REVISION CLASS
LAW299 BUSINESS LAW
BY:
IKHWAN NAGUIB BIN JUSOH
FACULTY OF LAW
UiTM CAWANGAN SARAWAK KAMPUS MUKAH

FINAL ASSESSMENT FORMAT
FEB 2022
• Date: 8th February 2022
• Time: 9.00 am – 6.00 pm
• Consists of 2 PARTS
• 3 CHAPTERS
a. Law of Contracts
b. Law of Agency
c. Law of Hire Purchase
PART A PART B
20 multiple choice questions • 3 case study questions
• Answer any 2 questions
only

PART A
• Refer to past year examination question
(EQPS)
• 3 to 4 semester

PART B
• Case study – refer to the guidelines from
uFuture
• (I + L + A + C)
– Issue: Identify the right issue
– Introduction: Definition
– Law: Relevant section + Decided cases)
– Application: Problem solving by applying the law
and decided cases)
– Conclusion: Advise the parties

EXAMPLE: PART B JULY 2021
QUESTION 1
Madam Wang was a 64-year-old lady who had been diagnosed with
blood cancer. She was hospitalised in a private healthcare facility for
more than two years until her death last month. During her time in
hospital, a nurse called Aida was assigned to take care of Madam
Wang.
After Madam Wang’s death, her son Wee Lee discovered that his
mother had sold her house to Aida for RM25,000. Wee Lee believed
that his mother had not made the contract voluntarily and decided to
challenge the validity of the sale.
Advise Wee Lee on whether he may do so.
(15 marks)

Answer
• Issue: Undue influence
• Introduction: Definition of free consent of
parties
• Law: Sec.16 of Contracts Act 1950, Alacard v
Skinner
• Application:
• Conclusion:

QUESTION 2
Khalil instructed his agent Leman to buy 300 cartons of apple
juice from Murah Hyper Mart as they were selling the juice at
half price as part of a promotion. Leman forgot to do so and
when he went to Murah Hyper Mart a few days later, the
promotion has ended, and he had to purchase them at the
normal price. Khalil became very angry with Leman and
scolded him. Leman retaliated by immediately quitting from
his post.
Advise Khalil on the course of action available to him.
(15 marks)

Answer
• Issue: Duty of agent
• Introduction: Definition
• Law: Sec.164 of Contracts Act 1950, Keppel v
Wheeler
• Application:
• Conclusion

QUESTION 3
Rohan Singh entered into a hire purchase agreement with Suka Hati
Finance in January 2016 for a car at the price of RM93,000 to be paid
in 72 instalments. Rohan Singh defaulted in paying the instalments
from March to April 2021 and the company sent a notice to repossess
the car on 8 May 2021. On 14 May 2021, Suka Hati Finance heard
rumours that Rohan Singh had become insolvent. They immediately
repossessed the car on 20 May 2021.
Rohan Singh is thinking of bringing a legal action on Suka Hati Finance
for unlawful repossession of his car.
Advise Suka Hati Finance.
(15 marks)

Answer
• Issue: Repossession of goods
• Introduction: Definition
• Law: Sec. 16 (1), Sec. 16 (1B) of Hire Purchase
Act 1967, Procedures of repossession
• Application:
• Conclusion: