Diabetes and Gut interplay
By Dr. Usama Ragab Youssif
In Gastro Canal Association Annual Conference
Agenda
Diabetes as the main player
Gut as the main player
Diabetes and gut in a separate game
Gut as game changer
Tips and tricks: diabetes drugs
2. Agenda
• Diabetes as the main player
• Gut as the main player
• Diabetes and gut in a separate game
• Gut as game changer
• Tips and tricks: diabetes drugs
3. Introduction
• 50% suffer from GI symptoms “distressing”
• Figures are underestimated: diabetes is known for its CVD legacy
• Many has been discussed but the most famous is gastroparesis
• GI motor dysfunction may have an impact on glycemic control or at least QoL.
4. Bharucha AE, Locke GR, Murray JA. Gastrointestinal
Manifestations of Diabetes. In: Cowie CC, Casagrande SS,
Menke A, et al., editors. Diabetes in America. 3rd edition.
Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive
and Kidney Diseases (US); 2018 Aug. CHAPTER 27.
6. Stats
• True incidence & prevalence is underestimated
• Figures differ between type 1 and type 2
• Symptoms are more common in women with diabetes, as is the case with
functional gastrointestinal disorders
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1989–1996.
7. Esophagus
• Less studies than stomach
• Share similar pathogenesis
• Acute hyperglycemia inhibits
esophageal motility and reduces the
basal lower esophageal sphincter
pressure
• Reduction of cholinergic activity and
vagal parasympathetic dysfunction.
Fraser RJ, et al. Diabetologia. 1990;33:675–680.
De Boer SY, et al. Gastroenterology. 1992;103:775–780.
Lam WF, et al. Digestion. 1993;54:48–53.
8. Esophagus (cont.)
• Heart burn “as a part of GERD”
Reflux
Non erosive GERD
• Dysphagia “potentially indicating
esophageal motor dysfunction”
• Disordered esophageal motility leads to pill
induced esophagitis due to pill impaction
• Candidiasis sometimes draw our attention
to lowered immunity “diabetes impair
neutrophil function and opsonization”
9. Stomach -
Diabetic
Gastroparesis
• Described by Paul Kassander: 6 cases in 1958 and coined the term “gastroparesis diabetocorum”
• He suggested that “gastroparesis could impact adversely on glycemic control”.
• Modern definition: abnormally delayed gastric emptying of solid food in the absence of mechanical
obstruction
• It may occur in T1D or T2D not necessary = poor prognosis
10. Epidemiology
• The ‘true’ incidence and prevalence of diabetic gastroparesis globally remain
uncertain
• Diabetes is the leading cause of gastroparesis: 30%
• In T1DM from DCCT-EDIC: delayed gastric emptying of a solid meal occurred in
47%
• It is not exclusive for T1D, it may occur in both types
• Awareness of this condition improves it and decrease its incidence
11. Risk Factors
Long duration of diabetes
Presence of other
microvascular complications
Female gender
Obesity
Smoking
Camilleri M, Chedid V, Ford AC, et al. Gastroparesis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:41.
13. Stomach vs
diabetes
The rate of gastric emptying = major
determinant of postprandial glycemia in
both health and diabetes
Novel anti-diabetic medications e.g., short
acting GLP-1 RA, diminish postprandial
glycemic excursions by slowing gastric
emptying
Gastroparesis is less in well controlled
diabetes (even longstanding)
Marathe CS et al. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1396–1405.
Watson LE et al. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;154:27–34.
Boronikolos GC et al. Diabetologia. 2015;58:1175–1182.
14. Diagnosis
• Take care, symptoms may be decieving: more symptoms and no emptying troubles
• Exclude mechanical obstruction: I need help my “GI” friend
• Scintigraphy, developed in the 1970s, remains the ‘gold standard’ technique.
• It is precise but involve radiation exposure and need technical expertise
Marathe CS, et al. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000-. Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553219/
15. Methods
• Standardized meal criteria “American
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Society and the Society of Nuclear
Medicine”: intra-gastric retention of
>60% of a standardized meal at 2
hours and/or >10% at 4 hours
• 13C based breath tests: GEBT “gastric
emptying breathing test”
• Ultrasonography: operator-
dependent
• Wireless motility capsule, MRI, and
SPECT imaging
Camilleri M, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:18–37.
Phillips LK, et al. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11:112–128.
