2. Bugs, No Drugs: No ESKAPE
– Enterococcus faecium (E), Staphylococcus aureus (S), Klebsiella
pneumoniae (K), Acinetobacter baumannii (A), Pseudomonas aeruginosa
(P), and Enterobacter spp. (E)ate-stage clinical development
pipeline remains unacceptably lean
– Some important molecules for problematic pathogens
such as MRSA
– Few novel molecules for other ESKAPE pathogens
– No new drugs for infection due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative
bacilli (eg, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa)
– None represent more than an incremental advance over currently
available therapies
NO ESKAPE ? FROM PATHOGENS
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 2
3. EXTENDED-SPECTRUM Β-LACTAMASES (ESBLS):
THE FORGOTTEN (AND UNDERRATED) MDR GNB
• Most commonly identified in enterobacteriaceae
• Plasmid-mediated
• Impart decreased susceptibility to β-lactam
antimicrobials
• Often co-resistance to aminoglycosides,
fluoroquinolones
• Carbapenems are drugs of choice for invasive
infections due to ESBL-producers 16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 3
4. • ESBLs are enzymes
capable of
hydrolysing
penicillins, broad-
spectrum
cephalosporins and
Monobactams, and
are generally derived
from TEM and SHV-
type enzymes
WHAT ARE ESBL
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 4
5. ALEXANDER FLEMING
NOBEL LECTURE, DECEMBER 11, 1945
“It arose simply from a fortunate occurrence which happened when I
was working on a purely academic bacteriological problem which had
nothing to do with antagonism, or moulds, or antiseptics, or
antibiotics.”
www.nobelprize.org
Google images
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 5
6. • Abx
• Penicillin
• Cephalosporin
• Monobactam
• Carbapenem
• Bactericidal
WHAT IS A BETA-LACTAM?
Google Images
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 6
7. • Enterobacteriaceae
• Resistance to
oxyimino-
cephalosporins and
monobactams but
not cephamycins and
carbamenems
• Susceptible to
beta-lactamase
inhibitors
ESBLS
Oteo, et al., 2010
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 7
9. CLASSIFICATION
• Ambler Classification
• Molecular class A – D
• A
• Bush-Jacoby-Medeiros Classification
• Functional group 1 – 4
• 2
• 2b
• 2be
Paterson and Bonomo, 2005
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 9
10. • Mid 1980s
• Variants of TEM and
SHV
• Breakdown 3rd
generation
cephalosporins
• Mainly in hospital
Klebsiella
• Spread world wide
ESBL EVOLUTION
1016-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD
11. • ESBLs are often
located on
plasmids that are
transferable from
strain to strain and
between bacterial
species.
WHERE ESBL ARE LOCATED
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 11
12. •Common ESBL worldwide, often produced by
Escherichia coli
•Often causes UTI
•Now reported in US
• Healthcare associated
• Some community
•Community-based ESBL infection raise
concern for continued increases in
carbapenem use
CTX-M: ESBL EPIDEMIC
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 12
13. WHY WE NEED ESBL DETECTION
• ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae have been
responsible for numerous outbreaks of infection
throughout the world and pose challenging infection
control issues. Clinical outcomes data indicate that
ESBLs are clinically significant and, when detected,
indicate the need for the use of appropriate
antibacterial agents.
• Unfortunately, the laboratory detection of ESBLs can be
complex and, at times, misleading.
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 13
14. ESBL PRODUCING BACTERIA ARE MORE
COMPLEX ?
• Antibacterial choice is often complicated by
multi-resistance. Many ESBLproducing
organisms also expressAmpC â-
lactamases and may be co-transferredwith
plasmids mediating aminoglycoside
resistance. In addition, there is an
increasing association between ESBL
production and fluoroquinolone resistance
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 14
18. • Although in in vitro tests
ESBLs are inhibited by
â-lactamase inhibitors such
as clavulanic acid, the
activity of â-lactam/â-
lactamase inhibitor
combination agents is
influenced by the bacterial
inoculum, dose
administration regimen and
specific type of ESBL
present
ESBL DYNAMICS
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 18
25. WHAT ARE EXTENDED-SPECTRUM
Β-LACTAMASES?
• ESBLs are enzymes that mediate
resistance to extended-spectrum (third
generation) cephalosporins (e.g.,
ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone)
and monobactams (e.g., aztreonam) but do
not affect cephamycins (e.g., cefoxitin and
cefotetan) or Carbapenems (e.g.,
meropenem or imipenem
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 25
26. WHY SHOULD CLINICAL LABORATORY PERSONNEL BE
CONCERNED ABOUT DETECTING THESE ENZYMES?
