• Told they must pass a screening process for their capacity to
speak frankly (except control group).
• One group – given obscenities and explicit sexual descriptions
to read aloud.
• Other group – milder words (‘petting’ and ‘prostitution’).
• After initiation, they listened to a group discussion believing
they would join in the following week.
• Discussion was tame, boring, mumbled and incoherent.
Results
• The group given
obscenities rated the
group discussion and
the other group
members as more
interesting than those in
the mild or control
conditions.
• WHY?
• Hypothesis was that the
act of volunteering for
embarrassment should
cause dissonance. The
liking for the chosen
option should increase
because the choice
entailed suffering.
In Sum
• Cognitive dissonance is an unpleasant state of
psychological tension generated when a person has two or
more cognitions that are inconsistent or do not fit together.
• Leon Festinger proposed that we seek harmony between
the differences by changing one or more of the
inconsistent cognitions
• Induced compliance – a special case of cognitive
dissonance when a person is persuaded to behave in a
way that is contrary to an attitude
• Effort Justification - Inconsistency is experienced when a
person makes a considerable effort to achieve a modest
goal.

Contenu connexe

En vedette

En vedette (8)

05 - Defences
05 - Defences05 - Defences
05 - Defences
 
Q2 L04 - Schizophrenia
Q2 L04  - SchizophreniaQ2 L04  - Schizophrenia
Q2 L04 - Schizophrenia
 
Q203 adolescence --social
Q203   adolescence --socialQ203   adolescence --social
Q203 adolescence --social
 
Schizophrenia
SchizophreniaSchizophrenia
Schizophrenia
 
12 global citizenship
12   global citizenship12   global citizenship
12 global citizenship
 
Apl06 prejudice and discrimination
Apl06   prejudice and discriminationApl06   prejudice and discrimination
Apl06 prejudice and discrimination
 
Racial Discrimination
Racial DiscriminationRacial Discrimination
Racial Discrimination
 
Racism Presentation
Racism PresentationRacism Presentation
Racism Presentation
 

Similaire à Apl05 cognitive dissonance

Q3L04 - Cognitive Dissonance
Q3L04 - Cognitive DissonanceQ3L04 - Cognitive Dissonance
Q3L04 - Cognitive DissonanceDickson College
 
Prosocial behavior 2011 class
Prosocial behavior 2011 classProsocial behavior 2011 class
Prosocial behavior 2011 classSpencer Gross
 
Consequences Of Forced Compliance
Consequences Of Forced ComplianceConsequences Of Forced Compliance
Consequences Of Forced Complianceguest1e43b3
 
Socialpsychology 160330142748
Socialpsychology 160330142748Socialpsychology 160330142748
Socialpsychology 160330142748Cleophas Rwemera
 
Social Psychology-Conformity puga
Social Psychology-Conformity pugaSocial Psychology-Conformity puga
Social Psychology-Conformity pugajunpuga
 
ALTRUISM & COOPERATION (Psych 201 - Chapter 14 - Spring 2014)
ALTRUISM & COOPERATION (Psych 201 - Chapter 14 - Spring 2014)ALTRUISM & COOPERATION (Psych 201 - Chapter 14 - Spring 2014)
ALTRUISM & COOPERATION (Psych 201 - Chapter 14 - Spring 2014)Melanie Tannenbaum
 
Social psychology
Social psychologySocial psychology
Social psychologyErikaBeam
 
Speech151finalslidesfall20131123
Speech151finalslidesfall20131123Speech151finalslidesfall20131123
Speech151finalslidesfall20131123RThornock
 
Modules 37-39 PowerPoint Slides
Modules 37-39 PowerPoint SlidesModules 37-39 PowerPoint Slides
Modules 37-39 PowerPoint Slideshemovicv
 
Introduction to Social Psychology - conformity
Introduction to Social Psychology - conformityIntroduction to Social Psychology - conformity
Introduction to Social Psychology - conformityJill Jan
 
Volunteer Advocacy Project - Week 1
Volunteer Advocacy Project - Week 1Volunteer Advocacy Project - Week 1
Volunteer Advocacy Project - Week 1Patti Singleton
 
Unconscious Bias - UVA.pptx
Unconscious Bias - UVA.pptxUnconscious Bias - UVA.pptx
Unconscious Bias - UVA.pptxAndreasAddison2
 
White dealing with difficult situations
White dealing with difficult situationsWhite dealing with difficult situations
White dealing with difficult situationsRotary International
 
Filled in uc irvine april 2018 - powerpoint
Filled in uc irvine   april 2018 - powerpointFilled in uc irvine   april 2018 - powerpoint
Filled in uc irvine april 2018 - powerpointMaya Grodman, MA
 
Apl07 causes of prejudice
Apl07   causes of prejudiceApl07   causes of prejudice
Apl07 causes of prejudiceDickson College
 