Camilleri M, et al. Gastroparesis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:41.
16. Diabetologist perspectives
• We need to match insulin with CHO to minimize
postprandial hypos
• Delayed gastric emptying = mismatch = time difference
• Lower blood glucose concentrations in the early
postprandial period (so-called ‘gastric hypoglycemia’)
and subsequent hyperglycemia.
• Greater glycemic variability = worse outcomes
• Individualize insulin treatment in those patients
• Avoid GIT upset antidiabetic drugs
Horowitz M, et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006;18:405–407.
Ishii M, et al. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:901–903.
Ceriello A, et al. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7:221–230.
17. Gastroparesis management
• Management of gastroparesis should be individualized.
• Small frequent meals, low fat, more liquid than solid
• It is difficult so, involve a dietitian
• Optimize glycemic control
• Adjust insulin, avoid gastric wise antidiabetics
Olausson EA, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:375–385.
Tornblom H. Diabetologia. 2016;59:409–413.
Calles-Escandon J, et al. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0194759.
18. Drug therapy
Prokinetic
drugs:
Metocloperamide: FDA approved for short periods “12 weeks”
Domperidone: the famous but cardiac concerns
Erythromycin: but tachyphylaxis
Novel
agents
including
Ghrelin agonist: relamorelin
5HT4 receptor agonist: velusetrag and prucalopride
Tornblom H. Diabetologia. 2016;59:409–413.
Patterson D, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1230–1234.
Jones KL, et al. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:339–344.
Lembo A, et al. Gastroenterology 151: 87-96 e86.
Manini ML, et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil 22: 42-49, e47-48.
Carbone F, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:1265–1274.
20. Gall bladder
• Gall stones are more frequent in people with diabetes “risk factors for stones,
such as intestinal dysmotility, obesity, and hyper TG, are more common in this
group (esp. T2D)
• Diabetic cholecystoparesis: acute hyperglycemia inhibit GB motility
• Delayed gastric emptying = delayed GB emptying
• Some drugs may impair GB emptying e.g., GLP1 RA
• Dramatic weight loss after metabolic surgery may be contributor
Pazzi P, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14 Suppl 2:62–65.
Gielkens HA, et al. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998;33:1074–1079.
Marso SP, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:311–322.
Gether IM, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104:2463–2472.
Pineda O, et al. Obes Surg. 2017;27:148–153.
21. Small intestine
• SIBO:
15% – 40% in T1D
It is due to altered intestinal motility and partly due to impaired immunity
• Diabetic enteropathy with impaired intestinal motility in a way like gastroparesis
Diagnosis of exclusion
22. Enteropathy workup
• Exclude diabetes and gut in same battle e.g., T1D and Celiac
• Exclude your fault: your antidiabetic drugs e.g., metformin, GLP1 RA, acarbose…
• Small intestinal manometry: limited to specialized centers.
• Scintigraphy can quantify small intestinal transit: uncertain.
• More recent technologies: ingestible wireless capsules
• SIBO: diagnosis by aspiration and culture
23. Treatment
of
enteropathy
Prokinetic agents used for
gastroparesis, but much less well
evaluated.
SIBO can be treated with antibiotics,
such as rifamixin, amoxicillin-
clavulanic acid or metronidazole.
SIBO frequently relapses.
24. Diabetic
constipation
Maleki D, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2808–2816.
Prasad VG, et al. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017;36:11–22.
Rao SS, et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23:8–23.
25. Chronic
constipation
in diabetes
Marathe CS, et al. Endotext [Internet]. South
Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000-.
Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK55321
9/
26. Diabetic diarrhea
Autonomic neuropathy
Large volume, painless, nocturnal, diarrhea with or without fecal incontinence.
It is a diagnosis of exclusion
Diabetic diarrhea vs just incontinence
Remember antidiabetic drugs that may cause diarrhea: metformin (malabsorptive),
acarbose (osmotic), and GLP-1 receptor agonists
Celik AF, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:1314–1316.
Marathe CS, et al. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553219/
27. Chronic
Diarrhea in
Diabetes
Marathe CS, et al. Endotext [Internet]. South
Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000-.
Available from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK55321
9/
28. Fecal
incontinence
It is more in diabetes
Longer duration +/- the control
Presence of microvascular complication may predict it
Exclude organic causes e.g., malignancies, IBS, other
neuropathies…
Anorectal manometry (conventional, 3D or HRM)
Barium defecography is useful to detect structural
abnormalities
Epanomeritakis E, et al. Dis Colon
Rectum. 1999;42:1394–1400.
