Journalism in the Age of
Youtube The rise of Web2.0 and the death of democracy?

<ul><li>YouTube presents an interesting case
study to illustrate the main themes: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>YouTube style content is now infecting the mainstream media news agenda </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Digital convergence has led to a blurring of the boundaries between reporter and audience </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Mainstream news organisations are now using ‘citizen-journalist’ sources in greater numbers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>This has implications for what we say about professionalism in journalism </li></ul></ul>

Media futurist Dan Gillmor predicts
that by 2021, ‘citizens will produce 50 percent of the news peer-to-peer’, however mainstream news media, that we have grown up with, are yet to meaningfully adopt or experiment with these new forms.

The Age of YouTube <ul><li>20
years of digital technologies </li></ul><ul><li>Digital has moved from the sublime to the mundane—the everyday </li></ul><ul><li>Network society (Castells) </li></ul><ul><li>Convergence culture (Jenkins) </li></ul><ul><li>Surveillance economy (Hirst) </li></ul>

The digital sublime <ul><li>every radical
media transformation induced by a new technology brings along the myth of the beginning of a new era </li></ul><ul><li>including the hopes for social change and almost religious visions of miracles which the new modes to move information should bring </li></ul>

Network Society

<ul><li>a society in which a
combination of social and media networks shapes its prime mode of organization and most important structures at all levels (individual, organizational and societal) </li></ul><ul><li>the diffusion of a networking logic substantially modifies the operation and outcomes in processes of production, experience, power, and culture </li></ul>

Convergence Culture where old and
new media collide

<ul><li>changes in communications, storytelling and
information technologies are reshaping almost every aspect of contemporary life </li></ul><ul><li>these technologies have altered the ways that consumers interact with core institutions of government, education, and commerce </li></ul>

YouTube and the surveillance society
Police and other authorities now surveiling YouTube for “criminal” activity

The digital dialectic <ul><li>Convergence </li></ul><ul><li>Many
to many broadcasting </li></ul><ul><li>Democratising the public sphere </li></ul><ul><li>Competition for corporate media </li></ul><ul><li>Fragmentation </li></ul><ul><li>Narrowcasting and “The Daily Me” </li></ul><ul><li>Destroys commonality of public discourse </li></ul><ul><li>Atomises citizenship </li></ul><ul><li>Corporate media continue aggregation and monopoly practices </li></ul>

Amfeed – The Daily Me
News on demand, tailored to your needs

Consumption of news is going
mobile Plastic Logic, a developer of plastic electronics, has fabricated the world’s biggest flexible organic active matrix display, which consists of a flexible, high resolution, printed active matrix backplane driving an electronic paper frontplane. December 7 2005. Television or not? Video is now available to mobile phones. News is consumed ‘on the go’

Mobile TV – the next
platform revolution? It’s television, but not as we (used to) know it.

“ Open source” journalism Grassroots
journalism is part o the wider phenomenon of citizen-generated media—of a global conversation that is growing in strength, complexity and power. When people can express themselves, they will. When they can do so with powerful yet inexpensive tools, they take the new-media realm quickly. When they an reach a potentially global audience, they literally can change the world. Dan Gillmor, We the media (2006)

Non-professionals <ul><li>Accidental journalists – eyewitnesses
with a recording device/cellphone </li></ul><ul><li>Amateur journalists – bloggers who cover news, do original research and expose hidden issues </li></ul><ul><li>Citizen journalists – Amateurs with a particular social mission in politics, etc </li></ul><ul><li>Pro-am – a combination of the above with a professional journalist/mentor </li></ul>

This is a simple project
testing a single idea: Maybe a beat reporter could do a way better job if there was a “live” social network connected to the beat, made up of people who know the territory the beat covers, and want the reporting on that beat to be better. That’s the entire idea—so far. Beat reporting with a social network: can we get it to work? Can reporters bring knowledge, contacts and interests of many different people from around the beat into the production of news, views and information for the beat, by making use of social networking tools that lower the cost of collaboration? Is it viable for dispersed groups to become an editorial force?

Escenic Tip Engine In the
future, journalists won't be closest to the breaking news.

‘ by the people, for
the people’ <ul><li>Gillmor is a digital optimist </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Society can no longer afford to rely on “Big Media” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>News reporting is becoming a two-way conversation—a “seminar”, not a “lecture” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Professional journalism’s worst enemy may be itself.” (xxvi) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Blogging and citizen journalism are in the tradition of bourgeois liberalism (eg: Thomas Paine) </li></ul></ul>

American Carnival The weakening of
journalistic professionalism and centrality in this rapidly transforming system not only makes lies and hoaxes more possible but also poses compelling new questions about the quality of news informing democratic society. (p.117) In such a new and still-evolving order, governed less and less by professionalism—or at least incognizant of the need for standards—it becomes far easier for objective truth and basic facts about important issues to become debatable notions in civil society and political discourse. (p.31) Neil Henry, American Carnival (2007)

“ Fun house” and “freak
show” <ul><li>Neil Henry is a digital pessimist </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Blogging and citizen media is more noise, less news </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Attacks on professionalism / job cuts / reduced budgets weaken journalism </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>PR “hucksters” take advantage and bombard us with “fake news” </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Does journalism matter? Yes it does </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>… but it is “troubled and confused” (p.208) </li></ul></ul>

