Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Le téléchargement de votre SlideShare est en cours. ×

Scholarly Social Machines Essay

Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Prochain SlideShare
2066 and all that
2066 and all that
Chargement dans…3
×

Consultez-les par la suite

1 sur 24 Publicité

Scholarly Social Machines Essay

Télécharger pour lire hors ligne

Despite many attempts to perturb a scholarly publishing system that is over 350 years old, it feels pretty much like business as usual. I argue that we have become trapped inside the machine, and if we want to change it in an informed way we need to step outside and take a look. First I describe my lens—what I mean by a social machine, and the scholarly social machines ecosystem.
I close with a list of questions that could be workshop discussion points. Presented at the ESWC 2017 Workshop on Enabling Decentralised Scholarly Communication, Portorož - Portorose, May 2017.
This article is a response to the Call for Linked Research. The essay is currently available on www.oerc.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/users/user384/scholarly-social-machines.html

Despite many attempts to perturb a scholarly publishing system that is over 350 years old, it feels pretty much like business as usual. I argue that we have become trapped inside the machine, and if we want to change it in an informed way we need to step outside and take a look. First I describe my lens—what I mean by a social machine, and the scholarly social machines ecosystem.
I close with a list of questions that could be workshop discussion points. Presented at the ESWC 2017 Workshop on Enabling Decentralised Scholarly Communication, Portorož - Portorose, May 2017.
This article is a response to the Call for Linked Research. The essay is currently available on www.oerc.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/users/user384/scholarly-social-machines.html

Publicité
Publicité

Plus De Contenu Connexe

Diaporamas pour vous (20)

Similaire à Scholarly Social Machines Essay (20)

Publicité

Plus par David De Roure (20)

Plus récents (20)

Publicité

Scholarly Social Machines Essay

  1. 1. Scholarly Social Machines An Essay David De Roure @dder
  2. 2. §  Despite many attempts to perturb a scholarly publishing system that is over 350 years old, it feels pretty much like business as usual. §  I argue that we have become trapped inside the machine, and if we want to change it in an informed way we need to step outside and take a look. §  First I describe my lens—what I mean by a social machine, and the scholarly social machines ecosystem. §  I close with a list of questions that could be workshop discussion points.
  3. 3. Edwards, P. N., et al. (2013) Knowledge Infrastructures: Intellectual Frameworks and Research Challenges. Ann Arbor: Deep Blue. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/97552
  4. 4. Social Machines
  5. 5. Real life is and must be full of all kinds of social constraint – the very processes from which society arises. Computers can help if we use them to create abstract social machines on the Web: processes in which the people do the creative work and the machine does the administration… The stage is set for an evolutionary growth of new social engines. The ability to create new forms of social process would be given to the world at large, and development would be rapid. Berners-Lee, Weaving the Web, 1999 (pp. 172–175) Social Machines
  6. 6. The ul'mate ambi'on of SOCIAM is to enable us to understand how the Social Machines evolve in the wild and what factors influence their success and evolu'on. Its aim is to develop both theory and prac'ce so that we can create the next genera'on of Social Machines. sociam.org The Theory and Prac'ce of Social Machines
  7. 7. Methods Sociality
  8. 8. Observer of one social machine Observers using third party observatory Observer of multiple social machines Human participants in Social Machine Human participants in multiple Social Machines Observer of Social Machine infrastructure 1 4 2 3 5 6 SM SM SM
  9. 9. Scholarly Social Machines
  10. 10. Scholarly Machines Ecosystem
  11. 11. RichardO’Bierne
  12. 12. §  But in 2017 we still talk in traditional terms: §  We talk about data but forget about software. §  We don’t discuss how citizen science doesn’t fit very well. §  We forget cultural differences and look for one size fits all. §  We write yet more reports that say the same things. §  We try to tackle the problem using traditional publishing, i.e. with very machines that we believe are flawed. §  The antidisintermediationists would rather everyone stayed inside the machine as we know it, promoting a revamped status quo instead of a radical rethink.
  13. 13. Stepping outside
  14. 14. Bodleian Libraries UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD Social Machines Metadata Story of the First Folio Social Machines Annotation Pip Willcox
  15. 15. Digital Music Objects David De Roure @dder AES, Berlin, May 2017 seman'caudio.ac.uk
  16. 16. MarkSandler
  17. 17. Compose Perform Record Mix Distribute Discover Listen Share Production Consumption Activities Professional Casual Involvement Pros Pro-ams Amateurs Fans Audiences SteveBenford
  18. 18. numbersintonotes.net Provenance
  19. 19. Looking back in
  20. 20. 1.  The real-time data supply to our research will increase dramatically. What will this will do to the ecosystem? Is our knowledge infrastructure ready? Have we rehearsed the methods, and if so where? 2.  Can we achieve the full potential of shifts in scholarship, such as citizen science and its augmentation through machine learning, and facilitate rather than constrain further innovation? 3.  Are our teams ready? What size research teams will we work with in the future? What specialists do we need? How restricted are we by disciplinary silos? 4.  How much will be automated? What percentage of academic content will be produced by machine? Consumed by machine?
  21. 21. 5.  Which components and processes will become obsolete? Are we ready to replace rather than revamp? 6.  Once we figure out what we need to do, how do we figure out the best interventions to achieve it? 7.  How do we use social machines as an abstraction that helps describe, understand, analyse, and model the scholarly social machines ecosystem? 8.  How do we evidence the optimum granularities in our scholarly communications ecosystem on the spectrum between: § Extreme decentralisation, which aims to empower the individual and community § Massive monolithic social platforms, which harness collective energies to benefit a smaller constituency?
  22. 22. This article is a response to the Call for Linked Research https://linkedresearch.org/calls
  23. 23. Thanks to my SOCIAM colleagues at the universities of Southampton and Edinburgh (EPSRC EP/J017728), my FAST colleagues in Queen Mary University of London and University of Nottingham (EPSRC EP/L019981), and especially Grant Miller, Dave Murray-Rust, Ségolène Tarte, Pip Willcox, and the participants in the DHOxSS 2016 Social Humanities workshop. david.deroure@oerc.ox.ac.uk www.oerc.ox.ac.uk/people/dder @dder www.sociam.org www.semanticaudio.ac.uk hTp://www.oerc.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/users/user384/scholarly-social-machines.html hTp://www.slideshare.net/dder/scholarly-social-machines-essay
  24. 24. 1.  De Roure, D., (2014). The future of scholarly communications. Insights. 27(3), pp. 233–238. doi: 10.1629/2048-7754.171 2.  Tim Berners-Lee, Mark Fischetti. 1999. Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by its Inventor (1st ed.). Harper San Francisco. 3.  Edwards, P. N., Jackson, S. J., Chalmers, M. K., Bowker, G. C., Borgman, C. L., Ribes, D., Burton, M., & Calvert, S. (2013) Knowledge Infrastructures: Intellectual Frameworks and Research Challenges. Ann Arbor: Deep Blue. http:// hdl.handle.net/2027.42/97552. 4.  David De Roure and Pip Willcox (2015). Coniunction, with the participation of Society: Citizens, Scale, and Scholarly Social Machines. Scholarly Communications Workshop, Boston, MA. April 2015. Available on http://www.academia.edu/ 12103878/ 5.  David De Roure, Graham Klyne, Kevin R. Page, John Pybus, David M. Weigl, Matthew Wilcoxson, Pip Willcox (2016). Plans and performances: Parallels in the production of science and music. 2016 IEEE 12th International Conference on e- Science, Baltimore, MD, 2016, pp. 185-192. doi: 10.1109/eScience.2016.7870899 References

×