Sun WM, et al. Eur J Gastroenterol
Hepatol. 1996;8:1007–1012.
Schiller LR, et al. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:1666–1671.
Norton C, et al. BMJ. 2007;334:1370–1371.
Carrington EV, et al. Nat Rev Gastroenterol
Hepatol. 2018;15:309–323.
29. Treatment of
fecal
incontinence
Rarely curative
We focus to improve QoL
Fecal impaction with overflow: manual
removal then increase fibers and toilet training
Biofeedback training
Engel BT, et al. N Engl J Med. 1974;290:646–649.
Narayanan SP, et al. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2019;21:21.
30. Drugs that affect gut
Metformin GLP1 RA
Glucosidase
inhibitors
Imeglimin
32. Agenda
• Diabetes as the main player
• Gut as the main player
• Diabetes and gut in a separate game
• Gut as game changer
• Tips and tricks: diabetes drugs
33. Gut as the main player
Secondary diabetes e.g., cystic fibrosis and pancreatitis
34. Pancreatic
diabetes
• Commonly misdiagnosed as T2D
• Has been called “type 3c diabetes” or pancreoprivic
diabetes
• Easily use pancreatic diabetes as umbrella term
• Due to loss of structural and functional insulin secretion in
context of exocrine pancreatic dysfunction
• It includes:
Pancreatitis (acute and chronic),
trauma or pancreatectomy,
neoplasia,
fibrocalculous pancreatopathy
idiopathic forms
35. Post
Pancreatitis
Diabetes
Mellitus
(PPDM)
Even single but may lead to PPDM
Both acute and chronic pancreatitis can
lead to PPDM
Risk is highest with recurrent bouts.
PPDM versus T1DM: pancreatic exocrine
insufficiency
Risk of microvascular complication is the
same
36. Cystic
fibrosis–
related
diabetes
(CFRD)
CFRD is the most common comorbidity in
people with cystic fibrosis
CFRD occur in about 20% of adolescents
and 40–50% of adults.
Worse nutritional status, more severe
inflammatory lung disease, and greater
mortality.
Insulin insufficiency is the primary defect in
CFRD.
Moran A, et al. Pediatr Diabetes 2018;19(Suppl. 27):64–74
38. Agenda
• Diabetes as the main player
• Gut as the main player
• Diabetes and gut in a separate game
• Gut as game changer
• Tips and tricks: diabetes drugs
39. Gut and
diabetes in a
separate
game
Celiac disease.
Hemochromatosis
Autoimmune gastritis
Somatostatinoma and other PNETs
40. Type 1
Diabetes
and Celiac
disease
Gut malabsorption and upset
There is a genetic link between both
6% of T1DM patients have CD
Symptoms of CD may be overlooked
More T1D members in 1 family increases
risk of CD
43. PNETs and diabetes
Lewis A, Li D, Williams J, Singh G. Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: State-of-the-Art Diagnosis and Management. Oncology (Williston Park, NY). 2017 Oct 15;31(10):e1-2.
44. Agenda
• Diabetes as the main player
• Gut as the main player
• Diabetes and gut in a separate game
• Gut as game changer
• Tips and tricks: diabetes drugs
55. Agenda
• Diabetes as the main player
• Gut as the main player
• Diabetes and gut in a separate game
• Gut as game changer
• Tips and tricks: diabetes drugs
56. Metformin
the GI
upset
If tolerated not contraindicated
Start low go slow
Give with main meals
Give with dinner to sleep after
Use lower dose if higher one is distressing
Use XR formulas rather than conventional one
57. GLP1 RA and
GI upset
• Tell the patient that it is the mechanism
• It is mild, non distressing, it will help you
stop eating!!!
• Avoid in gastroparesis
• Start low go slow
• It will go
• Eat small frequent meal
• Avoiding eating when not hungry
• Avoid fatty meals
• Avoid concurrent metformin in high doses
• Use prokinetic therapy together at initiation
Notes de l'éditeur
Predominant among them, and most extensively studied, is abnormally delayed gastric emptying or diabetic gastroparesis.