Similaire à Apl05 cognitive dissonance (20)

Q3L04 - Cognitive Dissonance
Q3L04 - Cognitive DissonanceQ3L04 - Cognitive Dissonance
Q3L04 - Cognitive Dissonance
 
socio-cultural_psych_2020.pptx
socio-cultural_psych_2020.pptxsocio-cultural_psych_2020.pptx
socio-cultural_psych_2020.pptx
 
Prosocial behavior 2011 class
Prosocial behavior 2011 classProsocial behavior 2011 class
Prosocial behavior 2011 class
 
Group Influence
Group InfluenceGroup Influence
Group Influence
 
Consequences Of Forced Compliance
Consequences Of Forced ComplianceConsequences Of Forced Compliance
Consequences Of Forced Compliance
 
Socialpsychology 160330142748
Socialpsychology 160330142748Socialpsychology 160330142748
Socialpsychology 160330142748
 
Social psychology
Social psychologySocial psychology
Social psychology
 
Social Psychology-Conformity puga
Social Psychology-Conformity pugaSocial Psychology-Conformity puga
Social Psychology-Conformity puga
 
ALTRUISM & COOPERATION (Psych 201 - Chapter 14 - Spring 2014)
ALTRUISM & COOPERATION (Psych 201 - Chapter 14 - Spring 2014)ALTRUISM & COOPERATION (Psych 201 - Chapter 14 - Spring 2014)
ALTRUISM & COOPERATION (Psych 201 - Chapter 14 - Spring 2014)
 
Social psychology
Social psychologySocial psychology
Social psychology
 
Speech151finalslidesfall20131123
Speech151finalslidesfall20131123Speech151finalslidesfall20131123
Speech151finalslidesfall20131123
 
Mental fitness 5.0
Mental fitness 5.0Mental fitness 5.0
Mental fitness 5.0
 
Modules 37-39 PowerPoint Slides
Modules 37-39 PowerPoint SlidesModules 37-39 PowerPoint Slides
Modules 37-39 PowerPoint Slides
 
Introduction to Social Psychology - conformity
Introduction to Social Psychology - conformityIntroduction to Social Psychology - conformity
Introduction to Social Psychology - conformity
 
Volunteer Advocacy Project - Week 1
Volunteer Advocacy Project - Week 1Volunteer Advocacy Project - Week 1
Volunteer Advocacy Project - Week 1
 
Unconscious Bias - UVA.pptx
Unconscious Bias - UVA.pptxUnconscious Bias - UVA.pptx
Unconscious Bias - UVA.pptx
 
White dealing with difficult situations
White dealing with difficult situationsWhite dealing with difficult situations
White dealing with difficult situations
 
Filled in uc irvine april 2018 - powerpoint
Filled in uc irvine   april 2018 - powerpointFilled in uc irvine   april 2018 - powerpoint
Filled in uc irvine april 2018 - powerpoint
 
Difficult conversations
Difficult conversationsDifficult conversations
Difficult conversations
 
Apl07 causes of prejudice
Apl07   causes of prejudiceApl07   causes of prejudice
Apl07 causes of prejudice
 

Plus de Dickson College

Plus de Dickson College (20)

Apl08 reducing prejudice
Apl08   reducing prejudiceApl08   reducing prejudice
Apl08 reducing prejudice
 
Apl04 persuasion
Apl04   persuasionApl04   persuasion
Apl04 persuasion
 
Apl02 attitude formation and measurement
Apl02   attitude formation and measurementApl02   attitude formation and measurement
Apl02 attitude formation and measurement
 
Apl01
Apl01Apl01
Apl01
 
Apl03 interpersonal communication
Apl03   interpersonal communicationApl03   interpersonal communication
Apl03 interpersonal communication
 
Not Such A Trivial Pursuit Scoreboard
Not Such A Trivial Pursuit ScoreboardNot Such A Trivial Pursuit Scoreboard
Not Such A Trivial Pursuit Scoreboard
 
11 prosocial behaviour
11   prosocial behaviour11   prosocial behaviour
11 prosocial behaviour
 
10 emotional intelligence
10   emotional intelligence10   emotional intelligence
10 emotional intelligence
 
08 stress, coping, trauma, resilience
08   stress, coping, trauma, resilience08   stress, coping, trauma, resilience
08 stress, coping, trauma, resilience
 
07 self and self efficacy
07   self and self efficacy07   self and self efficacy
07 self and self efficacy
 
05 parfit
05   parfit05   parfit
05 parfit
 
04 lyubomirsky pdf
04   lyubomirsky pdf04   lyubomirsky pdf
04 lyubomirsky pdf
 
03 broaden and build
03   broaden and build03   broaden and build
03 broaden and build
 
02 seligman
02   seligman02   seligman
02 seligman
 
01 emotional brain
01   emotional brain01   emotional brain
01 emotional brain
 
Autistic spectrum disorders
Autistic spectrum disordersAutistic spectrum disorders
Autistic spectrum disorders
 