• The presence of an ESBL-producing organism in a clinical
infection can result in treatment failure if one of the above
classes of drugs is used. ESBLs can be difficult to detect
because they have different levels of activity against
various cephalosporins. Thus, the choice of which
antimicrobial agents to test is critical. For example, one
enzyme may actively hydrolyze ceftazidime, resulting in
ceftazidime minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of
256 µg/ml, but have poor activity on cefotaxime, producing
MICs of only 4 µg/ml. If an ESBL is detected, all penicillins,
cephalosporins, and aztreonam should be reported as
resistant, even if in vitro test results indicate susceptibility16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 26
27. HOW CAN CLINICAL LABORATORY
PERSONNEL CONFIRM ESBL PRODUCTION?
• NCCLS recommends performing phenotypic confirmation of
potential ESBL-producing isolates of K. pneumoniae, K.
oxytoca, or E. coli by testing both cefotaxime and ceftazidime,
alone and in combination with clavulanic acid . Testing can be
performed by the broth micro dilution method or by disk
diffusion. For MIC testing, a decrease of > 3 doubling dilutions
in an MIC for either cefotaxime or ceftazidime tested in
combination with 4 µg/ml clavulanic acid, versus its MIC when
tested alone, confirms an ESBL-producing organism. For disk
diffusion testing, a > 5 mm increase in a zone diameter for either
antimicrobial agent tested in combination with clavulanic acid
versus its zone when tested alone confirms an ESBL-producing
organism.
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 27
29. • NCCLS suggests making
disks by adding 10 µl of a
1000 µg/ml stock solution
of clavulanic acid to
cefotaxime and ceftazidime
disks each day of testing .
In the future, commercial
manufacturers of
antimicrobial disks may
produce disks containing
cefotaxime and ceftazidime
with clavulanic acid.
HOW SHOULD LABORATORY PERSONNEL TEST FOR
CEFOTAXIME AND CEFTAZIDIME IN COMBINATION WITH
CLAVULANIC ACID?
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 29
30. •Common ESBL worldwide, often produced by
Escherichia coli
•Often causes UTI
•Now reported in US
• Healthcare associated
• Some community
•Community-based ESBL infection raise concern
for continued increases in carbapenem use
CTX-M: ESBL EPIDEMIC
Urban, Diag Micro Infect Dis, 2010; Sjölund-Karlsson, EID, 2011
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 30
31. CARBAPENEM RESISTANCE
• Emerging problem in Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii,
Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)
• Risk factors include ICU stay, prolonged
exposures to healthcare, indwelling devices,
antibiotic exposures
• Long-term acute care centers (LTACs)
• Severely limits treatment options
• Increased use of older, toxic agents such as
colistin
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 31
32. KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE CARBAPENEMASES (KPCS)
• Plasmid-mediated carbapenemases
• KPC-producing strains of Klebsiella pneumonia and other
enterobacteriaceae
• KPC-2, KPC-3
• Endemicity in many locales in the US
• Hyperendemicity in NYC
• 24% of K. pneumoniae infections were due to KPCs in 2
hospitals
• Country-wide outbreak ongoing in Israel, Greece, Columbia and
others
*
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 32
33. KPCS (CONT)
• Might appear susceptible to imipenem or
meropenem, but with borderline MICs per 2009 CLSI
breakpoints
• Usually Ertapenem resistant
• Modified Hodge test
• Usually only susceptible to colistin, Tigecycline and
select aminoglycosides
• Easily spread in hospitals (often requires Cohorting of
staff and patients to control)
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 33
34. • Other isolates of
Enterobacteriaceae, such
as Salmonella species and
Proteus mirabilis, and
isolates of Pseudomonas
aeruginosa produce
ESBLs. However, at this
time, methods for screening
and phenotypic
confirmatory testing of
these isolates have not
been determined by
NCCLS.
DO ISOLATES OTHER THAN K. PNEUMONIAE,
K. OXYTOCA, OR E. COLI PRODUCE ESBL’S?
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 34
35. HOW SHOULD CEPHALOSPORIN AND
PENICILLIN RESULTS BE REPORTED?