It has been suggested that more than 50% of individuals attending outpatient diabetic clinics will at some stage experience a distressing gastrointestinal symptom. Gastrointestinal motor dysfunction is also common in diabetes and may have an impact on glycemic control. Of the motor dysfunctions, gastroparesis, or delayed gastric emptying, is the most important
reported inconsistencies likely reflect discrepancies in the methodology used and the patient populations studied. It should be appreciated that gastrointestinal symptoms are often not volunteered, particularly those considered embarrassing (such as fecal incontinence) and it would not be surprising if current estimates are less than is really the case. Symptoms are more common in women with diabetes, as is the case with functional gastrointestinal disorders (2).
While it is unclear whether symptom prevalence varies between type 1 and type 2 diabetes there is no doubt that gastrointestinal symptoms have a substantial negative impact on quality of life in people with diabetes (3).
Humble explanation
--------------
While the esophagus has been less well studied than the stomach, it is clear that disordered esophageal function occurs frequently and that disordered motility in both the esophagus and stomach may share a similar pathogenesis.
Acute hyperglycemia inhibits esophageal motility (6), and reduces the basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure (7).
It has been postulated that the major mechanism underlying esophageal dysmotility is a reduction of cholinergic activity and vagal parasympathetic dysfunction (8).
Acute hyperglycemia inhibits esophageal motility (6), and reduces the basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure (7). While the esophagus has been less well studied than the stomach, it is clear that disordered esophageal function occurs frequently and that disordered motility in both the esophagus and stomach may share a similar pathogenesis. It has been postulated that the major mechanism underlying esophageal dysmotility is a reduction of cholinergic activity and vagal parasympathetic dysfunction (8).
Delayed gastric emptying in diabetes was first reported almost a century ago, but it was Kassander who, in 1958, documented asymptomatic increased gastric retention of barium in diabetes and coined the descriptive term ‘gastroparesis diabeticorum’ (15).
Interestingly, Kassander also suggested in this paper that gastroparesis could impact adversely on glycemic control.
Some sixty years on, diabetic gastroparesis, traditionally defined as abnormally delayed gastric emptying of solid food in the absence of mechanical obstruction, remains a diagnostic and management challenge (16).
Gastroparesis occurs in both type 1 and 2 diabetes and may not, necessarily, be indicative of a poor prognosis (17, 18).
The ‘true’ incidence and prevalence of diabetic gastroparesis globally remain uncertain largely due to inconsistencies in the definition of gastroparesis, study populations, and methodology.
It is, however, clear that diabetes is a leading cause of gastroparesis, accounting for about 30% of cases in tertiary referral studies (16).
A recent analysis of data from the follow-up arm of the landmark prospective study in type 1 diabetes, called DCCT-EDIC (Diabetes Control and Complications –Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications) found that delayed gastric emptying of a solid meal occurred in 47% of this population, consistent with the prevalence reported in other cross-sectional studies (20).
Previously believed to be essentially a complication of advanced type 1 diabetes (T1D), it is now apparent that gastroparesis also occurs frequently in type 2 diabetes (T2D) (15, 21).
Bidirectional relationship between gastric emptying and glycaemia. Abbreviations: CCK, cholecystokinin; GIP, gastric inhibitory polypeptide; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide 1; PYY, peptide YY. Reproduced with permission from Philips et al (21)
The rate of gastric emptying is now appreciated as a major determinant of postprandial glycemia in both health and diabetes, and novel anti-diabetic medications, such as short acting GLP-1 receptor agonists, diminish postprandial glycemic excursions predominantly by slowing gastric emptying, are used widely.
It should, however, also be noted that the awareness of the central importance of glycemic control to the development and progression of microvascular complications, and the consequent increased priority in management to improve it, may have led to a reduction in the incidence of gastroparesis. Consistent with this, it has recently been shown that in well-controlled T2D, even when longstanding, the prevalence of gastroparesis is low and, not infrequently, gastric emptying is modestly accelerated (18, 24)
As alluded to, the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms is poorly predictive of delayed gastric emptying. It is well established that patients with debilitating upper GI symptoms may have normal, or even rapid emptying, while others with unequivocally markedly delayed emptying may report few, or no symptoms.
Measurement of gastric emptying, after exclusion of mechanical obstruction at the gastric outlet or proximal small intestine is, accordingly, mandatory for a formal diagnosis of gastroparesis, for which scintigraphy, developed in the 1970s, remains the ‘gold standard’ technique.