Anxiety disorders
Anxiety disordersAnxiety disorders
Anxiety disorders
 
Personality disorders
Personality disordersPersonality disorders
Personality disorders
 
Models and prevalence
Models and prevalenceModels and prevalence
Models and prevalence
 
abraham maslow
abraham maslowabraham maslow
abraham maslow
 

Apl05 cognitive dissonance

  • 2. Questions • Rate the following statements on a Likert scale (1) strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neither agree or disagree (4) agree (5) strongly agree
  • 3. 1. World hunger is a serious problem that needs attention.
  • 4. 2. Our country needs to address the growing number of homeless.
  • 5. 3. Sleep, exercise and a healthy diet is key for one’s well-being.
  • 6. 4. Green bags at grocery stores will help the environment in the long run
  • 7. 5. Our government should spend more money on more buses and routes in Canberra
  • 8. 6. The public needs better understanding of mental health issues in order to reduce stigma
  • 9. Answer Yes/No for the following questions • 1. Do you personally do anything to lessen world hunger (e.g., donate money or food)? • 2. Do you personally do anything to help the homeless (e.g., volunteer at a homeless shelter or donate money)? • 3. Do you ensure that you have the required hours of sleep each night, exercise regularly and maintain a healthy diet? • 4. Do you bring your own green bag or shopping bag when you go shopping? • 5. Do you personally convey your feelings to the government (e.g., by writing your representative or by participating in protests/marches)? • 6. Do you personally do anything to help promote community understanding of mental health issues (e.g. volunteer for Lifeline, etc)
  • 10. How did these inconsistencies make you feel??
  • 12. Definition • An unpleasant state of psychological tension generated when a person has two or more cognitions (thoughts, attitudes, beliefs or states of awareness of behaviour) that are inconsistent or do not fit together. • E.g. If a person believes that monogamy is an important feature of marriage and yet is having an affair, he/she may experience a measure of guilt and discomfort (dissonance)
  • 13. Leon Festinger • Proposed that we seek harmony in our attitudes, beliefs and behaviour and that we try to reduce tension from inconsistency between these elements. • Theory holds that people will try to reduce dissonance by changing one or more of the inconsistent cognitions by looking for additional evidence to support one side or the other, or by derogating the source of one of the cognitions. • Dissonance has physiological consequences – changes in the electrical conductivity of the skin that can be detected by a polygraph
  • 14. The greater the dissonance, the stronger the attempts to reduce it
  • 15. Festinger’s 1959 experiment • Induced compliance – a special case of cognitive dissonance: inconsistency is experienced when a person is persuaded to behave in a way that is contrary to an attitude • 1) Students were given a very boring task (turning wooden pegs round and round) • 2) Then bribed them $1, $20 or $0 to go and persuade another student that the task had been really interesting and to be on call to help again at some time in the future. • He then got the students to rate how interesting they thought the task had been.
  • 16. Results • Those in the $1 group rated the task as interesting, but those in the $20 group reported it as boring ($0 group even more so). • This can be explained by cognitive dissonance because lying to the other student created dissonance ("I am truthful" vs "I just told a lie") • The $1 students managed to persuade themselves that they hadn't lied and the task had been interesting, just to get rid of the dissonance. • i.e. $20 person could explain their lie with the thought ‘I did it for the $20’. It must have been a lousy task indeed.’ = no dissonance • $1 person had the dilemma: ‘I’ve done a really boring task, then told someone else that it is interesting, and even agreed to come back and do it again for a measly $1???
  • 17.
  • 18. Effort Justification • Inconsistency is experienced when a person makes a considerable effort to achieve a modest goal. • Aronson and Mills (1959) study – • Female students volunteered for a group discussion about sex. • Told they must pass a screening process for their capacity to speak frankly (except control group). • One group – given obscenities and explicit sexual descriptions to read aloud. • Other group – milder words (‘petting’ and ‘prostitution’). • After initiation, they listened to a group discussion believing they would join in the following week. • Discussion was tame, boring, mumbled and incoherent.
  • 19. Results • The group given obscenities rated the group discussion and the other group members as more interesting than those in the mild or control conditions. • WHY? • Hypothesis was that the act of volunteering for embarrassment should cause dissonance. The liking for the chosen option should increase because the choice entailed suffering.
  • 20. In Sum • Cognitive dissonance is an unpleasant state of psychological tension generated when a person has two or more cognitions that are inconsistent or do not fit together. • Leon Festinger proposed that we seek harmony between the differences by changing one or more of the inconsistent cognitions • Induced compliance – a special case of cognitive dissonance when a person is persuaded to behave in a way that is contrary to an attitude • Effort Justification - Inconsistency is experienced when a person makes a considerable effort to achieve a modest goal.