The UGC manifesto We are
living in an age that historians will say was characterized by the democratization of expression. Whereas the means of media production and dissemination were once concentrated in a few hands, they are now ubiquitous: everybody can be an entertainer, an educator or a pundit. We believe that this liberation of the means of production is one of the most important things to happen in recent history. It allows anyone to create the next great sitcom, to share the reality of daily life across cultural boundaries, to share political thoughts and educational materials. This is a beautiful thing, and we are dedicated to furthering this democratization in a manner that always respects intellectual property rights in a venue where everyone can feel comfortable . (Blip.tv, 2008)

Broadcast yourself – make the
news <ul><ul><li>YouTube style content is now infecting the mainstream media news agenda </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Digital convergence has led to a blurring of the boundaries between reporter and audience </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Broadcast news organisations are now using non-professional video in greater numbers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>This has implications for what we say about professionalism in journalism </li></ul></ul>

<ul><li>Elbowing aside the media elite,
YouTube wants to grab a seat at the anchor desk with a new channel dubbed &quot;Citizen News.&quot; </li></ul><ul><li>With two giants in their respective fields of old media (CNN) and new (YouTube) supporting citizen journalism, the pitfalls of letting anyone report news beg to be examined. </li></ul><ul><li>(Carter, May 2008) </li></ul>

The YouTube effect Welcome to
the &quot;YouTube effect.&quot; It is the phenomenon whereby video clips, often produced by individuals acting on their own, are rapidly disseminated worldwide on websites such as YouTube and Google Video. YouTube has 34 million monthly visitors, and 65,000 new videos are posted every day. YouTube is a mixed blessing: It is now harder to know what to believe. How do we know that what we see in a video clip posted by a &quot;citizen journalist&quot; is not a manipulated montage? Moises Naim, LA Times , 20 December 2006

As a former journalist, I
have finally realized what bothers me so much about the notion of citizen journalism. It is the veritable absence of investigative journalism. Why is it missing? Money. Pure and simple. (comment on Flip the Media blog in response to YouTube announcement) In the professional media, there is a firm code of ethics, such as preserving privacy and fairness of the point of view. Cub reporters are supposed to take a lecture about ethical issues I am concerned about the thriving of citizen media without their following a code of ethics , it will be out of control.

The observation that some videos
actually reveal “truth” is the start of a trend that is changing the way journalists approach stories. Yes, a journalist might have a great clip for a story from YouTube. But the question remains: Is the story legitimate? Even though a video poster has uploaded his or her video for the world to see, the journalists still have to sift through the fact and fiction. They still have to make the phone calls and set up interviews to confirm information. Journalism for the 21 st Century blog January 2007

TV to reckon with YouTube
BBC does deal to get licensed content on to YouTube On the other hand, Viacom sued Google for copyright infringement Both show that the mainstream media cannot ignore the “YouTube effect” any more

Facebook as a news source?
Social networks are becoming our first port of call, replacing porn as the biggest attention-grabber on the web

<ul><li>a significant commercial success </li></ul><ul><li>since
March of 2007, it has added 650,000 new users and has racked up 62 years of video on the site. </li></ul><ul><li>over 90,000 channels have been created, </li></ul><ul><li>more than 24,000 events broadcast and </li></ul><ul><li>more than 61,000 video clips uploaded from Justin.tv to YouTube. </li></ul>

What Justin.tv proves is that
the juvenile self-broadcast is quickly becoming the dominant artform for today's YouTube generation. Andrew Keen, The Independent 28 July 2008

Optimism v Pessimism <ul><li>Citizen journalism
will forever undermine the power of the major broadcast and publishing news media </li></ul><ul><li>Journalism will either have to adapt or die, either way it’s a good thing </li></ul><ul><li>The corporates cannot afford to ignore UGC, nor let it outflank them </li></ul><ul><li>Instead the corporate global media giants will attempt to harness the power of social networking and UGC to enhance profits </li></ul>

&quot;The journalist of the future
is going to be someone who is trained from the beginning to be flexible and work in an environment that mixes digital images, sound, text and the Internet as well as traditional newspapers, magazines and television and radio broadcasts.“ Sybril Bennett, New Century Journalism, Belmont College

Now more than ever, we
need professional journalists to help distinguish the wheat of reliable news and credible opinion from the chaff of information, rumor and propaganda that clogs the Internet, and to help create the next-generation vehicles for online journalism. Doug Millison, The journalist of tomorrow , 1999

Who’s who in the digital
zoo? <ul><li>Clearly Youtubers are not ‘professional’ or ‘career’ journalists </li></ul><ul><li>However, it opens up parts of the news agenda to non-professionals </li></ul><ul><li>For audience it blurs the edges of ‘news’ even further </li></ul><ul><li>It appeals to digital natives more than mainstream media does </li></ul><ul><li>Professional journalism is still coming to terms with the “YouTube effect” </li></ul>

Impact on journalism education <ul><li>We
have to be theorising and explaining and exploring these issues with our students not for them </li></ul><ul><li>We have to discuss and articulate a position on the ‘citizen-journalist’ phenomenon </li></ul><ul><li>We have to consider what impact digital platform innovations, such as YouTube, MySpace and blogging might have on professional practice in the future </li></ul><ul><li>and perhaps adjust our programs accordingly </li></ul>