The test meal advocated in the consensus statement comprises two egg-whites, two slices of bread and jam (30 g) with water (120 ml), providing 255 kcal with little fat (72% carbohydrate, 24% protein, 2% fat and 2% fiber) (25). While a useful exercise, the probability of universal adoption of a specific meal, especially outside Western cultures, is intuitively low.
In people with insulin-treated diabetes (type 1 or type 2), it is important to match exogenous insulin delivery with the availability of carbohydrate to minimize the risk of postprandial hypoglycemia.
It is, therefore, intuitively likely that delayed gastric emptying predisposes to lower blood glucose concentrations in the early postprandial period (so-called ‘gastric hypoglycemia’) (38) and subsequent hyperglycemia.
A study in type 1 patients reported that insulin requirements were lower in those with gastroparesis during the first 120 min post-meal, but greater during 180-240 min, compared to patients with normal gastric emptying(39). It is increasingly appreciated that greater glycemic variability is associated with worse outcomes (40).
Knowledge of the rate of emptying may potentially assist the clinician in developing strategies to reduce postprandial glycemic variability in individual patients, although this needs to be evaluated formally.
Management of gastroparesis should be individualized.
In clinical practice, patients are generally advised to consume small, frequent meals that are low in fat and fiber, with more calories as liquids than solids; ingested solids should be those that fragment readily into small particles (41).
It should, however, be noted that this advice has not been rigorously evaluated and may be difficult to adhere to, so that the involvement of a dietitian is recommended (42).
While optimizing glycemic control is intuitively important, given the inhibitory effect of acute hyperglycemia on gastric emptying, this has not been clearly established to be the case in the chronic setting, although the use of continuous subcutaneous glucose infusion and continuous glucose monitoring has recently been advocated (43).
Concurrent medications should be reviewed and, if possible, those which may slow gastric emptying (e.g. opiates, anticholinergics) ceased.
In this regard, it should be appreciated that short-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g. exenatide BD and lixisenatide) and the amylin analogue, pramlintide (44), improve chronic glycemic control primarily by slowing gastric emptying.
Olausson EA, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:375–385.
Tornblom H. Diabetologia. 2016;59:409–413.
Calles-Escandon J, et al. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0194759.
Lembo A, et al. Gastroenterology 151: 87-96 e86.
Manini ML, et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil 22: 42-49, e47-48.
Carbone F, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:1265–1274.
Treatment Algorithm for Diabetic Gastroparesis. PRN, as needed. Reproduced with permission from Du et al (1)
Gall stones are encountered more frequently in people with diabetes, which is not surprising given that risk factors for the development of stones, such as intestinal dysmotility, obesity, and hypertriglyceridemia, are more common in this group (particularly type 2 diabetes) (57).
In addition, impairment of gall bladder motility and autonomic neuropathy, as well as factors such as cholesterol supersaturation and crystal nucleation promoting factors, are considered important.
Common techniques used to measure gall bladder motor function include ultrasound and scintigraphy. Some studies have found increased fasting gall bladder volume, while in others, there was no difference, or even a reduction, in people with diabetes. It is possible that differences in the techniques employed (ultrasound or scintigraphy), and the presence of autonomic neuropathy may account for these discrepancies.
Many studies, however, have reported impairment in postprandial gall bladder emptying in diabetes, sometimes termed ‘diabetic cholecystoparesis’ (57). It is also possible that delayed gastric emptying contributes to delayed emptying from the gall bladder.
In health, acute hyperglycemia inhibits gall bladder motility in a dose-dependent manner (58).
An increased prevalence of gall bladder-related disorders (including cholecystitis and cholelithiasis) is associated with the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists (59) and may potentially relate to a drug-induced prolongation of gall bladder refilling time (60).
Similarly, an increase in gall-bladder disease has been reported post-bariatric surgery in obese individuals (including those with diabetes) with the implication that dramatic weight loss may predispose (61).
Diabetic diarrhea” has been traditionally considered a manifestation of autonomic neuropathy (73).
The typical symptom is large volume, painless, nocturnal, diarrhea with or without fecal incontinence.
Again the diagnosis essentially represents one of exclusion and it is important to distinguish diarrhea from fecal incontinence.
It should be remembered that widely used glucose-lowering therapies, including metformin (malabsorptive), acarbose (osmotic), and GLP-1 receptor agonists, not infrequently cause diarrhea.