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 35
• If an isolate is confirmed as an ESBL-producer by the
NCCLS-recommended phenotypic confirmatory test
procedure, all penicillins, cephalosporins, and
aztreonam should be reported as resistant. This list
does not include the Cephamycins (cefotetan and
cefoxitin), which should be reported according to their
routine test results. If an isolate is not confirmed as an
ESBL-producer, current recommendations suggest
reporting results as for routine testing. Do not change
interpretations of penicillins, cephalosporins, and
aztreonam for isolates not confirmed as ESBL
36. • Acinetobacter
• Often S to clavulanate
alone
• S. maltophila +ve result
by inhibition of L-2
chromosomal b-
lactamase, ubiquitous
in the species
BACTERIA NOT TO TEST FOR
ESBLS
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 36
37. NEW DELHI METALLO-BETA-LACTAMASE-1
(NDM-1)
• Carbapenemases mediating broad spectrum
resistance
• Usually found in Klebsiella pneumonia, E. coli
• Initially identified in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh
• Recovered in Australia, France, Japan, Kenya,
North America, Singapore, Taiwan, and the United
Kingdom, Australia, Canada
• Recovered in the US (Massachussetts, Illinois and
California)
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 37
38. MDR GNB IN LONG TERM CARE
• Quinolone resistance increasingly common in
hospitals, long-term care and in some community
settings
• B-lactam resistance established in hospitals, many
long-term care settings
• Risk factors in long-term care for resistant Gram-
negative bacilli
• Indwelling devices
• Poor functional status
• Pressure ulcers/wounds
• Antimicrobial/quinolone exposure
• Prior hospitalization 16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 38
39. • Contact
precautions/hand
hygiene
• Environment and
source control
• Antibiotic stewardship
• Enhanced infection
control measures
• Bundles
STRATEGIES TO CONTROL THE
SPREAD OF MDR GNB
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 39
40. ROLE OF THE ENVIRONMENT
• Environmental sources of contamination/infection
• Increasingly recognized as sources of infection
• Particularly important with pathogens such as
Clostridium difficile, Norovirus, Acinetobacter
spp.
• Bleach preparations are more effective for some
pathogens (still need cleaning)
• Latest technology being tested: UV light,
hydrogen peroxide vapor 16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 40
41. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANING
• Adequacy of cleaning of patients’ rooms
suboptimal
• Improve monitoring and feedback of efficacy of
cleaning
• Direct observation and culturing not efficient, time-
consuming and expensive
• Other options: ATP bioluminescence and
fluorescent dyes
• Monitor process, efficacy of cleaning
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 41
42. SUPPLEMENTS TO ROUTINE ENVIRONMENTAL
CLEANING
• Disinfection units that decontaminate
environmental surfaces
• Must remove debris and dirt in order for
these units to be effective
• Two most common methods
• UV light
• Hydrogen peroxide (HP)
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 42
43. • Broad-spectrum
antimicrobial disinfectant
• Preferred agent for skin
preparation prior to
insertion of vascular
catheter and prior to
surgery
• Studied for “source control”,
decrease in degree of
contamination of patients
by problem hospital
pathogens
CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE (CHG)
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 43
44. ENHANCED INFECTION CONTROL PROCESSES
• Active Surveillance
• Use of “screening” cultures to identify patients colonized with
pathogens (usually MDR) of interest
• Goal is to prevent spread in the hospital by identifying patients who
are colonized and intervening to prevent spread
• Most experience is with Gram positive pathogens
• Limited use for some pathogens (due to low sensitivity)
• Cohorting of patients
• Dedicated staff
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 44
45. ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP - GOALS
• Optimize appropriate use of antimicrobials
• The right agent, dose, timing, duration, route
• Optimize clinical outcomes
• Reduce emergence of resistance
• Limit drug-related adverse events
• Minimize risk of unintentional consequences
• Help reduce antimicrobial resistance
• The combination of effective antimicrobial stewardship and
infection control has been shown to limit the emergence and
transmission of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria
Dellit TH et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(2):159–177; . Drew RH. J Manag Care Pharm.
2009;15(2 Suppl):S18–S23; Drew RH et al. Pharmacotherapy. 2009;29(5):593–607.
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 45
46. • A bundle is a structured
way of improving the
processes of care and
patient outcomes: a
small, straightforward
set of evidence-based
practices that, when
performed collectively
and reliably, have been
proven to improve
patient outcomes.
Resar R, Joint Commission Journal
on Quality and Patient Safety.
BUNDLES
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 46
47. CONCLUSIONS
• MDR GNB are growing in prevalence in multiple
geographic locales
• Occur in a variety of healthcare associated
settings
• Even in the community
• Antimicrobial stewardship is here to stay
• Problem is compounded by dry pharmaceutical
pipeline
• Novel methods to control spread of MDROs are
attractive but not clearly effective/cost-effective
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 47
48. NEW DELHI METALLO-BETA-LACTAMASE-1
(NDM-1)
• Carbapenemases mediating broad spectrum
resistance
• Usually found in Klebsiella pneumonia, E. coli
• Initially identified in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh
• Recovered in Australia, France, Japan, Kenya,
North America, Singapore, Taiwan, and the United
Kingdom, Australia, Canada
• Recovered in the US (Massachussetts, Illinois and
California)
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 48
49. STILL THE BEST WAY TO PREVENT SPREAD OF
INFECTIONS AND DRUG RESISTANCE IS ……
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 49
50. VISIT ME FOR MORE ARTICLES OF INTEREST
ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES ……
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 50
51. • Programme Created by Dr.T.V.Rao MD
for Microbiologists in the Developing
World
• Email
• doctortvrao@gmail.com
16-03-2018DR.T.V.RAO MD 51