1. Hospital Management
Session VIII
Patient Safety Friendly Hospital Initiative (PSFHI)
DR. ASHFAQ AHMED BHUTTO
MBBS, MBA, MAS, DCPS, MRCGP, (PhD)
SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2012
2. Acknowledgement
2
The slide depicted here are taken from WHO
resource CD provided by WHO EMRO region with
permission.
4. The risk of Dying is:
4
If some one is admitted to a Hospital in USA for one
day only
It is equal to travel
8800 hour in an Air plane or 460 trip from Pakistan
to USA
5. Adverse Events in Health Care
5
■ 10% of hospital patients suffer an adverse event
■ 16.6% of hospital patients suffer an adverse event
(Australia)
■ ≈100,000 hospital deaths/year through medical error
(USA)
■ Unsafe Surgery:
o 234m case globally/year: 7 m complications, 1 m death
■ Patient Handovers
o 15% of adverse events or errors (USA study)
6. Common Types of Error
6
A nurse gives a patient a 4 X overdose of
methotrexate; the patient dies
A physician removes the wrong kidney
A patient receives a 10 X overdose of insulin,
goes into shock, is resuscitated, but has
persistent brain damage.
7. Case
7
64 year old woman is admitted to hospital with
fevers. Presumed diagnosis of pneumonia, treated
for that with penicillin. On day 2, she develops a
severe rash, felt to be caused by her infection.
Involves entire body. Service is very busy. No senior
doctor available. Penicillin continued. Rash
progresses. On day 4 she is confused, gets out of bed
at night, floor is wet, and she slips and falls,
fracturing hip. Dies on day 7.
What happened?
8. Causation
8
Individuals made errors
Junior doctor didn’t know what was causing rash
Senior doctor wasn’t available
Nurse wasn’t there when patient got out of bed
However, the system also allowed errors to slip
through
No good approach for dealing with very busy period
Insufficient nurse staffing at night
Operating room was too full and no surgeon available
9. The Burden of Unsafe Care
9
Adverse events due to medical devices & medications:
Good data from developed nations
Very little data from developing / transitional nations
Surgical errors, health-care associated infections
Common sources of harm in all nations
Preliminary data from developing / transitional nations
Unsafe blood products
Likely major cause of harm in some developing nations
Reasonably good data from select nations (WHO)
Patients safety among pregnant women and newborns
Better data needed from developing / transitional nations
10. The Burden of Unsafe Care: Developing Countries
10
Mothers and newborns
Maternal mortality rates:
North America: 1 in 3700
Asia (some countries): 1 in 65
Africa (some countries): 1 in 16
Afghanistan 1 in 6
% deliveries in developing countries
attended by health professional: 53%
11. The Burden of Unsafe Care: Unsafe Injections
11
16 billion injections a year
in developing countries
39.6% with syringes and
needles reused non
sterilized (70% in some
countries)
Unsafe disposal can lead
to re-sale of used
equipment on the black
market.
The extent of harm caused by
unsafe injections is unknown
12. Unsafe Blood, Counterfeit Drugs
12
5–15% of HIV infections in
developing countries are due to
unsafe blood
Unsafe blood risks
transmission of: hepatitis B & C
syphilis, malaria, Chagas
disease and West Nile fever
Counterfeit drugs account for
up to 30% of medicines
consumed in developing
countries
The extent of harm caused
by unsafe blood and
medications are unknown
13. Deficit of Qualified Health-care Providers
13
The deficit in 57 countries is
estimated to be 2.4 million doctors,
nurses and midwives
Fatigue, production pressures cause
high risk of mistakes
14. Medical Record Review Study
Results 14
Study Adverse No. of Permanent Percent Percent AE
event rate records disability deaths preventable
EMR 8.1% 15,548 0.9% 1.86% 83%
(2.5-18%)
Australia 16.6% 14,210 2.2% 0.79% 50%
Canada 7.5% 3,745 0.4% 1.2% 37%
New York 3.7% 30,195 0.24% 0.51% NA
Wilson RM. Unpublished data, Regional Patient Safety Research Meeting, Amman, Jordan, August 2008
15. THE SWISS CHEESE MODEL
SUCCESSIVE LAYERS OF DEFENCES
Physical barriers Procedures
Information
Decisions
Adapted from Professor James Reason
15
16. THE SWISS CHEESE MODEL
16
DEFENCES
Procedures
Physical barriers
Information THE
Decisions HOLES
Poor protocols
Faulty equipment
Missing information
Patient
harmed Inadequate supervision