It is likely that optimizing glycemic control is important in the management of diabetic diarrhea (74), but again, this has not been rigorously evaluated.
Dietary strategies include a low FODMAP (Fermentable Oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Monosaccharides and Polyols) diet under guidance of a qualified dietitian, although this has not been evaluated specifically for the diabetes population in clinical trials.
Loperamide, an over-the-counter mu opioid receptor agonist, is used widely.
Bile acid sequestrants, such as cholestyramine and colesevelam, are used when bile salt malabsorption is suspected, and have the added advantage of reducing LDL cholesterol and glycated hemoglobin.
Other agents include clonidine, diphenoxylate, octreotide, and ondansetron (figure 5).
HRM= high resolution manometry
Treatment of fecal incontinence is rarely curative and the focus of management is to improve symptoms and quality of life. Fecal impaction with overflow can be managed by initial manual removal of stool from the rectum and enemas (promoting evacuation) and the subsequent prescription of bulk laxatives, increasing fiber intake, and toilet training. Operant reconditioning of rectosphincteric responses, called ‘biofeedback’ training, was first described by Engel et al in 1974 (83) and can be useful in treating fecal, as well as urinary, incontinence. The technique involves visual demonstration of voluntary contraction of external anal sphincter (EAS) contraction to the patient and training to improve the quality of the response (both strength and duration). Biofeedback training is effective in the longer term in only about 60% of patients in clinical trials; those with a low bowel satisfaction score and having digital evacuations fare better (84).
Pancreatic diabetes includes both structural and functional loss of glucosenormalizing insulin secretion in the context of exocrine pancreatic dysfunction and is commonly misdiagnosed as type 2 diabetes.
Hyperglycemia due to general pancreatic dysfunction has been called “type 3c diabetes,” and, more recently, diabetes in the context of disease of the exocrine pancreas has been termed pancreoprivic diabetes (1).
The diverse set of etiologies includes pancreatitis (acute and chronic), trauma or pancreatectomy, neoplasia, cystic fibrosis, hemochromatosis, fibrocalculous pancreatopathy, rare genetic disorders (193), and idiopathic forms (1); as such, pancreatic diabetes is the preferred umbrella terminology.
American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2014;37(Suppl. 1):S81–S90
There is loss of both insulin and glucagon secretion and often higher-than-expected insulin requirements.
Risk for microvascular complications appears to be similar to that of other forms of diabetes.
In the context of pancreatectomy, islet autotransplantation can be done to retain insulin secretion (200,201).
In some cases, autotransplant can lead to insulin independence. In others, it may decrease insulin requirements (202).
CFRD is the most common comorbidity in people with cystic fibrosis, occurring in about 20% of adolescents and 40–50% of adults.
Diabetes in this population, compared with individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, is associated with worse nutritional status, more severe inflammatory lung disease, and greater mortality.
Insulin insufficiency is the primary defect in CFRD.
Cystic fibrosis is a genetic condition. It's caused by a faulty gene that affects the movement of salt and water in and out of cells. This, along with recurrent infections, can result in a build-up of thick, sticky mucus in the body's tubes and passageways – particularly the lungs and digestive system.
The primary rationale for the use of insulin in people with CFRD isto induce an anabolic state while promoting macronutrient retention and weight gain.
De Block CE, et al. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1999 Nov 1;84(11):4062-7.
There is a much greater release of insulin in response to oral glucose administration as compared with administering the same amount of glucose by intravenous (IV) infusion. Subjects were given oral glucose on day 1 with plasma insulin levels recorded. The same volunteers returned on a second day and an IV glucose infusion was titrated to match the plasma glucose excursion achieved with the oral load. The difference in the measured plasma insulin is the incretin effect, mediated by the hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide.
Acarbose is a complex oligosaccharide that acts as an inhibitor of several enzymes responsible for the breakdown of complex carbohydrates in the intestines. It inhibits both pancreatic alpha-amylase and membrane-bound alpha-glucosidases - including intestinal glucoamylase, sucrase, maltase, and isomaltase - which are responsible for the metabolism of complex starches and oligo-, tri-, and disaccharides into absorbable simple sugars. By inhibiting the activity of these enzymes, acarbose limits the absorption of dietary carbohydrates and the subsequent postprandial increase in blood glucose and insulin levels. Acarbose is therefore used in conjunction with diet, exercise, and other pharmacotherapies for the management of blood sugar levels in patients with type 2 diabetes.