eMonocot Plenary Meeting Presentation

First Plenary Meeting Kew 27/1/11

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],First Plenary Meeting Kew 27/1/11

Agenda ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],2007 Autumn: CATE project seeks eTaxonomic successor November: Submission of Consortium grant proposal to NERC 2008 April: NERC Consortium grant panel presentation July: Proposal not funded December: CATE project finishes 2009 September: Permission to resubmit granted November: Resubmission of Consortium grant proposal to NERC 2010 April: NERC Consortium grant panel presentation May: Proposal Funded November/December: Project start.

Aims (1) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Aims (2) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

PROJECT STRUCTURE PROJECT BOARD: AB, CG, VS, PW & Sarah Phillips (Project strategy) ICT Board: AB, CG, VS & Sarah Phillips [ICT deliverables] Content board: WB, SM, DS & PW [Content deliverables] Outreach board: CG, IK, MS, VS, PW [Impact plan, workshops] Ben Clark Soraya Villalba Ruth Bone Odile Weber Ed Baker Joseph Kelly A.N. Other CATE-Araceae: Anna Haigh & Simon Mayo Grassbase: Maria Vorontsova & Derek Clayton Palmweb: Alex Theys & Bill Baker

Now ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Now

To deliver the goals of eMonocot a level of community involvement is critical How do we propose to work with taxonomic communities to generate both core eMonocot and scratchpad resources? Four questions: 1) How do taxonomists divide themselves into groups offline? What groups exist already? 2) What are the benefits and disadvantages of many small communities compared to few large communities? 3) What are the benefits and disadvantages of ad-hoc / organic community creation versus more controlled organization? 4) What are the stages in the life of an online community and where could or should support be provided? Communities

eMonocot Plenary Meeting Presentation

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Tendances (10)

Similaire à eMonocot Plenary Meeting Presentation

Similaire à eMonocot Plenary Meeting Presentation (20)

Plus de eMonocot

Plus de eMonocot (14)

Dernier

Dernier (20)

eMonocot Plenary Meeting Presentation