Adapted from Professor James Reason
17. Regional Strategy for Patient Safety
5 Axes to enhance the safety of patients
I Awareness
II Assess Scope
EMR
V Organizing & Patient Safety
Strategy III Understanding the
Running
Causes of Error
PS programs
IV Developing &
Testing Methods
For Prevention
17
18. Patient Safety Friendly
Hospital Initiative (PSFHI) – (1)
18
Promote safe practices in hospitals by assessing
adherence to PS guidelines developed -
EMRO/WAPS/IIRO
Develop standards for assessing patient safety and
guidelines for implementation
Patient safety assessment manual
7 hospitals identified as pilot sites for PSFHI –
EGY, JOR, MOR, PAK, SUD, TUN, YEM
19. Patient Safety Friendly
Hospital Initiative (PSFHI) – (2)
19
PS Assessment manual developed
Review of literature
Internally reviewed
Externally reviewed
Pre-piloted
Piloted
Baseline Assessment of 7 hospitals completed
between July-October 2009
20. Five Domains for Measurement of
Performance of a PSF Hospital
20
22. Baseline assessment of
pilot hospitals in 7 countries
Standards EGY JOR MOR PAK SUD TUN YEM
Critical (20) 15.5 12 10.5 13 8 11 5
Core (90) 41 34 25.5 34 22 32.5 16.5
Developmen 0.5 4 1 3.5 1 3 1
tal (30)
Total 57.5 50 37.5 50.5 32.5 47.5 22.5
22
22
23. Domains Patient Safety Subdomain Critical Core Developmental
Standards Standards Standards
A. Leadership and A.1. The leadership and governance 3 3 2
Management Domain are committed to patient safety
A.2. The hospital has a patient 2 5 2
safety program.
A.3. The hospital uses data to 0 2 2
improve safety performance.
A.4. The hospital has essential 3 3 1
functioning equipment and supplies
to deliver its services.
A.5. The hospital ensures staff 1 5 0
safety for safer patients and
availability of staff round the clock to
deliver safe care.
A.6. Hospital has policies, 0 2 0
guidelines, and standard operating
procedures (SOP) for all
departments and supporting
services.
23 9 20 7
24. Examples of Critical Standards:
24
The hospital has Patient Safety as a strategic priority.
This strategy is being implemented through a
detailed action plan.
All patients are identified and verified with at least 2
identifiers including full name and date of birth.
The hospital maintains clear channels of
communication for urgent critical results.
The hospital conforms to guidelines on management
of sharps waste.
25. Examples of Core Standards :
25
The hospital has a set of process and output
measures that assess performance with a special
focus on patient safety.
The patient rights statement exists in the hospital
and is visible to patients.
The hospital ensures that each and every patient has
a single completed medical record with a unique
identifier.
26. LEVELS OF COMPLIANCE WITH PATIENT
SAFETY STANDARDS
26
Hospital level Critical Core Developmental
Standards Standards Standards
Level 1 100% Any Any
Level 2 100% 60-89% Any
Level 3 100% ≥ 90% Any
Level 4 100% ≥ 90% ≥ 80%
28. 1-Leadership Commitment
28
Embrace a blame free Culture
Strategic plan
Accountability
Leadership PS walk rounds
29. 2-Establish a PS Organizational Structure
29
Human Resources:
PS leader
PS Coordinator
PS Departmental focal points
PS Council
PS Sub committees:
Infection prevention and control
Environment safety
Medication safety
Research and ethics
Patient and public involvement
30. 3-Adopt PSFH Standards
30
Start learning about PSFH standards and how to
comply with them
Self assessment on ongoing basis
Action plan : develop and monitor its
implementation
31. 4- Train , Train, Train
31
Involve as many as possible:
PS Concepts
PS assessment
PS reporting
PS SOPs , plans
Risk Management
32. 5- Work to Overcome Resistance
32
What are they going to gain?
Let them compete and be proud of their
accomplishments
Communicate to all staff
33. 6- Develop Systems, Procedures that support PS
33
Risk Management
ADE Reporting
Clinical Auditing
PS Performance Management
Patient Safety Tour
Level 1: Compliance with 100% of critical standards and any number of core and developmental standardsLevel 2: Compliance with 100% critical standards and 60% to 89% core standards, and any number of developmental standardsLevel 3: Compliance with 100% critical standards and at least 90% core standards, and any number of developmental standardsLevel 4: Compliance with 100% critical standards and at least 90% core standards, and at least 80% of developmental standards.